In a battery, the dielectric momentum, or electrical intertia is extended outwards in both directions from the center and discharges to the "center"
In a DC generator, the polarization is in place as long as the DC generator is in momentum.

Non transverse electrical inertia.  Direct Current is a TIME SCALAR, no variation in time.
Direct current machines only have two poles, plus and minus;
Direct Current, a time invariant condition

correct, and it behaves equivalent to(congruently with) as another magneto static (charged magnet)
but the coil with time invieant change in voltage/dielectric supply of the power source has a definite duration of the differential available in the battery...
a solid magnet has a time differential... of as long as ? (not particles?)

correct, and it behaves equivalent to(congruently with) as another magneto static (charged magnet)

Saying "magneto-static" is like saying  Hot Ice, or  pretty dead girl.      Magnetism = polarization = reciprocation = the total opposite of STATIC

but the coil with time invieant change in voltage/dielectric supply of the power source has a definite duration of the differential available in the battery...
a solid magnet has a time differential... of as long as ? (not particles?)

Time invariance is typical of most ALL longitudinal propagation.

Don't give me this crap about "producing."  That's just a desperate attempt to change the subject and shift the topic away from the fact that you can't answer a basic question about magnetism.

Furthermore, who says that I have to do "research into magnetism" (i.e.; "producing") to raise this issue with you?  You?  That is a totally false argument.  You talk all about debating principles and tactics and then shoot yourself in the foot by stooping so low in your responses by playing silly games like this.

You barely know your ass from your elbow when it comes to magnetism, period.  The fact that I don't play with magnets like you do has absolutely nothing to do with the hard fact you barely know what you are talking about.  The vast majority of what you say is just your own fantasy nonsense with no basis in reality.  You didn't have the slightest clue what magnetic field viewing film was doing before I explained it to you.  Yet you still describe what the film shows using your nonsensical false terminology.

This whole thing is just a Kenny the Magnetic Clown Show and nothing more than that.  When people want to debate something with you where you clearly are lost and haven't a clue what to say you play silly, pretentious, infantile and false "debating games" that anyone with an IQ over 55 could easily detect.

You should at least have the guts to say, "I don't know how the neons light up" because that's what everybody knows already.

You are stuck to the fridge door like a hapless magnetic clown rag doll and frankly you deserve it.  A clown like you needs to be put in his place because you are spouting nonsense.  People that want to open their eyes now know the truth.

Here is an example of Kenny's brilliance:

Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES
the spatial magnetic reciprocation is responsible for the 2 -2.5 (average) degree diff. in the heat.
Radiation, discharge, heat. Same as your stove top, discharge the charge.
However nobody is going to COOK anything with 2 or 3 degrees of heat.
Any circulatory radiative discharge necessitates HEAT, including the very iron in the magnet and its other constituents

What Kenny is saying above that a bloody magnet just sitting there is a source of thermal power. (That's what "generating heat" means Bozo.)

That's it, Kenny has found the source of free energy that we have all been looking for - NOT.

However nobody is going to COOK anything with 2 or 3 degrees of heat.

Are you sure about that?

We just have to connect copper pipes conducting water between a long chain of successive magnets.  Water will flow through the pipes and pick up the heat generated by each magnet.  Each magnet in the chain will be thermally isolated from every other magnet.  Therefore each magnet in the chain will operate at a slightly elevated temperature compared to the previous magnet in the chain.  There will always be a small delta-t between the water in the copper pipes and each magnet in the chain such that the water is always picking up some heat from each magnet.  The Curie temperature for a neo magnet is way above the boiling point of water so with a long enough chain of magnets you will be able to produce super heated steam at the end of the chain.  World saved!

Or perhaps hapless magnet rag doll clown Kenny was totally ignorant and had no clue that saying, "Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES" actually implied that a magnet just sitting there minding it's own business was producing thermal power from nowhere.  Perhaps Kenny measured a different temperature of the magnet relative to the surroundings and mistakenly assumed that the hotter magnet automatically implied that it was producing thermal power.  (Sounds like some Google searching might fix that.)

Another hapless Roseanne Roseannadanna moment for poor Kenny the Rag Doll Clown stuck on that fridge door.

The truth about Kenny is plain for all to see.

I NEVER talk about free energy ASSHOLE,    nor is a 2.5 to 3 degree shift  free energy to harvest.

Strawman fallacy boy

Find one spot where I associate anything with free energy son.    You cannot. Pathetic.

Nice try though son.  Idiot.   

You're as useless as bull tits and the Popes balls. 

You cannot.

Yes I can!

Here is what you said:  "Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES"

What Kenny is saying above that a bloody magnet just sitting there is a source of thermal power. (That's what "generating heat" means Bozo.)

Whoops!  You ignored my post #1579.  I wonder why that is?

I am done Kenny.  I just wanted to "spike" your nonsensical thread one more time to give it some flavour and a dose of reality.

Any person of sound mind reading through large sections of this thread is bound to stumble across a debate between you and Picowatt or a debate between you and me.  If they had any doubts that you were a Crazy Magnet Rag Doll Clown then all doubts will have been removed if they encounter one of these debates.

You can go back to your "discoveries" and inertial plains and all that crapola now.  There is no way I would invest a lot of time in this thread but it's fun to do a reality check from time to time.  It's good to get people to see both sides of a debate.  The insignificance of your crazy theories and your related mental health issues are nicely shown in this thread.

Plus you have to admit it, it's more fun to deal with a real person as opposed to a sheeple.

And you still don't have the slightest clue how the neons light!  Think flywheel!  Think outside of the box you are in!

An energized inductor is like a spinning flywheel.  Can you stop a spinning flywheel cold with your bare hands?  Can you stop it cold with big hydraulic calipers and disk brake pads?  The answer is you can't, it's impossible.

MileHigh

Here is an example of Kenny's brilliance:

What Kenny is saying above that a bloody magnet just sitting there is a source of thermal power. (That's what "generating heat" means Bozo.)

That's it, Kenny has found the source of free energy that we have all been looking for - NOT.

Are you sure about that?

We just have to connect copper pipes conducting water between a long chain of successive magnets.  Water will flow through the pipes and pick up the heat generated by each magnet.  Each magnet in the chain will be thermally isolated from every other magnet.  Therefore each magnet in the chain will operate at a slightly elevated temperature compared to the previous magnet in the chain.  There will always be a small delta-t between the water in the copper pipes and each magnet in the chain such that the water is always picking up some heat from each magnet.  The Curie temperature for a neo magnet is way above the boiling point of water so with a long enough chain of magnets you will be able to produce super heated steam at the end of the chain.  World saved!

Or perhaps hapless magnet rag doll clown Kenny was totally ignorant and had no clue that saying, "Is the untouched powerful magnet just 'sitting there' generating heat? YES" actually implied that a magnet just sitting there minding it's own business was producing thermal power from nowhere.  Perhaps Kenny measured a different temperature of the magnet relative to the surroundings and mistakenly assumed that the hotter magnet automatically implied that it was producing thermal power.  (Sounds like some Google searching might fix that.)

Another hapless Roseanne Roseannadanna moment for poor Kenny the Rag Doll Clown stuck on that fridge door.

The truth about Kenny is plain for all to see.

   I do not understand your hostility and others to what Ken said. Instead of adding theoretical arguments, I think that it would be better to come up with your own experimental evidence, reproducing his experiments and arguing in accordance. From this point of view it has a great advantage: that of the experimenter with an open mind, who is attentive to detail which current science does not give them any attention or worse it deny their existence. You know ... teoria sine praxis sicut rota sine axis!

SaDAng

SaDAng, one day you may realize that I had my debate with Kenny for the benefit of people like you. 

Oh, i see you're Jesus the martyr ?    ROFL 


Pic  below

My experimental evidence is in lab reports that I did more than 30 years ago.

Even MORE funny.

You really are one deluded POS,      but I find it funny and amusing.   I do like to laugh, honestly. 



Pic below

SaDAng, one day you may realize that I had my debate with Kenny for the benefit of people like you.  Kenny's experiments are a farce and a joke and one day you may also realize this.  My experimental evidence is in lab reports that I did more than 30 years ago.  Try asking Kenny to measure the value of an inductor with a power supply, a resistor, and a scope and he would not have the slightest clue how to do that.  That's an unacceptable situation.  It's like owning a car and not knowing that it burns gasoline and not knowing where to add the gasoline when you need it.

If you are truly interested in this subject then you have to read and study and experiment.  You must draw your information from multiple sources.  If you do that and execute properly you will sooner or later realize that Kenny is a clown.  When you talk about hostility and abuse and all that goes with it, you have to realize that the ground rules on this thread have been set by Kenny.  Look there first when you talk about hostility.

MileHigh

I understand him very well and also you and others who are deeply rooted in official magnetism. I learned form life that the so called science is science only seen from the outside, but when you go deeper into it, science is nothing but ambiguity, assumptions, constants, matches and the like. Ken is not the first to touch the subject of magnetism in a way unsupported by the current scientific dogma, that I studied over time. There were others before him, each with his version suitable to their respective time understandings. But Ken bases his theory and experiments on the existence of the ether, and that's what makes a clown for most, but for me it is not so at all! Because I know from my own experience that the ether exists, but so far from how was it thought by Einstein, Michelson, Morley and others who tried to prove or dismiss it. You know ... there is an alternative science, the one of the founders of modern science elements (or even the ancient science, terms and concepts), which founders thought totally different than we understand today the well established scientific terms and concepts. It's just a way to shape the reality! And what I think you must surely understand waht I want to say, even if you do not agree with that, if you really maintain your clain that "My experimental evidence is in lab reports that I did more than 30 years ago!".

You know, in an emptied space intentionally, it's easy to come and fill it with any laws, rules, postulates, assumptions, descriptions, dark matter, dark energy, zero point energy, quarks, bosons, and so on. Why so and not otherwise? That, again, is very simple to understand! You just have to lean on unwritten science, on what thought of its founders. On their original writings and their way to look and understand the world, the foundations on which they based their research! How many scientists of the present world have made ​​this? They do not even questioning it! As if Einstein, Lorentz, Maxwell, and others had been some holy immaculate to which even with the thought should not think! The science is just like religion! Ie dogma!

I do not want to create a sterile polemics here on this topic, but I want to see open minds to new theoretical foundations, not minds entrenched in current scientific dogma and its way to shape the reality, who do not even realize that revolve in a circle. And I know what I mean when I say that science today is the same as religion and is just a dogma and nothing more!

SaDAng