Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1228751 times)

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1035 on: August 02, 2014, 07:47:38 AM »



Yes, 99% are. 

Unless you see grandma stroking soft iron with a magnet and selling that SHIT on a back alley.





Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1036 on: August 02, 2014, 07:50:09 AM »
.

Discovered, a simple formula for determining the centrifugal field, the centripetal, and the dielectric boundary

Its a serious proof.

(in a perfect magnet as an ideal "perfect" magnet, which of course is nearly impossible)


never the less, its a teaching proof that the golden section applies to all divergent and convergent field reciprocations

Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHDsnO3y7CA


Graph:



Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1037 on: August 02, 2014, 07:59:10 AM »

Yes, 99% are. 

Unless you see grandma stroking soft iron with a magnet and selling that SHIT on a back alley.

So, you believe this comment from you to be true?

Quote
"magnets" are CREATED by discharging capacitor banks THRU THE (pre-) "POLES"...

All emphasis yours...

PW

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1038 on: August 02, 2014, 08:22:41 AM »
All emphasis yours...

PW


thats called an 'exclusion fallacy'       wont work here son.


I spoke about how to create coherent magnetization 10 pages ago, about BOTH methods.


pedal your fallacies down the road

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1039 on: August 02, 2014, 08:53:16 AM »

thats called an 'exclusion fallacy'       wont work here son.


I spoke about how to create coherent magnetization 10 pages ago, about BOTH methods.


pedal your fallacies down the road

It was a simple question requiring only a yes or no.  It is an important point I am trying to understand.

Why cannot magnetization just be the alignment of something in the pre-magnet substrate as is conventional thinking?

I.e., apply an external magnetic field to a NdFeB pre-magnet of sufficient strength to saturate the neo, domains align, remove external magnetic field, crystalline/molecular/electron properties of NdFeB causes retention of that alignment up to the Curie temp. 

Why does electricity have to enter into the mechanism involved at all?  Why cannot the process be a purely magnetic process as is currently believed?  Is there any actual proof that conventional thinking along these lines is incorrect?

PW

Offline d3x0r

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1417
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1040 on: August 02, 2014, 09:08:41 AM »
@TA
You see no diffference between the figure you drew and the one recorded on ferrofilm?






Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1041 on: August 02, 2014, 09:11:13 AM »
Kenny:

That was just another whackadoo answer to my question to you about how you make a magnet.  You completely changed the subject to the wireless transmission of energy.

Your argument about the definition of a field was to point to antiquity and claim that they got it right.  That's totally lame.  You can't define a field either.  But.... ah-ha!  When you look at how fields and volume and energy relate to each other, it all makes sense.  Haven't heard much from you about that.

Plus, even some of your supporters know that you are making a big blunder.  But they are sellouts and they won't say anything.  Don't want to disturb your stream-of-consciousness 'genius.'  Couldn't do that.

So, it would appear that you have no clue how to make a magnet.

Space is like a 3D carpet that you yank and away the wave goes traveling down the carpet like a moving disturbance.  What happens when a wave travels down a carpet Kenny?  Can you relate that to fields and space?

MileHigh

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1042 on: August 02, 2014, 09:30:22 AM »
Why cannot magnetization just be the alignment of something in the pre-magnet substrate as is conventional thinking?

I.e., apply an external magnetic field to a NdFeB pre-magnet of sufficient strength to saturate the neo, domains align, remove external magnetic field, crystalline/molecular/electron properties of NdFeB causes retention of that alignment up to the Curie temp. 


what "domains"
, thats a BS description of the inter-atomic magneto-dielectric     Same as "bloch wall"       , its just a BS term assigned to formerly unknown phenomena.


You mean the hexagonal lattice of the Neo



>>>>>>>>>Why does electricity have to enter into the mechanism involved at all?


coherency or increase in capacitance are BOTH "(di)electrical" by NATURE AND DEFINITION.

Id love you to show ANY system that ISNT dielectric, magnetic, and electric.........   any such system is atomic in its very nature, by its very nature.   Ergo your premise does NOT exist.




>>>Why cannot magnetization just be the alignment of something in the pre-magnet substrate as is conventional thinking?

Conventionally, you like most people think that "magnetism is driving a "magnet"...."    it isnt .   .........Magnetism = radiation = polarization = creation of space.



Honestly, (no offense), but why the FUCK did you think Faraday and JJ Thomson called magnetism  "the dielectric FIELD"    ???


All spatial fields are resultants of radiation, of discharge,   both connotatively and DEnotatively.



Radiation OF what BY what?   ............again  >>>>>>>>>>>      magnetism is NOT  "driving/running"  a "magnet"    PERIOD,  and double period.


You, like MOST, are blaming flies (space, polarization) on the horseshit (magnetism)............ you LEFT OUT the Horse (dielectricity)  as cause.   ;D ;D


Once again  "fallacy of attribute reification"


coherency of dielectric inertial from induction without increase in capacitance

OR increase in capacitance and having proportional (and higher gauss) macro-magnetic preponderances...


both of those are driven by dielectric interia as necessitated in ANY magnetic and dielectric conjugate system



Dont you even know the FIELD cross-section of AC transmission lines???  :o


The only damn thing giving MASS(iveness) to Matter/Mass IS magnetism.
     If you dont grasp that, you cannot grasp ANYTHING.

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1043 on: August 02, 2014, 09:35:05 AM »
You can't define a field either.


I DID define FIELD in the book

and have at LEAST a 300 page book on fields to be written as the next work....,  with an ALREADY existent 150 pages of notes in 5 MS WORD files... and an additional 210+ pages of handwritten notes on same.




Checkmate

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1044 on: August 02, 2014, 09:37:40 AM »
@TA
You see no diffference between the figure you drew and the one recorded on ferrofilm?


D3X0R........as I mention in the video, the ONLY reason there isnt 100% perfect match is because the LED spacing is not 100% proportional on MY FERROCELL (only)


Sorry, but I didnt design the LED spacing to fit the lens circumference.


I mention this several places in in the video........  however that is JUST MY FERROCELL  (not others)



Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1045 on: August 02, 2014, 10:20:47 AM »
TA,

Using various techniques to do so, "something" that follows the domain concept, i.e., magnetically aligned regions, has been imaged within and on the surface of a magnet that at least "looks" like domains as they were originally perceived.  Pre and post magnetization imaging also reveals that these "domains", or "regions" form/align following magnetization.

As for the rest of your response, possibly someone else here that understands what you are saying will be kind enough to explain it further to me so that I too will understand.

PW

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1046 on: August 02, 2014, 10:26:57 AM »
 :-X

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1047 on: August 02, 2014, 10:31:36 AM »
TA,

Using various techniques to do so, "something" that follows the domain concept, i.e., magnetically aligned regions, has been imaged within and on the surface of a magnet that at least "looks" like domains as they were originally perceived.  Pre and post magnetization imaging also reveals that these "domains", or "regions" form/align following magnetization.

As for the rest of your response, possibly someone else here that understands your response will be kind enough to explain it further to me so that I too will understand (any takers?).

PW

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1048 on: August 02, 2014, 10:38:20 AM »
Pre and post magnetization imaging also reveals that these "domains", or "regions" form/align following magnetization.


YES, Ive seen the same nano-scale images.    Nevertheless, that is still only seeing regions of coherent magnetism, and not that which is producing same which is in fact ITSELF that which was causally aligned and therefore has resultant coherent, or aligned magnetic preponderances.


still a cart before the horse fallacious scenario or CORRECT observations and INCORRECT conclusions.



Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #1049 on: August 02, 2014, 11:04:01 AM »

YES, Ive seen the same nano-scale images.    Nevertheless, that is still only seeing regions of coherent magnetism, and not that which is producing same which is in fact ITSELF that which was causally aligned and therefore has resultant coherent, or aligned magnetic preponderances.


still a cart before the horse fallacious scenario or CORRECT observations and INCORRECT conclusions.

According to convention, and as surmised long before these imaging capabilities were available, the domains are regions of similar alignment, with "buffering" regions (if you will) of lesser aligned regions in between.  Also according to convention, each domain contains a large number of atomic or molecular structures each having a magnetic moment similarly aligned within a given domain.

When imaging the domains, we see the result of those atomic/molecular alignments reflected as the more macroscopic structures, i.e., domains.

Is this somewhat a question of semantics, that is, do you have a preference for some other word that describes what it is we see and what is referred to as a domain?

PW