I said nothing about flipping the poles of a the magnet. I said ,Quote: We can place the wire in the north region,and the magnet will spin in one direction. We can place the wire in the south region,and the magnet will still rotate in the same direction-And this is correct thank you.Please read post correctly ,before saying some one is incorrect.

No, you are once again wrong!  The conductive magnet will spin in opposite directions when placing the wire in the north region as compared to placing the wire in the south region!

Like I said, prove me wrong, and I won't make another post to this forum!

Gravock

Maybe you'll take what I say seriously when you see the electromagnet wrapped completely and tightly in aluminium foil start rotating like the conductive nickel coated neo magnet.
Gravock

Once again (for the 4th time) son,  ROTATION/ SPIN  is NOT conjugate field reciprocation.


I suspect you are drunk or insane.

Brad

If you want, I will put your credit and a couple pictures in the 3rd edition and give you credit for your new invention


IF you want,  As I said, I got many hundreds of 1000s of downloads on the book already     (NO I DONT MAKE A CENT OFF IT).


IF you want your picture and a credit for your discovery in the book, I will give it, if not, I wont put it there.      YOUR CHOICE.


Otherwise I will replicate same experiment and give you credit but use MY picture

Poor execution of a half-ass experiment and a lack of understanding on TinMan's part is what defeated the electromagnet from rotating. 

BS claim #1

However, there is an inverted field in the hole of a ring magnet like you said.

BS claim #2


"inverted field in the hole"        WHAT HOLE?            Fields dont "see holes",   All fields move divergently and convergently


charge/discharge

convergent/divergent

centripetal/centrifugal

There is no "opposite pole" in the "middle",  THERE IS the dielectric inertial plane around the CIRCUMFERENCE of ALL magnets.

You cut a magnet a 1000000 times, it will still be there, it is "incommensurable".  As it is necessitated to be so.

no cutting involved; just test using a speaker/microwave oven magnet....

If a SPHERE MAGNET is placed ON A MAGNET is has a PRECISE angle, due to gyromagnetic precession.    Its IN the book.

I said on a metal plate (should have additionally specified ferrous so I didn't get a smart remark about it not being attracted at all on copper/aluminum etc)

Quote

The south is felt most within the top/bottom boundary of the magnet, which in a fluid it will definately experience.... moving a magnet outside of this region will make it seem as if it's an all-north face, but with a thinner outer boundary and smaller sensing magnet, there is a flip outside of the material of the magnet (above)   

NOPE to that as well.

Ya actually it is.  Inside a ring magnet, the a separate magnet will be south-up if the ring is is north-up just like attaching a magnet to the outside.... the mating magnet will be south-up.

But I'm not defending this any further... this bit will definitely be leading a horse to water (but can't make him drink); and shouldn't have

hey look thousands of images with magnets with holes in them .

Demented child...........  EACH "side" OF EVERY MAGNET ON EARTH HAS TWO vortex movements,  ONE centrifugal, and ONE centripetal


So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

Which side is moving which direction?!!!

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW

S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW



back to school with you.

No, it's back to school for you.  Duel Counter Rotating Homopolar Motor (Magnetic Vortex Motor - Part 4)!  This video clearly shows the conductive discs moving in opposite directions over opposite poles and not in the same rotation direction as you and TinMan wrongly and falsely asserts.

Gravock

    If a SPHERE MAGNET is placed ON A MAGNET is has a PRECISE angle, due to gyromagnetic precession.    Its IN the book.
I said on a metal plate (should have additionally specified ferrous so I didn't get a smart remark about it not being attracted at all on copper/aluminum etc) 

I know, I was referring to another method, ON a magnet.

Ya actually it is.  Inside a ring magnet, the a separate magnet will be south-up if the ring is is north-up just like attaching a magnet to the outside.... the mating magnet will be south-up.

Ya actually, no.......you "dont get it",    EVERY SIDE TO EVERY MAGNET on earth has 2 fields, (both magnetic, as driven by dielectricity), centrifugal, and centripetal.

N and S are also ultimately meaningless polarized = spatial, = human perceptualizations of "N and S",  reciprocal field conjugation has neither "S nor N" "poles" reductively.

that "center" you speak of can be seen with magnetic viewing film, its the dielectric inertial plane.



So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW
S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW




From the illustrations below: We have, at picture 1, the “magnetic” disk resting against gravity in parallel to the dielectric plane
of the large 2x2x1” magnet, whose dielectric inertial plane is illustrated in green. In picture 2 we have the steel disk sitting (it almost
will rest on its knife edge) perpendicular to the dielectric, which is the only low torque position in line with the magnetic circular
induction, marked in red. In fact, even using a magnet twice this size, and many 100s of times the weight of the steel disk, the torque
of the steel disk along the dielectric will move the magnet to keep a perfect perpendicular; the same is true in reverse for the disk
“magnet” in parallel to the dielectric of the block. The steel disk is magnetized, is a magnetically induced disk in whole, whereas the
block and disk in picture one are electrified, are “magnets” only conventionally but are in fact dielectric objects in near-whole, and sodeemed
“magnets” because the magnetic ‘part’ is spatial and the near-whole, dielectric, is counterspatial and radial. This is magnetodielectric
momentum; identical to gyroscopic inertia, however here we have dielectrical centripetal inertia and circular magnetic
inertia expanding along the Z-axis (see diagrams of magnetism in other sections of this article). Massive confusion exists that this is
the “boundary wall, domain wall, Bloch wall” of a magnet, it is not, it is the primary mover of the magnetism, having been electrified,
it is the dielectric inertial plane. Breaking the magnet will cause an immediate (faster than light) creation of a new self-centering
dielectric plane. As per figure 1 I can place the brick magnet on a 500 pound refrigerator and not making contact with the tiny fewgrams
disk magnet, twist it from parallel against the dielectric plane against the brick magnet and make the 500 pound refrigerator
shake resultantly there is so much dielectric torque at play. This among many other experiments is proof that dielectricity is at play in
any magnet as primary, and magnetism itself as merely an attributional secondary. You certainly could not cause such a reaction by
way of magnetism alone from the disk magnet to the 500-pound object, that would be impossible; only by means of dielectric torque.

No, it's back to school for you. 

Gravock

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOZlAejTMYk


You DEMENTED DEMON,    he says in that video, the same damn thing I DO at 32 seconds in.     ROFL


However he is only witnessing the CENTRIFUGAL movement, NOT the centripetal.

Yes, you are officially drunk and/or insane      

Look at HIS diagram below in HIS video, its just a CRUDE example of what I have already said.


You son, are bat guano insane.