Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 12:22:08 AM

Title: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 12:22:08 AM
Hello.
I would like to address my question to those members of the forum who have prior experience in developing electronics professionally.

I had recently found an article (in Russian) that seems to summarize all my theories of how Free Energy devices that involve some sort of transformer may work.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fhalerman.narod.ru%2FTTCG%2FKapanadze.htm&edit-text= (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fhalerman.narod.ru%2FTTCG%2FKapanadze.htm&edit-text=)

http://halerman.narod.ru/TTCG/Kapanadze.htm

This article talks about efficient ways of exciting a Tesla Transformer using an oscillator that is Phase Lock Looped to the self-frequency of the Tesla Transformer SECONDARY and that applies an occasional impulse to maintain the oscillations.

The timing of this impulse is very critical and it compared to the automobile ignition timing.


If, indeed, transformers that work in the impulse mode can create Free Energy from Aether entering the device as the magnetic field collapses, than it makes a perfect sense to excite them at their resonant self-frequency and to measure the voltages and currents that exist inside the transformer after a square impulse was applied.

I would like to test different ferrite-core transformers and air-core transformers using this experimental rig.

1) Is occasional impulse method of driving a transformer more efficient than just using a transistor that is connected to the secondary for feedback and excites the primary?

2) Is this method better than the traditional Tesla Coil method of adding a pulse from a capacitor bank as voltage on the secondary decays?

My hypothesis is that Mother Nature tends to generate harmonic oscillations and in doing so, additional energy may be drawn from the aether to add to the energy that was brought to the transformer by the input impulse.

I want to test all the possible "Free Energy" transformer devices using this jig.

(http://s2.postimg.org/r78trpk85/Scan_140612_0005.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/r78trpk85/)
http://s2.postimg.org/blri7r8a1/Scan_140612_0005.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


There are two ways to construct this device.

A traditional PLL synthesizer that uses the coil resonance as a clock source and a digital approach.
(http://s9.postimg.org/fgmcu79d7/Scan_140612_0006.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/fgmcu79d7/)
http://s9.postimg.org/p15zh2ypb/Scan_140612_0006.jpg
OR

A Microcontroller - DDS impulse generator that uses a frequency divider to measure the oscillator frequency and some kind of DDS to generate an impulse.

(http://s28.postimg.org/tjuty7pux/Scan_140612_0003.jpg) (http://postimg.org/image/tjuty7pux/)
http://s28.postimg.org/u9dmakqel/Scan_140612_0003.jpg

Since my experiment will run in the 10KHz to 1MHz frequency, using a microcontroller directly would not be possible.
I would need some kind of ripple counter for this purpose.

Timing of the input impulse would be rather difficult. In case with traditional PLL, I would need a voltage-controlled oscillator that outputs a pulse every N number of oscillations.

In case with a microcontroller I would need to use an algorithm and circuity to time the pulse perfectly at very high frequencies.
So I will need to consider the time it takes to make a decision that the pulse has to occur and subtract it from the timing of the pulse.
I bought a http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD9833.pdf (http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD9833.pdf)

I am not sure how many steps are offered to shift the output phase.
I see this in the datasheet:

The analog output from the AD9833 is
fMCLK/228 × FREQREG
where FREQREG is the value loaded into the selected frequency
register. This signal is phase shifted by
2π/4096 × PHASEREG
where PHASEREG is the value contained in the selected phase
register

But Pi is an irrational number...

Maybe I should buy a different Analog Devices IC to generate the pulse.
A triangle output of AD 9833 makes it suitable, however there are very few examples of how to interface it to Arduino.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am designing a circuit that would be able to excite any RCL resonator at the 10KHz to 1MHz frequency range.
I would need to connect the circuit to Arduino anyways because I would like to see the output frequency on a text LCD and I would like some rotary encoder inputs to tweak some variables.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Help me design a circuit, please.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 09:08:07 AM
Here a project which can be useful
http://nutsvolts.texterity.com/nutsvolts/201404/?folio=20#pg20

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 10:06:02 AM
Here a project which can be useful
http://nutsvolts.texterity.com/nutsvolts/201404/?folio=20#pg20

Sounds great for the KHz frequency. Thank you.

I am thinking of using a high frequencyPWM IC that would run at the same clock source as the ripple counter.
Both the ripple counter and the PWM IC would run at higher clock frequency than the Arduino, but since the input impulse will happen rather occasionaly, Arduino will have time to do the math to position it.
https://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Components/General/tlc5940.pdf

Maybe a PULSE - POSITION MODULATION  IC such as http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD9560.pdf

BUT...

I WANT TO ANNOUNCE that instead of trying to replicate

Kapanadze Generator, Alula 0083, Hubbard Generator, Martinez Generator, Tesla Coil overunity, Ferroresonance experiments, etc,

I want to draw a common denominator from all the above TRANSFORMER-BASED overunity circuits.
Instead of messing with complex, analog circuits I want to design a JIG that would allow me to test all kinds of transformers at self-resonance.

There is a common theory that the magnetic field collapse brings in "radiant energy". Than lets test it. I want my transformers to be impulse driven and I want to measure all the input and all the output and than, if I see a sign of overunity, I will design a more optimized circuit for the task.

But for now I am building a TEST JIG.

Instead of trying to decipher what the inventor (or a scammer) had in mind when a specific circuit was designed, I want to take a universal approach.

If two frequencies have to mix inside a transformer, so be it. This will be the next addition to my circuit.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
I want your engineering advice, and I want you to criticize and check my ideas for sanity and practicality.
You are welcome to take on my project, but please inform me of every step you undertake so I can repeat it and learn. I will make sure that I will document everything.

 I actually WANT an experienced engineer to take on my project since I am not so great at designing my own circuits.
Help me design this jig, please. I promise to keep this circuit open- source. It will be a very handy RCL resonant frequency meter for any hobbyist.
It will track small amplitude - frequency relationships in the resonator.

If it works, I will put on my Guy Fawkes mask and distribute the results to everyone's doorstep.
THANK YOU.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: forest on June 13, 2014, 10:25:17 AM
he he if that would be so easy I would take a team of "experienced engineers to take on my project " and solve riddle in few months [/size] :P
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 10:40:02 AM
 
Quote
I want to draw a common denominator from all the above TRANSFORMER-BASED overunity circuits.

 Why you think that there is a common denominator?
 


 P.S. Some more practical circuits here http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/fe_basics.pdf
 
 
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 11:36:29 AM
But there has to be some rationality behind all those "Recipes of obtaining Overunity" that flood the internet.

There are four categories:

1) Permanent magnet motors - the V gate arrangement(I tried a linear motor - it works. Now I want to make it spin in a circle), the Perendev Motor, the Searl Generator, etc
2) Electromagnetic overunity - Bedini motors, other devices that use moving parts and coils.
3) Transformer- based devices - Kapanadze generator, Akula device, Hubbard Generator, etc.
4) Atmospheric Ion generators and Cosmic ray generators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townsend_avalanche , Nikola Tesla PATENT 685,958, etc.

1) So far I failed to make a rotating V-Gate motor, however I developed a beautiful 3D printable set to test the V gate motor that I am currently playing with.
2) This category seems to be the most ridden with false assumptions and pseudoscience, since it involves charging and discharging batteries. Inventors may not be aware of the battery surface charge phenomenon.
3) This is what makes Joule Ringer work better with a ground attached to it than without a ground. The common denominator of this is the so-called Ferroresonance.
4) Most scientifically proven, least efficient. The idea is to use "ions" from the atmosphere to generate power or to catch specially formed energy formations known as the Radiant Energy that can charge capacitors remotely and sometimes experimenters achieved it unintentionally.

So I want to work with 1 and 3 at this point.

I want to resonate a Tesla Coil so it explodes from electricity.
I need Pulse Position Modulation (PPM) to time a pulse to excite the coil, I realized.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 12:15:32 PM
 
 Why you think that there is a common denominator?
 
 P.S. Some more practical circuits here http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/fe_basics.pdf

This is a great amount of work! A well-written textbook.
vasik041, you are a genius.
I think deductively. So I am trying to find a common denominator.

Maybe there are few subcategories for the transformer.

There is a movement in FE that uses a so-called grey tube, a DIY cousin to thyratrons and spark gaps.

I think that you should read the first chapter of Secrets of Cold War Technology, where the author is describing Nikola Tesla experiments.
Than there are those two videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gPeIVVy0A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aJP_yp_tn4

This is what Tesla used to drive his transformers.


But there is a common denominator out here. Otherwise why would there be so many transformer - based devices.
Official physics is too conformist to accept the theory behind those devices. This keeps us, the hobbyists in the jungle.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 01:25:38 PM
Quote
I think that you should read the first chapter of Secrets of Cold War Technology

I've already read it some time ago... Entertaining, but not very usefull :-)

If you want know about Tesla's work read what he wrote himself.

If you study history of radio, you will find that main reason why spark gaps excitation circuits were replaced was...their low efficiency.


P.S. another text http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/fe_principles.pdf

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 01:38:02 PM
I've already read it some time ago... Entertaining, but not very usefull :-)

If you want know about Tesla's work read what he wrote himself.

If you study history of radio, you will find that main reason why spark gaps excitation circuits were replaced was...their low efficiency.

P.S. another text http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/fe_principles.pdf

I know. But they could produce a very sharp pulse. I don't want to deal with spark gaps.
I want to design a Frequency Divider --> Microcontroller --> PPM circuit. I want to see those capacitor - transformers resonate themselves to shreds.

You should try categorizing devices by their possible principle of operation. Categorize them to how far they stand from known laws of physics.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 03:23:23 PM
Quote
Categorize them to how far they stand from known laws of physics.

I think all devices works according to known laws of physics :-)

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: TinselKoala on June 13, 2014, 03:32:31 PM
@tarakan

You may find these videos interesting:

How the Arduino inductance meter works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6N8ys8FiA4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qx3B89379eQ

The SassyClassE auto-resonating SSTC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RXGGmlnOSY

The MHOP: Better-than-Bedini Pulse Motor (a playlist showing the complete development process, thanks MileHigh!):
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8F1PebS_EX7AX2aA_ZZtb9



Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 03:42:14 PM
I think all devices works according to known laws of physics :-)

Possibly.
But what about the conflict between aether dynamics theory and conventional space-time mesh theory?


I am googling for PPM ICs and they don't exist. PWM ICs do.
I need some kind of a buffer that can be programmed ahead of time to output a 1 bit value after an N number of clock cycles had passed.

This buffer along with the ripple counter will work at faster rates than my Arduino itself.


I need to input a value from Arduino that tells the IC to output zeros, output 1 when N clock cycles had passed.

Do you know of any suitable ICs for this purpose?
Same for the ripple counter. I need some high-speed frequency divider.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: ALTECHLAB on June 13, 2014, 03:50:25 PM
We go to OU models by "cold current" and plasma effects....no inductive coil, no resonance circuits...should be interested about your opinion...
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 13, 2014, 04:19:00 PM
...There are lots of possibilities how to generate that pulses.
If you use an AVR 8Bit micro running @ 20MHz - you should be able to generate pulses in a 50ns frame.
You will need a little assembly coding - but should be not that complicated.
I actually work with a imx28 (freescale) linux board. This chip - or for example the imx 6 has some special ptp clock hardware which can operate up to 120 MHz.
You can generate pulses using the compare unit of those clock - and can generate pulses with 8.33ns precision.
The most versatile solution would be to use an fpga eval board.
This would give you almost any degree of freedom, just limited by the system clock.
What about simply using an AD DDS generator - and simply tuning mechnism - observing the resulting voltage ?
That should be possible even with an attiny controller.

rgds.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: ALTECHLAB on June 13, 2014, 04:21:54 PM
see Akula OU generator with ferrite core...it's working!
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 05:27:37 PM
see Akula OU generator with ferrite core...it's working!

ALTECHLAB How do you know for sure ?

I think there are all signs that Akula is a faker :-)
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 13, 2014, 07:00:48 PM
If something is working and you have physically built and witnessed it, send me a PM with more information.

If you live in United States I want to come and check if it is working or not. I will popularize the circuit as soon as I replicate it myself.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 14, 2014, 05:47:54 PM
see Akula OU generator with ferrite core...it's working!
You had built it and it worked? I will pay. Build me a replica and mail it to me.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 14, 2014, 05:52:59 PM
Here is what I want to build.

I need to choose a Divider IC for the clock, a Divider for the input, and a buffer IC to store an impulse as a "1" and output that "1" in a line of "0"s as the clock is ticking.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: ARMCORTEX on June 14, 2014, 08:21:36 PM
Ok, I have designed amplifiers before, I have some college education in basic electronics, but I consider that mostly basic and easy. Like you my skill is self taught.

It looks like you have good logic and are clever individual, I doubt engineers will help you for ''free'', and alot of engineers would probably be unprepared for your task.

I trust you know how to program a microcontroller, and have good skill with non-programmable IC logic gates, the fastest I ever used were the 74LV series.

The thing you gotta know about VHF 100 MHZ and above is that you need specially designed stubs on a pcb, to avoid reflections, coaxial tubes, self made type high current.

You cannot poison your signal generator by your own radiation.

I have a good book from an ex-mit student that explains all the effects in simple terms, If you are interrested let me know, you will learn about loci diagrams and propagation effects.

The logic circuit, looks doable, and you should be able to do this without too much complications if you make a good pcb, plz read about pcb design guidelines for high frequency.

This I understand so-so, I apply these rules a bit like voodoo, and ''covering all angles''. Most of the times it will be ok if you obey the rules.

The amplifiers, you will not be able to do properly without proper calculations, you may not even be able to measure what signal you got correctly, there will be complications.



Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 14, 2014, 08:35:10 PM
Ok, I have designed amplifiers before, I have some college education in basic electronics, but I consider that mostly basic and easy. Like you my skill is self taught.

It looks like you have good logic and are clever individual, I doubt engineers will help you for ''free'', and alot of engineers would probably be unprepared for your task.

I trust you know how to program a microcontroller, and have good skill with non-programmable IC logic gates, the fastest I ever used were the 74LV series.

The thing you gotta know about VHF 100 MHZ and above is that you need specially designed stubs on a pcb, to avoid reflections, coaxial tubes, self made type high current.

You cannot poison your signal generator by your own radiation.

I have a good book from an ex-mit student that explains all the effects in simple terms, If you are interested let me know, you will learn about loci diagrams and propagation effects.

The logic circuit, looks doable, and you should be able to do this without too much complications if you make a good pcb, plz read about pcb design guidelines for high frequency.

This I understand so-so, I apply these rules a bit like voodoo, and ''covering all angles''. Most of the times it will be ok if you obey the rules.

The amplifiers, you will not be able to do properly without proper calculations, you may not even be able to measure what signal you got correctly, there will be complications.



Thank you.
Are there engineers on this forum?

I suspect that the absolute majority of well-paid electronic engineers that design this kind of circuitry bow their heads to the idols of the status quo and disregard overunity physics.

But I can always call this circuit a hobby RCL meter. Theoretically this concept can produce a very high end RCL meter.

I know that if I make this circuit run at 1GHz, I will need a lot of skills that I don't have. It would be nice if I get someone interested in the Ham Radio world where people optimize their antennas and try to make the most efficient morse code generators.

This could be a very good open-source project for the general public. If I do it, it will work at KHz frequencies and it won't be very helpful because I would not be able to test ferrite transformer Akula device-related things.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 14, 2014, 08:57:49 PM
...There are lots of possibilities how to generate that pulses.
If you use an AVR 8Bit micro running @ 20MHz - you should be able to generate pulses in a 50ns frame.
You will need a little assembly coding - but should be not that complicated.
I actually work with a imx28 (freescale) linux board. This chip - or for example the imx 6 has some special ptp clock hardware which can operate up to 120 MHz.
You can generate pulses using the compare unit of those clock - and can generate pulses with 8.33ns precision.
The most versatile solution would be to use an fpga eval board.
This would give you almost any degree of freedom, just limited by the system clock.
What about simply using an AD DDS generator - and simply tuning mechnism - observing the resulting voltage ?
That should be possible even with an attiny controller.

rgds.

I would love to learn Assembly.
There is only so much my head can lean. I am learning advanced statistics and calculus beyond what I was taught in school.

I thought of using DDS,

But in every RCL circuit there is a slight correlation between amplitude and self-frequency. So in the function COS(X*C) * [decay part] C is not constant. It drifts up or down.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda.html

I don't want to be another crazy overunity device inventor. (I am) I want to plant a seed of rationality, try to derive few common qualities that all OU devices have and make measurements. I KNOW that I am not going to be the lucky one who succeeds at replicating an OU device. Some organizations like CIA will always make sure that the circuits that are out there are not not the working ones. But they can't be too far from reality.

We need to be patient and to build mathematical and physics theory.

IF RCL circuits driven by impulses can give us overunity and this is a common hypothesis than lets make an effort to drive them in such way that this phenomenon can be observed.

FOR THIS I PROPOSE THE ABOVE MENTIONED RCL meter. It can be used for antenna calibration and other radio ham applications, can be commercialized.
Thank you!
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 14, 2014, 09:50:00 PM
Nobody within the overunity community has taken the self-tuning approach to all the transformer devices?

So for the tesla hypothesis I need a transformer with a critically damped primary and an underdamped secondary. I have to keep the primary from oscillating...
So I need to release energy, than reabsorb it into my primary circuit or burn it off on a resistor and measure how much energy I burned.
But this is the analog part that I don't want to discuss.

I want to find the buffer and the frequency dividers so I can work with the basic RCL meter.

I want to start an online, laissez-faire institute of rational overunity studies.

Lets build the RCL meter-self tuning driver. Otherwise what makes an overunity enthusiast different from the alchemist of the late middle ages.
The former tries to empirically obtain overunity, the latter used to empirically try to derive gold from other elements of the Periodic table.
But dark ages have to end at some point...

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 05:29:36 AM
Ok, I have designed amplifiers before, I have some college education in basic electronics, but I consider that mostly basic and easy. Like you my skill is self taught.

It looks like you have good logic and are clever individual, I doubt engineers will help you for ''free'', and alot of engineers would probably be unprepared for your task.

I trust you know how to program a microcontroller, and have good skill with non-programmable IC logic gates, the fastest I ever used were the 74LV series.

The thing you gotta know about VHF 100 MHZ and above is that you need specially designed stubs on a pcb, to avoid reflections, coaxial tubes, self made type high current.

You cannot poison your signal generator by your own radiation.

I have a good book from an ex-mit student that explains all the effects in simple terms, If you are interrested let me know, you will learn about loci diagrams and propagation effects.

The logic circuit, looks doable, and you should be able to do this without too much complications if you make a good pcb, plz read about pcb design guidelines for high frequency.

This I understand so-so, I apply these rules a bit like voodoo, and ''covering all angles''. Most of the times it will be ok if you obey the rules.

The amplifiers, you will not be able to do properly without proper calculations, you may not even be able to measure what signal you got correctly, there will be complications.


I feel like I need to document this idea as an idea and let others do it.
I realized that I should use asynchronous communication between the Arduino and the buffer that positions a spike. This way I can specify when the spike should happen as a number of clock pulses until the next spike instead of placing this spike in time as a "1" in a row of "0"s.

I cannot pick the right ICs to do the job. All I can do is google datasheets and read them. But I cannot google special values like operation frequency of the IC. So I need to ask a professional that builds circuits at around 100 MHz - 1GHz. My circuit may have a commercial application of measuring RCL. It can be built under this cover. Sorry for repeating myself.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: ARMCORTEX on June 15, 2014, 09:44:17 AM
Man that looks so boring with arduino.

Nonono.

ARM better!

Microchip better!

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 10:13:24 AM
Man that looks so boring with arduino.

Nonono.

ARM better!

Microchip better!

Digital signal processor may be an option than.
ARM is better. If I can find a cheap demo board and bootleg the right compiler. But I don't have time to learn all this for one circuit.
If I could split tasks with someone then I would do my share of the project.

I am interested in seeing the result but I am not going to study all the fields of engineering associated with its design. It is impossible as I don't have as much free time.

I think that it is time to hand this project to whoever wants to build it and leave.

Other overunity enthusiasts can either try to decypher the next Akula 0083 LED light circuit or try to find a fundamental approach to the subject matter.
There are no options besides those two.

Maybe mankind hasn't reached the level of self-awareness yet. Than all my efforts will be wasted no matter what...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Permanent magnet motors - the V gate arrangement (I tried a linear motor - it works. Now I want to make it spin in a circle), the Perendev Motor, the Searl Generator, etc
2) Electromagnetic - mechanical overunity - Bedini motors, other devices that use moving parts and coils. Veljko Milkovic stuff
3) Transformer- based devices - Kapanadze generator, Akula device, Hubbard Generator, Molina-Martinez, Hendershot device, etc.
4) Atmospheric Ion generators and Cosmic ray generators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townsend_avalanche , Nikola Tesla PATENT 685,958, etc.
5) Capacitor - based free energy devices. Non-linear or piezo - capacitor is used in those OU devices.

Those are the categories. Everyone wants a quick result and fails. The right thing would be to classify devices and form theories of operation.

Collapse of the magnetic field is the #1 suspect. This is what I wanted to experiment with but I see very little support.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 15, 2014, 10:38:52 AM
Quote
This is what I wanted to experiment with but I see very little support.

How easily you gave up :-(
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: TinselKoala on June 15, 2014, 05:37:05 PM
How easily you gave up :-(
And how unwilling to do homework. 

I can only suppose he didn't bother to watch my videos posted earlier showing an Arduino _auto-self-resonating_ Inductance Meter that illustrates the principles of programming the Arduino to initiate pulses to interrogate an LC tank, cause it to resonate, read the response, compute and display the resonant frequency and the inductance of the device under test.

He also probably isn't aware of my SNOT testbed, using Arduino to regulate and measure the kinetic energy of the "rotor" (a ball on a track) of a simple non-overunity magnet-motor type testbed that can be adapted to test _any_ magnet "gate" arrangement to see if it really does add energy to the system or works as a loss mechanism. I would wager he has never properly tested his "working" linear magnet motor arrangement to see if it really adds energy to the moving part or not... and I'll also wager that it does not add energy and thus all attempts at looping it will fail.

Or my demonstrations, and those of other people, of several auto-resonating  systems including Tesla coils of the standard and Slayer Exciter type, boost oscillators like Joule Thiefs, ambient energy harvesters and so forth.

Of course since he wants to operate at between 100 MHz and 1 GHz... he's a little out of range. As others have pointed out, reasonable operation at those frequencies requires construction techniques, test equipment and components that are out of reach of the average "garage experimenter". Even a "basic" 100 MHz bandwidth digital oscilloscope is a bit of kit that not many of us have available and even fewer could use properly.


Sorry, I'm feeling crotchety this morning. I always get annoyed by people who ask for help and advice then ignore it, and who think up overly complicated "solutions" to problems that will never be implemented because they are too busy to learn the basics. "No, a stand alone microprocessor is better than a packaged thing like Arduino, but I'm too busy to learn how to program it...." Please, give me a break.


Collapse of a magnetic field? Well, here, just so there can be some entertainment in this thread, here's a little slideshow of what one system does with a rapidly collapsing magnetic field.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTLFlRhsa5U
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 15, 2014, 05:38:12 PM
Are there engineers on this forum?
I suspect that the absolute majority of well-paid electronic engineers that design this kind of circuitry bow their heads to the idols of the status quo and disregard overunity physics.
But I can always call this circuit a hobby RCL meter. Theoretically this concept can produce a very high end RCL meter.
I know that if I make this circuit run at 1GHz, I will need a lot of skills that I don't have. It would be nice if I get someone interested in the Ham Radio world where people optimize their antennas and try to make the most efficient morse code generators.
There are engineers on this forum, and resonance trackers are somewhat simple things.
Puharich and Meyer have some in their patents (...)
Its quite easy to design them for narrow frequency ranges - and typicalwise you know your needs and there is no need for a universal wide-band tracker/resonance finder.
Using modern parts and drivers - it should be easy to make universal once up to few Mhz.
Because the components you can buy (even military or whatever)  are not the ideal ones - and you can design reasonable ones which operate in a specific "band" and a specific load impedance with little effort.
There are a few things to consider:
You would need a driver stage with adjustable output impedance.
If you are not able to match the load impedance - you can only get at fraction of the effect.
Under perfect conditions you loose only half the energy because of transmission, not including driver losses.
Using an array of mosfet bridges - you could vary the output impedance by certain degree.
But even if you adjust the output impedance - the transmission line from your driver stage to the device under test should be tuneable - whats quite difficult to realize.

So its possible to realize a kind of universal setup for the measurment, frequency and pulse generation - but if it comes to the driver stage - you need somewhat optimized driver to match your load - and a powersupply which can handle that.

>Joke ON
If we could manage to reduce the speed of light by a certain factor - we could increase the wavelength - that would help a bit.
>Joke OFF

Its not about skills but about reasonable effort.
An RF generator, operating from DC up to 1Ghz on a _fixed_ impedance of 50 Ohms with plenty of power is a serious expensive machine.
BTW, I think that these tracking is a tool but not the key to what you want to achieve.

A somewhat approach could be to analyze the "device under test" with a network analyzer and extract the impedance vs frequency plot.
Then you could design a driverstage which is capable to operate in that certain range...

(...)
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: TinselKoala on June 15, 2014, 05:42:55 PM
I have an HP 8640B signal generator for sale. It's a serious bit of kit, in fair cosmetic condition and good working. Will trade even for a Spectrum Analyzer plug-in for the HP180a scope.

You pay the shipping, of course!


Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 07:45:51 PM
I have to work. I work full time and go to college full time. I am taking summer classes. I have no time for free energy research.
Parts and a custom PCB are expensive.

Research is a very big venture, almost a gamble that I am not willing to play with my time. Status quo will not reward me for solving the myth. OU cannot be a facultative project. I haven't convinced anybody to build the circuit for RCL tests either.

So I gave up for a very good reason - I prioritize my immediate survival over OU research.

I cannot read 100 datasheets a day to see if there is a fit digital IC for my project and no one ever recommended me any ICs to meet the specs.

ALTECHLAB How do you know for sure ?

I think there are all signs that Akula is a faker :-)

Akula is a faker? His pot core transformer with two copper plates that surround the windings has an interesting characteristic and make very efficient Joule Thieves. (LaserHacker.com)Who came up with this transformer and what makes it so special? Numbers. Values.

Look at all the Ferroresonance experiments on You tube. If those videos weren't there, I would never have paid so much attention to the ferrite transformer OU.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 15, 2014, 08:34:37 PM
So I gave up for a very good reason - I prioritize my immediate survival over OU research.

I´ll give you something on the way:
The basic idea to hunt for special properties using a one-fits-all auto-resonator is not stupid.
A tuneable, wideband negative resistor would be the easiest way to do it.
Increasing the negative resistance will finally lead to a self-resonant phenomenon at the most pleasant frequency - without any need for tuning.

The reason why nobody has done that before is - that wideband negative resistors or the stuff you proposed(and how it should work)  are way out of reach - even with extense effort.

Electrical oscillation is never ever a "scalar" thing - only in very rare circumstances you can treat it that way.
"ideal voltage source", "ideal current source", having exact zero or infinite source resistance.

In real world - you have at least 2 compounds - voltage and current - combined to an impedance - and if you increase the frequency - impedance matters.

This is why I never had your idea - because I see no practical way to build it.

Even if we would had such things - it mght be necessary to have an impedance-impedance which could be a thing with complex signal "a" modifying complex impedance Z with parameter x as function of ......
Things are not that simple and I basically aprecciate your effort trying to make us build such thing.
Because its a "kick" to think beyond limits.
Even if its out of reach.

The "impedance" thing is a quite serious issue with lots of overunity stuff - because there are often multiple degrees of freedom - and even if you replicate something in a very serious way - there is a multitude of possible outcome.

I have brilliant ideas on a daily basis - but the truth is - that the chance nobody was there before - is pretty small.
Sometimes the way I came there was unique, sometimes a detail was unique - sometimes I was "first" - but in the end somebody else has done it. (later). It might be difficult to get some reward for solving a myth, anyway.

rgds.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 09:07:23 PM
I´ll give you something on the way:
The basic idea to hunt for special properties using a one-fits-all auto-resonator is not stupid.
A tuneable, wideband negative resistor would be the easiest way to do it.
Increasing the negative resistance will finally lead to a self-resonant phenomenon at the most pleasant frequency - without any need for tuning.

The reason why nobody has done that before is - that wideband negative resistors or the stuff you proposed(and how it should work)  are way out of reach - even with extense effort.

Electrical oscillation is never ever a "scalar" thing - only in very rare circumstances you can treat it that way.
"ideal voltage source", "ideal current source", having exact zero or infinite source resistance.

In real world - you have at least 2 compounds - voltage and current - combined to an impedance - and if you increase the frequency - impedance matters.

This is why I never had your idea - because I see no practical way to build it.

Even if we would had such things - it mght be necessary to have an impedance-impedance which could be a thing with complex signal "a" modifying complex impedance Z with parameter x as function of ......
Things are not that simple and I basically aprecciate your effort trying to make us build such thing.
Because its a "kick" to think beyond limits.
Even if its out of reach.

The "impedance" thing is a quite serious issue with lots of overunity stuff - because there are often multiple degrees of freedom - and even if you replicate something in a very serious way - there is a multitude of possible outcome.

I have brilliant ideas on a daily basis - but the truth is - that the chance nobody was there before - is pretty small.
Sometimes the way I came there was unique, sometimes a detail was unique - sometimes I was "first" - but in the end somebody else has done it. (later). It might be difficult to get some reward for solving a myth, anyway.

rgds.

We have multiple degrees of freedom but who said that there has to be only one "input impulse" and only one feedback line?

Their interrelationship will just be a matter of adding few lines into the code of the microcontroller.

What I had sketched was a 2D system. It considers time and power of only one line.
More feedback lines and more dimensions would make this system much more useful.


A team of several thousands of OU enthusiasts could tackle this problem instead of generating more and more content that restates the problem.

I can build this if I received help. There is nothing I can do about this circuit right now.

Negative resistance? Another analog approach? Why not use an analog double loop PLL than?
Things I propose are not that far out of reach. Someone with digital electronics design experience could make this. There isn't much to this circuit really.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: forest on June 15, 2014, 09:35:48 PM
You told the truth. Free energy is simple but to work out the proof need a very wide range of freedom. Freedom from common dutes, work, health problems and so on...and a lot of money ,resources, friends who can help and have experience. That is the job for youngster having rich father or a bold person as a hobby...
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 09:55:06 PM
Ok. I live in Frederick MD, USA. This is an hour from Baltimore MD and from Washington DC.
If anyone is interested in working on this project, I can spend 1 day a week and drive no more than 1.5 hours in one direction.
Lets split assignments. I can work on studying the programming part, for example if there is somebody who is willing to do electronics.

Having a central, high speed CPU and many buffers and ripple counters may be a wise idea for multidimensional analysis of OU transformers.
We can make the project modular. The final product can be sold as an engineering tool for RCL analysis.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: mscoffman on June 15, 2014, 10:10:48 PM

I cannot read 100 datasheets a day to see if there is a fit digital IC for my project and no one ever recommended me any ICs to meet the specs.


@tarakan

Keep your idea for when you have to choose your thesis in school, and keep your eye out for the sale of this device.
It is a combination of an FPGA and microprocessor. Very high speed digital circuits tend to design themselves. Even
you could design your idea using this device;

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13588168/papilio-duo-drag-and-drop-fpga-circuit-lab-for-mak


:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: mscoffman on June 15, 2014, 10:42:54 PM
Ok. I live in Frederick MD, USA. This is an hour from Baltimore MD and from Washington DC.
If anyone is interested in working on this project, I can spend 1 day a week and drive no more than 1.5 hours in one direction.
Lets split assignments. I can work on studying the programming part, for example if there is somebody who is willing to do electronics.

Having a central, high speed CPU and many buffers and ripple counters may be a wise idea for multidimensional analysis of OU transformers.
We can make the project modular. The final product can be sold as an engineering tool for RCL analysis.


I live in Silver Spring Md., but I am interested only in working on OU projects that have the immediate benefit of OU energy output.
F*ck people's theories!  Hope you find someone for your project.


:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 11:08:09 PM

I live in Silver Spring Md., but I am interested only in working on OU projects that have the immediate benefit of OU energy output.
F*ck people's theories!  Hope you find someone for your project.

:S:MarkSCoffman

There are two kinds of theories:
1)- lets sit and decipher a circuit that has a lot of analog components and try to understand why someone placed the there
2)- lets see why ferroresonance or some other phenomenon in general can produce OU.

You want a fast solution. So you somehow need to tune your circuit. But what are you trying to tune it to?
Every small-scale crafted circuit needs tuning. In mass production, tuning is automated.

It is like trying to set the ignition timing when you don't hear or see the engine and will never drive it...

We bring in energy to create more energy. Than we harvest some of that energy to bring in energy to create more energy. Cycle must repeat for for ever.
There is a circuit that is fitted for this purpose and there is a fundamental process it serves. A clear border has to be drawn between the two.

We can isolate the two. Measure how much energy is brought in and how much is produced. If the quantity of energy produced exceeds the quantity that is consumed, the means of utilizing the excess energy must be improved to allow for a self-powered OU circuit...

Why f*ck theories? It is like saying f*ck mathematics or f*ck physics.
However, we are at the level of antiquity with OU.
Armchair philosophers write theories, gods create OU circuits and populace remains uneducated and deliberately confused.

We need finite element analysis...
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 15, 2014, 11:14:15 PM
@tarakan

Keep your idea for when you have to choose your thesis in school, and keep your eye out for the sale of this device.
It is a combination of an FPGA and microprocessor. Very high speed digital circuits tend to design themselves. Even
you could design your idea using this device;

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13588168/papilio-duo-drag-and-drop-fpga-circuit-lab-for-mak

:S:MarkSCoffman

I am not majoring in engineering. I cannot change my major because it is expensive.
Interesting. But I am not going to use it unless a lot of hobbyist-friendly documentation is written, like for Arduino.
Thank you. I will keep an eye on this.

Division of labor is necessary to complete the task that I had drawn out.
I cannot make every part of the device but everyone can make some part.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 15, 2014, 11:53:45 PM
We have multiple degrees of freedom but who said that there has to be only one "input impulse" and only one feedback line?
Their interrelationship will just be a matter of adding few lines into the code of the microcontroller.
No.
Your idea is to make the universal bell-ringing utility.
The size of the bells we have to ring is from 1mm up to 10m diameter (you can replace that with inch if you prefer).
The speed and weight of the hammer should be fixed - even the elasticity of the handle should be fixed - but is not.
We don´t even know the density of the material the bell is made of.

Well - if the bell would be already ringing - there would be some chance of timing that some kind of standard hammer - applied at the right moment == impedance ==  will transfer some energy.
We could build a somewhat thing capable of producing somewhat dirac impulse - or use an inductor - tuneable in the range of 1:1000 (however such inductor would look like).

OK. even if we take a complete "unmatched" hammer - we have no chance to ring that bell until the transfered energy at least exceeds the losses of the system. If our hammer transfers energy slightly above that level - ringing that bell to some nominal level would still take an almost infinite amount of time.

What I had sketched was a 2D system. It considers time and power of only one line.
More feedback lines and more dimensions would make this system much more useful.
Of course.


A team of several thousands of OU enthusiasts could tackle this problem instead of generating more and more content that restates the problem.
Is it that simple ?
As already stated - OU or whatever effect(prefered) might be released in somewhat unusual scenario, which might be coupled to s resonant issue.
You need an OU bell - and the proper hammer. A "one fits all" hammer alone will show no OU.


I can build this if I received help. There is nothing I can do about this circuit right now.
I hope so.
If you would accept some suggestions concerning the diameters of bells to ring or other reduced constraints - I would think about contributing to this thread further.

Negative resistance? Another analog approach? Why not use an analog double loop PLL than?
Because a negative resistor (even if difficult to build) would be an auto-triggered, auto-scaled hammer - much closer to the goal than you think.
(Far out - of course - but within the same magnitude of far-outness than what you propose)

Things I propose are not that far out of reach. Someone with digital electronics design experience could make this. There isn't much to this circuit really.
I already tried to tell you that pushing the button for that hammer is a simple task - and can be done even with 70ies style circuitry - without any uP; somewhat digital - if you think thats better.
The problem is the hammer - not the trigger.

The engineering approach for this problem is:
We know the size of the bell, the density, the resonance frequency, and we calculate the perfect hammer matched to a standard impedance.
And we are quite happy if the bell rings in the end with somewhat acceptable economy.

I think this brings it to certain point ?

rgds.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 16, 2014, 02:52:00 AM
No.
Your idea is to make the universal bell-ringing utility.
The size of the bells we have to ring is from 1mm up to 10m diameter (you can replace that with inch if you prefer).
The speed and weight of the hammer should be fixed - even the elasticity of the handle should be fixed - but is not.
We don´t even know the density of the material the bell is made of.

To an extent. It will take measurements and judge from them what is the elasticity of the system.

Quote
Well - if the bell would be already ringing - there would be some chance of timing that some kind of standard hammer - applied at the right moment == impedance ==  will transfer some energy.
We could build a somewhat thing capable of producing somewhat dirac impulse - or use an inductor - tuneable in the range of 1:1000 (however such inductor would look like).

Dirac impulse is an ideal. A very thin impulse will be smoothed by the inductance of the system. There will be noise, of course. I think we are splitting hairs here...

OK. even if we take a complete "unmatched" hammer - we have no chance to ring that bell until the transfered energy at least exceeds the losses of the system. If our hammer transfers energy slightly above that level - ringing that bell to some nominal level would still take an almost infinite amount of time.
Of course.

Is it that simple ?
As already stated - OU or whatever effect(prefered) might be released in somewhat unusual scenario, which might be coupled to s resonant issue.
You need an OU bell - and the proper hammer. A "one fits all" hammer alone will show no OU.
True.

Quote
I hope so.
If you would accept some suggestions concerning the diameters of bells to ring or other reduced constraints - I would think about contributing to this thread further.
Only as a chief ideologist. :)

Quote
Because a negative resistor (even if difficult to build) would be an auto-triggered, auto-scaled hammer - much closer to the goal than you think.
(Far out - of course - but within the same magnitude of far-outness than what you propose)
I already tried to tell you that pushing the button for that hammer is a simple task - and can be done even with 70ies style circuitry - without any uP; somewhat digital - if you think thats better.
The problem is the hammer - not the trigger.

What "negative resistor" would you suggest?
We can make the "hammer" waveform and timing user-  adjustable so it can be located "by ear"

Quote
The engineering approach for this problem is:
We know the size of the bell, the density, the resonance frequency, and we calculate the perfect hammer matched to a standard impedance.
And we are quite happy if the bell rings in the end with somewhat acceptable economy.

I think this brings it to certain point ?

It does. We need a hammer that would also be adjustable by the uP to match the impedance? 70-s technology will give us something rather difficult to measure.
The idea is that measurements are obtained, than brought into the mathematical model, the program is improved, etc.

But I am still trying to do work of a whole research institution by myself.
I realize that for many OU enthusiasts OU is Opium for the Masses - a nice place to escape to but not a serious field of physics.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 16, 2014, 04:35:03 PM
But I am still trying to do work of a whole research institution by myself.
Thats the only option - if you work alone - and you have to be a talented schizo - otherwise you are lost.

Back to our hammer.
As already pointed out - it would make lots of sense to have different hammer-heads.
If you run into few MHz - and want to land a decent pulse to an unknown impedance - the driver stage should generate the pulse right at the "point of load".
The solution would be a detached driver with energy parked/stored at the point of load. - Means RF decoupling with special caps or pcb´s with integrated 50um plate caps.
High-Voltage, high-speed mosfet half-bridge, capable to apply a DC-pulse. (so after applying the pulse - the stage has to go high-z - that would be a double-action hammer).
Combined with perfect decoupling - this stage should be able to apply a somewhat voltage pulse (with impedance somewhat different to the target).
The timing signal should be connected using proper impedance controlled cabel/coax and matched impedance.
That would be the minimum effort to get some useful outcome.

Because you need a grip on the output frequency - you need a preamp (to reduce damping of device under test) and a prescaler.
You can do that discrete using a MMIC preamp and an MC12080.....
But there are some perfect chips used in old analog TV tuners - which could do the job.
MC44817,.. or similar....
There is a legendary 1Ghz prescaler/ preamp combination - still available on ebay - the SDA2101
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SDA2101-Manu-SIEMENS-Encapsulation-DIP8-FREQUENCY-DIVIDER-1-64-/370729890667
I´ve done few projects with that chip 25 yrs ago - but its a simple chip and useful. The only disadvantage I remember was malfunction after esd.
But after few weeks, they start working again ;-))))
Cool thing is that you can make a fine picosecond delay ramping the supply voltage of that chip.
But there should be modern equivalents available.

With a 1/64 prescaler - our maximum pll frequency would be around 150MHz.
There are PLL chips for 150MHz like NE/SA568... but in our case we would need a DDS to tune almost nearest - and lock the loop using a quarz oszillator with a varicap.
.......to be continued....


Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: forest on June 16, 2014, 06:22:48 PM
You need two things to be successful:
1. PRINCIPLE, a working one and the simplest one is probably the real and working one
2. ENERGY SOURCE of special kind, and I'm sure you  know what property of it is the most needed one
F*ck all else, there is no violation of physics  in free energy !

Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 17, 2014, 02:12:01 AM
Thats the only option - if you work alone - and you have to be a talented schizo - otherwise you are lost.

Back to our hammer.
As already pointed out - it would make lots of sense to have different hammer-heads.
If you run into few MHz - and want to land a decent pulse to an unknown impedance - the driver stage should generate the pulse right at the "point of load".
The solution would be a detached driver with energy parked/stored at the point of load. - Means RF decoupling with special caps or pcb´s with integrated 50um plate caps.
High-Voltage, high-speed mosfet half-bridge, capable to apply a DC-pulse. (so after applying the pulse - the stage has to go high-z - that would be a double-action hammer).
Combined with perfect decoupling - this stage should be able to apply a somewhat voltage pulse (with impedance somewhat different to the target).
The timing signal should be connected using proper impedance controlled cabel/coax and matched impedance.
That would be the minimum effort to get some useful outcome.

Because you need a grip on the output frequency - you need a preamp (to reduce damping of device under test) and a prescaler.
You can do that discrete using a MMIC preamp and an MC12080.....
But there are some perfect chips used in old analog TV tuners - which could do the job.
MC44817,.. or similar....
There is a legendary 1Ghz prescaler/ preamp combination - still available on ebay - the SDA2101
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SDA2101-Manu-SIEMENS-Encapsulation-DIP8-FREQUENCY-DIVIDER-1-64-/370729890667
I´ve done few projects with that chip 25 yrs ago - but its a simple chip and useful. The only disadvantage I remember was malfunction after esd.
But after few weeks, they start working again ;-))))
Cool thing is that you can make a fine picosecond delay ramping the supply voltage of that chip.
But there should be modern equivalents available.

With a 1/64 prescaler - our maximum pll frequency would be around 150MHz.
There are PLL chips for 150MHz like NE/SA568... but in our case we would need a DDS to tune almost nearest - and lock the loop using a quarz oszillator with a varicap.
.......to be continued....

I don't want to deal with analog solutions because analog electronics is harder to work with.

I think that this project is too difficult for me anyways and there is no reward for success.
TV tuners? I considered that but they don't fit this purpose very well. To make them fit is almost as difficult as to build entirely transistor-based circuit.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 17, 2014, 05:18:10 AM
You need two things to be successful:
1. PRINCIPLE, a working one and the simplest one is probably the real and working one
2. ENERGY SOURCE of special kind, and I'm sure you  know what property of it is the most needed one
F*ck all else, there is no violation of physics  in free energy !

Do you have an OU device?
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 17, 2014, 09:41:43 AM
@tarakan

Keep your idea for when you have to choose your thesis in school, and keep your eye out for the sale of this device.
It is a combination of an FPGA and microprocessor. Very high speed digital circuits tend to design themselves. Even
you could design your idea using this device;

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13588168/papilio-duo-drag-and-drop-fpga-circuit-lab-for-mak


:S:MarkSCoffman

I will wait for this kickstarter project to be up for sale.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 20, 2014, 02:19:11 AM
I need to learn to program FPGA, I guess.
Is there a hobbyist-friendly FPGA shield-like device, similar to what Arduino does to microcontrollers?
I have no experience with FPGA whatsoever.

I see that the Papillo DUO is the only thing that may be on the market. The rest of the designs exist only as step-by-step instructions.
I cannot solder SMD so I am not sure what to do with them.

I found another use for my circuit - electric pain relief devices. It doesn't have to be an RCL circuit to resonate. It can be a muscle.

This circuit can allow
a device like TENS 7000 penetrate the flesh and cause the muscle it is tuned to to relax and contract,
preventing most of the current from passing through the skin. Muscles do have self-frequency in a way.
This can allow two adhesive electrodes to excite a muscle that is out of their reach.

Meanwhile, I am a little bit isolated and there is no one more skillful than I am to teach me.
Is there an FPGA that can run at 100Mhz? Can FPGAs themselves act as asynchronous frequency dividers and divide the clock for Arduino?



Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 20, 2014, 08:27:19 AM
Quote
Is there a hobbyist-friendly FPGA shield-like device, similar to what Arduino does to microcontrollers?


http://www.elektor.com/search?q=fpga
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 20, 2014, 09:50:14 AM
I wish I had that kind of money.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 20, 2014, 11:38:23 PM
I want to learn Verilog.

Does Mojo or Papillo run at higher frequencies?
I am not sure how frequencies work for FPGA as they can multiply their own clock.

So programming FPGA is all about generating code that automates routine settings of individual logic gates?
In a way how HTML generates a web page.
An iteration would be used to latch an N number of gates for a specific task.

I want to learn how to program them.
Interfacing FPGA would be a greater problem.
I would go for the ones that are wired to USB already.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: vasik041 on June 21, 2014, 08:39:10 AM
Here some reading for you ;-)

http://www.xilinx.com/training/fpga-tutorials.htm
http://www.digilentinc.com/Data/Documents/Tutorials/Xilinx%20ISE%20WebPACK%20Verilog%20Tutorial.pdf
http://esd.cs.ucr.edu/labs/tutorial/
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: fritz on June 24, 2014, 06:11:33 PM
I don't want to deal with analog solutions because analog electronics is harder to work with.

The digital part of your obsession is very simple to achieve - even if you have to learn  a bit about cplds, fpga,s or uP.
But measuring and kicking will be analog per definition.
I have never seen a bit ring a bell.

So maybe you should write a simulator ;-))
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: tarakan on June 24, 2014, 06:27:53 PM
The digital part of your obsession is very simple to achieve - even if you have to learn  a bit about cplds, fpga,s or uP.
But measuring and kicking will be analog per definition.
I have never seen a bit ring a bell.

So maybe you should write a simulator ;-))

There is no obsession. I can use Arduino. I feel I should not go too deeply into microcontrollers.
FPGA - at some point in my life.

I posted all this to get other people started. This project it too difficult for me to carry out alone.

Kicking will be tripped by one bit. It will be analog. Maybe it will use a gas discharge tube or a vacuum tube for the final task.
Title: Re: Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1
Post by: John_Ahmet on November 13, 2018, 05:35:00 AM
There is no obsession. I can use Arduino. I feel I should not go too deeply into microcontrollers.
FPGA - at some point in my life.

I posted all this to get other people started. This project it too difficult for me to carry out alone.

Kicking will be tripped by one bit. It will be analog. Maybe it will use a gas discharge tube or a vacuum tube for the final task.

Hi,

first off, complete this project "Akula0083 30W". I'm sending the file. Then we can work together to make this project digitally better and decipher.

I live in Turkey. I'm trying to understand this project and make typological equivalents.

I have some experience in digital electronics. It would be enough to use Arduino and Raspberry pi in the project.

A company has managed to produce it.

https://infinitysav.com/pcb-device/

https://youtu.be/1n2KuK_YD5U

Please tell me your thoughts on this topic in general.