Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram  (Read 21154 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2018, 10:51:01 PM »
Here’s a guy magnetizing gold, with the pmh loop
And an electric charge


Similar to my hand-held ‘loop maker’
But with a much higher voltage
This guy uses a Ban De Graff to initiate the loop
through a steel plate
With 2 gold samples in the loop
https://youtu.be/zOLu6ftHtRY


Here we see the loop can be sustained without the keeper
by separating the residual-field into 2 components
Each acting as their own keeper, to the respective pole


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2018, 08:22:03 AM »
For those interested in the original source material
As I have said before, Ed was a fraud, and a scammer
He plagiarized the scientific work of others for his own
purposes, and to lure crowds to his castle.


https://www.jstor.org/stable/108001?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents


Many of his other experiments are found here as well.
In fact, the British Royal Society is the source of all of Ed’s material
Including his “secret of the Egyptians”, which he was not lying when he
said he left the secret by his moon fountain.
Just ask the Lit-Lik bird....
The secret is still there, in plain sight.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2018, 03:44:17 PM »
I propose a test, to ascertain the existence of dark energy and dark matter.


Present in the PMH, and similar (natural) magnetic loops, found in astronomical sources.


This test shall be the careful and precise weighing of the PMH,
in both conditions (locked and unlocked)


If so determined, that there be a difference in discernible mass
This is to be considered the source of dark energy and dark matter.
Specifically in the form of stored magnetic energy.


This is decidedly the proposed test, based on information presented by
Mr. Watkins (inventor of the PMH), Michael Faraday, and Augustin-Jean Fresnel
And the energy to mass derivation presented by Albert Einstein.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2018, 10:29:59 AM »
I planned to conduct this test, but I stopped myself


In theory, a sustained inductive effect should increase the internal energy
of the metal, thereby increasing its mass.
This is distinct from permanent magnetization, which does not change the mass.


However, a bit of preliminary math tells me that the difference in mass
would be something to the tune of 1 x 10^14 Joules per gram
so to have anything measurable, would take a LOT of energy
like a PMH the size of a house, and locked by the mains.


The problem then becomes the accuracy of scales that large,
and how to move the chunk of metal onto them.


there may be some middle ground, which could include as large of a PMH
as could be feasible, and a very very accurate scale.




Astronomical PMH loops could easily attain high energy levels
which would skew the equation into an appreciable value of ‘magnetic mass’
The issue then becomes finding such a magnetic loop, in a region where
Dark Matter should exist.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #34 on: March 07, 2018, 02:26:21 PM »
A little interesting observation I made
The magnitude depends a little on the core materials used
But I will describe the effect


Pre-note:
At this time I do not know the exact value of ‘stored magnetism’
being lost here, as I don’t currently have a tool to measure it.


When we saturate a core to be locked:
not all of the magnetism holds
The lock is actually sustained at a value less than saturation
(my best guess, deterministically, is ~60-75% retention +/-)


undoubtedly some function of H/a^2L
[edit: for clarity, the L used here is length/a, in whole number units]
[and a is (pi)(1/2 wire diameter)^2]


 




acting at the atomic level, to sustain the magnetic capacitance
for some reason, about a third of the magnetism leaks out
when we remove the locking field.
this can be picked up on the coils
(one of the determining indicators of the approximate value)


This is complicated by any excess electromagnetism from the coil field
as this too will leak back out when switched off
The exact rebound of the core-flux is most accurately observed when
the input is tuned very near the minimum to achieve full saturation


If this function can be identified, we will be very close to a mathematical
representation of the flux capacitor


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2023, 04:43:24 AM »
Repeatable experiment:


Place a resistance in series to the magnetic loop


Produced is heat (very small unless the device is large and magnetic strength high)
AND
a detectable magnetic field OUTSIDE of the PMH.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #36 on: March 28, 2023, 05:27:09 AM »
Lining up an extensive series of experiments with PMH’s
(Locked Loop, and without the keeper)


But before i begin, im reviewing my knowledge set
Re watching videos,
Going back through my discussions with David Lambright and his work
as well as my own previous experiments.
Cataloging the unknowns, clarifying questions that need answering before i begin.


First, does the strength of the applied field affect the strength of the loop?


To answer this i prepared 17 materials in 20 loops, mostly solid loops but a few were assemblies


And locked them under a range of (permanent) magnetic conditions
There are two cases:
One where the applied field induces less than saturation in the material


And the other is when the applied field saturates the material


Many tests were done, but for logging data 1/4” soft iron rod bent into a circle, ~ 6” diameter was used here. Gap distance ~ 1/8”


Unsaturated Condition: weaker magnetic fields produce a weaker lock
ranges of measurement (by breaking the keeper by adding g weights)
          0.5 - 3 g
Magnets used were rubber ferrite (frigerator magnets, magnetic strips etc)




Saturated Condition: no change in magnetic strength, 7g break point remained consistent
Magnets used: ceramic ferrite, cobalt, neos of various shapes and sizes


Conclusion: above the saturation point of the material, strength of the magnetic lock is determined by material properties alone.



A second question came up during these tests:
Concerning the length (and in some cases complexity) of the loops with respect to the inducing field.
It seems a small magnet can do big things. But this should be looked into


The primary question is, of course, what material, size of loop and resistance value(s) would be appropriate to begin tests of that nature?


is there any electric induction involved? Or is this a purely ‘magnetic current’?
Unfortunately i have never came across the original British Royal Society publication that shows the scientific interpretation of this. So all i have to go on is what ed wrote and what can be observed. (If anyone has a link to that plz post below)


For the Lambright thermal emissions to occur, there must be a flow of energy through the resistive components. Why this doesnt weaken the magnetic lock is outside the scope of my knowledge.
Maybe this could be deciphered with careful application of a certain atomic constant, but thats for someone else to worry about.


at first i was just curious as to wether or not the magnetism would flow through the resistor to the opposite leg and back into the loop
but now that i know its related to David’s research,
I’m wondering if his assemblies cause a form of resistance because of the way the field winds around


Ed wrote (and left evidence of) sending this down a wire…..
it goes down the resistor, thats basically already doing it
But how long can we make the circuit? Will the iron just keep magnetizing its neighbor infinitely as long as the loop is connected back to itself?


Or does it fade out at some distance or length of ferrous wire?


Iron wire and possibly some alternatives, but i think steel is off the table
I had some steel wire that stuck to a magnet, but didnt loop worth a squat
and maintained residual magnetism at spots not down the length
What material is best for this? Probably one that doesnt hold magnetism when the field goes away?


Can a magnetic circuit be made to do work?


These and other questions, i will experiment with and attempt to find some answers.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #37 on: March 29, 2023, 09:44:45 PM »
Two areas of exploration may include:


Use of feedback mechanisms
to detect ‘magnetic current’


and a path of curiosity:
when overlapping transparent images of 2 book covers as Ed. Hints to us
The device resembles a circuit shows in electrical diagrams of the Ankh / djed devices of Egypt
Wherein a lodestone was set to vibrate through 2 opposing coils to a spark-gap oscillator.
Same basic function we imagine from Tony Stark’s arch reactor


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #38 on: March 29, 2023, 09:48:00 PM »
The electrical changes that would make to the PMH are as follows:


Instead of two coils, each of them is comprised of two coils.
As a transformer. Ed clearly shows these as current transformers
Meaning the secondary has less windings than the primary (voltage step down)


And these are wires in series on one end of the loop, and through a spark gap on the other ends.
Also to note in this diagram Ed has both ends of the first two coils wired in series on both ends making a closed circuit (short)

truesearch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #39 on: March 30, 2023, 12:10:33 AM »
@sm0ky2,

I like what you're doing with the Leedskalnin PMH. . . I hope you keep posting your testing and resulting discoveries.[/font][/size]

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #40 on: March 30, 2023, 07:47:32 PM »
So we can create loops through resistors and diodes (diodes dont seem so be doing anything)
I assume it is because the magnetic components are close enough together the field passes through the non magnetic parts in the center of the component.
Transistors seem to be the same, except you get a splitting, meaning 1 line in, 2 lines out
don’t have a direct test for this yet but i assume the magnetism is divided mostly equally
(Gauss Divider?) hmm


Also i noticed that if you have small/thin parts like iron wire, you want to sink it to a massive ferrous material at the far end to draw it out
This extends the length of the current loop
I guess i would call it a (Gauss Amplifier?)
This can be done by connecting in series an electronics/jewlery ferrite
Or simply a dense piece of iron or steel.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #41 on: March 30, 2023, 07:50:41 PM »
The more in try to integrate Ed’s physics with our own….
The more i see its place.
I believe the currents are what we view as “field lines”
Just at a deeper level of understanding, and possibly new uses for this knowledge

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #42 on: March 30, 2023, 08:25:00 PM »
As is pertains to (PMH) magnetic loops in electromagnetism:


Our current science studies this phenomenon as: self-sustaining magnetism
IT’s existence is still not mainstream accepted, but much research is being done




A common question that people ask is:
why dont we use PMH loops instead of traditional electromagnets?


Well, we do. (when we can), however electromagnetic coils are not material dependent.
Where-as the max strength of a PMH IS.
So the limitations are based on how much we need to lift, not the comparative efficiencies.
The PMH is superior in terms of efficiency, only requiring a brief pulse to turn it on/off
instead of constant current to maintain the field.
But the electromagnet is superior in strength, we can just crank up the juice.


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram
« Reply #43 on: April 07, 2023, 05:27:36 PM »
As it turns out,
David Lambright was not the first person to discover this.
It was actually Faraday himself!
And the effect was named after him.


I think this should put the question to rest,
About wether Ed’s PMH is or isn’t in motion.
What do you think?


https://youtu.be/UFEVvsbvlkA