I explained it perfectly, ....that you DONT ACCEPT the answer, is not the same as  "DIDN'T answer".

Here is your "explanation:"

You see, son, I actually DO the experiments, you think you understand but you dont.

IF placed ONLY on the centrifugal edge you will GET NO BRIGHT SPOT IN THE CENTER, absolutely NOTHING.   (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/grin.gif)  (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/grin.gif)  (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/grin.gif)

however you can see that in an upcoming video.   I love they way you assume things.   The bright spot in the center, son, only appears when there is a centripetal magnetic vortex present.

And ONLY then.

I have news for you.  The people that read this forum, even the rabid believers, are not totally retarded.  The fact is that you didn't answer.  I conclude that the reason for your failure to explain the black voids is because you simply don't know the answer.  That means behind all of your bluster is a little scared guy that is afraid to show that he is human and doesn't have the knowledge, education, and experience to demonstrate that he really and truly knows what he is talking about.  It's a dichotomy that you have to deal with and it must cause you some stress.  Just how long can you be "On" before you get exhausted I wonder.

MileHigh

I've spent quite a bit of money experimenting with magnets for some time now and I've come to similar conclusions as Theoria.

The three things I'd like to mention that some may not know:

A: The magnetic "field" isn't static in repeatable experiments conducted by Eugene Podkletnov.
B: This "field" "seems to affect objects at a distance at a speed of 64c." IE: 64x the speed of light.  (No wonder it appears "static")
C: OverUnity is valid science and is being investigate by ALL astrophysicist........ Although they simply call it "Big Bang Theory". Yes, the fact the universe is expanding at an ever increasing speed confirms OverUnity to me. (Though additional energy could be "leaking" through from other dimensions.)

Some have said this thread isn't what this forum is about, I disagree. The better understanding we have about magnetism, mass, speed, doh'nuts, votexs, vortices and such the better. I'd like to suggest people watch the Discovery channel's "The Universe" series and pay particular attention to the Black Hole episode. There is far more information in the accurate representation of what a Supermassive Blackhole does to a star than many will realise.
I believe the secret to "OverUnity" "free energy" (in the broad sense) is hiding in recreating a magnetic scale model of our galaxy. Easily achieved if we had a better understanding of magnetism.

Then please go ahead and explain the black voids (still waiting) and the egg-shaped void.  I am very curious to hear your explanation and perhaps others are too.

Then please go ahead and explain the egg-shaped void.  I am very curious to hear your explanation and perhaps others are too.

Well, Im an idiot, right?   You have your force vector formula for the calculation.

Im waiting for the Cult of Quantum to spit out answer.




I just DID explain the dielectric displacement ("black void") above.  Im glad you missed it on purpose.



talk of electrons?  Whats this nonsense?    

J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.


     “Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the ‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

     The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings

     “Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.”  - Dr. Steve Biller



 Nature is not governed by the irrational pontifications of GR and QM, rather it is governed by mutually interactive reciprocal conjugates of charges-discharges, centripetal-centrifugal movements, both spatial and counterspatial. Instantaneous action at a distance, and fields are all Ether modality mediations as propagated by counterspace-in-disturbance, the Ether, its pressure gradients and perturbations. No other mediator can be logically hypothesized, much less theorized. The very same Ether of Tesla, Heaviside, C.P. Steinmetz, and even originally from Einstein before logic fled his mind completely, was correct and remains so. Tesla outright denied our current definition of the electron as a ‘discharge particle’.


     All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect understanding of the definition of a ‘field’), these pressure gradients, or “lines” are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus ‘electron’. The thermionic ‘electron’ contracts, pulling the ‘electron’, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the ‘electron’. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these so-called ‘electrons’ assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the ‘voids’, directing the ‘electrons’. Hence, it is the so-called ‘electrons’ (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. ‘Electrons’ have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called ‘electrons’ are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. ‘Electrons’ are in fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron ‘bead’; such notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of atomic charges and discharges.

     There is no such condition in nature as a negatively charge particle nor could there be. Charge and discharges are opposite conditions of a single subject, either protons or fields of movements and radiation of those same electrical fields. To claim that liquid in a jar (charged) is one thing, and pouring that liquid from the jar (discharge) is another liquid altogether, is nonsense, likewise compression and expansion are opposite conditions of a single subject. Compressing bodies are charging into higher potential conditions. Conversely, expanding bodies are discharging into lower potential conditions.

     “To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.”


     “Here we will dispel the "electronics nerd" concept that a capacitor stores "electrons" in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this "charged" set of plates. This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil, withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the space bounded by the other uncharged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to another set of plates.”



Youve been drinking the Kool Aid of Quantum, son.   Its nothing but Greek Atomism


Unicorn particles

Pixie particles that discharge

Pure irrational insanity, thru and thru       

Well, "dielectric displacement" does not cut it as an explanation for why we see the black void.

Empty claims, Its like eating sponge cake, you know theres something there, but nobody likes it.



Too bad too,  it  "CUT IT" for Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell, and Steinmetz


Since you dont experiment, let me educate you a bit son.


buy an electrostatic generator, and sprinkle graphite on the charged surface, then bring a magnet near it.

I assume (correctly) in your insanity that you dont know that a supra-diamagnetic material is ANTI-magnetic.

Let me translate that for you in a way your mind can understand  Diamagnetic = super-dielectric = anti-magnetism

Son, how did you think a Yttrium barium copper oxide disk at temp of LN2 (liquid nitrogen) levitates a magnet?  It becomes supra-diamagnetic.


Back to school with you.   Suggest you go read Heaviside, certainly JC Maxwell

You still didn't explain it and I am forced to conclude that you can't.  Likewise you can't explain how a coil works in a simple pulse circuit.  These are some Litmus test questions that are clear clues that show your propositions are a sham.  To demonstrate something new or some new area of knowledge or to propose a new alternate theory you have to be able to demonstrate competency in the overall subject matter, even if you disagree with it.  It's like John Rohner claiming that he designed some kind of special proprietary spark plug firing controller and then revealing to the world that he didn't even understand how a spark plug circuit works.  Or Wayne Travis claiming that he could extract free energy from water moving up and down in a cylinder and bellows contraption yet he never was capable of stating anything about his system using comprehensible sentences that made any sense to someone familiar with energy and hydraulics.

You have lots of company and many of us are very familiar with the pattern.

I have pretty decent cred and having patents is not relevant to this conversation.  Applying knowledge and understanding and evaluating situations is the backdrop to this discussion.  If you don't have the knowledge and just run off willy-nilly gobbling up anything you read you end up in a place like you are in now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI