Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1229223 times)

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5070 on: January 21, 2016, 11:39:40 AM »
 Joel here is the best representation of Ken in his “self home made” hemp robe …
 
Link to that video…of his …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLMl5PqgQ48
 
Look…. I like Ken,  now that does NOT mean that “I agree with his philosophy..” as such example :
 
Like his swearing and  calling people “trigger words”  …beign rude and crude… His Hate of people who dis-agree with him…
 
I will tolerate his Magnetism Theory as it is HIS belief .. and to convince me that it is correct is also “faith” in “my” understanding and for NOT EVERYONE ELSE…
 
“U” Have to discover that for your “self”…
 
 and if you hate what he does or what he is, “he is what he is” and that will not change him.. or my belief in him or his magnetic theory..
 
I also like ugly dogs.. so what !!! It’s my choice not yours …
 
You Have to accept the fact that calling him WRONG and filthy names just also wrong ..
 
 
Accept all of him as a “human” with all the character faults that he carries…because one just can’t cut out the bad part and leave just the good parts.. as that will make him cease to exist… as in Hinduism all LIFE is sacred, ever the slimy brown rat…
 
 
The Laughing Budda is a popular representation of fortune, pleasure, innocence, and complete joy which is already obvious on his cheerful face. Many people know that by rubbing his belly which is full of fortune, it can bring in good luck and success in your home. The larger the tummy of the Buddha, the more it becomes more favorable to the people. That is why the Laughing Buddha is truly one of the most dearly loved Buddha icons which can be seen in almost all Chinese homes and eating places all over the planet.
 
Moreover, the Laughing Buddha can also be called a Buddha of Wealth because it depicts holding wealth like vessels full of gold, tons of ingots, and sacks full of treasures. It also carries a wu lou or gourd which is a sign of healthiness and endurance in life. This article can teach you how to use the Laughing Buddha to achieve a better lifestyle.
 
 Acca..

[/font] Link to the Buddha…below
 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/Budai.jpg
 
 
http://www.iai-international.org/feng-shui-laughing-buddha.html
 

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5071 on: January 21, 2016, 07:36:19 PM »
QVZPE has meaning only in the current thinking paradigm, in which quantum=small, vacuum=empty space, zero=nothing, point=particle, energy=movement, or with other words SEsNPM, ie at smallest levels of an empty space there is some energy from particles. But if we assume there is no "resting mass" which is the truth of this sentence?

Well, therein lies your fundamental conceptual error, doesn't it?

Quantum != "small". Quantum means "quantized". In other words, the energy states of the universe are discrete, originally discovered due to distinct spectral emission lines of different elements, which is caused by electron orbitals being quantized, which is caused by an electron orbital requiring an integer number of De Broglie waves in its orbit, or the electron will have set up a destructive interference orbit that will cause an unstable orbit. Thus the electron, in dropping in its orbital, gives off only certain wavelength photons. Do you deny spectral emission lines? If not, how do you explain them in your universe? How do you explain the shift in spectral emission lines in a reduced QVZPE field density environment? What prevents the electron from "crashing into" the protons of the nucleus in your universe, because in the real world, it's the ground state energy level imparted by the QVZPE field that prevents this, thereby underpinning the stability of all matter.

Vacuum != "empty space". The vacuum is, quite literally, the Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Energy field, the fabric of space-time. Without it, space could not exist, matter could not exist. The QVZPE field radiation pressure (which is always increasing due to mass in stars being reverted to energy), in trying to reach its highest entropy state, has only two options... either expand space or concretize mass. As I proved mathematically, for mass to be created, entropy must increase, and it's common sense that when space increases for the same unit measure of energy in that space, entropy increases. It is more energetically conservative right now for the universe to expand to relieve QVZPE field radiation pressure. At some point in the past, it was more energetically conservative to concretize mass, which accounts for the mass we have today.

You can think of the QVZPE field as an extension of the stars themselves... the stars are a hot plasma, very low in entropy, the QVZPE field is a cold plasma, higher in entropy... the energy being converted from mass in those stars flows out into space, increasing the area it covers as it flows outward from the star. Thus, it cools and increases in entropy, becoming part of the QVZPE field.

Or do you also deny that stars give off energy converted from mass? Because that'd be a bit nonsensical, don't you think? Now, where would that energy from stars go, and by what means is it being mediated in your universe?

Mass is an extension of the QVZPE field in that mass is an even higher-entropy form of energy... when the force of gravity overcomes the molecular repulsion inherent in the matter in stars, the resulting fusion lowers entropy, converting some of that mass back into energy, while at the same time transmuting that mass into higher-entropy forms (ie: heavier elements).

But you'll note it's a balancing act... too much mass in one place and you get a black hole, nothing can escape despite atoms fusing, and thus entropy continues increasing... but take that gravity away from the black hole and entropy would suddenly decrease catastrophically, forming the most energetically conservative (highest entropy) forms of energy it can... which would likely be matter.

That's why heavier elements are formed in an exploding supernova, after all... the sudden gravitational collapse isn't enough to cause a black hole, the rebound overpowers gravity, throwing that low-entropy star matter out. Since everything in the universe seeks the quickest and easiest path to highest entropy, some of that already-existing matter is transmuted to heavier elements, and some of the  energy in the exploding supernova is converted to lighter elements.

One could say gravity is an effect brought about by the universe's seeking balance... since everything tends toward higher entropy, something must balance that... gravity does so. In the case of planets, since the gravity is insufficient to cause fusion, apparently an agglomeration of molecules is lower-entropy (ie: they occupy a smaller space) than those same molecules being spread over a large amount of space. Enough of the molecules put together, though, and gravity can really get to work, fusing the elements to give off energy (which has lower entropy)... but it still tends toward higher entropy... that energy is thrown outward to spread throughout space (and thereby raise its entropy), and the matter forms heavier (ie: higher entropy) forms of matter via transmutation... gravity, the universe's most frustrated force, always striving, never achieving.  :D

When one denies the existence of the QVZPE field, one denies the great majority of all of the universe. When one denies that fields exist, one denies the very underpinnings of what makes our universe work the way it does.

Offline sadang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5072 on: January 21, 2016, 10:50:23 PM »
CycleGuy, I'm not here to convince you about my words, vision and understanding, nor I have all the answers in the world, I'm here only to express my opinion which rise some questions for some.

There is not any real word, other than that defined by human mind. Can you comprehend and accept this? In an atom in which 99,99 x 10^12 of its volume is empty space, how can you define the matter, particle, mass and the momentum? And what define the real world in this emptiness? The existence and interaction of fields maybe? And fields are what beyond the abstract concept and their math expression? 

When one denies the existence of QVZPE field, one denies only the current concepts and interpretations of what makes our Universe work the way it work, not how it works in its intimate and its entirety. And he try to put it on other bricks, which should be based on principles not laws, ie valid from micro to macro levels of Universe. At least what we define micro and macro related to current limited understanding.

“Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality.” – W. Russell

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5073 on: January 21, 2016, 10:51:42 PM »



   I presume a magnet works perfectly fine in a vacuum, therefore
  even if you think there's nothing there,there certainly is!
           John.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5074 on: January 21, 2016, 11:51:14 PM »
CycleGuy, I'm not here to convince you about my words, vision and understanding, nor I have all the answers in the world, I'm here only to express my opinion which rise some questions for some.

There is not any real word, other than that defined by human mind. Can you comprehend and accept this? In an atom in which 99,99 x 10^12 of its volume is empty space, how can you define the matter, particle, mass and the momentum? And what define the real world in this emptiness? The existence and interaction of fields maybe? And fields are what beyond the abstract concept and their math expression? 

The universe neither knows nor cares what your "opinion" of it is. It is reality and it will remain reality no matter how far off the rails your thinking goes. Reality will not bend to your will no matter what. Reconcile yourself to this fact, and the fact that QM has been verified to be accurate to better than one part in one million (and it improves every day), or continue to deny reality. The only one you're really hurting in your denial of reality and in your embracing the utter insanity that is Wheelerism (an amateurish and unattributed rip-off hodgepodge of Russellian theory, Circlon theory, Dollard theory and a few other off the wall rantings, mixed in with several serious fundamental errors in critical thinking) is yourself.

But if you continue to insist on golfing off the green, I'll be forced to drop you into the Bozo Bin. My job isn't to correct your fundamental misconceptions about reality, as an adult you should be capable of doing that yourself. My job is to learn as much as I can about reality, collaborate with those who are doing the same, and figure out some way of using that knowledge to benefit mankind. You can either join in, or you can go sit down on the second string bench, twiddle your thumbs and think your silly unworkable-universe thoughts.

When one denies the existence of QVZPE field, one denies only the current concepts and interpretations of what makes our Universe work the way it work, not how it works in its intimate and its entirety. And he try to put it on other bricks, which should be based on principles not laws, ie valid from micro to macro levels of Universe. At least what we define micro and macro related to current limited understanding.

“Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality.” – W. Russell

Walter Russell, the man who thought the spiral arms of a galaxy were radiation spiraling outward, instead of matter spiraling inward?

Walter Russell, whose formal education ended at the 4th grade?

Walter Russell, who wrote: "Electricity is the strain or tension set up by the two opposing desires of universal Mind thinking", whatever that babble means?

Walter Russell, who posited that all planetary orbits become eccentric with time, whereas modern science knows planetary orbits start out eccentric due to excessive speed, and as the planet scrubs off speed due to gravitational drag, the orbit becomes more circular?

Walter Russell, who said the Earth was thrown off from the sun, and that the planet was continually flattening at the poles and would thus become unstable in its orbit about the sun?

Walter Russell, who said that light does not travel, that it "reproduces" itself, and that the speed of light is dependent upon the frequency and the length of the waves of that light?

Walter Russell, who said that light is both a "corpuscle" and a wave?

Walter Russell, who said the electron wasn't a "negative particle", it was an ever-expanding "corpuscle", and therefore it was perpetually moving outward toward space? He states exactly what Mr. Wheeler ripped off from Russellian theory without even bothering to attribute, to wit:

Quote
There is no such condition in nature as negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.

Compressing bodies are charging into higher potential conditions. Conversely, expanding bodies are discharging into lower potential conditions. To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting body.

Walter Russell, who blathered on about a "mother-light" and a "father-light"?

Walter Russell, who said that light rays "multiply their volume" in space after they leave a star, meaning they quite literally get bigger?

Walter Russell, who said light is "conditioned" from its creation to become a certain thing, specifically stating sodium and the seed of an oak tree?

Walter Russell, who said that the sun wasn't throwing off photons of light, but was somehow reproducing itself here on Earth "by extending the reproductions out through cold space into ever enlarging wave fields until those reproductions begin to converge again toward our center of gravity into ever smaller wave fields."? So light can grow and shrink in volume, according to Russell, all without it affecting the frequency of that light, apparently.

Yeah, quoting Walter Russell isn't going to bolster your argument. He's the original Wheeler. He happened upon a couple of discoveries, then went off into the deep dark woods of whackjobbery.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5075 on: January 22, 2016, 12:09:43 AM »
{Sorry for the over-width images, I don't know how to get the forum to resize their display size.}

   I presume a magnet works perfectly fine in a vacuum, therefore
  even if you think there's nothing there,there certainly is!
           John.

It depends upon how you define "vacuum".

In a 'normal' vacuum (in which there is no atmosphere, but the QVZPE field is present), a magnet would not see a diminished field strength.

In a 'perfect' vacuum (in which there is, quite literally, nothing... no atmosphere, no QVZPE field), a magnet would have no field strength... remember, a magnet is a folded strange attractor, it induces virtual photons from the QVZPE field to enter the magnet via the Attractive (centripetal) interface, they travel through the magnet and are expelled via the Repulsive (centrifugal) interface on the opposite pole face. No virtual photons from the QVZPE field, no magnetic field.

From another of my posts:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1956.msg34981#msg34981
Quote
A conventional "dipole" magnet actually has 4 poles (2 Attractive and 2 Repulsive). Thus, a conventional magnet is "quadrachronologic" (when viewed from the perspective of both of the conventional magnet's pole faces).

The QVZPE field density is stressed twice on each pole face of the conventional magnet, once to slow time down (via the virtual photons thrown off at each Repulsive pole), and once to speed time up (via the virtual photons pulled in at each Attractive pole).

In short, our terminology for magnets is all screwed up, which confuses the entire topic.
                              Described Today As:     Should Be Described As:
Conventional Magnet:  Dipolar                       Quadrapolar, Quadrachronologic
Perfect Magnet:          Monopolar                   Dipolar, Dichronologic
Pole Descriptions:       N Pole, S Pole              Face 1 Attractive, Face 1 Repulsive, Face 2 Attractive, Face 2 Repulsive

We should be looking at and describing the Attractive and Repulsive poles that are intrinsic in each pole face of the conventional magnet. When we refer to an entire conventional magnet, we should be referring to it as "quadrapolar" and "quadrachronologic", rather than "dipolar". What we refer to today as "monopole" magnets we should be referring to as "dipolar" and "dichronologic", since a perfect magnet with all magnetic domains aligned in the same direction will have two poles... an Attractive (centripetal) and a Repulsive (centrifugal) pole.

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=36313.0;attach=825988
That's a PDF file entitled: "Pressures and Energies of Vacuum in a Magnetic Field. Differences and Analogy with Casimir Effect". Scientists from Instituto de Cibernetica, Matematica y Fisica in Havana, Cuba did the research for NASA. They show that the Attractive (centripetal) interfaces on a magnet "squash" the QVZPE field density closer to the magnet pole face, whereas the Repulsive (centrifugal) interfaces "spread out" the QVZPE field density. This is a result of the temporal (time-asymmetric) qualities of a magnet's interfaces.

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5076 on: January 22, 2016, 01:09:18 AM »
Here is a link to Michael Snyder on magnetism. He is the original discoverer of the Hale Shaw cell and the magnetic flux lines ..2007


 

  http://overunity.com/15426/the-ferrocell/15/





Here is my old post from page 39 of this thread

 Here is the Flicker photos of Michael Snyder he developed the single axis magnet plasmon viewer..  His YT channel is https://www.youtube.com/user/SirZerp/videos
 
http://www.aps.org/about/physics-images/archive/heleshaw.cfm
 
“Anti-Vortex Image in Hele-Shaw Cell
Magnetic fields can be hard to understand or characterize. Two natural means of visualizing magnetic fields are the aurora australis and the aurora borealis, as well as the Sun's corona.
Michael Snyder and others have explored ways to visualize magnetic fields in the lab. The visualization here started with a Hele-Shaw cell. A Hele-Shaw cell is two flat parallel plates separated by a nearly infinitesimal distance. In this case, Snyder's and Frederick's Hele-Shaw cell is made of two 100mm circular glass windows separated by a Fe3O4 ferrofluid; that is, a liquid of 10nm particles that becomes strongly magnetized.
The Hele-Shaw cell is facing the camera and illuminated by 36 colored LED lights placed around the cell’s perimeter. The light is scattered through the cell as the ferrofluid particles respond to two magnets behind the cell which are aligned north/south and south/north. The magnetization produces this anti-vortex image.”
 
http://www.revolution-labs.com/
 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sirzerp/2947536208/in/photostream/lightbox/
 

 
Acca.


Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5077 on: January 22, 2016, 02:50:37 AM »

this forum is suposed to be about sharing information and technical know how

Do we realy have to put up with this verbal abuse and foul laguage ?

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5078 on: January 22, 2016, 02:49:34 PM »
Look at this picture its the path of reactions but there is something missing that reveals the paramagnetic resonant Code and I just found it !!!!

Do you see all these Russian free energy resonant field technologies all depend on finding the paramagnetic resonance peak field of a coil set up and only now are they all agreeing that they get ill from it so its never going to work as a safe energy system if they keep doing it the way they are doing it !

Well I have found a new way of doing it and its the safe way !!!

Also I would like to have a bet with anyone that a magnetic field line is made of !!!!Nothing !!!! And In between the lines are particle harmonics as say trapped zero point fields set to a harmonic resonance equal to the intensity of that part of the field ...

Monopoles are holding different zero point particles like gravitons and bosons ! Confirming these two as the true fabric of space and time ! All the others hold the charge carriers .....

...........................................................................................gravity now isolated..............................................................................................
 


Yes, Yes you know a lot on the quantum physics level that may well be true, but time is getting short we need to move forward if you don’t want to be a brain dead US captive slave in a fema camp.
Aliens usually give abdicates some sort of telepathic message of some kind about the earths future and how we can stop the idiots from destroying it, why don't you regress your mind back into that information and use it, help the earth and humanity before your freedom and ours is gone, forget about contracts money and self wealth most people are just existing,  the 5 percent of the rest are banksters and Politicians, Politicians have already been bought out till it all changes it looks world wide, so who is the Führer ? don't get side tracked, move on.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5079 on: January 22, 2016, 04:52:06 PM »



   Is a "perfect" vacuum attainable?
   ie. No QVZPE field.
            John.

Offline sadang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5080 on: January 22, 2016, 06:01:06 PM »
CycleGuy, you still keep paying exaggerate attention to minor aspects of what I write, and completely avoid the important aspects. I consider Universe care about my opinion as well as of your opinion, because we both shape it! The Universe is not something external to you and me and everything compose and define it. And Universe is reality in the same manner as I wrote above. Or as I wrote in a previous message, thinking that Universe obey the human laws as we define it from here on Earth, is a huge mistake and a big lack of wisdom!

So, keep believing the Universe is defined by QVZPE if this is your way, and continue on Descartes method of knowledge. And will shape a reality accordingly! But, from time to time rethink what are the meaning of such concepts as matter, particles, mass, momentum, field and static.

"As I revolve in my mind the thoughts in answer to your question I find the most wonderful thing is the utter aberration of the scientific mind during the last twenty-five years. In that time the relativity theory, the electron theory, the quantum theory, the theory of radioactivity and others have been worked out and developed to an amazing degree. And yet probably not less than 90 per cent of what is thought today to be demonstrable scientific truth is nothing but unrealizable dreams." - Nikola Tesla - Galveston Daily News, Galveston, Texas, March 13, 1932, Page 11

"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." - Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum (from Ken's book page 9)

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5081 on: January 22, 2016, 06:24:29 PM »
   Is a "perfect" vacuum attainable?
   ie. No QVZPE field.
            John.

Not with the materials we have available. The main problem is that metal is the best shielding material to use to block electromagnetic fields (which the QVZPE field is comprised of, given that it's a magnetohydrodynamic fluid, a cold plasma), but at extremely high frequencies, metal becomes transparent to those electromagnetic waves. I've theorized that a combination of graphene, then bismuth (one of the densest stable metals), then lead, then iron (to fritter away any remaining electromagnetic fields as eddy currents) would make an effective shield:

From another of my posts, some random thoughts into avenues of research:
Quote
1) What if, rather than trying to reflect or block QVZPE wave modes at the exterior of the walls, we attempt to absorb them, and fritter them away in eddy currents? I'm thinking along the lines of research into high-efficiency solar panels, which trap a photon in a "maze" of sorts, a contorted waveguide, allowing all the energy of that photon to go toward knocking electrons free rather than being partially reflected.

2) We know that the Casimir effect cannot block high-frequency wave modes because the metal plates become transparent to the energy at high frequencies (at and above the X-ray range), yet it is the high frequencies (high energies) which would reduce the QVZPE field density the most.

3) We'd have to use a metal or some substance or combination of substances that can block or absorb x-rays and higher, along with the lower frequency modes of the QVZPE.

4) Perhaps an iron plate, a layer of lead, then a layer of bismuth, and graphene sheets on the outside? The iron plate would be the base to eddy-current away any induced fields that make it all the way through the shield (and it being the most atomically stable element, it would better withstand an artificially lowered QVZPE environment than any other element), the lead would be there to block ultra-high frequency waves, the bismuth would do the same as the lead and would repel magnetic fields due to being diamagnetic, and the graphene would absorb electromagnetic radiation all the way up to the THz range, and convert it to an electrical current.

5) I'd made a note earlier about graphene making a good Casimir cavity wall material. This is because graphene has a near zero nuclear magnetic moment, it's a zero-gap semiconductor, it's an excellent conductor with the lowest known resistivity at room temperature, and it can convert electromagnetic radiation of any wavelength into an electrical current.

Some strange effects occur when you lower the QVZPE field density in a Casimir cavity... space in that cavity shrinks, time in that cavity speeds up, and in a complete absence of QVZPE field, all elements would experience an effect whereby their electron orbits were no longer sustained at their 1s orbitals... so in a complete absence of QVZPE field, any element would undergo electron capture decay up the Periodic Table, transmuting into lighter and lighter elements until it hit hydrogen, whereupon it'd convert into a neutron, a photon in the gamma ray energy range, and an electron neutrino. That'd give off a tremendous amount of energy, orders of magnitude more than a nuclear weapon's fissioning or fusing of a similar amount of material.

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5082 on: January 22, 2016, 06:34:56 PM »
CycleGuy, you still keep paying exaggerate attention to minor aspects of what I write, and completely avoid the important aspects. I consider Universe care about my opinion as well as of your opinion, because we both shape it!

No, we don't "shape it". We merely reside within it. The universe existed long before we did, and will exist long after we're extinct. Our opinions of the universe amount to quite literally nothing to the universe.

The Universe is not something external to you and me and everything compose and define it. And Universe is reality in the same manner as I wrote above. Or as I wrote in a previous message, thinking that Universe obey the human laws as we define it from here on Earth, is a huge mistake and a big lack of wisdom!

You've got that backwards... they're not our rules, they're the rules the universe follows. We merely did the research to discover those rules.

As an experiment, I invite you to wish just as hard as you possibly can that the sun splits into two distinct orbs... invite all your friends, hold hands, sing Kumbaya, chant, burn incense... the sun will remain as it is. Your New Age mysticism is nothing more than a mind f*ck that weak minds use when they can't fathom the underlying rules of the universe. Deal with that reality as you will.

So, keep believing the Universe is defined by QVZPE if this is your way, and continue on Descartes method of knowledge. And will shape a reality accordingly! But, from time to time rethink what are the meaning of such concepts as matter, particles, mass, momentum, field and static.

"As I revolve in my mind the thoughts in answer to your question I find the most wonderful thing is the utter aberration of the scientific mind during the last twenty-five years. In that time the relativity theory, the electron theory, the quantum theory, the theory of radioactivity and others have been worked out and developed to an amazing degree. And yet probably not less than 90 per cent of what is thought today to be demonstrable scientific truth is nothing but unrealizable dreams." - Nikola Tesla - Galveston Daily News, Galveston, Texas, March 13, 1932, Page 11

"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." - Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum (from Ken's book page 9)

Nikola Tesla invented a lot. That doesn't make him correct on everything. Your inability to discern between what he got right and what he got tremendously, laughably wrong is the same reason behind your inability to discern that Wheeler's hobby theory and his take on magnets is likewise tremendously, laughably wrong.

Nikola Tesla, for instance, said he'd received messages from Mars... so according to your way of thinking, there is intelligent life on Mars. See how ludicrous that sounds? No, you probably don't.

Offline sadang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5083 on: January 22, 2016, 07:13:25 PM »
CycleGuy and what make you believe the Universe is older than you or me? The human short matter life? Did you bent on what is a human being? A particle, a field or more than that?

No, that rules are not the rules the Universe follows, they are the rules we defined according to our current understanding about the Universe. And looking at it as something external to our own will and consciousness.

And stop with these silly example of naive experiments, I was not born yesterday. I have the ability and capacity to discern very well between current science dogma and other alternative solutions to it.

I finally understood your mind. You're too seized by the theory of quantum to see or accept anything else. And more than that, you do not want any change! You feel comfortable in that situation, and fear of the unknown! Specific to current scientists, not to see the circularity of current theories.

Keep going on your way and make abstraction of my words. My best wishes to your endeavor! And don't forget this is the Ken's topic about the vortex magnetism and not about quantum fantasies!

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5084 on: January 22, 2016, 07:21:06 PM »
CycleGuy and what make you believe the Universe is older than you or me?

Oh for crying out loud.

Ok, we're done. You're delusional and clue-repellent, and it appears you're getting worse, not better. Into the Bozo Bin with you.