Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 1229814 times)

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5055 on: January 21, 2016, 12:42:53 AM »
Tinman ....

May be  you could help instead of insulting calling everyone dummies here and maybe you could get some respect ...

Seems you have been brainwashed by milehigh ...

All theories are open to discussion  even the one you have a problem with...

Do us a favor and Help us .....

Or get the hell out of here because you are no help it's your  choice ...


Acca...

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5056 on: January 21, 2016, 12:49:58 AM »
Tinman also thanks for duplicating the "magnetvortex" under water ...

seen your videos even the one with the electromagnetic coil under water..

made by me aka. Al...

Acca...

Offline core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5057 on: January 21, 2016, 02:59:31 AM »
Anyone who disagrees with this reality is a dummy !!!

Electric Charge
The unit of electric charge is the Coulomb (abbreviated C). Ordinary matter is made up of atoms which have positively charged nuclei and negatively charged electrons surrounding them. Charge is quantized as a multiple of the electron or proton charge:
 

The influence of charges is characterized in terms of the forces between them (Coulomb's law) and the electric field and voltage produced by them. One Coulomb of charge is the charge which would flow through a 120 watt lightbulb (120 volts AC) in one second. Two charges of one Coulomb each separated by a meter would repel each other with a force of about a million tons!

The rate of flow of electric charge is called electric current and is measured in Amperes.

In introducing one of the fundamental properties of matter, it is perhaps appropriate to point out that we use simplified sketches and constructs to introduce concepts, and there is inevitably much more to the story. No significance should be attached to the circles representing the proton and electron, in the sense of implying a relative size, or even that they are hard sphere objects, although that's a useful first construct. The most important opening idea, electrically, is that they have a property called "charge" which is the same size, but opposite in polarity for the proton and electron. The proton has 1836 times the mass of the electron, but exactly the same size charge, only positive rather than negative. Even the terms "positive" and "negative" are arbitrary, but well-entrenched historical labels. The essential implication of that is that the proton and electron will strongly attract each other, the historical archtype of the cliche "opposites attract". Two protons or two electrons would strongly repel each other. Once you have established those basic ideas about electricity, "like charges repel and unlike charges attract", then you have the foundation for electricity and can build from there.

...... Blah.....Blah...Blah

Are you aware (or how you spell it a wear) what plagiarism is? If you are going to Copy/Paste someone else's work at a minimum, credit the source. There is no need for your drawn out post, just post a link to this site:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecur.html

.......and we can read all about it.

Please take this test:

1. How do you spell United Kingdom.
2. What does U.K. stand for.
3. What color was George Washington's white horse.



Yep, you are stupid,.............. do the aliens laugh at you like we do?

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5058 on: January 21, 2016, 02:59:44 AM »
I think it sounds like Atom Uranus93 is saying he has NOT met aliens but been abducted by them, their is stuff on this planet that's millions of years old you know and it's had people trying to hide it, who knows what the truth is, it's a pity people with closed minds didn't have closed mouths, no offense intended. But i think your going to find the UFO does exist !

Offline core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5059 on: January 21, 2016, 03:11:24 AM »
I think it sounds like Atom Uranus93 is saying he has NOT met aliens but been abducted by them, their is stuff on this planet that's millions of years old you know and it's had people trying to hide it, who knows what the truth is, it's a pity people with closed minds didn't have closed mouths, no offense intended. But i think your going to find the UFO does exist !

I firmly believe UFO's exist, but I don't believe in plagiarizing other peoples work. That's the mark of an idiot and someone who doesn't have an original thought. I am sure you would agree.

Offline core

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5060 on: January 21, 2016, 03:16:30 AM »
The young man would be better suited if he stuck with Harmonics. With this he does have something, I am onboard with that. It's ridiculous to call people "Dummies" when you yourself can't write a completed sentence and your spelling rivals that of a five year old.

 

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5061 on: January 21, 2016, 03:38:50 AM »
@CycleGuy

Thank you.
That was a very good display of someone under mind control.
You can't be serious man.
Very bold.

Ask whom? The proponents of Quantum Mechanics? I have, they've answered cogently with mathematically corroborated replies which reflect underlying reality.

Nice try. I guess they did all that on the first day so six days left to rest. Word of advice. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

You've denied reality and dismissed things which refute your hobby theory, all while expounding upon a hobby theory that is so easily disproved even a child could do it by merely asking you to explain the universal gravitational constant in relation to your hobby theory...

There are no things because it is not out yet and I am not dismissing anything. Those are just words and acts you have invented. Yes a child like you can try but you will not succeed because again, like I said, these things take time to answer in a new construct. I realize you need the origins and they are there as well. I realize you really don't get it and this is my fault for not following a set path.

or asking, if clouds are gravity shields as you purport, why, for instance, cirrostratus clouds above lower altostratus clouds above lower stratocumulus clouds don't just float off the planet... or asking why, if one is in a tall building, the "gravity shielding" you purport occurs from all that material on the floors above and below one's location doesn't affect one's weight from floor to floor... or asking why clouds are able to effectively block gravity so much that the atoms of the rocks below don't swing wildly back and forth between the sun's gravity and the earth's gravity, thus heating up, as you purport happens as means of your getting around denying massless entities and thus photons and thus light... or why, if one is on a submarine at depth, one's weight doesn't change with changing depth if all that water above and below is acting as a gravity shield (remember, you've stated clouds are gravity shields, and clouds are water... so seawater or lake water should be an even more effective gravity shield, right?)... so many examples that disprove the Wheelerization of Wheelerism that constitutes your hobby theory... none of which you can explain, let alone back up with mathematics.

You are totally delirious. I never said anything like that. Everything you just spoke can be proven with SC.

And you'll have to further contend with the fact that researchers have now photographed the electron and the virtual photon flux that constitutes magnetism:

http://www.dvice.com/archives/2011/08/this_is_an_imag.php
http://io9.com/the-first-image-ever-of-a-hydrogen-atoms-orbital-struc-509684901
https://youtu.be/ofp-OHIq6Wo
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17983-magnetricity-observed-for-first-time.html

It is these same people who will want to use SC.

And you'll have to further contend with the fact that researchers at Chalmers University concretized virtual photons straight from the QVZPE field using Dynamical Casimir Effect:
https://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Chalmers-scientists-create-light-from-vacuum.aspx

Sorry but that's just an "illustration" you keep mixing up reality with impressionism.

Remember, your hobby theory denies the existence of anything that doesn't have mass... so no QVZPE field, no photons and most especially no virtual photons. Do you even know what "virtual" means in this context?

You can pile it on as you wish. I never said anything like what you are referring to. You are only jumping to a whole bunch of erroneous conclusions as if you new the construct better then me. You are only confirming there is much to look at. So what else is new in a new construct. I'm not the bad guy here man. Look we are only talking here. Do you think any of those guys that follow QVZPE would not want a clear and totally workable construct to explain their effects. WTF, it's still their effects and now they would have a solid basis. Do you think any of them go to sleep thinking "I hope to hell we're right". Do you think that hope is enough? Hope only keeps you hoping.

Your hobby theory is unworkable, it cannot reflect reality, as even a grade-school child could ascertain. I'll leave you to deal with the personal repercussions of your acceptance of that reality... but just know that eventually you will be required to acknowledge that reality. The only question, really, is how many years of your life you're going to waste denying that reality.

You can call it what you want. The challenge is to use SC as the base to figure all that out smart boy. Don't talk to me about unworkable. And yes right now it cannot reflect your reality, so you have trouble with it. Very normal. Sometimes you need to get sicker to get better. Sometime you need to step away from your junk yard to see the mess.

@CycleGuy

Show me were I said anything about Gravity Shield. Why should there be a gravity shield? Gravity is gravity and can only be variable with proximity. What's closer to the sun the clouds or the earth surface. Hmmmmmmm. This is your illusion and all you can do is run with it. If something was not clear, you ask for clarifications. You don't go jumping to conclusions and justify insulting people just because you misunderstood something. I also told you straight out that I am responding quickly to your questions with a brief answer just to give a run down. Of course there are other points to fill in so what else is new. The general idea is there. What you want is knowledge McDonald's style, one minute and your done. You see an article about item A and then you think you know everything there is about it. It does not work that way but for you it seems that if something does not strike your mind with an all illuminating hammer, it is a Hobby Theory or someone is denying reality. hahaha

OK, prove to me the field exists. It has to be irrefutable otherwise it will not meet your own standard right. Or is there a double standard here.

I can understand the attack mode and also that such a theory will not be received that well because it flies in the face of many present constructs. But that cannot and will not be my problem.  My problem is to find a new way to work towards OU because the present 150 year junket is leading us nowhere. So where is your QVZPE OU device? Do you have one on your bench? How many watts does it output? How many questions do you think I can ask these QVZPE guys and they will not have the answer in the next minute. Hmmmmmm. Life is so great isn't it when you ride a double standard trolley.

Do you know how many years we have been on the present construct? Do you think the first "proponent" had all the answers when he first put it down on paper or even after 10 years. What do you think this is. Instant wisdom. Do you think the first guy that drew the first idea of the electron was well received? That everyone simply understood everything there was about it? Just because you read a few lines of something new, you are all of a sudden supposed to know everything there is about it and decide it's an illusion. hahaha  You're the illusion.

So indirectly what you are telling me is there is no possible way the present construct could be wrong. It is infallible. It is perfect. So who is crazier, the one who sees fields all around him or the one who sees real atoms and gravity as the main responsible factors of our effects. The only two things we can really count on, and it seems they have been PURPOSELY set aside because the payoff would be to high. No no, look only at the field, consider only the electron, believe in Zero Point Energy, forget that dilapidated old atom that has no tricks up its sleeve and forget that constant and burdensome gravity and just be happy in the field, our field, not natures, our field, the one we thought up and hypnotized you with, not the one nature made. I believe. Yes I believe and will not question. I will comply. Hmmmmmm.

Or maybe tell me how many data collection devices use only a field and electrons or are there conductive atoms involved. You don't get it do you. I guess those conductive atoms are just dumb then. They are useless mass without the action of a field and an electron. They serve no purpose in our effects, only the field and the electron can do that. Wow, so the universe went to all this trouble to produce all these atoms only for them to be relegated to the bottom drawer. Hmmmm. Don't think so.

Or show me a field that exists on its own. Nothing pulsing, no energy expended, no magnet, no earth, no conductive atoms used. Not a single atom. NOTHING but a field. Wow. Make my day. How is it that the field cannot exist without the atom, but the atom can exist without the field. How is it that the electron cannot exist without the atom but the atom can exist without the electron. Why is it that every effect can be explained with the Atom and Gravity, but we only consider the field and the electron. Add em up and what do you get? I would call it monovisionism.

Casimir effect, again two atom filled conductive plates placed at micro distance apart, but no, the effect has to be outside those plates because we all know that those plates are dumb junk not worth looking at and we really want to believe in ZPE, soooooooooo, there is no way those plates can effect each other. It has to come from the QVZPE because their copper atoms sensors said so. I think it is they who need a life. They need to come down to reality. I told you, SC would explain everything about what QVZPE is doing but only if you understand SC and have the time to work it out.

So I guess you know everything. Two gravity sources cannot do anything too atoms. So I guess the "radiation belt" is due to a field as well. hahahaha. So let the QVZPE guys feed you your brain food. Give them all your confidence that they are right indeed. Close your eyes to the fact that QVZPE is in essence a marketing ploy designed to make money. Money because donations do not come in when the source of energy is not known. That is a fact of commercial OU life. The academics do not want to hear anything that is free energy. So they invent Zero Point Energy so they can now say "LOOK, IT'S NOT FREE ENERGY, THE ENERGY IS COMING FROM THE ZPE". Right or wrong they do not really care as long as the money is flowing. So what. They invent a source and bingo, the money model is secure. Use your brain man.

I have seen every image there is of atoms but who said those are electrons? Everything is ALWAYS BASED ON OUR BEST PRESENT CONSTRUCT. You are just confusing what is and why is. Tomorrow morning if Harvard announces that the field has been found to be an impostor because of that damn experiment I told you was never done, what will you say? Maybe you will say, WOW, maybe I should not jump so fast to conclusions.

You know, I was the one who started the Wire X on this forum. I'm like a real blood hound. I'll sniff it out if it takes a day, a week, a month or even years. You know how many hours of observation, investigation, logic, counter-logic was involved in those times was so tremendous. No one realizes the time it takes. People come here and bullshit their OU devices all the time and because of our dedication to OU we are required to look at everything, question everything, but one thing though, jumping to conclusions I also know about and that is embarrassing I know. It happens to everyone. Really, it makes you better and pushes you to be even more certain of covering as many angles as one human can before letting it start to sink in. You think I am crazy. hahahahaha So, maybe that's a good sign. At least you know this is different. It's like looking through 3D glasses, these are SC glasses. So you can work in Standard Model (SM), and when you want a second opinion on THE ACTUAL EFFECT, you look with SC. This is only good and shows that you are open to more then ONE MODEL. That's where your power is, by having a choice.

The Holmiun atom page you reffered. Let's see what it says "Raising the temperature can cause a holmium ion to flip the direction of its spin, creating two adjacent poles of the same type. FOR A LITTLE EXTRA ENERGY, THE FLIPPED MAGNET CAN FLIP ITS NEIGHBOR, CREATING A DOMINO EFFECT THAT RIPPLES THROUGH THE SOLID". SC all the way man. That mimics what copper does. There are six spin modes. So easy. First atoms at the end of the wire get excited and start jittering causing the next and the next down the line. Not in one direction but two (but that is secondary right now). The more they look at the true effect, the more you will find SC and the true attributes of the atom. NO FIELD OR ELECTRONS REQUIRED.

I really thought I could have some serious discussions in a constructive manner. You know, normal discussions like someone saying "Hmmmmm. I don't get it, what do you mean by this or that". NORMAL discussions, but I guess this is again asking to much. hahaha

You want to play with electrons, go ahead. Tell me where the electron energy comes from and also, tell me who is driving those electrons around and around and around. He should be in the Grand Prix. Tell me how th electron is ductile, fluid, gas, solid, liquid, electricity and everything else in between.

SC Theory does have an outer shell model but I am leaving this open because the action of the nucleus for me is where the real action is. The construct also has the energy source of that outer shell. In SC the outer shell has enough to do being the interface, the bonding, the ductility, the liquidity, the gas, the has enough to be hot, cold and everywhere in between, the outer solidifies the structure, the inner conveys the action.

I always had, even as a young man, a real problem when I was thinking about the simple light bulb. How is it that electrons, if they travel in one direction, start at one end, hit the bulb and while the bulb is almost in plasma, the electron is still capable of continuing on the the negative side. Now I know. The outer holds the matrix fast even when hot and the inner was doing all the electricity conveyance. You really don't get this do you. I know thousands who will very quickly understand this one paragraph. hahaha

I want to make nuclei dance. So my tactics will be different then yours and we will see who comes up with the smallest OU device possible so it is not hard to figure out and copy so anyone can make it. This is Overunity.com. My construct is really concentrating on this end of it even though it involves everything else, I will leave it to others to meld with it. I just want OU man. After that, everything else, health, medicine, whatever is their own activity, it will be up to them to figure it out how SC can help them. As long as it helps OUers. hahahahahaha.

With SC, your body now has more brains. The atoms in your organs are different. They all work on SC and so do all the bad guys you want to get rig of to stay healthy. hahaha

I'll be back when the doc is ready. In the meantime, please just grab a cold beer and relax. Consider yourself off the case until like for everyone else, I can issue my doc.

wattsup

PS: I am only responding to you now because I had e-mails from others who never post here asking for further details. This is a public forum and there can be thousands of people who come here so I will not make a spectacle of SC theory (À là Kenny Boy) just to provide you with your own punching bag. I am also a very scrappy guy. I have had more then my real share but I told myself that for SC, I will not entertain such activity. But it's not easy. So for now, I will no longer respond until my doc is out and have opened my own thread or just stay always at OUR, otherwise I realize this approach is not constructive. Have a good one and thanks for your input. Just to mention, this post took 4 hours to write and check. I ain't do'in it again until the doc is out. Just too much work.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2016, 02:32:02 PM by wattsup »

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5062 on: January 21, 2016, 04:05:06 AM »
All I can say Thanks !!, and that is what a fantastic response was...by Wattsup..

Acca...

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5063 on: January 21, 2016, 04:07:32 AM »
 Atom…
 
 
off topic …UFO stuff…
 
 
Here is one of my clips from Denver Colorado about (2011) the secret space program.. That is an invisible saucer you can see the knife edge effect,  this this thing was flying next to high voltage 500 kva lines in south Denver.. about 2:20 am during the summer.. Yeah it very real !!!  It’s a keeper…
 
At one time I was getting million views a month using night vision Xenonics (supervision) equipment..
 
 
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ0n3VMryqk
 
 
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread760104/pg1
 
 
 
 
 Acca…[/font]

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5064 on: January 21, 2016, 06:05:54 AM »
 Here are the latest clips from Ken Wheeler the “MAGNET GURU”
 
 
 
 
Must-See Video! *SECRETS OF MAGNETISM* Never Seen Before* Torus-Hyperboloid
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whoylwf-i0A
 
 
 
Part 2: What??!! *WHEN MAGNETISM ISNT MAGNETISM* Inertia VS. Magnetism
 
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uFFlE3udTk
 
 
 
Acca…

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5065 on: January 21, 2016, 06:17:35 AM »
 Here are the latest clips from Ken Wheeler the “MAGNET GURU”
 
 
 
PART 3: TRANS-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY OF COUNTERSPACE: The Hyperboloid
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw6rw7B9Ejg
 
 
Part 4: Centripetal VS. Centrifugal & Gauss Meter *MAGNETISM ISN'T MAGNETISM*
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VheMzcOtKu8
 
 
 
 Acca….[/font]

Offline Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5066 on: January 21, 2016, 06:46:28 AM »
Ken Wheeler is "really the MAGNET GURU"

and the "angry photographer" is the best reviewer of cameras...

Yeah I do have a D750 Nikon.. Thanks Ken for the Clarification on D800 also..

Acca...



his You Tube channel below...

 
 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVcxJ9k14bi__-uA1cGkEcA[/font]

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5067 on: January 21, 2016, 08:43:13 AM »
Lol, if you people can't get along very well just imagine meeting a real alien and you trying to communicate with it when not speaking the same language?

Will you freak out? https://youtu.be/mGPKmPdL4Ew?t=57s

Or would you ask the alien to teach you?

To me looking at all of these people in here, sounds like you would be afraid of an alien, but at the same time, think you are smarter than an alien...lol

Who is scared of aliens? And who can tell me why it is illogical to be scared of aliens?

Element93rd, are you scared of god or do you respect and ask god to teach you? If god is not a human being, then it is an alien. I have thought about this before...the devil is an evil alien. So which god do you follow? The good one or the evil one? Who promises a better life and who will put you in hell? How do you follow good from wrong? If you say that you are so smart, tell me this? Does god teach us to destroy worlds? or to help our neighbors? SIMPLE stuff determine the future of this earth!

Element93rd, if you are so smart, why are you not doing anything about it to save this earth/humanity? You can't see the corruption? This means that the humanity will be over soon! It is inevitable! As smart as you are, there is nothing you can do? Or can you? Why has no alien come to the humanity rescue? Why are scientists are creating weapons of mass destruction? And not weapons of OVERUNITY FOOD? The rocket = torpedo. The airplane = dropping bombs. The radar = snoop on the enemy. The powder = shoot people. All of that shows the extinction of 90% of the corrupt people. IF HUMANS SCIENCE IS SO GOOD AND TRUTHFUL, why is everything money corrupt? WELL ELEMENT93RD, you are not doing anything positive are you?

Can you repair an HVAC system? lol...I'm sure you can't? Just like a pilot driving an airplane...they don't design any airplane, they just drive it and think they are bad ass...while they are driving someones design. lol

Offline joel321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 953
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5068 on: January 21, 2016, 09:12:58 AM »
That picture of wheeler with karate/kungfu/or-whatever outfit is funny as hell...tho...lol. No disrespect magnet guru, but reminds me of kungfu panda...lol

Offline sadang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #5069 on: January 21, 2016, 09:37:56 AM »

CycleGuy, is crucial to renounce at the concept of "resting mass". It did not exist only in our limited science, in a system subjected to analysis of the human mind, according to the principle of Descartes. "Mass" is simply an effect and a wrong interpretation of it and "rest" is simply a false concept based on the existence of "mass" and strict related to it. This is a clear example of circular thinking that you still can't sense with your rational and analytical mind, and it is available only in a closed system defined by human mind arbitrary created concepts.


More than that I can't say because is useless, you have to sense all these with your own mind, not with my mind. For example look at the Mass-Boom effect formula and interpret it according to the nonexistence of "rest mass" and maybe will see its non-sense, and its circularity which goes nowhere.


QVZPE has meaning only in the current thinking paradigm, in which quantum=small, vacuum=empty space, zero=nothing, point=particle, energy=movement, or with other words SEsNPM, ie at smallest levels of an empty space there is some energy from particles. But if we assume there is no "resting mass" which is the truth of this sentence?


And after you will comprehend this aspect and its implications in human day by day life, will begin to sense that even fields does not exist, but that is a topic after understanding that there are no particles at all.


Keep in mind the words of Ken and try to put them in your own words (of course according to how you were educated over years); "Mother nature has never taken a course in math, algebra and she absolutely rejects the nonsense espoused by quantum. ‘She’ knows only about charge-discharge, spatial-counterspatial and centripetal-centrifugal spin as binary conjugates to charges and discharges. Gravity, electromagnetism and matter are all modalities of the Ether, of charges and spin."