Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1599278 times)

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #585 on: July 25, 2014, 05:19:12 AM »
I will be doing many more test this weekend PW, and will include your seguestions
Also keep in mind everyone, that the magnet produces only H2, but we still have 2 spin diretions of H2 bubbles. This can only mean that it is the water that the force is acting against. It is also ovious thst an electrical current is needed to achieve spin in my setup. None the less, ATM it seems that the right hand dosnt apply to one of these spin directions

Tinman,

Sincere thanks for your time and efforts.

Do you believe it possible to make a sufficient amount of O2 at the magnet (to allow visualization) by reversing the tank polarity?

As I surmised in a previous post, it may be possible that two different actions are being observed, a homopolar torque/motoring action and an ion "wind".  As H2 is liberated, negative ions form in the area of H2 production and these negative ions would then be repelled away from that immediate area.  As those ions carry a charge, their path as they leave that immediate area would be affected by the magnetic field.

If the above is true, using the same magnet polarity as in your H2 tests, reversing tank polarity to produce O2, and hence produce positive ions, should reverse the direction of the observed vortex immediately above the magnetic pole (reverse polarity ions should travel an oppositely curved path in the same magnetic field polarity). 

I surmise that when the tape is applied to the sides of the magnet, bulk current density in the electrolyte is lowered and the homopolar action is somewhat suppressed, particularly at lower currents.  This allows, at lower currents, the ion flow just above the magnet's pole to be more readily visible and somewhat predominant (as the pole area has the highest current density at this time).  As current is increased further, bulk current in the electrolyte becomes greater, and when sufficient, allows motoring to occur via homopolar action.

Anyway, it's just a thought...

Thanks again,
PW





   


TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #586 on: July 25, 2014, 05:28:45 AM »
Tinman,

If the above is true, using the same magnet polarity as in your H2 tests, reversing tank polarity to produce O2, and hence produce positive ions, should reverse the direction of the observed vortex immediately above the magnetic pole (reverse polarity ions should travel an oppositely curved path in the same magnetic field polarity). 



one small hitch there though,  :o 

HYDRO is diamagnetic,
and   OXY is  paramagnetic


"Mother nature is a crazy bitch"- Alfred Reed
     ROFL


little humor   ;D


 





picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #587 on: July 25, 2014, 05:41:08 AM »

You didnt read it above.     1819 is END ON view of AC transmission lines......same as running down your street

BUT that is also the cross section of a magnet,  top to bottom polarization ,   with the differences mentioned above,  that being the boundary of the physical magnet and the mutual centripetal and centrifugal reciprocation.

While accurate only END ON (the AC LINES) as a model of magnetism, the incommensurable magneto-dielectric "field of dielectricity" (Maxwell) is still correct and applicable.


TA,

I am sorry, but I am still a bit uncertain if I understand what is depicted in 1819 completely.  There are two panels/images.  The left image appears to be viewing film, the right appears to be a line drawing/graph with a big red square.

There are numbered callouts/labels below the images, but no corresponding identification numbers in the images.

I am assuming that the left image is viewing film and that the right image is a graphical representation of the "end on" AC lines.  The red square overlayed on the right image, I also assume, represents a block magnet showing the dielectric plane (center line).

If the above assumptions are correct, is the viewing film a depiction of the same block magnet oriented behind the film as indicated by the red square in the right image?  I just want to make sure I am understanding what you present correctly.

It would be most helpful when presenting viewing film, etc, of magnetic fields if you would provide an image or overlay of the orientation of the magnet and its geometric shape as positioned behind the film (with polarity marked as well).

Just a suggestion,

PW

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #588 on: July 25, 2014, 06:03:04 AM »
TA,

I am sorry, but I am still a bit uncertain if I understand what is depicted in 1819 completely.  There are two panels/images.  The left image appears to be viewing film, the right appears to be a line drawing/graph with a big red square.

There are numbered callouts/labels below the images, but no corresponding identification numbers in the images.

It would be most helpful when presenting viewing film, etc, of magnetic fields if you would provide an image or overlay of the orientation of the magnet and its geometric shape as positioned behind the film (with polarity marked as well).

Just a suggestion,

PW


NO, that left image is not viewing flim, its iron filiings around AC current lines looking END ON
Same  thing, in diagram on the right

Taken from JC Maxwells diagram of the dielectric and magnetic around AC lines looking END (of wire) ON (down the lines)



I am assuming that the left image is viewing film and that the right image is a graphical representation of the "end on" AC lines.  The red square overlayed on the right image, I also assume, represents a block magnet showing the dielectric plane (center line).<<<<<

Yes, the GREEN viewing film, however all this film does is show VELOCITY of fields, and the POINT/AXIS of polarization

They call it "magnetic viewing fim", but its real nature is showing polarization and shows really only 3 things

A: bright line of the dielectric inertial plane  (or as everyone else sees it, the axis along which the magnet is polarized)

B: shows the centrifugal edge in bright (again, velocity)

C: shows a fuzzy bright circle at the centripetal point.

I developed a liquid suspension that does the EXACT SAME THING as this film does  ;)




Until I made the connection afterwords in working on magnetism, and recognizing this geometry before, nobody had a clue how galactic jets works, what, why, etc.

Even the so-called "experts" admit theyre really clueless
about this special geometry, well its very simple, is the same as in a magnet


The only reason the galactic jets have an extremely tight centrifugal vortex
is because theyre being deflected into a very very tight centrifugal cone due to mind numbing levels (we cannot fathom the levels) of power.



picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #589 on: July 25, 2014, 06:09:00 AM »


one small hitch there though,  :o 

HYDRO is diamagnetic,
and   OXY is  paramagnetic


"Mother nature is a crazy bitch"- Alfred Reed
     ROFL


little humor   ;D

Yes, but are we actually seeing the influence of the magnetic field on the H2 itself, or are we seeing motion by proxy due to repulsion/curvature of ions?  I don't have that answer, hence the suggested test.  Possibly this has been tested before, if so, what were the results? 

If we are to believe that what we are seeing is merely the behavior of H2 rising in a magnetic field, then should it not be possible to eliminate the electrolysis part altogether and just produce/inject H2 above the magnet?  A stronger NaOh solution with a thin sheet of Al on top of the magnet should liberate H2 without the need for electrolysis.  Would it not then also produce a vortex?

Possibly only atomic H is involved in producing the vortex, as it exists briefly before recombination to H2 (unsure how long).  But even then, if atomic H is required, although seemingly a bit more difficult, it may be possible to devise an experiment wherein atomic H is injected immediately above the pole piece to look for spin/vortex in the absence of an electrical field.

Anyway, the reverse polarity test seems easy enough to try.  Whether or not it will tell us anything useful I don't know (but that is what experiments are for).

PW

picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2039
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #590 on: July 25, 2014, 06:13:20 AM »

NO, that left image is not viewing flim, its iron filiings around AC current lines looking END ON
Same  thing, in diagram on the right

Taken from JC Maxwells diagram of the dielectric and magnetic around AC lines looking END (of wire) ON (down the lines)


TA,

Thanks, I got it now, that's why I asked...

PW

Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #591 on: July 25, 2014, 06:22:03 AM »
@all

I really like the work done here its reminds me of my own ,
what i learned is that what others thinks or like is not useful in research ,
 sharing point of views is great as long as no one imposes there own on to others.

We each have used all our senses and brain to forge our view of the world ,day after day we each traveled our own way had our own experiences , and we should be pround of it , and respect others travel as we wish ours would be . What are you a repeat robot or a man.

I have seen things i did not like as much ..

At the original poster

I think you are on the spot , people of pure heart and intent have acces to the knowledge base , keep going you will do great .

You may or not check my vortex tread , theres is something about the force travels in the opposite direction in a magnectic medium thena paramagnetic with the same current direction .

Take good care

Best regards

Mark

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #592 on: July 25, 2014, 06:29:26 AM »
Yes, but are we actually seeing the influence of the magnetic field on the H2 itself, or are we seeing motion by proxy due to repulsion/curvature of ions?  I don't have that answer, hence the suggested test.  Possibly this has been tested before, if so, what were the results? 

If we are to believe that what we are seeing is merely the behavior of H2 rising in a magnetic field, then should it not be possible to eliminate the electrolysis part altogether and just produce/inject H2 above the magnet?  A stronger NaOh solution with a thin sheet of Al on top of the magnet should liberate H2 without the need for electrolysis.  Would it not then also produce a vortex?


As you can see in my vid on using pyrolytic graphite, it will move opposite to the movement it is turned, regardless of CW or CCW
however that stuff is EXTREMELY diamagnetic.


Any comment on repulsion/curvature of ions on our parts is speculative,  however neither of those is or CAN drive the magnet CW or CCW when polarity is reversed.

There are 2 charging 'portals' for any magnet, the centripetal point, and the dielectric plane.
with the dielectric inertial plane taped off, there is only ONE 'PORTAL' of charge entry, (and the end-product resultant hydrogen spin movement) period.


Not to get "picky" (not regarding you), but the only true magnetism (in refined denotation) is the centrifugal,.... the centripetal is also magnetic however being convergent to reintegration and perpetuating (as all 3 'components' do) magneto-dielctric inertia, its properties are different from the centrifugal.


SAME way you can say  "well stretching a rubber band (magnetism) one way outwards /divergently is no different than releasing it and letting it contract convergently / inwards".

they are quantitatively the same force,........but wholly different qualitatively.

stretch a rubber band while touching your lip with it, feel it getting HOT (radiation / centrifugal) .......now let it contract on your lip (where you can feel it easy),.....feel it getting COLD (convergence, centripetal)

The "wonderful" magnet is the dis-equilibrium of fascination since it has macro-magnetic properties that are 'permanent' and self-sustaining due to field incommensurability, ....natures own little "Möbius loop"  :o


This is also why my SEED GROWTH experiments only show TRUE results when the seeds are exposed for X TIME period along the centrifugal edge, and NOT just on  "one side" , in which case results are perfect and always predictable IF you tape the seeds along the centrifugal edge, and NOT just "either side" then test them.

Remembering again, Ether is Ether is Ether.  ;D





Possibly only atomic H is involved in producing the vortex, as it exists briefly before recombination to H2 (unsure how long).  But even then, if atomic H is required, although seemingly a bit more difficult, it may be possible to devise an experiment wherein atomic H is injected immediately above the pole piece to look for spin/vortex in the absence of an electrical field.
PW


Nope, lots and LOTS of other methods to show magnetic vortex that have nothing to do with zapping magnets or using ferrous testing media.

(a couple of those testing mediums produce amazing results)

I hope Tinman invents the next "X" and makes a fortune  ;)

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #593 on: July 25, 2014, 06:39:00 AM »
theres is something about the force travels in the opposite direction in a magnectic medium thena paramagnetic with the same current direction .


thats because, unlike ferrous accelerating towards a magnet centrifugally (bit complex explained in the book however) ,....... the paramagnetic is attracted to the centripetal.


WHICH IS ALSO why super diamagnetic materials (bismuth, pyrolytic graphite)  go nuts along the centrifugal but only bump across the centripetal point.


remember (or not?)  iron ball will NOT sit at the CENTER (centripetal) point of a magnet, ONLY its centrifugal edge


whereas a same ball, a magnetic ball, WILL ,    EASILY

A (seemingly obvious to me) point of future invention and insight will be made when people realize why a HUGE FLAT MAGNET (like my 6", really any magnet of course) ,.....its outer edge acts like a gravitational front accelerating ferrous objects TO THAT POINT.

The acceleration is dielectric in origin (not magnetic induction as is reported), its magnetic dilation resultant from dielectric constriction in the ferrous object.


tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #594 on: July 25, 2014, 06:45:42 AM »
Tinman,

Sincere thanks for your time and efforts.

Do you believe it possible to make a sufficient amount of O2 at the magnet (to allow visualization) by reversing the tank polarity?

As I surmised in a previous post, it may be possible that two different actions are being observed, a homopolar torque/motoring action and an ion "wind".  As H2 is liberated, negative ions form in the area of H2 production and these negative ions would then be repelled away from that immediate area.  As those ions carry a charge, their path as they leave that immediate area would be affected by the magnetic field.

If the above is true, using the same magnet polarity as in your H2 tests, reversing tank polarity to produce O2, and hence produce positive ions, should reverse the direction of the observed vortex immediately above the magnetic pole (reverse polarity ions should travel an oppositely curved path in the same magnetic field polarity). 

I surmise that when the tape is applied to the sides of the magnet, bulk current density in the electrolyte is lowered and the homopolar action is somewhat suppressed, particularly at lower currents.  This allows, at lower currents, the ion flow just above the magnet's pole to be more readily visible and somewhat predominant (as the pole area has the highest current density at this time).  As current is increased further, bulk current in the electrolyte becomes greater, and when sufficient, allows motoring to occur via homopolar action.

Anyway, it's just a thought...

Thanks again,
PW





 
I will give it a tr y tonight, but I would think the spin would be reversed-if not, then we reslly have some thinking to do. A problem is that very few bubbles ste produced from the magnet when used ad the anode-and my nickle coating is disapearing fast lol-may have to rescue some more magnets from older projects.
May place the magnet into a plastic holder, and use s\s wire on top of the magnet to eliminate the magnetic field of the small bolt

Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #595 on: July 25, 2014, 07:05:50 AM »

thats because, unlike ferrous accelerating towards a magnet centrifugally (bit complex explained in the book however) ,....... the paramagnetic is attracted to the centripetal.


WHICH IS ALSO why super diamagnetic materials (bismuth, pyrolytic graphite)  go nuts along the centrifugal but only bump across the centripetal point.


remember (or not?)  iron ball will NOT sit at the CENTER (centripetal) point of a magnet, ONLY its centrifugal edge


whereas a same ball, a magnetic ball, WILL ,    EASILY

A (seemingly obvious to me) point of future invention and insight will be made when people realize why a HUGE FLAT MAGNET (like my 6", really any magnet of course) ,.....its outer edge acts like a gravitational front accelerating ferrous objects TO THAT POINT.

The acceleration is dielectric in origin (not magnetic induction as is reported), its magnetic dilation resultant from dielectric constriction in the ferrous object.

I not sure about the egg or the chicken that is first , i know there are the same freq magnetc offset by 1/4 of the freq and necessary in all living systems . a path is needed for both (Ex Coax cable) . I agree with your conclusions its time to go to the parctical .

There have been devices that claimed using energy from magnets in the past . We know the static force is on the opposite side of the poles and we have the magnetic at the poles we need to find a way to combine those two in a closed system .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6QIIwFkO00&list=UULKKCauubuWLRdng24R-cKQ In this video is my torus plane version yellow and copper wire opposite forces.

Its been nice talking about all that its been almost 4 since i looked at my research .

Good luck !

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #596 on: July 25, 2014, 07:17:10 AM »
we need to find a way to combine those two in a closed system .


What if some one,.....   was already getting results with such thinking well in place?    :)


Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #597 on: July 25, 2014, 07:20:18 AM »

What if some one,.....   was already getting results with such thinking well in place?    :)

I would not be the first  :)

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #598 on: July 25, 2014, 07:37:19 AM »
When, pray tell, will mankind discover the "secret" of the magnetic viewing film?

TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #599 on: July 25, 2014, 08:04:25 AM »
When, pray tell, will mankind discover the "secret" of the magnetic viewing film?


velocity gradients are hardly "magnetic viewing film"

its very premise is faulty in implication

"look, it shows polarity".        yeah,  but it doesnt show you magnetic field reciprocation or the magneto-dielectric geometry of the magnets conjugate incommensurable system   (or, the moving gyromagnetic precession driven by a sharp coherent increase in dielectric capacitance)


In case you forgot, gyromagnetic precession is a well known entity in MRI technology

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_precession


However they pathetically link it to unicorn discharge-particles   ROFL   ;D