The item being magnetized is placed across the pole pieces and a brief discharge of current is passed thru the coil(s) of the magnetizer's electromagnet, which magnetizes the item between the electromagnet's pole pieces. If the item is such that it can retain the magnetism, it becomes a PM.
Dead wrong son.
Brief LARGE AMOUNT OF CURRENT you mean.You're as clueless as a goddamn lemming. You dont (still) GET the fucking word "MAGNETIZE" , Magnetization (as implied resultant magnetism in the "magnet") is the TERMINATION OF ELECTRICITY moron.......... Even a 8th grade book on electricity will tell you that son.
How the FUCK did you think you created a FINGER CRUSHING NEO MAGNET? Its inductively CHARGED at the dielectric from the Cap banks, to the coils INTO the Magnet.
Magnetism is the RESULTANT FROM ANOTHER. There is no such bullshit as "magnetism" occuring (on its own)
Magnetism is SPATIAL, is RADIATION, is the TERMINATION / DEAD END of either A: dielectric amplification B: discharge termination of electrical current (into X)
Dont you even fucking know how AC power lines SPREAD APART when the current is altered?
?? Guess what is "spreading the lines apart"
?? Magnetism
GUESS NOW what the fuck is CAUSING THEM to spread apart.
You have poo between your ears.
Let me give you a fucking heads up on the word "ELECTROMAGNET"........OK, Its OVERWHELMINGLY ELECTRICAL, with resultant strong magnetic (temporary) charge.
Yes, moron, the magnet is electrically INDUCED BY the ELECTRIC INDUCTION from the ELECTO-magnet. Wise the ever loving hell up boy.
A permanent magnet of sufficiently high strength could instead be used to replace the electromagnet of the magnetizer, and it would also, in a similar fashion, magnetize the new magnet. It would, however, be very difficult to remove the new magnet from the pole pieces of a powerful permanent magnet, so an electromagnet is used instead.
Thanks for that "no shit" heads up. NOW ask how you create a (very WEAK) permanent magnet with a STRONG magnet?
YOU STROKE IT with the strong magnet and align the dielectricity in a coherent fashion in the steel bar ,etc,... to create resultant macro-magnetic polarization
Ohhhhhhhh, and WHY IS A MAGNET MADE THIS WAY SO STINKING WEAK IN POWER?? because it was not, IS NOT, HAS NOT been electrified from a HUGE inductive electrical DUMP
You however, have been stroking something else. and its NOT the books.
The question becomes, of the two diagrams below, one being graphed, the other showing iron filings on the left, which of the two
is showing the cross section of a permanent magnet, and which is showing current moving in opposite directions as in AC lines (blue
representing the dielectric, and red the magnetic)? The answer is that both are showing both current moving in opposite directions and
the cross section along the Z-axis of a permanent magnet. In the iron filings illustration on the left, you need only connect the two
conductive AC wires with a line (however in 3D it would be a flattened toroidal accretion disk) and you have the XY-axis ‘accretion
disk’ of dielectric counterspatial, inertial, radial, and centripetal dominance and the vertically expansive spatial, circular, centrifugal
(and centripetal) and polarized magnetic reciprocating field. Of the diagram on the right, you need only connect the two AC
conductive wires with a line once again, and compress vertically, the blue dielectric lines into a flatter profile to fit the dielectric
geometry into a magnetic mass (or “magnet”) rather than free hanging space AC lines. Both illustrations are that of field or currents
(both Ether in nature) moving in opposite directions and the cross section of a permanent magnet. Likewise in an alternating current
situation, the feed lines are pressing apart in free hanging space which allows for more magnetism (whereas current in the same
direction, the current lines are pulled together which allows for more dielectric storage). This electrification in creating a magnet
means the dielectric, while centripetal, exists predominately like a gyroscopic flywheel mass, along the periphery at which the center
Z-axis is the reciprocating magnetic field portal. In its fixed form of a permanent magnet, the compressing dielectric centripetal
counter (spatial) force is working in direct opposition to the magnetic, with the dielectric attempting to come together at the XY-axis
centerpoint, while at the same time, the magnetic is attempting to push the XY-axis apart at the centerpoint, resultantly like stepping
down flow from a larger diameter pipe into a smaller one, there is increased pressure, or in this case, increased magnetic pressure of
which we, incorrectly, deem an electrified dielectric object, as a “magnet” or “magnetic object”.
Ironically (not so) electrification in the creation of a permanent magnet creates significant spatial magnetic polarization, whereas an
identical relationship exists likewise in the spatial-counterspatial geometry as created in current lines that are polarized, and have
current moving in opposite directions. This is the harmonic conjugate relationship of magnetism and dielectricity, spatial and
counterspatial, both moving 180 degrees opposite one another, however in a binding electrical system, or a “magnetic” mass create an
unique centripetal-centrifugal, radial-circular, inertial-radiative, spatial-counterspatial set of relationships, so fully and accurately
spelled out by the gods of electrical theory, Maxwell, Heaviside, Faraday, Tesla, Steinmetz, and others.
Both diagrams show the same geometry, but in different electrical dimensions. Alternating electrical current being polarized,
produces the same magneto-dielectric geometry as electrification produces in the creation of an ‘electrified’ dielectric object
(“magnet”) with spatial magnetic polarization. Electrical current polarization produces a temporary building-radiative polarized (there
is no other kind) magnetic field, or in the other case, magnetic polarization formed in the electrification of a ferrous mass into a
dielectric object with a fixed radiative magnetic field. When electrified, the ferrous mass retains (due to the special inter-atomic
magneto-dielectric elasticity of the volume of iron) high dielectric capacitance, also proven in experimentation in releasing this
dielectricity (light reflector = dielectric conductor, iron in its special nature can be stably dielectrically saturated from electrification).
Magnetism is literally the polarization of dielectricity as contained or induced by an object (permanent magnet, TEM,
electromagnet), the two are conjugate and inversely proportional in their magneto-dielectric architecture, where one is circular,
dielectricity is radial, where one is centrifugal-centripetal, dielectricity is centripetal, where one is radiative, dielectricity is inertial,
where one is spatial (polarized), dielectricity is counterspatial. This conjugate pair creates and props up the entire universe, and powers
all atomic elements, is responsible for charge, discharge, induction, radiation, generation, polarization, mass creation which likewise
terminates into gravity. An incapacity to understand this fundamental is a roadblock to any true comprehension of magnetism or
dielectricity. Where magnetism seeks static circular polarization, electrification is a radial dynamic polarization.