Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1259307 times)

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4710 on: December 04, 2015, 07:32:38 AM »
Element93rd, in real life FIXING scenarios I will kick your ass. Blah! Blah! Blah!

The mosquito is to most dangerous insect/animal in the whole world!

During rainy season, the car crashes DRASTICALLY increase---hmmm...let me think why that is.

Most people require transportation, so a good engine mechanic will always be needed! The smart ones, out of corruption, make good money and, of course, they make a living. Same with Air conditioning technicians. Computer repair technicians (not residential), hmmm let me think here...what else...lol

Anyways, POINT BLANK, what new innovation do you have to make a drastic change to this world? I will support it. Or even if your innovation betters any machinery or the thinking of the majority? SOOO!!! How is your thinking going to change the majority of peoples thinking (it has surely not changed mine yet) to benefit them either in their pockets or in their mind????

How is your thinking going to improve anything invented as of now?:

- in the CPU area

- in the gasoline/diesel engine area

- in the suspension of a car area

- in the engendering of an air conditioning unit

- in simple stuff like filters too...(you want me to show you what stuff have filters?)

- in the medical field? You think if minnie was a smoker for 40 years your grass juice will give him back his years? (just an example minnie..not saying that you were a smoker for 40 years...actually you sound like a good guy :) )...

WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU HAVE FOR EVOLUTION and WHEN YOU SHOW ME, I WILL ADMIT THAT I AM MORE STUPID THAN YOU ARE!!! But since you don't show anything, I am only going based on my past experiences.

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4711 on: December 04, 2015, 07:37:07 AM »
Minnie, look at element93rd talking pixie dust when you just want help on your electric bills and man labor to put food on the table. But I REALLY do hope that element93rd gives you an answer to...I guess...well, I don't know what his motives are! But he sure sounds like a thinker hehehehe.

I on the other hand can fix all of your farm equipment! lol Those electrical hair clippers...those gasoline engines in the equipment...those heavy equipment with oil hoses...meh! I am the MVP for most people I get tired of them smooching on me!

There is NOTHING in your house that I CANNOT REPAIR! There is nothing in your farm THAT I CANNOT REPAIR! MEH! But ask element93rd to fix your broken items? I suck at making people laugh though 'cause I don't like joking around. I like to laugh at idiots though! :)

BUT WAIT THERE IS MORE...is there an easy and cheap way to fix them? Ask element93rd minnie, he sure has answers...lol..I will read what he has to answer when you ask him...I MEAN 'COMMON minnie...YOU HAVE SHIT LOAD OR REPAIRING TO DO in your farm and to keep things moving along smooth. Tell me you have nothing that needs repair right now? lol And from the things that need repairing, ask element93rd how to repair your tools/problems? lol lets be real! lol

Offline SoManyWires

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4712 on: December 04, 2015, 10:02:15 AM »


 I found this on Youtube and it was good for me.
 Hidden Universe "2015 Mystery behind quantum theory and Albert Einstein".
 I'm sorry I don't know how to do direct links.
hi,
at the youtube page you are wanting to copy over to here, go to that youtube page and move the mouse pointer onto the address of the youtube webpage, right click the mouse, now move the pointer to Copy.

then after that you want to return to the page on ou.com you wanted to post the copy onto,
now press the right mouse button, and this time you are going to select Paste.

after that, look for the button that is labelled Donate. haha joking

all the best and thankyou for feeding cities.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4713 on: December 05, 2015, 12:32:19 AM »



   Atom, Michio Kaku will go along with the harmonics idea.
I found a video something about Universe and free lunch.
Spaticles,another,higher harmonic!

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4714 on: December 05, 2015, 07:00:43 AM »
Quote
Try this video link !

I have seen that before and many upon many others (looking at things from different angels). Actually that is not farfetched! The energy communicates with itself back and forth. The north pole of the earth is communicating with the south pole of the earth and also with the surrounding energy. Energy and electrons communicate with each other be it by 0 and 1 or another forms of communication..I don't disagree with this. Like I said, the MIND IS VERY POWERFUL...as so is the SEED SOME ONE ELSE IMPLANTS IN YOUR MIND. This is a reason why I strongly believe that all energy has “self awareness”...all the way down to the quantum level. I mean, at the speed of light, the photons have to know where they are going? AND ALSO THEY HAVE TO BE FOOD! The light does experience death and does have a mother and a father? And, I personally believe, that they want to live the longest.

I could write more about this but this is enough...and yes the narrator is David Sereda whom he believes in aliens too https://youtu.be/MiGsLA_sdmg he also has a theory about a clock of energy that goes faster than light. Can't find it because all of this is underground stuff...way under the mass media stuff. But it relates to a vortex of light...MAYBE JUST MAYBE...all photons gather their speed from going down a quantum black hole and then a new photon is born..but then the implications would suggest that there are particles that are greater than the speed of light? But now it has been “discovered” that neutrinos violate the speed of light. “In fact” someone has taken a fotograph of the sun with neutrinos from the opposite side of the earth (through the earth).

I understand all of that. I don't find it far fetched! BUT I am also grounded to the “at present time” stuff...like how mechanical stuff work. How the birds achieve flight. How the right brothers strggled to show the people how they had built a machine that could fly. I know about the evolution of the bullet...from the powder and cannon balls all the way down to a bullet. Essentially, a miniature cannon inside a barrel!

So what do we do now?

There is proof that ALIENS exists since we are aliens ourselves...looking an in inverted way...we are aliens in earth...humans is just a words. We are human aliens to the milky way...now if there are trillions of galaxies (or an unknown number) it is mathematically and energy fact that we cannot be the only living life in the universe.

SOOOO we can talk about this and that or the other and you may say that you are educating me and that you are smarter than me, BUT, at the end of the day, WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? Understanding these things alone will not change things = for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. But that is not correct! That is Vague...because if there is a greater opposite action to the positive reaction, the positive would be less...by the same token, if there is less opposite action to the positive reaction, the positive would be great! This is learning from FREEE energy! This is not learning from MONEY energy! 40Hrs a week energy! The laws are there….we are just slaves of the corrupt upper class!

We are down here debating this and that with one another while you don't speak about the corruption of money and earth by the guys that call the shots. WW 1 and 2 were started by them NOT by you bitching about it! The wars where started by corrupt people with money disagreeing with each other about property. IOW< a neighbor VS another neighbor trying to steal each others homes (FREEE property). YOU SEE MY INVERTED WAY OF THINKING?

THE HOLLY GRAIL IS TO OWN A BANK AND BECOME AT THE TOP WHERE COUNTRY RULERS LIVE! NOT! Just trying to bitch about it here in forums and make little objects to save you energy bills that come from huge generators. ::) WHILE AT THE SAME TIME KEEPING YOUR HUMBLENESS TO HELP THE WORLD!

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4715 on: December 05, 2015, 07:45:28 AM »
^ yeah yeah yeah I will study the video some more but trush me, I am concrete set down on my believes.

BUT what kind of recipe where you giving to minnie about all of this grass juice and stuff? And then you mentioned something about becoming 10 years younger or something.

I can only focus on the person further when I can agree of the person. This is kind of like insurance....

Lets exchange knowledge? I'll teach you anything regarding how to fix anything in your house and you teach me things I don't know? Two atoms exchanging energy? :) Our attraction is because I have something you don't know and you have something I don't know. Deal? I will teach you everything I know and you teach me everything you know?

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4716 on: December 06, 2015, 09:23:31 AM »
Quote
anything for everything hahahahhahaha thats not a good deal for me hahahahahahah No ! I am not interested in fixing things because if the go wrong than they are designed wrong ! Now designe something that can never go wrong ....

In what type of house do you live in that does not require MAINTENANCE/REPAIR? or new modern things? Your home does have a stove, refrigerator, water supply, electricity, an air conditioning unit, A roof, windows, ceiling fans, an LCD TV, surveillance cameras, a garage door, lawn mower, weed eater, a water boiler, etc...I can fix any of those….the house is the most important thing to keep maintained! You can't fix things that break in your house BECAUSE I have asked you how to repair those things and you don't have the answers. Do you drive a car? Do you know how to repair a car when it breaks too? Anything regarding a car is reparable... the most important things are the engine and transmission! Do you know how to repair them too?

Quote
Test 1 ......................................... Go forth and find all the S I UNITS bring them here and describe what they are and what they can do and why are they important ....... If you can not do this than its your brain that you need to fix. lol ahah

You need to teach me this stuff! I don't proclaim to know these stuff. ALSO!, you need to show how these stuff apply to real life scenarios! Better gasoline engine? Longer life for a human body? An Over Unity device? A solution for the next great 6th extinction? A way to get many hot females in bed? SHOW YOUR INTELLIGENCE! I will teach you why you get banned hear LOL! You have asked me about that before lol! HMMMM, you do know about google crome, fire fox, internet explorer, opera browser, and virtual cookies too? TEAch me and the rest of the people reading your teachings! LETS HEAR IT? Lets move forward and make a better world? Lets help all people? Get rid of poverty and corruption? Lets get in tough with aliens that want to help us? Lets get rid of the MONEY? Lets get rid of corrupt people!? Lets find answers for EVERYTHING? NOT! Just your own personal one angel answers but a 360 degree angle ANSWERS?

What I know you don't know, what you know I don't know...LETS exchange knowledge in peace! FREEE knowledge being exchanged!? You scared?

Offline SoManyWires

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4717 on: December 07, 2015, 09:44:43 AM »
I live in a cave ! I have a stone wheel a pet bear to protect me and I don't have windows . hahahahha ! You have to teach your self or don't bother. Its not important nothing is so do nothing ! You cant save this world its doomed something to do with its population lab rats and money
Did you know that 9 out of every 10 people is psychotic 4 of them are possessed by demonic evil spirits and on average 3  million people  have been murdered by an act of war over the pass 5000 years ! And right now a deadly virus that was frozen 25 million years ago is now killing hundreds of whales each month and its mutated into a super virus and is now on land.

You have no idea what hard work commitment and unity could bring if the selfish minds of humans were to finally understand why they are here .... If you do not love the Christ you love the devil and its as simple as that ! Very soon something very big is going to happen so big I may be the only one who will be left to observe heaven land on this hell hole and that I promise you will happen .......

and this is why some people just scare the hell out of me.

one must first be consumed by the concept of religion being more true than false.
heaven and hell only exist for those all consumed by such beliefs based on their theoretical offerings of data.

a non violent offering of attempts to present validation would be most appreciated for a change but is best rather not offered respectively on this website here
at the request of known overunity.com T.O.S.





     



   

           

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4718 on: December 07, 2015, 11:45:55 AM »
Hey element93rd, I feel your pain = when you have many answers and people don't take you serious...so this is the chance for you to make yourself explain your theory. Tell us more about the 9?

But lets continue to debate for forum entertainment purposes...which you have a lot of shit to say! Lol...meh!

Quote
I live in a cave ! I have a stone wheel a pet bear to protect me and I don't have windows . hahahahha ! You have to teach your self or don't bother. Its not important nothing is so do nothing ! You cant save this world its doomed something to do with its population lab rats and money .. Avoid it if I were you and just find 7 mad woman and feed them chocolate donuts burgers chips cream buns tea and honey . Just keep feeding them and see what happens hahahahahahhahaha There was this ultra hot girl I grew up with but when she went to McDonalds she became addicted to food and just could not stop eating crap she weighs 50 stone now and looks like she is connected to a tyre inflation device hahahahah .......  And when she finally lets the gas out its stench is so bad its makes you want to vomit. She introduced me to her friend and asked for a 3 some hahahahah Man I was in trubble so I bought them 500 pizzas two cows 5 sheep and a tone of ice cream and they soon lost interest in me hahahahhahahaah ... Some other friends I had when I young all turned into drug addicts and alcoholics and some others became mean greed and evil bank managers. In china on every bank holiday they cut the heads of prisoners in a very large hall all at the same time than medics rush into the hall and collect all there fresh body parts. ISS Muslim terrorists line up Christian woman and children in the hundreds and burry them alive after they force them to watch there loved ones being beheaded and there bodies feed to pigs. Every day on average 100 children are raped and murdered by sick perverted men and some woman.

LOL, everything that you say to me is very very crap! But at the same time, your gibberish has a goal? It seems like you want to find peace in the world? I agree with you if you do!

BUT if you claim to know the “solution” to life, you have to understand STOP saying shyt like you bought them 500 pizzas? Because that right there show that you are looney in the brain! You could bouy those pizzas but that is STUPID! And ILLOGICAL!

Quote
Did you know that 9 out of every 10 people is psychotic 4 of them are possessed by demonic evil spirits and on average 3  million people  have been murdered by an act of war over the pass 5000 years ! And right now a deadly virus that was frozen 25 million years ago is now killing hundreds of whales each month and its mutated into a super virus and is now on land.

Yessss, I know but lets organize things. Yawn!!!

How can we prove that 9 our of 10 people are psychotic?

How can we show who is possessed by daemons?

Yes, the murder numbers of humans due to war goes in the billions. And the kings back then use to have 40 wives not just one as it is accustomed today!

Yes! Quantum microbial particles are the fastest evolution particles in life…:|

Quote
This planet is fucked son ............... It makes me fill sick to think I am part of all the above and every time I try to change this world I am meet with insult abuse envy hate fear madness greed evil stupidity arrogance manipulation lies disseat jealousy and they are all a bunch of pathetic lazy self thinkers rats pigs with stomachs that can never be filled ....You want to save this world get rid of humanity ASAP ! AND I THINK YOU WOULD BE VERY GOOD AT THAT PART HAHAHAHAH ...

THIS IS YOUR CHANCE TO SHOW THE WORLD YOUR GENIUS MIND! Lets see it? If you can't show it, you are probably just a looney! Lol

SOLUTIONS!!!! After facts/proximity theories!

Quote
You have no idea what hard work commitment and unity could bring if the selfish minds of humans were to finally understand why they are here .... If you do not love the Christ you love the devil and its as simple as that ! Very soon something very big is going to happen so big I may be the only one who will be left to observe heaven land on this hell hole and that I promise you will happen .......

And all you want to do is fix a fridge TV oven lawn mower ? wtf is wrong with you son ? lol

Blah blah blah blah blah...yawn! Show facts to make a change? WE are all seconds dead every time the clock tics...I am 4 seconds dead right now…..we are all dying and multiplying! Lets say you are running for president in this forum? How will you go about getting these people's votes? Instead of being a little bitch about it and crying, LETS SEE YOUR FINDINGS!? I have found MANY ways to repair every day stuff easy! For example, how to prevent obesity! Or understand the difference between ADHD/ADD and being a regular little child. THESE STUPID AS HUMANS ARE VERY STUPID! Since you don't seem to be in the corrupt side of thinking, then SHOW RESULTS!!!?

Show how to stop the killing of animals?

Show how to stop the extinction of animals?

Show how money will be in 30 years? Plus show why it even exists?

All of those deaths you mention happened due to evolutionary sexual corruption and money!!! It is easy to fix...IT ONLY TAKE CHANGING THE MENTALITY OF THE PEOPLE!

How do you change their mentality? ...with your #9?

Either you are a crazy guy or you have answers...which one is it? Are you a ?

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4719 on: December 08, 2015, 10:38:41 AM »
We have much to discuss, you and I, Mr. Wheeler. I've found countless conceptual errors in your book that need to be rectified if you wish your hobby theory to be widely adopted.

Longitudinal dielectricity is another matter. Which is why it is SUPERLUMINAL

Superposition and phase modification via wave interference isn't anything new, nor does it violate Einstein's SR nor causality:

http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/publications/PIE_withayachumnankul2010.pdf
Quote
Garrett and McCumber [18] were the first to analytically estimate that a Gaussian pulse can travel in a linear anomalous dispersive medium at a group velocity (the velocity of the Gaussian’s envelope) greater than c or even be negative, i.e., the transmitted peak exits the medium before the incident peak enters it. The pulse shape remains Gaussian with no distortion under the constraint that the pulse’s spectral width resides within an anomalously
dispersive region and the propagation length is sufficiently short.

In general, the superluminality being considered does not violate causality or Einstein’s special relativity. This is supported by the facts as follows: 1) the information constituting an emerging pulse is from the leading edge of an incident pulse, and the peaks of incident and emerging pulses are not causally related; 2) the energy of the emerging pulse, in the case of passive media, never exceeds the energy of the pulse at the same instant traveling in vacuum; and 3) as shown by Sommerfeld and Brillouin, the wave propagation speed is always limited to the precursor velocity or Sommerfeld’s front velocity, which never exceeds the speed of light in vacuum. In fact, the mechanism behind superluminal propagation is connected with phase modification and superposition [19]. While propagating in an anomalously dispersive medium, the pulse experiences attenuation particularly at its tail, but its shape is still intact. This results in the pulse’s peak apparently shifting forward in time and seemingly traveling faster than c. Even though the pulse suffers attenuation, calculations show that the concept of group velocity does not lose its meaning.

This can occur in dispersive media such as a plasma... without all the wave interference and superposition histrionics:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html
Quote
A plasma is very similar to a gaseous medium, except that the electrons are free: i.e., there is no restoring force due to nearby atomic nuclei. Hence, we can obtain an expression for the dielectric constant of a plasma from Eq. (1149).

We can immediately see that formula (1150) is problematic. For frequencies above the plasma frequency, the dielectric constant of a plasma is less than unity. Hence, the refractive index is also less than unity. This would seem to imply that high frequency electromagnetic waves can propagate through a plasma with a velocity which is greater than the velocity of light in a vacuum. Does this violate the principles of relativity? On the other hand, for frequencies below the plasma frequency, the dielectric constant is negative, which would seem to imply that the refractive index is imaginary.

It follows from Eq. (1150) that in a plasma, the above type of expression, which effectively determines the wave frequency as a function of the wave-number for the medium in question, is called a dispersion relation (since, amongst other things, it determines how fast wave-pulses disperse in the medium). According to the above dispersion relation, the phase velocity of high frequency waves propagating through a plasma is indeed greater than c. However, the theory of relativity does not forbid this. What the theory of relativity says is that information cannot travel at a velocity greater than c. And the peaks and troughs of an infinite plane-wave, such as (1152), do not carry any information.

You'll note that the ability of high frequency electromagnetic waves (of which the QVZPE field is comprised, right up to the Planck frequency) being able to travel faster than c if they're above the plasma frequency is likely the reason the QVZPE field radiation pressure (which is increasing as additional mass in the universe is converted into energy by stars, then entropies and becomes part of the QVZPE field, and thus that increasing field radiation pressure must either cause universal expansion, or result in concretization of matter from the QVZPE field to relieve that QVZPE field radiation pressure) is causing the universe to expand at faster than the speed of light.

Faraday, JJ Thomson and Maxwell were looking at the speed of light in dielectrics such as glass, had postulated that the speed of light in a dielectric such as glass and the speed of electricity in a wire were the same, postulated that "We can scarcely avoid the conclusion that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium which is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.", further postulated that light was a disturbance wave in the aether, and therefore that the aether was a dielectric... which we now know to be false. The QVZPE field is paramagnetic in nature when considered in simplex (note the correct geometric topological usage, as opposed to Wheeler's attempt to redefine it to mean something akin to "simple for me to understand but not for you because you're too simple")... a plasma, a magnetohydrodynamic fluid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_electromagnetic_theory
Quote
Maxwell extended this view of displacement currents in dielectrics to the ether of free space.

Oliver Heaviside was a self-taught scholar who reformulated Maxwell's field equations in terms of electric and magnetic forces and energy flux, and independently co-formulated vector analysis. His series of articles continued the work entitled "Electromagnetic Induction and its Propagation", commenced in The Electrician in 1885 to nearly 1887 (ed., the latter part of the work dealing with the propagation of electromagnetic waves along wires through the dielectric surrounding them)...

Magnets are not dielectric, nor does the Bloch Wall throw off "inertial dielectricity" (given that you've redefined inertia to mean "the opposite of rest" per your book, and you've redefined "dielectricity" to mean "static electricity"). If it did, then it would be a simple matter to capture this "static electricity in motion" and put it to good use powering electrical equipment. No, magnets are ferromagnetic (a scientifically descriptive term encompassing an explanation, if you care to actually research it).

The Bloch Wall is merely where the two predominant magnetic domain directions in a magnet meet and cancel. It does not "power the magnet". The magnetic domains in the Bloch Wall region are "canted" from these two predominant magnetic domain directions, thus emitting / absorbing Larmor radiation mediated via virtual photons, the same as what is happening at the pole faces, but with no net magnetic moment, which is why the Bloch Wall region doesn't attract unmagnetized ferromagnetic material... just as unmagnetized iron doesn't attract unmagnetized ferromagnetic material, so too the same with the Bloch Wall region... the magnetic domains are essentially randomized in that region, thus giving no coherent magnetic moment, and thus considered to be "unmagnetized".

The reason one can cut a magnet and see the Bloch Wall "move" is because our relatively weak magnetic material cannot withstand the internal magnetic stresses, thus some of the magnetic domains unpin and flip to minimize the internal energy of the magnet. It does not do this "faster than the speed of light" as you contend... one of the people whom you keep touting as supportive of your theories also happens to be the one who mathematically derived the speed at which magnetism propagates (called the magnetic diffusion rate)... Maxwell himself. And it's not faster than the speed of light... it's dependent upon the resistivity of the material the magnetic flux is traveling through. In a perfect vacuum (no matter, no QVZPE field), the magnetic diffusion rate would be equal to the speed of light in that perfect vacuum. In a normal vacuum (no matter, but with the QVZPE field), it would again be equal to the speed of light in that normal vacuum. In any other material, it depends upon that material's resistivity. So on this contention of yours, you're just wrong. You're stating that the Bloch Wall can move faster than the magnetism that forces the Bloch Wall to the midline of the magnet in the first place. Which, by extension, destroys the majority of your theory.

Cutting a magnet causes some of the magnetic domains to unpin and flip to again minimize the internal energy of the magnet, which moves the Bloch Wall, at the magnetic diffusion rate for that magnetic material.

The relative weakness of our magnetic materials is also why there are opposing magnetic domains interspersed throughout the magnet.... which is why one can cut a magnet and still have the two poles in each piece. In effect, we have two opposing magnets within each magnet, which accounts for the two vortexes on each pole face. The centripetal of one face and the centrifugal of the opposing face constitutes one such of these "internal magnets", and the centripetal of the other face and its opposing centrifugal constitutes the other.

As for attraction and repulsion? It has to do with the virtual photon flux stressing the QVZPE field and thus space-time (expanding or contracting it). The centrifugal interface on either pole face increases QVZPE field density, expanding space-time and creating a "hill" which tends to push objects apart. The centripetal decreases QVZPE field density, contracting space-time and creating a "valley" which tends to pull objects together. Along with this, stored energy in that magnetic field always seeks its lowest energy state, just as the magnet does internally, which accounts for opposite poles attracting and like poles repelling. Thus, like-pole to like-pole increases QVZPE field density, expanding space-time and creating a "hill" which tends to push two magnets apart, whereas opposite-pole to opposite-pole decreases QVZPE field density, contracting space-time and creating a "valley" which tends to pull two magnets together.

Empirical evidence for the above is the various replications of the Bushman magnet drop experiment, showing differing fall times for differently configured magnetic arrays. When space-time is expanded, time slows down, slowing the fall speed... when space-time is contracted, time speeds up, increasing the fall speed as compared to an unmagnetized control object of same size and weight. It's also been found that the same effect can be found in a Casimir cavity, and within magnets themselves... but we'll cover time imparity in magnets allowing a simultaneous (from our frame of reference) energy deficit and overabundance in the magnet (the underlying reason why a magnet is a magnet) at a later date. You have much ground to cover in learning the basics before we dive into such heady material as time imparity, folded strange attractors, the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, the Poincare-Bendixson theorem, perfect magnets, Attractive and Repulsive interfaces, etc.

The electrons in a magnet are not "static electricity" (which you've redefined to "dielectricity"), they are bound point charges. A magnet works because electrons in orbit about their nucleus emit Larmor radiation in the form of virtual photons (a component of the QVZPE field) in trying to reach their 1s orbit, and once at their 1s orbit, the amount of Larmor radiation they emit is exactly balanced by the amount of energy they receive from in-phase QVZPE field modes, as Boyer proved way back in 1975, and which has been reiterated by the likes of Puthoff, Ibison, Haisch, Moddel, etc. It is that Larmor radiation that we perceive as a magnetic flux external to the magnet.

In addition, because electrons reject QVZPE field modes longer than the Compton radius (as all matter rejects QVZPE field modes longer than their radius... remember, the electron is/has mass, it has a rest mass of 9.11e−31 kilograms, or 0.5106 MeV), the electrons residing in a magnet all rejecting out-of-phase QVZPE field modes in the bulk of the magnet thus acts analogous to a Casimir cavity, with the end result being that it damps electron precession (ie: makes the electron orbit less chaotic), allowing that Larmor radiation emitted to be more coherent. Please note the proper usage of the word "precession", not your incorrect redefinition per your book to mean "rotation".

Are you not aware of the underlying reason for the quantum states of electron orbit, and thus quantum mechanics itself? It's not really confusing... electron orbit must have an integer number of De Broglie waves in its orbit in order to not set up an unstable destructive interference of the orbit. Thus, when an electron receives enough energy from the QVZPE field (the only place it can receive energy) to add at least one additional full De Broglie wave to its orbit, it does so, jumping outward in orbit. This is also the reason the higher orbits are successively closer together... adding one section of 1 foot long to a 1 foot diameter circle increases its diameter proportionally more than adding that same 1 foot section to a 5 foot diameter circle. for a quick analogy.

What keeps the electronegative electron from "crashing into" the electropositive proton of the nucleus (or put another way, what keeps the electron from going below its 1s orbit)? It's the in-phase QVZPE received by the electron. The QVZPE field underpins the stability of all matter.

Now, before you start chest-beating and claiming that electrons don't exist... there are now two research facilities that have photographed them... one was able to capture both the wave and particle nature of the electron in the same photograph. Of course, the "wave" part of the electron is merely due to it being so small and light that it's constantly interfered with by QVZPE field modes impinging upon it... so when we see the electron as a "wave", what we're really seeing is the anisotropy of the QVZPE field itself... remember what I'd said above about electrons rejecting out-of-phase QVZPE field modes (analogous to a Casimir cavity, except the electrons are acting as their own Casimir cavity by dint of their being crammed together into the magnetic material and orbiting in approximately the same directions), thus damping electron precession which contributes to magnetic flux coherency at the pole face. Performing the double-slit experiment by firing electrons through a well-shielded Casimir cavity to damp the interfering QVZPE field wave modes should provide insight into this phenomenon and finally settle the wave-particle duality issue.

Now, before you start foot-stomping, haranguing, spitting profanities and making desperate logical fallacy appeals to authority by dint of your multilingual capabilities, your ability to translate languages, your patents, your 20 years of studying magnets, your having filled page after page with fallacious reasoning and calling it a book, etc., all of which have failed countless times in the past, I'll cut to the chase for you, and define a field:

You say in your book "Magnets do not generate attraction and repulsion by throwing particle showers collectively called ‘field’ at each other as proposed by QM.".

Ok, so you're reifying an abstract construct (what the QM crowd call "particles" since they don't have any other word for it) that's used to explain the mathematically descriptive noun (and abstract construct) called "field"... a "field" merely being an abstract construct to mathematically quantify force over distance and time, and measure, predict and extrapolate or interpolate how that force over distance and time will react (or has reacted, or is reacting) at any given time for any given set of inputs)... but then, we're now able to observe magnetricity:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17983-magnetricity-observed-for-first-time.html
"Individual magnetic 'charges' - equivalent to the north and south poles of a magnet - have been observed inside a crystalline material called spin ice"

That's the Larmor radiation virtual photon flux they photographed above, Ken... so we've got pictures now of electrons and virtual photons, in addition to Chalmers University concretizing virtual photons directly from the QVZPE field in 2011 using Dynamical Casimir Effect... powerful corroborations of QM, to be sure.

So it would appear that magnets do indeed throw "particles" (the abstract construct, not a literal denotation of a physical object), which create the abstractly described "field" (which is a mathematically quantifiable descriptive noun that allows us to quantify forces over distance and time and predict and extrapolate or interpolate how those forces react) to generate "attraction and repulsion" (another abstract construct to quantify the effects of that force over distance and time).

So rather than accept that we're merely using words as abstracts to describe what we're seeing, you've turned all of physics on its head and now say all fields are non-spatial and non-localized phenomenological modulations of the "aether"... but you forget that a field, in being a descriptive and mathematically quantifiable abstract construct used to quantify, predict and extrapolate or interpolate the force we're measuring over time and space, must have points of measurement... a gradient that we record... ie: it must be localized and spatialized in order to quantify it. You say a "field" has no points, and "whose locus is simultaneously everywhere and nowhere"!

I guess I'll just point my little 500 gauss bar magnet at planet KOI 1843.03, wait for it to be attracted to Earth, then sell the whole planet for its 70% iron content... because that little bar magnet's field is non-spatial and non-localized... it goes on forever in the aether.

I also guess you've never held a gaussmeter one inch from a magnet, then two inches from it, then three inches from it to measure its field strength at various distances... that'd be localizing and spatializing the field strength of that magnet into a set of points known as a "field".

Funny thing about "fields"... being the descriptive and mathematically quantifiable abstract constructs that they are, used to quantify, predict and extrapolate or interpolate the force being observed... that set of points called a "field" that describes that force can subsequently be used on identical objects without having to bother to measure each identical object (that's kind of the point of creating these abstract constructs called "fields", after all... it allows us to take a set of measurements of one object emanating a force, and apply it to identical objects, or extrapolate / interpolate those measurements to take into account non-identical objects using mathematical algorithms that are derived empirically). And that's all a "field" is, at least to those who don't confuse the force being observed with the field describing that force.

Plenty more to go yet, Ken. Don't go running away now... despite the proofs I'll be presenting that your theory does not and cannot represent reality causing you psychological torment and, I'm sure, more than a little cognitive dissonance,  especially considering your 20 wasted years of study and your long hours spent filling page after page with what amounts to incoherent babbling, you need to reconcile yourself to reality.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4720 on: December 09, 2015, 12:19:57 AM »
the HUGE equation for that is in CP Steinmetz's work, and believe it or NOT,  nobody has EVER performed the experiment to test it.

Except those hundreds of papers on the subject in arxiv. Or didn't you know that magnetics plays a huge role in, for instance, computers... and knowing how fast magnetism propagates, how fast magnetic domain walls propagate and how to stop domain unpinning is essential to improving, for instance, hard drive performance?

Actually, Maxwell mathematically derived the speed at which magnetism propagates, called the magnetic diffusion rate. And it's not faster than the speed of light, as you claim via claiming that cutting a magnet will recenter the Bloch Wall (which you've redefined to "inertial dielectric plane" (further redefining "inertia" to be "the opposite of rest" and "dielectric" to mean "static electricity") at faster than the speed of light.

The magnetic diffusion rate depends upon the resistivity of the material the magnetic flux is traveling through, and under no circumstances does it exceed c. Your red-faced embarrassment over your bragging about a deep knowledge of Maxwell and further enlisting him as supportive of your theories, without your having known this elementary fact about magnets, must eat at you... and we'll know it does by your footstomping ad hominem-filled textwall reply of little substance, referring back to your own fallacious conclusions as though you were in your own little echo chamber, rather than providing mathematical proofs of such veracity they could be accepted for publication... because we all know you don't have that.

There is a long standing "what the fuck??"   about that fact among some folks.

There is a space-time paradox in measuring magnetic field , as  Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko writes about in EXHAUSTIVE LONG LONG DETAILS WITH NEW EQUATIONS.

Your misuse of the word "paradox" is noted. It's not a paradox, the phenomenon is completely expected under QM... perhaps to those who follow your one-particle rip-off bastardization of Circlon Theory (which can be proven by comparing the text in your book comparing a nuclear explosion to the unwinding of clock springs to the identical text of Circlon Theory... to wit):

Your book: The uranium, plutonium, or tritium are still within the mushroom cloud.
Circlon Theory: All of the protons, electrons, and neutrons making up the uranium, plutonium, or tritium are still within the mushroom cloud.

along with your hodgepodge of other patchwork theories pasted together with flopsweat and bombastic spittle-flecks, it's a paradox because you're hobby theory isn't fully-fleshed enough to suss the true temporal nature of magnets.

But your book denies warped space (and hence, given that space and time are conjugate in 4D Minkowski space, time variability), thus according to the book you wrote, there can be no "space-time 'paradox'". Did Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko just destroy yet another section of your theory? Why yes, yes he did, and by your own admission, no less.

Why, you've demonstrated right here on this forum that you lack the fundamental understanding as to why there is space-time variability at the Attractive and Repulsive interfaces of a magnet (indeed, you failed to even acknowledge that there are Attractive and Repulsive interfaces, despite the evidence staring you right in the face). Your book goes further into your fallacious reasoning by describing a sort of "helical gear" magnetic attraction and repulsion model, which is a nice analogy that allows beginners to conceptualize it, but doesn't actually accurately describe or explain what is happening and why. To do that, you'd have to fall back on the descriptions and explanations that QM have already put forth, which they mathematically modeled and predicted years ago, and now are able to actually empirically observe.

The reason for that, is that magnetism is a Poincare' disk extrapolation of a charge in discharge with a resultant spatial vector but no point of temporal CAUSATIVE measurement.

Your word salad analogy stands in direct contrast to reality, Mr. Wheeler. You're yet again restating in different words that magnetism can travel faster than the speed of light because there is no temporal causitive measurement to that spatial vector... see above as regards the refutation by Maxwell.

Remember, Mr. Wheeler, before you start foot-stomping and ticking off your "accomplishments" to try to establish yourself as more of an expert than I via the logical fallacy of appealing to authority (while trying desperately to establish yourself as that very authority), that you're not contesting what I say, so my qualifications and background matter little... you're contesting reality. And in so contesting reality, the burden of proof is upon you... and while you've provided videos showing interesting observations (most of which were found by others long before you, several of which you've subsequently claimed as your own... the Michael Snyder hyoptrochoidal discovery being one such example years before you claimed it as your own; the quadrapolar (and quadravortexual) nature of magnets as discovered by Howard Johnson literally decades before you claimed the discovery as your own, as another example; the discovery by Louis Pasteur in 1872, and Krylov and Tarakonova in 1960 reporting on the effects of magnetic fields on plants (they called this effect magnetotropism), and the patent by Albert R. Davis in 1977 for a magnetizer for seeds being a particularly egregious example of your claiming credit for something long known about), you've not provided any framework (mathematical or otherwise) upon which those observations can be hung, unlike QM, which has, in spades.

What was it Dr. Jennings said about "intellectual vampires of discovery and invention"?

I don't have to convince you of anything, however, I must merely refute you. In this case, I used those you tout as supportive of your theory (including yourself, if you didn't notice) to refute you. There are about a thousand other refutations of your fallacious theory in the offing.

I will note I don't dispute your observations, I dispute the false conclusions you've been deriving from those observations.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2015, 05:54:20 AM by CycleGuy »

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4721 on: December 09, 2015, 02:35:23 AM »
Here is an example of Kenny's brilliance:

 
Quote
Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES
 the spatial magnetic reciprocation is responsible for the 2 -2.5 (average) degree diff. in the heat.
 Radiation, discharge, heat. Same as your stove top, discharge the charge.
 However nobody is going to COOK anything with 2 or 3 degrees of heat.
 Any circulatory radiative discharge necessitates HEAT, including the very iron in the magnet and its other constituents
 

What Kenny is saying above that a bloody magnet just sitting there is a source of thermal power. (That's what "generating heat" means Bozo.)

That's it, Kenny has found the source of free energy that we have all been looking for - NOT.

 
Quote
However nobody is going to COOK anything with 2 or 3 degrees of heat.
 

Are you sure about that?

We just have to connect copper pipes conducting water between a long chain of successive magnets.  Water will flow through the pipes and pick up the heat generated by each magnet.  Each magnet in the chain will be thermally isolated from every other magnet.  Therefore each magnet in the chain will operate at a slightly elevated temperature compared to the previous magnet in the chain.  There will always be a small delta-t between the water in the copper pipes and each magnet in the chain such that the water is always picking up some heat from each magnet.  The Curie temperature for a neo magnet is way above the boiling point of water so with a long enough chain of magnets you will be able to produce super heated steam at the end of the chain.  World saved!

Or perhaps hapless magnet rag doll clown Kenny was totally ignorant and had no clue that saying, "Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES" actually implied that a magnet just sitting there minding it's own business was producing thermal power from nowhere.  Perhaps Kenny measured a different temperature of the magnet relative to the surroundings and mistakenly assumed that the hotter magnet automatically implied that it was producing thermal power.  (Sounds like some Google searching might fix that.)

Another hapless Roseanne Roseannadanna moment for poor Kenny the Rag Doll Clown stuck on that fridge door.

The truth about Kenny is plain for all to see.

My goodness sake, has Mr. Wheeler discovered frustrated magnets?!

http://www.cmth.bnl.gov/workshop/FrustratedMagnetism04/Talks/AChernyshev/poster_1D_heat.pdf

No, no... that just pertains to anomalous heat transport through a magnet, not heat generation... and is completely explainable using QM.

What Mr. Wheeler has discovered is brow-beaded frustration in being utterly unable to properly experiment and isolate variables, as well as explain what he observes, which leads to hilarious examples of fallacious reasoning... several of which have culminated in a book. Him being a photographer, you'd think his experience in the visible with cameras would have given him a clue in the infrared with FLIR, but no... no.

Oh, and he was so close, too. Unfortunately for Mr. Wheeler, his denial of the underlying precepts of QM precludes him finding that "free energy" solution which his video above purports to have found. And the solution is so simple... why, it's been staring him in the face the whole time he's been denying it.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2015, 04:45:58 AM by CycleGuy »

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4722 on: December 09, 2015, 03:05:41 AM »
I NEVER talk about free energy ASSHOLE,    nor is a 2.5 to 3 degree shift  free energy to harvest.

Strawman fallacy boy

Find one spot where I associate anything with free energy son.    You cannot. Pathetic.


Nice try though son.  Idiot.    ;D ;D ;D


You're as useless as bull tits and the Popes balls.  ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0CB9GVjLH8
NEVER SEEN before: Power output & *NO INPUT*. Using HUGE Neodymium & Halbach Array

"Why would anybody be so interested in an LED being lit? Because there's no power input!"

Another example of Mr. Wheeler's inability to properly experiment and isolate variables... why, I'd bet if he just sat the device there in whatever position he deems to be "correct" without jiggling it, that LED would go out. Anyone notice that when it's perfectly still, the light goes out?

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4723 on: December 09, 2015, 03:19:34 AM »
Particles ULTIMATELY do not exist, they're 'stable' dielectric formations

Dielectricity in galactic and intense power stellar formations congregates into fundamental particle creation.

There is only ONE fundamental particle, which you call the neutron,  all "free neutrons" spin up and become protons within , what is it,  17 mins in "free space".   then...... i.e.  Hydrogen.

beta decay, inverse beta decay

protons can become neutrons , and vice versa.


protons are magnetically dominant,   neutrons are dielectrically dominant.

Are you referring to electron capture decay when referring to the ambiguous term "inverse beta decay"? Or were you not aware that a beta particle is a high-energy electron?

I've done an analysis of all the elements in the Periodic Table, correlating their proton:neutron ratio to their Molar Magnetic Susceptibility and magnetic properties, and there is no correlation... odd then, that an element's magnetic properties can be predicted merely by knowing how its valence shells are filled, eh?

Particle radiation (He nucleus) is not up for debate, obviously.   WHAT the particles themselves ARE ultimately .......IS

matter is created in galactic and stellar formations.

See images of galactic jets.

thats new matter being shot out both "ends"

So wrong that wrong is the wrong word to describe how wrong you are, Mr. Wheeler. Your shallow understanding of nuclear processes leads to more of your fallacious reasoning, hence your adoption of and bastardization of Circlon Theory's "neutron as proton and electron 'egg'" theory, sans the electron.

From your book, the same as you've said above:
Quote
"There is only one particle in the universe, the mass-particle, with two modal attributes of existence. QM explanation of neutron to proton conversion is a pathetic farce, is nonsensical in the extreme. There is “beta decay”, there are no electrons. The universe is divinely simple in its makeup."

Never mind that beta decay wouldn't take place if electrons didn't exist, as, for example, free neutron beta decay doesn't just result in a proton, it also results in an electron (beta particle), and electron anti-neutrino, and in rare cases a gamma ray.

So your saying "There is 'beta decay'", then turning around and saying "there are no electrons" (in the same sentence, no less) is nonsensical, given than a beta particle is a high energy electron. Unless you're talking about the other beta particle, the positron, which wouldn't make it beta decay according to the literal definition.

Of course, your also saying there are no photons rules out gamma radiation. So Fukushima and Chernobyl are now rendered safe.  ::)

Given that gamma rays are merely hard x-rays (the main distinction between gamma and x-ray being its source (which is unknown sometimes), secondarily its energy, but the ranges overlap), that leaves out most of the radiation in outer space, and ruling out photons means no x-ray machines, no microwave ovens, no photovoltaics, etc... but I'm betting you didn't realize that the names "gamma ray", "x-ray", "microwaves" and "photon" are merely abstracts used as descriptive terms to describe various frequency ranges and energy levels of radiation, just as "beta particle" is an abstract to denote a "high-energy electron", which is an abstract to describe a certain type of electrical charge.

You appear to be utterly unable to reconcile yourself to the fact that words are shorthand abstracts used to describe sometimes complicated objects or concepts, so you redefine everything and use complicated long-hand descriptions.

And apparently this "mass-particle" can change its mass from 1.672621777e−27 kg (rest mass of a proton) to 1.674927351e−27 kg (mass of a neutron) and back magically and without any explanation from you, Mr. Wheeler. So things don't actually weigh what they weigh because they can magically change weight, apparently as these "mass-particles" are spontaneously and without external input switching between "proton-form" and "neutron-form".  ???

Likewise, this "mass-particle" can change its size, from 10e−14 meters to 10e−10 meters (that's a change in size of about 10,000 times, BTW) and back, for some strange reason. So if you go outside to your "four-wheeled means of locomotion utilizing internal combustion reciprocally con axially mediated to the wheels in a circularly rotating modality causing spatial distention internally and externally therewith" (Wheeler's likely definition, what we would call a car) and find it at 1:10,000 scale, at least you'll know why. :D

I'd love to see your explanation for the para- and ortho- forms of hydrogen based upon your "mass-particle" concept, especially as regards their burn rate and energy content.

Also... your take on astrophysical jets creating new matter at the origin of the jets is incorrect. The existing matter is being sucked in at the accretion disc, some of it has enough velocity to escape and because that matter has accumulated on the accretion disc and is spiraling, it's expelled in a vortex on either side perpendicular to the accretion disc. It's simply geometry, so one would think you would understand it, having studied geometry as you claim to have done, but apparently you don't understand it at all.

It takes the energetic conditions of a star to transmute elements higher up the Period Table than iron into heavier elements, and the extraordinarily energetic conditions of an exploding supernova to transmute iron into heavier elements (iron being the most atomically stable element, which is why fusion works with lighter elements, and fission works with heavier elements, but the closer you get to iron from either end, the less energy you can get out of the reactions), do you honestly think matter is being created in less energetic conditions?

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #4724 on: December 09, 2015, 05:35:38 AM »
Quote
Well looking at that pic I'd say that adds to your theory.
 Those that have actually read Einstein's theory of relativity
 

Except Einstein blames everything on the flies (SPACE) buzzing around the horse poop (spatial / mass/ magnitude) ,......and he leaves out the HORSE (dielectricity/ Ether) .

He committed the Platonic sin of inverse fallacy of reification.

Other than that, agreed.   ;D

So you agree that a geometric atmospheric flow phenomenon that was replicated in the lab sans magnetism somehow substantiates your magnetic theory, Mr. Wheeler? Are you entirely certain of that? Or are you committing the Platonic sin and fallacy of reification?

http://www.space.com/30608-mysterious-saturn-hexagon-explained.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn%27s_hexagon
Quote
Explanation[edit]
One hypothesis, developed at Oxford University, is that the hexagon forms where there is a steep latitudinal gradient in the speed of the atmospheric winds in Saturn's atmosphere.[14] Similar regular shapes were created in the laboratory when a circular tank of liquid was rotated at different speeds at its centre and periphery. The most common shape was six sided, but shapes from three to eight sided were also produced. The shapes form in an area of turbulent flow between the two different rotating fluid bodies with dissimilar speeds.[14][15] A number of stable vortices of similar size form on the slower (south) side of the fluid boundary and these interact with each other to space themselves out evenly around the perimeter. The presence of the vortices influences the boundary to move northward where each is present and this gives rise to the polygon effect.[15]