This would imply that magnetic fields have a frequency(ies), which is/are directly related to the frequency of the "time variable electric charge and currents"?

Yes, Gyromagnetic ratios, and magnetic precession is nothing of my discovery, this principle is part and parcel to all magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) technology, however the entire field of MRI technology
is senseless and clueless that a permanent magnet exhibits this due to a special magneto-dielectric field geometry. MRI use enormous
power to generate these magnetic precessions, which field contrasts are then used to image and determine what is being scanned.
Enormous pulsing power is used in the creation of MRI images, however a single large pulse is used to create an identical precessional
magnetic geometry in the permanent magnet. As is the case with most technology, things are discovered and perfected without
actually understanding or caring about the principles behind them
 

Every once in awhile, I hear about magnetricity, which seems to me to be based on the idea that magnetic "current" can be harvested and used to light up lightbulbs and power motors, etc.,.  Most explanations I find are either steeped in new age ideology and terminology or articulated with antequated notions of electrons spinning around atoms or are secretly vague/abstruse or a mix of all three.   My question:  In your opinion, if magnetricity were possible, would it have to do with influencing or tapping into the strength of the dielectric plane?

Well, taking the position of CP Steinmetz, Heavisidse, Tesla and others, there is no such Unicorn as a "discharge particle" , i.e.  the 'electron'.   It absolutely does not exist, and its mental creation is a false understanding of the function of charge transference.

No, said "magne-tricity" (your term) is not possible, magnetism is definitionally radiation and always a terminus posterior to a prior.   We all know how to get electrification by movement of a polarized (=magnet) field, but magnetism is not an entity that can or could exist of its own accord.   It exists inter-atomically resultant to charge, in T.E.M. and macro-magnetically in a "magnet" resultant to its disequilibrium from electrification where the interatomic magneto-dielectricity is WAY out of balance.

By "new age" you mean the CULT OF QUANTUM which makes nothing, invents nothing, and only produces mental fecal matter.

The people that invented 100% of our modern world , Tesla, JC Maxwell, CP Steinmetz, Heaviside, they all collectively spit at this mental midgetry that has invaded current "science".

If the dielectric plane is where the "pinch" is located, is this not where the real power is?

Yes, that is the case.  A magnet is "squealing" from dielectric 'pinch'     

grab a mouse around his mid-section and squeeze, listen to him squeal.          (humor) Here be the magnetism in a "magnet" (electrified dielectric object) "squealing" with polarization

ROFL

OF WHICH under a perfect condition is 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism



ALL of this is detailed in the book.


SEE the "Squeeze"  !!!!!    

See this one ? Neo magnet spinning in between two sheets of highly diamagnetic pyrolityc graphite

http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/magnets/pyrolytic_graphite_2/spin.gif

Yes indeed, I have LOTS of  pyrolytic graphite     

see a bit here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6je5P1BOp3A

The magnetic field moves with it's source!

Exactly true.   I can easily and PERMANENTLY ruin the magnetic gauss rating of a magnet to a great degree by horribly deforming the dielectric inertial plane by applying a LOW VOLTAGE (6volts) in small quick pulses along the inertial plane.


Every "magnet" has its 'engine' in the dielectric inertial plane at the midpoint to ANY and EVERY magnet which is ALWAYS self-centering and part of field incommensurability in a magneto-dielectric conjugate system.

Was that a rodent coil? 

 
A "constrictor" coil     

Poles of a magnet is a concept, and should only be used as a reference point to which particular side or end of the magnet we are referring to.

well said.

I said nothing about flipping the poles of a the magnet. I said ,Quote: We can place the wire in the north region,and the magnet will spin in one direction. We can place the wire in the south region,and the magnet will still rotate in the same direction-And this is correct thank you.Please read post correctly ,before saying some one is incorrect.

All polarization = spatial is a mind skr3w.    ANY rotation is moving in the "same direction",  only apparently different from SPATIALLY SEPARATED ENDS.



Euclidean method,......pen and paper to the rescue!!!


Just print the SAME SHEET about 10 times, then roll 2 up into cones. etc etc.......

TA
I spent the afternoon fooling around with different magnet configurations in water,then passing a current through them. This is something that was shown some time ago,but there was never a clear answer given as to why we get the vortex effect.

Its easy, see pics JUST ABOVE, even "vortex" movements are just straight lines against a fulcrum of an opposing force.


like a dog chained to a pole that runs round and round (winding himself CLOSER to the pole) he draws out a centriPETAL movement


opposite, of that, he draws out a CENTRIFUGAL movement.


All movement of FORCE  and FIELD modalities are really straight lines twisted due to spatial / counterspatial     Divergent/ convergent field reciprocations / repulsions / attractions, etc etc etc.




You mean that "magnetflipper" guys videos???

The water vortex movement is simple water hydrolysis where the hydrogen bubbles move themselves centrifugally in the magnetic current.

I have 4 other ways of doing that which have NOTHING do to with adding etc, electricity. 

Nice (see snapshot below)!

Gravock

Yes, yes yes. 

I have made discoveries on the golden section in the past 12 years that would blow your mind off your neck. 

 
5+ Phi^-3 = Golden circle of incommensurability (MY DISCOVERY)

course MOST people have NO idea what incommensurability is........but it was the "most important secret to the Platonists and Pythagoreans".




took me a few years to unite these 2 incommensurate golden proportions and make a proof (that would take 100 pages to explain, and I wont do it here)