You catch who in what mistake?.

Well, TA of course...who wlse ?

He's is/was the only one (besides me) who hadn't made 1 or 3 in this thread.

*takes humble bow with toes pointed inward*

Regards...

GRAVITYBLOCK YOU SIR ARE RIGHT ! NOW SPIN THE FOIL ! DIALETRIC INERTHIA WHAT A LOAD OF TRIPE ! ALL THE LOOK AT ME I AM SO GOOD AND THAN THE BLIND SPOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA ..... IN MY BOOK NEITHER WILL SPIN IN A ZERO G ENVIRNMENT ...

You are all 50% RIGHT AND THE REST IS GOBBLDYGOUK NONSENSE ,,,,,, GO WRITE A BOOK ABOUT A BLIND MAN AND A PET MAGNET HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH  SO YOU THINK THE ANGLE OF SPINNING WATER GOING DOWN A HOLE IS DUE TO A DIALECTRIC HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA OK OOOOOOHHHHHH NOOOOOO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

SILLY MONKEY HAHAHAHAHAH NICE BOOK HAHAHAHAH BUT IT ANINT WORTH A PEANUT !!!!! You wrote a book on the whim and some out of date data and you wont the world to believe it yet you can not prove it as it is wrong . You cant even make an indirect experiment to give the stupid theory and gravity hahahahahah OH THE GRAVITY OF IT HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH NO BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW WHAT GRAVITY IS DO YOU ITS SPACE TIME CURITURE NOT A DIALETRIC YOU BUMBLLING MONKEY GO BACK TO THE STUPID SCHOOL AND CRY OUT THE WORDS YUMMYBUMBEERLYIMADEASILLYHUBBALYTUMBERLY HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA NOW YOU WANT TO REINVENT GRAVITY AS A DIALETRIC FORCE Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah !!!

So its me the one who can crush every rock you throw until you find its gravity .. WARNING TO ALL HUMANITY DONT LISTEN TO A DIALETRIC GRAVITY THEORY ITS NUTS ...... AND SO FAR WRONG THAT THE WORD WRONG IS THE WRONG WORD FOR IT ..

Now you guys stop the little boy games all the insults the twisting of science contrived twitter twatter bull .........................................

Do you want the proof here and now and stand totally ashamed embraced with only an ideology that is outside the excepted rules of physics and what about the man himself old albert the one who worked it all out .. Oh no you just want to take him on in the hope your have a brain better than him . Did old albert ever write in the manner that I have been reading when submitting he's work ? Is there one sentence written by the grate man that is vindictive to anyone that said he was wrong ? NO ... I am saddened by this childish pathetic scuba bling bing bong .... I came here to read and write science ! So far all I can ready is stupidity wrapped up in attempt to make your egos enflamed by your so called intelligence !

Now list to me ! I have a device that measure's space time curvature and the so called diametric of the earth they have the same vector because the dielectric constant follows gravity ... But the dielectric field will never go down a plug hole or ever spin a magnet without gravity .... Take away gravity and you lose the dielectric effect .. !!!!! YOU SILLY MONKEYS !!!!

ME


   





 



     

Would be nice to have a better illustration of these centriptetal/centrifugal fields as applies to a ring magnet instead of a single solid bar magnet structure.

Modelling compounded magnets is:

A: a pain in the ass


B: its hard enough showing (not meaning you) weak minded ass-scratching monkeys how a NORMAL magnet works, ..........ergo no need (at this time) to complicate it for their squishy little brians

You left out the part where you had to fight your way thru 9 yards of bullsh!t from naysayers, nitpickers, and shills, some of which are chronicled in my old but still relevant thread dedicated their activities...

Too true,     ALAS,  unfortunate for "THEM",  as someone madly skilled at ancient Greek dialectic and the Greek platonic method of "seeing thru skepticism, fallacies and subversive bullshit"    they haven't seen the likes of me before.

If they want to tangle, Id rather just stick to the topic, ....but if they want, I will, figuratively,.........dance on their little pin heads, and piss on their guts.




 

At last some fresh air all that EGO and a daft empty attempt to re-write the law of truth the TERM DIALETRIC INERTSHIA IS NOW A DODO HAHAHA !!! But the term space time curvature is what give directional force to the effect and that is gravity !! Try this trick with the magnet in a zero g environment like space and it can not work no gravity no spin on the magnet . But this is not about a magnet its about a magnetic vortex and I must say that is interesting and the more I think about it the more interesting it gets .

One experiments I made a few years ago was a simple study with small 3 inch ferrite magnets 12 in a ring 5 stacked up at each point with a single magnet and a counter weight spinning ! The gap between each stack started at 5 inches after each try I positioned the stacks closer until on the 5th try they were all touching . There is and opposing forces between each stack so I had to tape them closer each try .. When I got to the 5th turn and the stacks were all touching something strange happened and I wrote it down as a field burst where a release of flux spread all over the room and the magnets lost the ability to attract the armature . I had to take each stack and isolate them for 4 hours for the field to return to normal .   

After that I started to work with opposing and iron that had a 2.2 degree curvature and to my surprise a field bubble was created over the iron which grew slowly. When stopped I taped strongly with a small hammer and the bubble burst but would not re-grow in the same spot on the ground where the experiment had taken place ..   I had to move the experiment 4 meters away before the bubble grew again !

I monitored the position of each experiment and noticed that a full cycle of the moon had to pass before a bubble could be set up in the same spot .. The term magnetic vortex may have some truth to it but not while the magnet is still in the same position so in simple terms you make the vortex and than you have to move away the apparatus leavening behind an invisible vortex ! This system is also a very good way to measure gravity and is obvious as in every position to ground you make the experiment the size and strength of the bubble is different ..

Sorry if my English gram her is not in the American style or if my writing is simply simple its just that my observations of the universe are relatively simple ! I never paint with words and only build with mathematics ! The follow on from this work was to build a device to confirm the dielectric constant and its relationship with gravity to that I mastered many things including particle physics . I now build zero point generators for private clients and continue to study the elusive graviton . The main problem with all things zero point or over unity is that the physics is not academic its science for anyone with an interest in such things and the out of date world of academics is falling behind very fast. Knowledge is fact over fiction nothing else its not a personal encounter or should it ever be and those that cloud it with there ability to blind themselves with deluded words and half measured effects should let go and build a house to see what it would look like if they don't use a door to enter it . The truth is inside that is where the home of truth lives not on the roof or in a flower basket hanging pretty on the out side so please keep the facts flowing into the house of truth and through the door of reality and knowledge.

Now that is enough of poetry ! which one of you will confirm with me a real magnetic vortex ?? or are you all just pretending to experiment


ME





     



 


 

At last some fresh air all that EGO and a daft empty attempt to re-write the law of truth the TERM DIALETRIC INERTSHIA IS NOW A DODO HAHAHA !!! But the term space time curvature is what give directional force to the effect and that is gravity !!

You are confusing 2 WHOLLY diff terms dielectric and  dialectic  !!!!!  ROFL

There is NO "space time curvature"     these are FIELD pressure curvatures       ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   


You are, as most are, reifying the POSTERIOR ATTRIBUTE of fields,  that being space  AS the Principle.......its NOT.     Tesla and Heaviside  BOTH SAID THIS


See appendix A, vol 1 of Heaviside  "ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY"   its at the END of Vol 1.


Dielectricity terminates INTO/AS mass creation in galactic and stellar formation JUST as electricity terminates into magnetism.    So, wrong again.

There is and opposing forces between each stack so I had to tape them closer each try .. When I got to the 5th turn and the stacks were all touching something strange happened and I wrote it down as a field burst where a release of flux spread all over the room and the magnets lost the ability to attract the armature . I had to take each stack and isolate them for 4 hours for the field to return to normal .   

Great, you discovered the dielectric inertial plane.   Hurray.   

I monitored the position of each experiment and noticed that a full cycle of the moon had to pass before a bubble could be set up in the same spot .

Yes, thats because dielectricity and gravity are linked in ways I WILL NOT EXPLAIN HERE

But they are linked in the same fashion as Electricity is to magnetism.     Congrats on finding that out   (so did I , a looong time ago)

Now that is enough of poetry ! which one of you will confirm with me a real magnetic vortex ?? or are you all just pretending to experiment .

I AM and HAVE BEEN experimenting my ass off. 

     



 
[/quote]

Try this trick with the magnet in a zero g environment like space and it can not work no gravity no spin on the magnet

Let me correct your insane stupidity here   .    NO HUMAN EVER has been in a  "Zero G" environment.



You are confusing EXTREMELY VELOCITY in a  ZERO-DRAG low earth orbit (= PLENTY OF GRAVITY)  with     "Zero gravity"


The "former" space shuttle didn't "rocket back to earth" fool, .... it decelerates from nozzles which places it on a return trajectory to earth.


Im even pretty fucking sure there is gravity even AT THE POINT of Pluto...........     yeah, thats the case.


drats, foiled again!!!    

Wow TA, do you see anything in your response that would be construed by most as arrogance and condescension?

If you dont like my personality, fine, dont really care.     This isnt a HOOKER trying to win a "pretty contest"    OK?

, but I have yet to see or read anything that I would consider as "Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex".  To the contrary, most of the "proofs" you have presented can have alternate and quite conventional explanations.  The "proof" would be in ruling out these alternate more conventional explanations through additional experiments devised specifically for that purpose (null experiments).

Good, Im glad you are blind, HOWEVER I have 9 diff. testing methods to write and make videos on.   Dont give a damn what you believe. 

All seasoned experimentalists learn that when an experiment provides a non-conventional result.

Nice classical Greek skepticism,  now go PISS OFF and experiment yourself son.      "non conventional" my goddamn ass.

I experiment, examine, use logic and retroduction...... Pedal your Greek Skepticism DOWN THE ROAD

Many people for long time have observed vortex divergent and convergent patterns.

As my schedule allows, I hope to perform additional experiments I have considered regarding Tinman's spinning bubbles.

GOOD, go experiment,  and stop flapping your lips.......Im in the middle of more experiments myself.