Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84249
  • *Latest: not2late

  • *Total Posts: 898026
  • *Total Topics: 15837
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 15
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1215308 times)

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4755 on: December 13, 2015, 05:16:34 PM »
You can never change the laws of physics ! This Japanese fruit cake is doing his disclosure the wrong way round ! The correct way is to demo the sample at room temperature with out magnetism that add the magnetism than bring down the temperature than increase the temperature.  The obvious error is made by intent to pull the wool over your eyes ! When he does a visual on the sample at a higher temperature there is no decrease in the number of bubbles hahahahh check mate .... hahahaha

Also there is no spin so a vortex with no spin is not a vortex .. Static charged bubbles is what he has got and that means his stupid 1 million volt microscope is interfering with the sample hahahahahhahahahah in other words its a heap of junk ! Also the daft claim that its the first time an atom can be seen is a lie as there is now very good pictures made of the proton surface ...

These so called scientist's who in the video were claimed to confirm it all work for the company and none are particle physicists or quantum mechanics so no independent study is made or confirmed .  His electron propagation tech is shit and the daft claim that he can send an electron through an eye of a needle at 50 miles away is bonkers ....... So the man is bonkers ! He designed a heap of junk found loads of bubbles and used it as a lie to cover up his error !

Stop believing in YouTube and stick to the real laws that govern such things ! It would not surprise me if his mad idea to make a smart phone that can view a 3D image of an atom will suck up some more money as its obvious that the directors of the company are as thick as 2 planks of wood ! When you see people doing things the wrong way round and present them as real with no out side independent conformation don't trust it ............

I am thinking of writing to the company director with these facts and may seek legal compensation for wasting my time and adding in other claims that will completely destroy this nut job .......... They will not like what we have to say about it ! And if they let us take a re take I think you should go there and do it !!! hahahahhahahahahahahah bonkers its all bonkers .....

If you're not going to contribute to the discussion by sticking to reality, then why do you bother?

He didn't say he could shoot an electron through the eye of a needle at 50 miles, he was analogizing the accuracy of the electron holography microscope used to image the magnetic vortexes. And you're still forgetting the side-shots of the vortexes, in real-time, showing them rotating... because the ultra-low temperatures and fast scanning speed allowed a small enough "time-slice" that we could see it. And you forget the two mathematical proofs provided, completely in accordance with QM.

"air bubbles"... in an ultra-high vacuum.  ::)

I have had the good experience of being within 500 ft of 6 UFOS and not magnetic fields were being used !
 
  Flying saucers are very important and work best as a magnetic vortex so they have a direct role in this thread !
 

You do not represent scientific inquiry, you represent its polar opposite. Your writing whatever comes to mind, no matter how nonsensical, no matter if it contradicts what you've stated prior, is doing a great disservice to scientific inquiry in that there are those who would believe outright your meanderings, and it necessitates everyone having to wade through and vet your statements. You are not, sir, contributing to scientific inquiry, you are contributing to a form of scientific chaos in which psychiatric infirmity and nonsensical beliefs invade upon truth.

So, we're done here. You're on "ignore" status from now on.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2015, 10:21:16 PM by CycleGuy »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4756 on: December 13, 2015, 08:35:48 PM »



  Atom,your language gets more reminiscent of Kelly every day!
   Don't kill off the debate, I'm enjoying it,
           John.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2015, 10:51:55 PM by minnie »

Offline citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4757 on: December 13, 2015, 11:18:45 PM »
I don't understand why you guys are even arguing about this.  Dufo has already picked up the banner and is shouting from the rooftops that this theory is correct.  Surely no one has any doubts about this if Dufo is for it.  I mean after all he is the master of deception and misinformation.  I really had no interest in this topic at all until I saw where Dufo started posting about it.  Then I realized it was probably another snow job to get people to argue instead of concentrating on trying to find some real solutions.  From the little I have read about this theory it does make any difference at all.  Only real testing and working with magnets will teach you anything.  There is nothing to be gained from reading another pie in the sky wild theory.

Just my opinion and I don't really care whether you agree or not.

Carroll

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4757 on: December 13, 2015, 11:18:45 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4758 on: December 14, 2015, 12:08:15 AM »



   This is for Joel,
                         this fellow Perelman came up with a solution for
Poincare's conjecture. There was a medal and a million dollar prize.
He didn't collect either.Great man!
            John.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4759 on: December 14, 2015, 03:11:41 AM »
The easiest way of proving or disproving Mr. Wheeler's hypothesis that a magnet is "dielectric" and is throwing off / taking in "inertial dielectricity" is to devise an experiment such that these charged particles (because remember, he says a magnet gives off "inertial dielectricity", while he's redefined "inertial" to mean "the opposite of rest" and "dielectricity" to mean "static electricity"... so "static electricity in motion") are put through a dielectric such that they give off Cherenkov radiation.

If Mr. Wheeler is able to produce Cherenkov radiation from a magnet, it would be an absolute confirmation of his theory. If he is unable to do so, that nullus resultarum will stand as an absolute refutation of  his theory.

Will Mr. Wheeler take the challenge to validate his theory?
« Last Edit: December 14, 2015, 07:36:35 AM by CycleGuy »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4759 on: December 14, 2015, 03:11:41 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline massive

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4760 on: December 14, 2015, 07:06:20 AM »

STATIC ?   whats that ?        every object you can see on this planet is collectively either rotating 1000 mph or orbiting the sun 67,000mph , or the centre of this galaxy 490,000mph

^scientic american

"static electricty" was coined in the 1800s but is freely used in 2015

where Michelson and Morley ?   ....whoops back in the 1800s   ;D

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4761 on: December 14, 2015, 07:52:12 AM »
The easiest way of proving or disproving Mr. Wheeler's hypothesis that a magnet is "dielectric" and is throwing off / taking in "inertial dielectricity" is to devise an experiment such that these charged particles (because remember, he says a magnet gives off "inertial dielectricity", while he's redefined "inertial" to mean "the opposite of rest" and "dielectricity" to mean "static electricity"... so "static electricity in motion") are put through a dielectric such that they give off Cherenkov radiation.

If Mr. Wheeler is able to produce Cherenkov radiation from a magnet, it would be an absolute confirmation of his theory. If he is unable to do so, that nullus resultarum will stand as an absolute refutation of  his theory.

Will Mr. Wheeler take the challenge to validate his theory?
That's not quite right. Producing the Cherenkov radiation from a magnet will not be "absolute confirmation"; it's a formal fallacy to think so. "If A then B; observe B.... therefore A" is fallacious reasoning called "Affirming the consequent". If Kenny's theory is correct, then under certain conditions producing CR from a magnet will result. Observe CR from the magnet... you can't therefore conclude that Kenny's theory is correct.

However, you are right about the second part: "If A then B; observe _not B_, therefore Not A." This is valid reasoning (modus tollens). So it's possible to _disprove_ absolutely the Wheeler theory by doing the right experiments with proper controls and finding a null result. However, getting a positive result can only "support" a theory, it cannot prove it. "Proof" of a scientific theory comes from a preponderance of supporting evidence but is very difficult to achieve in "absolute" terms. And there isn't even a shred of valid supporting evidence, much less a preponderance, for Kenny's hobby theory. (Which actually doesn't even rise to the level of a "theory" at all; it's more like a haphazard bundle of inconsistent conjectures with little correspondence to any reality.)


I'm still laughing about the "free energy" from the Bismuth sphere. That whole affair shows very clearly where the gaps are in Wheeler's reasoning, logic, use and understanding of his instruments, his poor experimental technique with lack of proper controls, and so on, including his reluctance to accept reality and his inability to admit his errors.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4761 on: December 14, 2015, 07:52:12 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4762 on: December 14, 2015, 09:09:29 AM »
That's not quite right. Producing the Cherenkov radiation from a magnet will not be "absolute confirmation"; it's a formal fallacy to think so. "If A then B; observe B.... therefore A" is fallacious reasoning called "Affirming the consequent". If Kenny's theory is correct, then under certain conditions producing CR from a magnet will result. Observe CR from the magnet... you can't therefore conclude that Kenny's theory is correct.

However, you are right about the second part: "If A then B; observe _not B_, therefore Not A." This is valid reasoning (modus tollens). So it's possible to _disprove_ absolutely the Wheeler theory by doing the right experiments with proper controls and finding a null result. However, getting a positive result can only "support" a theory, it cannot prove it. "Proof" of a scientific theory comes from a preponderance of supporting evidence but is very difficult to achieve in "absolute" terms. And there isn't even a shred of valid supporting evidence, much less a preponderance, for Kenny's hobby theory. (Which actually doesn't even rise to the level of a "theory" at all; it's more like a haphazard bundle of inconsistent conjectures with little correspondence to any reality.)

I'm still laughing about the "free energy" from the Bismuth sphere. That whole affair shows very clearly where the gaps are in Wheeler's reasoning, logic, use and understanding of his instruments, his poor experimental technique with lack of proper controls, and so on, including his reluctance to accept reality and his inability to admit his errors.

I especially like the photons of visible light the first sphere was giving off, according to Mr. Wheeler's theory. As is often the case, the evidence to disprove an odd theory is presented within the evidence supposedly supporting that odd theory. ::)

I was attempting to bait Mr. Wheeler into disproving his own theory.  ;D

Considering that it takes the highly charged particles produced in a nuclear reactor to produce Cherenkov radiation, Mr. Wheeler would have a difficult time finding a dielectric medium through which his "inertial dielectricity" would exceed the phase velocity of light in that dielectric medium unless he concentrates the magnetic flux quite a bit and separates the Attractive and Repulsive interface fluxes. And of course, they'd have to be charged particles, which they're not.

The very definition of Cherenkov radiation would prove that the particles going through the dielectric medium are indeed charged particles (if Mr. Wheeler could produce Cherenkov radiation with a magnet, which he can't)... but the radiation would, by necessity, be bluish in color with a continuous spectra, no spectral peaks. Obviously, because of the cutoff frequency denoted by cos theta = 1/(nB), x-ray and higher frequencies cannot be detected in this way, but if Wheeler's stating his magnets are giving off energy in that range, he's a greater fool than any of us had previously thought.

Any other frequencies of incident radiation, and he's looking at Askaryan radiation, a subset of Cherenkov radiation as a result of uncharged entities (I'm loathe to call them "particles" as an abstract construct, for fear Mr. Wheeler latches onto that single word as his "disproof" of the entire process). That'll be up around 5 GHz if he's using sand as the dielectric, or 2 GHz for ice. But he'll need to concentrate magnetic flux tremendously to get the energy level necessary to manifest Askaryan radiation, even more so than for Cherenkov radiation.

Or, he could defer to the research that's already been done:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/0011001.pdf
They used photons to detect Askaryan radiation. Virtual photons, being photons themselves, would give a similar result.

Of course, since he says magnetic material is "dielectric" in nature, that would mean that all magnets are already giving off Askaryan radiation if the magnet is of sufficient strength... and he's got some of the most powerful magnets available to the public. Has he ever measured any radio frequency radiation coming off his magnets? I'm betting no.

Ergo, magnets are not "dielectrics", they do not give off "inertial dielectricity". They are ferromagnets (a scientifically descriptive name encompassing an explanation), and are mediated via virtual photons. Just as QM has said for a quite some time.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2015, 04:18:03 PM by CycleGuy »

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4763 on: December 14, 2015, 09:14:10 AM »
The ULTIMATE answer is that a vortex is 100% correct not matter what bullshit your mind thinks! Even in the math...1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-0 down to a vortex of 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-0 and this is a repetitive cycle...all computer CPUs are govenred by 0's and 1's...with 90% of the number NOT needed! SO! When this element93rd guy is trying to proclaim that only the number 9 is the answer for all, I DON'T BUY IT! I ONLY SEE HIM SEEING THE VORTEX...of his number 9...but he does not realize where that number came from? It did not start from the number 1 to the number 9 all of a sudden? Lol. His fucking number 9 is a vortex! Mmmm 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-? The nine is at the last place of a numeral scale? AS IF 1-8 does not matter but yet those numbers got to the number 9! He fails to see that the number 9 is a vortex!!! IOW, is is a repetition of numerical numbers = a vortex in the math equations.

AS A MATER OF FACT, we all learn from a vortex! If there was no vortex, we would not learn! And so would not the ATOMIC particles! IT IS A LAW THAT ALL PARTICLES ARE GOING IN CIRCLES! DOWN TO A VOID!

This dumbass of element93rd does not see that a magnetic field is a vortex...just as any electromagnetic field is..THE ONLY REASON ONE CAN SEE THE FLOW IS FROM A VORTEX FIELD….the view of seeing a sound regarding a #9 is because it FLOWS down to a number 1! The number 9 would never exist with out the numbers 1-8? SO this is 100% facts to me that a vortex is in everything!

- numbers

- galaxies

- dark matter

- dark energy

- the big bang

ALL IS A VORTEX. = IT IS A LADDER OF ENERGY> vortex + vortex + vortex + vortex + vortex vortex + vortex + vortex + vortex + vortex + vortex = what comes out of the vortex is evolution!

This means that light is a vortex that what is coming out from it is great BUT the light is still a vortex! A photon needs “batteries” to keep on shining! HOW THE FUCK CAN A PHOTON KEEP ON LIVING WITH JUST A NUMBER 9? The photons are going down this vortex of quantum level…….the same reason why UFO's can become invisible!!!!

A 12 hour clock is a vortex 'cause is continues to be a 12 hour clock for infinity! How the hell can't a 9 number not be a nine 4 minutes from now since it is a number? You ONLY learned about the number nine due to a vortex! IF WE ARE GOING DOWN THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE, lest see you explain NOT! To go down it with your number 9 math?

IFFFF YOU DON'T SHOW ME ANSWERS I NEED TO KICK YOUR ASS! SERIOUSLY! A GOOD ASS KICKING!!! BY the same token, if you show that the number 9 is not a vortex, I would tell my girlfriend to sleep with you if I tell her too.

Lets hear the evidence that the #9 is NOT a vortex! hehehehe

And how the number nine became 9 with out the numbers 1-8?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4763 on: December 14, 2015, 09:14:10 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4764 on: December 14, 2015, 10:02:35 AM »
Minnie, you are here to get a freee energy device? Sorry to tell you that it has already been invented...we are here talking politics (vortex is essential just how the space time curves to itself) lol

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4765 on: December 14, 2015, 07:34:18 PM »
Below is a good basic explanation of what I've been saying. I came to the same conclusions by reading a *lot* of research papers. Kind of wish I'd found this long ago, it would have jump-started my quest for knowledge a bit. I arrived at my conclusions without knowing any of the terminology, nor any of the scientific underpinnings of physical phenomena, nor any of the math, nor even where to find any of the information... so it was a process of just searching a lot and figuring things out.

https://archive.org/stream/WhatIsAMagneticField/mfield_djvu.txt
http://www.oocities.org/dsligar.geo/mfield.html
https://ia601409.us.archive.org/27/items/WhatIsAMagneticFieldRev.April22010/mfield.pdf

Quote
What is the frequency of a permanent magnet's field?

F.A. Wilson explains in his book, From Atoms To Amperes (Bernard Babani publishing, London England c 1989) that in the case of the electromagnetic force, the exchange particle is the photon, and that from Einstein's and Planck's formula arises a relationship between the mass of a photon and the frequency of the light (visible or not) it represents.

Planck's formula: E=hf where:

E is the energy of a single photon,
f is the photon's frequency,
h is Planck's constant,

Einstein's formula: E=mc2 where:

E is energy,
m is mass,
c2 is the speed of light squared,

hence, hf=mc2

thus showing that the mass of a photon is directly proportional to the frequency of the photon.

E=hf and E=mc2 so hf=mc2

Therefore, f=(mc2)/h

Because higher frequencies have more energy (E=hf), they deliver more mass (E=mc2). Einstein understood that light quanta (photons) are a mass transfer mechanism. The flux quanta (flowing particles) or photon exchange frequency is thus mass in motion and is the force of a magnetic field. The frequency and number of photons exchanged must be extremely high to exert physical attraction or repulsion.

The implication is that the frequency creates a force that is a physical mass connection, hf=mc2. Different magnet compounds should have different frequencies since photons are emitted/absorbed by electrons. If an electron is throwing out a stream of photons while orbiting/spinning, you can visualize a corkscrew or helix stream of photons!

A photons wavelength is measured as a distance along a line through the center of the helix in one revolution around the helical trajectory. A flat projection side view of a helix looks like a sine wave.

Low frequency photons (such as radio waves) are often described in terms of wavelength (units in meters), while high frequency photons (such as
gamma particles) are often described in terms of particle mass energy (units in electron volts). As you increase the energy by increasing the frequency, you wind up with photons of more measurable mass. At the high frequency end of the electromagnetic spectrum are high energy photons known as gamma rays, which are streams of gamma particles. Beta particles are free electrons or positrons. Alpha particles are the nucleus of helium atoms.

In everyday life, you can understand that energy is proportional to frequency if you understand a concrete hammer drill will deliver more energy to the drill hole if it hammers at a frequency of 10 strokes per second instead of 1 stroke per second.

Is a magnet losing mass by emitting a field?

Stick a magnet to the bottom of a metal shelf. Watch it defy gravity. If it is defying gravity, it must be expending energy. By E=mc2 it must be losing mass!

One may object to this by stating there is mass displacement, therefore work, and energy loss, but the flux quanta (flowing particles) of the magnetic field is an unobvious mass displacement itself.

Akira Tonomura's article on Electron Holography (Physics Today, April, 1990), contains a photo of magnetic vortices labeled "Seeing flux quanta" and states "Where two oppositely directed magnetization streams merge, they produce vortices similar to merging streams of water." Akira Tonomura is a winner of the Benjamin Franklin Medal for Physics.

Theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate Sheldon Glashow explains for PBS NOVA online (Einstein's Big Idea, October 11, 2005) that, "When an object emits light, say, a flashlight, it gets lighter." It has been calculated that every second, the Earth is struck by about 4.5 pounds of sun light.

Do magnets evaporate like black holes?

I find it interesting that iron (a strongly magnetic element) is the most massive element that can be produced during the fusion phase of a star's life. It takes a supernova to create all the elements beyond iron in the periodic table. A star's fusion phase starts with hydrogen and stops at iron which has the most tightly bound and thus most stable nucleus of all the elements. Iron 56 is at the top of the binding energy curve. On the curve, hydrogen is at the bottom to the left of iron, and the heavy elements such as uranium are at the bottom to the right of iron. I've seen one book that stated nickel 56 is really at the top of the binding energy curve. It is interesting that many meteorites are made of ferromagnetic elements, iron and nickel, blown out by stars that went supernova! Iron and nickel, with their tightly bound nucleus, seem to give virtual photons (flux quanta) a better grip for magnetic attraction when passing through.

The relative abundances of the elements in the periodic table drops off tremendously after nickel because supernova are relatively rare events in the history of our 13.75 billion year old universe.

A star with enough mass near the end of its fusion phase can go supernova, and may leave behind a neutron star, or a black hole, depending on the mass available. Certain magnetic rapidly rotating neutron stars, known as Magnetars, are believed to produce the strongest magnetic fields in the universe. A black hole is an object of such dense mass that it creates a gravitational field so strong that the escape velocity exceeds the speed of light! If black holes have a magnetic field, and it can get out, this seems to imply that virtual photons (flux quanta) can travel faster than the speed of light! Black holes may evaporate by a process known as Hawking radiation (named after Stephen Hawking who theorized it). Black holes may also evaporate by quantum tunneling. Quantum tunneling is when a particle penetrates a barrier which it ought not have enough energy to penetrate.

Where is the mass of these virtual photons from a magnet?

Force carrying photons are called virtual photons because unlike other real photons, they cannot be directly detected by a particle detector. In Feynman diagrams, virtual photons are symbolized by squiggly lines that never have loose ends. Magnetic lines of force curve back to the magnet and never have loose ends. This topology seems to imply there are no magnetic monopole particles. Virtual photons may be concentrated along magnetic lines of force (flux lines), which may be mass entanglements. Einstein stated, "The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which
the field strength or the energy density are particularly high". The energy density is strongest where the lines of force are around a magnet, so that is
where the most virtual photons should be.

The range of electromagnetic force is thought to be infinite. The strength or intensity of an electromagnetic field decreases at a rate of 1 /distance2 . This equation holds true for light from a point source, but not for force from a magnet which drops off at faster rates. This is probably because virtual photons from a magnet are following the flux lines and not traveling in straight lines like photons from a light bulb. You can measure force from magnets with a ruler and a grocery scale.

Could it be that force carrying virtual photons cannot be detected because they are in another dimension? Could their mass be smeared around the universe in another small dimension, with only force detectable in our normal size visible dimensions? (Magnetism as invisible plumbing behind our reality, non-locality, like Einstein's spooky action at a distance via EPR channels.) The Aharonov-Bohm effect also seems to demonstrate non-local effects.

The October 12, 1999 Time Travel episode of PBS's NOVA showed photons traveling at 1 .7 times the speed of light via quantum tunneling. This faster than light communication may imply travel through another dimension. A short distance traveled at the speed of light in a very small dimension could appear as a large distance traveled faster than the speed of light in our normal size visible dimensions. Quantum tunneling may be direct evidence of the other hidden dimensions in string theory.

Do the lines of force have a physical reality?

The magnetic lines of force have tension, as demonstrated by a magnet being suspended in air below a type-2 superconductor. The conventional explanation for this is flux pinning in the superconductor. The magnet hanging below the superconductor will swing back and forth on the tension of its flux lines (lines of force) which are somehow partly pinned in and partly expelled from the superconductor.

Flux line tension is the basis for proposals and research to use magnetic fields as solar wind sails to propel spacecraft. The force of the solar wind pushes against the magnetic field, and the tension of the flux lines transfers the force back to the spacecraft, dragging it through space like a sailing ship.

Does a magnet slow time?

Nobel prize winner Richard Feynman explains in his sum over histories interpretation of Quantum Mechanics that photons go where time is least. They follow the path of least time. Generally, this is a straight line, from point A to point B, if the effects of gravity and small constrictions are excluded. Einstein showed that gravity slows time, and that acceleration produces the same effects as gravity. Astronomers have observed that gravity bends light. Physicists have proven with atomic clocks and airplanes that gravity slows time. Clocks run slower at lower altitudes where gravity is stronger. Time is least (flows more slowly) where gravity is most. Gravity bends light because the photons are seeking or are pulled toward a path of least time, which is a path of more gravity! This space time curvature is the essence of General Relativity. Because we are talking about photons, this is also a link between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Could it be that virtual photons from a magnet follow the magnetic lines of force because this is their path of least time? Could it be that a magnet slows time by accelerating photons? Einstein asked himself the question: If gravity and acceleration feel the same, perhaps they are the same.

Kip Thome explains in his book, Black Holes and Time Warps that the electromagnetic field of an object contributes to the gravity of the object, because mass and energy are equivalent. Brian Greene explains in his book, The Elegant Universe (a 3 part PBS NOVA, Oct. 28, Nov. 4, 2003) that Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic field are relativistic. This implies that an electromagnetic or magnetic field changes the rate at which time flows. The combined ideas of fields, quantum particles, and relativity produce what is known as relativistic quantum field theory.

Note the blurb above:
Quote
Because higher frequencies have more energy (E=hf), they deliver more mass (E=mc2). Einstein understood that light quanta (photons) are a mass transfer mechanism. The flux quanta (flowing particles) or photon exchange frequency is thus mass in motion and is the force of a magnetic field.

That photons are a mass transfer mechanism is why we have "virtual particles" popping in and out of existence, and why it's possible to concretize mass from the QVZPE field. Constructive interference of QVZPE field wave modes generates a "wave" energetic enough to temporarily concretize mass. That energy is then "smeared" out over a longer space and time as the concretized virtual mass is subsumed back into the QVZPE field.

As an analogy, think of a bathtub. You fill it half full. At 3/4 full, you put a shelf that has holes in it. Then you start making waves. Eventually, constructive wave interference will generate a wave large enough to reach high enough to throw some water on that shelf. As soon as the water gets onto the shelf, it starts draining back down. The water level is the QVZPE field, the waves are the QVZPE field modes constructively interfering, the shelf is our reality.

So there must be an energetic hurdle the QVZPE field must get over in order to concretize mass, so most of those particles are transitory in nature.


Can someone check my premise and math?

The QVZPE field has been measured with an energy density of 6 × 10E-10 J/m3, or 3.74490548E10 eV/m3.

We know the element with the lowest ionization energy is Cesium, at 3.897 eV. So it's closest to "self-destructing" if hit with enough energy.

We know that Cs has an atomic radius of 260 pm (empirically measured). Thus, we could pack 38,461,538,461 Cs atoms along each axis of a cubic meter.

Thus, we'd have 5.68957669E31 Cs atoms per cubic meter, and a total ionization energy for the cubic meter of Cs of 2.17228038E32 eV/m3.

Thus, if we suddenly see all the Cs in the world spontaneously destructing, we'll know the QVZPE field radiation pressure has reached at least 2.17228038E32 eV/m3.

That gives us 3.817999 eV that the QVZPE field would have to increase to ionize Cs. Thus, the QVZPE field is at or less than 0.079001 eV.

So apparently the virtual particles that pop into existence are the result of constructive interference that tremendously increases QVZPE field density in a very localized region, forcing those virtual particles into existence briefly before the constructive wave interference collapses, allowing the virtual particles to disappear back into the QVZPE field.

I believe this is somewhat akin to the bathtub and shelf analogy I presented above, it "smooths out" or damps the QVZPE wave by "smearing" the energy of those constructively interfering waves over a longer time period as the virtual particle again becomes part of the QVZPE field. for constructively interfering QVZPE field modes that are able to reach the energy level sufficient to momentarily concretize mass.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2015, 11:21:05 PM by CycleGuy »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4765 on: December 14, 2015, 07:34:18 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4766 on: December 14, 2015, 09:31:01 PM »
"Throw every textbook away"

Me and the gal.we make two steaming hot huge mugs of coffie together and we go and sit down in the bedroom,steaming mugs in-hand.we put our mugs down on floor for one minute to allow for cooling.I lift my mug up from floor and begin sipping.she lifts her mug up and brings it to her lips.shock-of-all-shocks all of her coffie is gone,vanished.the whole 400mls.but the mug is still warm! We run around looking for evidence of spillage,but nothing.not a drop in sight on the floor.she leaps into my lap in terror,shivvering.this is a true story.two witnesses.neither witness under narcotic influence.how can physics explain this kind of shit,how,how...how

Offline citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4767 on: December 14, 2015, 09:57:08 PM »
Obviously your cat likes hot coffee!

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4768 on: December 14, 2015, 11:38:49 PM »
no pets back in '97 son.let's hear everyones paranormals testomonials.things that go beyond the physics textbooks but belong in physics textbooks hahaha whooooooooo spoooky vibes

Offline Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 862
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4769 on: December 15, 2015, 04:05:07 PM »
profitis,

"let's hear everyones paranormals testomonials.things that go beyond the physics textbooks but belong in physics textbooks hahaha whooooooooo spoooky vibes"


if you have time to read all 192 pages ( 2940 stories ?

http://allnurses.com/general-nursing-discussion/whats-your-best-108202.html



Kator01
 

 

OneLink