Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84255
  • *Latest: romeos69

  • *Total Posts: 898231
  • *Total Topics: 15838
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1217155 times)

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5130 on: January 27, 2016, 11:51:00 PM »

Nope that is a picture with color squares and boxes on it.

Progress is that like a tart in a mini skirt ?
well some one has printed a herringbone tartan to make the skirt out of, he, he !AG

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline ATOM10.01

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5131 on: January 28, 2016, 12:21:19 AM »
I got an email demanding not to supply real free energy technology and never to detail gravity ?

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5132 on: January 29, 2016, 12:51:00 AM »



   I'd just love a brand-spanking Fisher and Paykel direct drive!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5132 on: January 29, 2016, 12:51:00 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5133 on: January 29, 2016, 01:35:06 PM »



    Ultimate proof looks as if it's getting towards the endangered species
    category.
     This is what my dog thinks happens with a ferrocell.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5134 on: January 29, 2016, 05:01:32 PM »



   An actual picture of me,an old worn-out farmer.
   It's very wet here.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5134 on: January 29, 2016, 05:01:32 PM »
Sponsored links:





Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5136 on: January 29, 2016, 06:35:52 PM »
Nice Deere... drove one like that when I was a kid on the farm. What model is that? Ours was an 8850. I was driving that from 10 years old. We also had several smaller ones.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5136 on: January 29, 2016, 06:35:52 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5137 on: January 29, 2016, 06:57:08 PM »



    Acca, U.K. Not too far from Stratford upon Avon.
    Cycle, thought you must be a down-to-earth sort
    of fellow. I really appreciate your contribution and
    I'm sort of getting an idea-but it's not so easy when
    one's getting older. I.e. go upstairs for something
    and forget what you went for. I find remembering
    the meaning of new words a challenge and am
    often using a dictionary

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5138 on: January 29, 2016, 08:58:03 PM »
    Ultimate proof looks as if it's getting towards the endangered species category.
     This is what my dog thinks happens with a ferrocell.

Almost... except the magnetic "lines of flux" (what we now know are virtual photons) don't really want to travel from pole face to pole face, and in fact, the great majority of them don't. The most energetically conservative path is as I described prior, out of the anti-vortex (centrifugal) repulsive interface on one of the pole faces, into the QVZPE field, out of the QVZPE field, into the vortex (centripetal) attractive interface on the same pole face, then through the magnet to repeat the process on the opposite pole face.

Remember, a conventional magnet has interspersed throughout it what we can consider to be two magnets... the magnetic material isn't strong enough to resist the magnetic force, so some of the domains unpin and flip to lower the internal energy of the magnet. Thus, we have two predominant magnetic domain directions. This is why you can cut a magnet and still have a N and a S pole in each cut piece.

Because of the above, there are actually two vortexes on each pole face... the Repulsive centrifugal, or what is known as the anti-vortex; and the Attractive centripetal, or what is known as the vortex. Personally, I think 'vortex' and 'anti-vortex' are poor choices of words, as it allows too much confusion with the other applications of the word 'vortex'. Anyway, the Attractive interface pulls virtual photon flux into the magnet from the QVZPE field, the Repulsive interface throws off virtual photon flux, which is then subsumed back into the QVZPE field.

Because magnets directly stress the QVZPE field in this way, and because the QVZPE field is literally the fabric of space-time, the effect is that the Attractive interface in the center of each pole face speeds up time and contracts space, whereas the Repulsive interface on the pole face perimeter slows down time and expands space.

The only reason we see any magnetic flux going "pole to pole" is because of the Bloch Wall... that's where the two opposing magnetic domain directions interspersed throughout a magnet meet and mutually cancel, the magnetic domains in the Bloch Wall region are 'canted' away from the two predominant magnetic domain directions, giving the Bloch Wall essentially a random magnetization, thus we can consider it "unmagnetized".

Because of this "canting", some of the virtual photon flux is thrown off / drawn in at the Bloch Wall, coercing some of the magnetic flux from the pole faces into arcing toward the Bloch Wall. In reality, almost none of the magnetic flux goes pole face to pole face, what we're seeing is magnetic flux arcing between each pole face and the Bloch Wall. If we were to wrap a magnet's Bloch Wall region in a thick layer of diamagnetic material such as bismuth to block the flux thrown off / drawn in there, you'd see that there is almost no magnetic flux pole-face to pole-face. You'd likely also notice that since your magnet is now forced to channel all the virtual photon flux where it's supposed to go rather than frittering some of it away at the Bloch Wall, the magnetic force at the pole faces is stronger.

Here's where I discuss this in more detail, as well as propose an idea for exploiting the magnetic flux to create a motionless electrical generator:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=2576.msg35033#msg35033

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5138 on: January 29, 2016, 08:58:03 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5139 on: January 29, 2016, 11:04:45 PM »



   What we're seeing in ferrocell are real photons. I came across the magneto optic
   Kerr effect.
   Somewhere I came across the idea that virtual photons probably couldn't be
   observed as such and were a means of making calculations.
   Can anything useful be deduced from big examples such as Earth's field,Sun's field
   or Galactic and inter Galactic fields?
   In nature things mostly take a path of least resistance.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5140 on: January 30, 2016, 11:40:21 AM »



   Went to Open-Source-Energy and did a bit of reading and I'm getting,
   or hope I'm getting some idea of QVZPE field density.
       It's all very exciting stuff "You wouldn't read it in a book" is a favourite
   saying of one of my daughters, I think that would be applicable here.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5140 on: January 30, 2016, 11:40:21 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5141 on: January 30, 2016, 06:11:48 PM »
   What we're seeing in ferrocell are real photons. I came across the magneto optic Kerr effect.

   Somewhere I came across the idea that virtual photons probably couldn't be observed as such and were a means of making calculations.

   Can anything useful be deduced from big examples such as Earth's field,Sun's field or Galactic and inter Galactic fields?

   In nature things mostly take a path of least resistance.

Yes, the magnetohydrodynamic cell utilizes photons in the visible range... although I'd like to see what it'd look like with much higher frequencies used, then downshifted so we could see them. Like using infrared LEDs and a FLIR camera, but much higher frequency than that... x-rays or gamma rays, maybe.

Remember, magnets are temporal in nature, the two interfaces on each pole face directly stress the QVZPE field, and the QVZPE field is, quite literally, the fabric of space-time. The Repulsive (centrifugal; anti-vortex) interface expands space and slows down time. The Attractive (centripetal; vortex) interface contracts space and speeds up time. Thus, when viewing the magnetic field, we're viewing a "time-slice" of the  magnetic field as it spirals out ahead and behind our time frame. The higher the frequency used to "view" the magnetic field, the smaller the "time slice" viewed. So if we use a very high frequency and vary it up and down, we could create a composite image of the entire magnetic field, captured in still-motion, sort of like putting a timing light on an engine.

Anyway, "virtual photons" aren't actually photons. Just like everything else, they're a perturbation in the QVZPE field. If one were to use constructive interference to build up a "wave" of these virtual photons, the first thing we'd see concretized out of the QVZPE field is a photon, as it contains the lowest quanta of energy allowable in the universe, thus we think of and call them "virtual photons" even though they're not really photons... you can think of them as "potential photons".

We say they're the medium which mediates magnetism, but in reality, the QVZPE field mediates magnetism, and the magnetic flux we call "virtual photons" are merely a "pattern" in the QVZPE field because of magnetism.

I've already discussed the two interfaces on each pole face of a magnet, and I've discussed separating out the Attractive and Repulsive interfaces so they no longer mutually cancel each other. I believe when I'm finally able to get around to doing so, for a strong enough magnet, we'll see real photons emanating from the Repulsive interfaces merely because that energy flow is no longer being canceled by the Attractive interfaces, and would thus be adding energy to the QVZPE field in a localized spot enough to concretize photons much as Chalmers University did using Dynamical Casimir Effect in 2011.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5142 on: January 30, 2016, 09:06:39 PM »
What I learned today:

The universe is a "three-layer cake", with matter as the highest entropy form of energy, the QVZPE field being a less entropic form of energy, and the energy traversing the QVZPE field being the least entropic. Of course, there are outliers... black holes are extremely high entropy, and stars are extremely low entropy, which represents a dichotomy, so I'll leave those for later studying.

The energy traversing the QVZPE field spreads out in space after it exits a star, and thus its entropy increases... eventually it's entropic enough that it becomes part of the QVZPE field. Thought of another way, the stars are hot plasma, the QVZPE field is an extension of the stars, a cold plasma.

Matter is an attempt by the universe to reach its highest entropy state, but it cannot do so easily because of probability and the rules the universe must operate by.

An aside:
Quote
Living beings such as us represent another oddity of the universe... we're low-entropy, yet we're made of matter, which is high-entropy. So what made life occur, when the tendency of the universe is toward higher entropy? And why did life start from high-entropy matter, rather than low-entropy energy? It's a puzzle that life as we know it even began at all.

But, because the universe attempts to reach its highest entropy state but cannot easily do so because of the underlying fundamental rules by which the universe is forced to operate, it instead attempts to reach its lowest free energy state.

https://gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/when-nature-plays-skee-ball-the-meaning-of-free-energy/
Quote
So what’s so special about free energy?  It is the combination of energy and entropy that balances the effects of probability decreasing with energy and probability increasing with the number of possible combinations.  Saying “a system settles into its state of minimum free energy” is just a way of saying “a system assumes its state of maximum probability.”

And the above quote is why the universe is a "three layer cake" of matter, QVZPE field, and energy traversing the QVZPE field... and the reason why the universe is expanding. Because the probability of concretizing more mass is low under prevalent universal conditions, the only other option for the universe to relieve the field radiation pressure of that energy being thrown off by stars, entropying and becoming part of the QVZPE field is to expand.

Now, as to stars and black holes... two polar opposite extreme examples, stars being very low entropy, and black holes being very highly entropic. Both are affected by gravity, to differing levels. So apparently gravity affects the probability distribution of the universe by skewing it and affecting how probable certain interactions will be.

I'm still trying to analogize the concept...
For extremely high gravity, you get a black hole and highly entropic conditions.
For moderately high gravity, you get a star and extremely low entropic conditions.
For low gravity, you get mass accumulation and moderately entropic conditions.
For no gravity, you get... ???

I'm confused here because I'm assuming that stars are matter (given that plasma is considered to be matter), but for some reason, gravity causes an increase in entropy for regular mass and for black holes, whereas it causes a decrease of entropy for stars (ie: gravity has overridden molecular repulsion and forced fusion)... but a black hole is essentially a star on steroids, with gravity so great that the light from fusion cannot even escape... black holes are plasma just as a star is. So why does gravity cause a star's entropy to decrease, whereas it causes a black hole's entropy to increase?

Much more studying to do.

Offline sadang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5143 on: January 30, 2016, 09:51:06 PM »
SINGLE SLIT EXPERIMENT: Part 1 Dismissing "wave particle duality" Quantum Quackery

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcQNYa3VZ8


Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5144 on: January 30, 2016, 10:47:29 PM »
SINGLE SLIT EXPERIMENT: Part 1 Dismissing "wave particle duality" Quantum Quackery

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcQNYa3VZ8

I noticed this as the page was reloading and before your post was hidden by the Bozo Bin code, so I'll reply real quick...

Wheeler yet again has discovered nothing, he's not saying anything new, he's not discrediting QM, QFT or QED (and is in fact corroborating all of them), and I suspect he's being disingenuous in his claims of discrediting QM, given that he should know that any single-slit of a width several times the wavelength will result in a diffraction interference pattern, whereas a single-slit of a width equal to or less than the wavelength will not... just as he should know that a well-defined obstruction to an electromagnetic wave acts as a secondary source, and creates a new wavefront. This new wavefront propagates into the geometric shadow area of the obstacle. The propagation of light in Quantum Field Theory actually is consistent with the very interpretation of the Huygens-Fresnel Principle.

If you look at the Huygens-Fresnel Principle (this concept's been known about since 1678, expanded upon by Fresnel in 1816), you'll find that each wavelength of light interferes with itself... any point on any peak of any particular wave acts as a point of diffraction, the sum of constructive and destructive interference of all these arbitrary points of diffraction resulting in the next wave.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens%E2%80%93Fresnel_principle
https://youtu.be/7CmbItRjM-Y
https://youtu.be/T-kgoxhFSmU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D8cPrEAGyc

As for his shining a laser against a pin, that's an inverse case of the single-slit diffraction case. It's called the Knife-Edge Effect, and is explained by the Hugyens-Fresnel Principle explained above.

If people weren't so uneducated and gullible, they'd not fall for Mr. Wheeler's BS. In point of fact, the Huygens-Fresnel Principle was the forerunner of and impetus for modern quantum electrodynamics, and in fact, Einstein debated Walther Ritz on the concept, taking the stance that the Huygens-Fresnel Principle was necessary for the quantum concept of a photon.

So in effect, Mr. Wheeler just corroborated Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics. Thanks for that, Mr. Wheeler. Is that not what you wanted to do? Perhaps you should think through what you're going to stomp your feet about before you start stomping.

 

OneLink