Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1228769 times)

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #600 on: July 25, 2014, 08:12:44 AM »
I will give it a tr y tonight, but I would think the spin would be reversed-if not, then we reslly have some thinking to do. A problem is that very few bubbles ste produced from the magnet when used ad the anode-and my nickle coating is disapearing fast lol-may have to rescue some more magnets from older projects.
May place the magnet into a plastic holder, and use s\s wire on top of the magnet to eliminate the magnetic field of the small bolt

Tinman,

Maybe the reverse polarity will put a little nickle back on! 

But seriously, if you think your neo can handle another quick run as is, try using either the existing setup or do a run both polarities with the screw somewhat covered (heat shrink comes to mind).  i too was concerned about the amount of O2 you could produce at the magnet.  See what happens.

If you lose the Ni from the neo, handle the neo carefully, inhalation of any dust is supposedly bad (wouldn't want to injest it either).  As well, the neo is going to get real hygroscopic when the Ni disappears, and will corrode/crumble fairly quick, particularly, I would think, in your NaOh solution.

Do what you can, when you can...

Thanks,
PW

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #601 on: July 25, 2014, 09:38:39 AM »
Tinman,

Maybe the reverse polarity will put a little nickle back on! 

But seriously, if you think your neo can handle another quick run as is, try using either the existing setup or do a run both polarities with the screw somewhat covered (heat shrink comes to mind).  i too was concerned about the amount of O2 you could produce at the magnet.  See what happens.

If you lose the Ni from the neo, handle the neo carefully, inhalation of any dust is supposedly bad (wouldn't want to injest it either).  As well, the neo is going to get real hygroscopic when the Ni disappears, and will corrode/crumble fairly quick, particularly, I would think, in your NaOh solution.

Do what you can, when you can...

Thanks,
PW




Why dont some of you folks who live CLOSE (kinda) to TinMan buy and send him some NEOS  ;D




As for fields, the most important fact that is always overlooked is: A field can never terminate in space nor is a field even part of
space itself, rather is a dimensional measure of a field or fields


Naught has there been a single evidence of any Ether/Field modality terminating in space.        Definitional to all fields, its impossible.


Tesla was right to call space reification as an 'entity' that 'does stuff /acts/ influences'   "insane"   ;D

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1162
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #602 on: July 25, 2014, 09:50:03 AM »
Hey Tinman mate what neos do you need? Skype your deets. Kultus has my handle.

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5237
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #603 on: July 25, 2014, 11:49:06 AM »
Here is a video i made late last night,but couldnt post it here,as i got an internal error 500 for this forum?. Anyway,all good now,so here it is. Much more testing to come this weekend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhBGQNkyWUM&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5237
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #604 on: July 25, 2014, 11:51:08 AM »
Hey Tinman mate what neos do you need? Skype your deets. Kultus has my handle.
Hey jimboot.
It's been that long since i've been on skype,it took me a while to remember my handle lol. I think you are already on my skype-will look tonight.

Cheers

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5237
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #605 on: July 25, 2014, 12:13:36 PM »
When, pray tell, will mankind discover the "secret" of the magnetic viewing film?
Magnetic viewing film will not give you an accurate view of the !so called! field line's. As the viewing film is made with nickel flakes suspended in thin oil,it will be showing much the same as the iron fileings trick. Each flack of nickel itself would become magnetic,just as the iron fileings do. The difference being that the nickel is much finer,and so gives a smoother look that the iron fileings do.

How it work's.
The surface of the nickel flakes are shiney and reflective,and when magnetic lines of force are parallel to the surface of the sheet,the flakes of nickel lay flat,and you see the bright lines on the sheet. When the lines of force are perpendicular to the viewing sheet,the nickel flakes stand on end,and you get the dark areas on the sheet.

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5237
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #606 on: July 25, 2014, 01:13:22 PM »
Tinman has not discovered anything at all.  He is just exploring how current flow and magnetic fields interact and having fun doing it.  You insult science when you make stupid or ignorant statements like that.
I would have to disagree MH.Lets have a look at the electromagnet that I made(remember-my electromagnet-not little johny's down the road) Side by side with a PM,in the same test condition's.PM shows the lorentz force by way of a vortex spin around the magnet,how ever,there is no such sign of said lorentz force by way of spin on the electromagnet. So that particular electromagnet design shows different magnetic properties than that of a PM. I would say that was some sort of discovery-wouldnt you?.

And if we look at my last two video's,i would say that there is defently reason to keep looking-keep experimenting.

So you ask many people many questions,and put forth to them many !!do you know how it works!!
So in the fairness of all involved,could you tell me(us) exactly why my electromagnet shows no spin like that of the PM?.

In order to pass judgment on weather TA is correct or wrong in regards to his theories,you must know all there is to know about a magnets properties. What confusion would come if i showed a PM cylinder magnet of same inner and outer dimentions as the electromagnets core,and it showed a clear spin?.What if i have replaced the hollow core of the electromagnet with a solid iron core,and it still shows no spin-throughout a wide range of field strengths. All im saying is,there are many unanswered question about magnetic field's,and NO ONE has all the answers yet. So unless anyone is 100% full bottles on magnetic fields,then judgment cant be made.

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #607 on: July 25, 2014, 02:26:52 PM »


Many here keep questioning "OTHER METHODS / DEVICES" for proving double magnetic vortex and the inertial dielectric plane.

Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric.  I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light.    However even he didnt ever "get it".


We have established a "device"  using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment ;D, splitter, a special lens,  XXXXX,  and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.



As they used to say on the NEWS,  "you saw it here first"  ;D
« Last Edit: July 25, 2014, 10:31:35 PM by TheoriaApophasis »

Offline e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
The Dominant Theory Appears to be Dead
« Reply #608 on: July 25, 2014, 05:36:09 PM »
This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

If you’ve ever wiggled a balloon against your hair, you know that rubbing together two different materials can generate static electricity. But rubbing bits of the same material can create static, too. Now, researchers have shot down a decades-old idea of how that same-stuff static comes about.

The same-material phenomenon produces important real-world effects, such as generating lightening in volcanic eruptions, gumming up the processing of powders in manufacturing, and causing explosions in grain elevators. Physicists thought they understood what was going on, but suddenly "the dominant theory appears to be dead," says Troy Shinbrot, an applied physicist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, in New Jersey who was not involved in the new work."
Article continues at the link above but I think that says enough to validate that we "don't already know everything".   The more I know the more I know how little we know.   ???


Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #609 on: July 25, 2014, 06:19:50 PM »

We have established a "device"  using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 480NM , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).



480nm?  Blue??

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: The Dominant Theory Appears to be Dead
« Reply #610 on: July 25, 2014, 07:51:06 PM »
This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

THIS is what Eric P Dollard has been screaming about for DECADES,   dielectricity, or electrostatics.       It really really is almost a 100% lost premise

BUT it forms MOST of Teslas research, and investigation by Faraday, Maxwell and Heaviside.

People think dielectrics are "insulators",  they are JUST THE OPPOSITE
http://journal.borderlands.com/1987/the-fallacy-of-conductors/



natures NATURAL "electricity" isnt electricity at all, its DIelectricity.         My amazing discoveries and other things, and uncovering the missing element of light is based IN dielectrics

The wave-particle duality  BULLSH*T is out the window in understanding dielectrics

testing of photoelectric effect is right, but its conclusions are 100% WRONG.       The E and M of   LIGHT (gamma, Xray etc etc)  is NOT responsible for the results of the photoelectric effect.
electromagnetism is merely a carrier of its radial component.

electricity is a byproduct OF Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity)...........   The 800 pound gorilla that is going to turn the world upside down with countless new inventions MUST be and WILL be in dielectrics,  not electricity.





From that article link:
If equal numbers of electrons hopped in both directions, nothing much would change. But that's where the size difference comes in. As Lowell and Truscott explained it, only one point of the sphere touches the plane, and it has just a few electrons to give and a larger number of empty states with which to absorb them. In contrast, a larger streak of the plane comes in contact with the sphere, so it has plenty of electrons to give. So more electrons hop from plane to sphere than vice versa, leaving the sphere negatively charged and the plane positively charged and creating the static. Other researchers showed how the theory could apply to grains of two different sizes.

<<<<<

THIS IS WHY THOSE MENTAL MIDGETS dont know what is going on, the entire stinking world is BRAINWASHED by Greek Atomism rehashed,


The "unicorn pixie dust discharge particle"  i.e.  the electron is  PURE CRAP, 100%

“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the
‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the
magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric
Discharges, Waves and Impulses)


The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged
Heaviside to begin a series of writings

“Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.” - Dr. Steve
Biller

“Here we will dispel the "electronics nerd" concept that a capacitor stores "electrons" in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates
as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one
pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this "charged" set of plates.
This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil,
withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the
space bounded by the other uncharged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact
become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to
another set of plates.” – E. Dollard

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end
of one unit line of dielectric induction.


“The notion exists that the electro-motive force, E.M.F. in volts, is established by “cutting” lines of magnetic induction via a socalled
electric conductor. This “cutting” is then said to impel the motions of so-called electrons within the conducting material. It is
however that a perfect conductor cannot “cut” through lines of induction, or flux lines, Phi. Heaviside points out that the perfect
conductor is a perfect obstructer and magnetic induction cannot gain entry into the so-called conducting material. So where is the
current, how then does an E.M.F. come about? Now enters the complication; it can be inferred that an electrical generator that is
wound with a perfect conducting material cannot produce an E.M.F. No lines of flux can be cut and the Ether gets wound up in a knot.
Heaviside remarks that the practitioners of his day “do a good deal of churning up the Ether in their dynamos”. – E. Dollard

You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the
“flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance. There are no discrete
particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation,
only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle
of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy
discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty
mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization;
magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge;
dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q;
‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.

There are no electrons, negative charges, special-dimensions, warped space (resoundingly denied by Tesla and others), and no
photons; only charge, induction and radiation/discharges and their relational spins, all as mediated thru the Ether. Quantum and
Relativity is a quack religion of mathematical physics based upon the absurd premise that the universe is a giant sea of interactive
massless tiny invisible beads and that space itself, nothing, mediates interactions and can be genuinely ‘warped’. Such conceptual
Atomistic reifications as amplified by GR (Relativity) cannot be enjoined, and the only genuine warping occurring is not out in the
cosmos of space, but in the empty spaces between the ears of those who reify such absurdities; warped minds rationally would invent
warped space; its purely logical in its insanity that the former produce the later.

Space has only one dimension, space, which is a metrical dimension. The use of cubic notation is habit-based, any number of coordinates
in any number of geometries can serve to define the boundaries of space. Nature is not governed by the irrational
pontifications of GR and QM, rather it is governed by mutually interactive reciprocal conjugates of charges-discharges, centripetalcentrifugal
movements, both spatial and counterspatial. Instantaneous action at a distance, and fields are all Ether modality mediations
as propagated by counterspace-in-disturbance, the Ether, its pressure gradients and perturbations. No other mediator can be logically
hypothesized, much less theorized. The very same Ether of Tesla, Heaviside, C.P. Steinmetz, and even originally from Einstein before
logic fled his mind completely, was correct and remains so. Tesla outright denied our current definition of the electron as a ‘discharge
particle’.

All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect
understanding of the definition of a ‘field’), these pressure gradients, or “lines” are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving
motion to the terminus ‘electron’. The thermionic ‘electron’ contracts, pulling the ‘electron’, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the
‘electron’. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these socalled
‘electrons’ assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the ‘voids’, directing the
‘electrons’. Hence, it is the so-called ‘electrons’ (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. ‘Electrons’
have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called ‘electrons’ are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. ‘Electrons’ are in
fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is
established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by
the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron ‘bead’; such
notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of
atomic charges and discharges

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: The Dominant Theory Appears to be Dead
« Reply #611 on: July 25, 2014, 10:08:57 PM »
This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

If you’ve ever wiggled a balloon against your hair, you know that rubbing together two different materials can generate static electricity. But rubbing bits of the same material can create static, too. Now, researchers have shot down a decades-old idea of how that same-stuff static comes about.

The same-material phenomenon produces important real-world effects, such as generating lightening in volcanic eruptions, gumming up the processing of powders in manufacturing, and causing explosions in grain elevators. Physicists thought they understood what was going on, but suddenly "the dominant theory appears to be dead," says Troy Shinbrot, an applied physicist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, in New Jersey who was not involved in the new work."
Article continues at the link above but I think that says enough to validate that we "don't already know everything".   The more I know the more I know how little we know.   ???

Read that article carefully and read the post immediately above this one. They cannot both be right. But they can most certainly both be wrong. Note that the Tattooed Genius is claiming that the science that has constructed the technology that completely surrounds us and enables our very lives is wrong and that the entities, like electrons, that it manipulates so facilely and productively don't even exist. And he's posting from a computer!

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #612 on: July 25, 2014, 10:10:42 PM »
480nm?  Blue??

Magenta is the new blue, didn't you know? Or maybe you need your white balance adjusted. Or maybe the CCDs in his mighty 3-chip video camera are all confused because the entities they are made to deal with... don't exist.

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: The Dominant Theory Appears to be Dead
« Reply #613 on: July 25, 2014, 10:24:52 PM »
But they can most certainly both be wrong. Note that the Tattooed Genius is claiming that the science that has constructed the technology that completely surrounds us and enables our very lives is wrong and that the entities,

I said no such thing, you proven liar of vile filth.
Getting ACCURATE results, and getting 100% wrong conclusions is sciences (so-called) biggest fuck up.

I used to repair computers, dont even think of giving me a heads up on a computer, boy.
The TECH that surrounds you and me are  ELECTRICAL, ...............the REAL COMPUTER, idiot, is your brain and nervous system which are DIELECTRICAL
same as lightning.


So, you, pathetically, in DEMONIC IGNORANCE, are denying dielectrics using your brain that WORKS off electrostatic charge/discharge  (i.e. dielectricity).
Since you are WHOLLY UNREAD on electrical theory, let me give your a HEADS up on HOW MUCH dielectricity plays a part in MOST of Teslas works, MUCH of Heaviside, and Maxwells writings.

Tesla created the AC electrical generator,  but MOST of Tesla's focus, as he himself ADMITS was in electrostatics, ie DIELECTRICITY.

You son, are a "fools fool"


mass/gravity  and electricity are BOTH byproducts
of the interplay etc. between natures 2 Principles, Dielectricity and Magnetism.


The Ether is the Ether is the Ether,
    Ive already proven in the video the simple modality extrapolation to get ALL 4 Field modalities.


 >>>>>>>Electrostatics are "natures" electrical modality of operation, BOY <<<<<<<<<<
FACT:   Electricity is the PRODUCT OF    PHI (magnetism) and  PSI (dielectricity)   = Q (electrification in Planck).

That means,  BOY,  that Electricity is a WHOLLY DIFF. creature than DIELECTRICITY.


>>>>>And as I proved about 8 pages ago, proved you BOTH a stinking LIAR, and very VILE DISGUSTING PERSON. <<<<<<






Boy, because of MY understanding of **~*~*~*~*~DIELECTRICITY*~*~*~*~*~*......
............I'm the first person ever to deliver to the world the ACCURATE model of WHAT a magnet is, HOW it works, and WHY it works

Whats more, I get RESULTS,
.........  Tinman did same in less than 72 HOURS,..........NOW his brain is spinning with IDEAS like his magnet, that will hopefully make him a fortune in invention.







completely surrounds us and enables our very lives


Proven liar and proven spreader of filth..........YOUR VERY LIFE i.e. your body runs off dielectricity.

what you USE in your daily life, runs off electricity.


If you dont know this simple fact, then you know LESS THAN NOTHING

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #614 on: July 25, 2014, 10:32:51 PM »
480nm?  Blue??

Those were snaps off the video of single channel 635 nm,    yes yes, my err.    I havent slept in nearly 4 days.


Par-don.  :P