TinselKoala,
                  this is "new science" you don't have to adhere to what is
  thought to be fact.
        You and me are in the "dark ages".

Not only is it not science, it isn't even new.

Science... the real kind that is used to engineer devices that work, that describes the world in a coherent manner with well defined, non-contradictory terms and mathematics... makes predictions that are testable by experiment. It allows mathematical descriptions of reality. It takes observations, uses them to construct testable hypotheses, and results in even greater control over phenomena in the real world. In that mishmash up above, just look and see how many contradictions and multiple definitions of the same thing you can find. They abound. Now look again and see how many actual predictions of observations can be found, that are not covered by the Standard Model of particle physics and Quantum Electrodynamics. There are none.  Look yet again, and see if you can derive things like the Fine Structure Constant from the mishmash. You can't. Look even further and find, if you can, one single engineered device that uses the "concepts" that are written down there, but isn't covered by this "old science of the Dark Ages" that they pretend to replace. You cannot.
 
Show that bunch of claptrap to the persons who use particle beam lithography to build the chips your computer works on... and they'll laugh at you. Show it to the people who build and fly rockets to launch space probes that travel to distant planets and even leave the Solar system... and they'll bust a gut in hilarity. Show it to the faculty at MIT, and you'll probably get sent to the Funny Farm. Only on fringe websites like this one, and with people who cannot actually do anything that resembles real Science, will you find nonsense like that getting any traction. And you _still_ won't be able to find any engineered thing, any mathematics, or even any properly performed experiments that support the "theory" that generated the nonsense.

"Genuine Overunity" from a Bismuth sphere placed next to a magnet !!  Eric $d ranting about hollow suns and invisible stars in space! That's the only kind of "support" you'll ever see for the nonsense "theories" of Walter Russel and others of his ilk.

@TinselKoala

...It allows mathematical descriptions of reality...

Rather it allows mathematical shaping of reality, ie a disaster and mess against the external and human being internal nature! In few words just circular thinking available in the curent so called scientific paradigm!

Are you and others like you part of something like this?
- http://www.fixtheworldproject.net/clean-energy-suppression.html

Element93rd, it is time to show what you mean with evidence. I personally do not find you that smart! But you have great achievements? I want to insult you regarding those!

At this very moment I think you are a CRAZY guy, but if you SHOW your evidence, you will become my god! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, show us what you are talking about?

Element93rd, this is your time to “shine” or to get laughed at! ENOUGH! With trying to feel like you are smarter than everyone just WITH WORDS!

I have an either bubble making motor !!!! for real !!!!

Show it already? Teach! People...that is our responsibility! And to call stupid people stupid! So are you stupid or smart? To me, you sond  like you are kind of crazy in the head BUT AT THE SAME TIME, you are not crazy enough!

How is your evidence/facts? In electrical schematic form or 2 year old squiggles on paper….doe not matter. Time to shut up and put up!

You have been banned from here 4 times, I know you are not scared of that….but you keep on coming back! To teach the masses or to get banned again? Lets change that and LEARN!

You are the same like TA, SIMPLE! You are here to “prove” that the vortex is NOT real, BUT YET< you back up your “theories” with vortex assumptions!?

EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THE NUMBER 1_9 WORKS? Or how the EYE BALL cannot hear? How your thoughts communicate due to electricity? How you where not born a female with big tits? lol

   "It allows a mathematical shaping", but Mother Nature doesn't do math!

lol....explain how mother nature does not do math? hehehe OR, who are you quoting..hehehehe

Shit minnie, logged off? Pfft, scardy cat? Man, how do you have a decent debate with that guy? I guess he needs to go google stuff... lol

   Nature does the math and takes the path of least resistance,from a
waterfall to a ferrocell!

  We have a lovely machine for sharpening our combs and cutters.
 It requires a bit of skill to use it properly.
    Nature doesn't do math is one of Kelly's main selling points.
    Nature doesn't do straight lines is another.