ALTECHLAB How do you know for sure ?

I think there are all signs that Akula is a faker :-)

I´ll give you something on the way:
The basic idea to hunt for special properties using a one-fits-all auto-resonator is not stupid.
A tuneable, wideband negative resistor would be the easiest way to do it.
Increasing the negative resistance will finally lead to a self-resonant phenomenon at the most pleasant frequency - without any need for tuning.

The reason why nobody has done that before is - that wideband negative resistors or the stuff you proposed(and how it should work)  are way out of reach - even with extense effort.

Electrical oscillation is never ever a "scalar" thing - only in very rare circumstances you can treat it that way.
"ideal voltage source", "ideal current source", having exact zero or infinite source resistance.

In real world - you have at least 2 compounds - voltage and current - combined to an impedance - and if you increase the frequency - impedance matters.

This is why I never had your idea - because I see no practical way to build it.

Even if we would had such things - it mght be necessary to have an impedance-impedance which could be a thing with complex signal "a" modifying complex impedance Z with parameter x as function of ......
Things are not that simple and I basically aprecciate your effort trying to make us build such thing.
Because its a "kick" to think beyond limits.
Even if its out of reach.

The "impedance" thing is a quite serious issue with lots of overunity stuff - because there are often multiple degrees of freedom - and even if you replicate something in a very serious way - there is a multitude of possible outcome.

I have brilliant ideas on a daily basis - but the truth is - that the chance nobody was there before - is pretty small.
Sometimes the way I came there was unique, sometimes a detail was unique - sometimes I was "first" - but in the end somebody else has done it. (later). It might be difficult to get some reward for solving a myth, anyway.

rgds.

Ok. I live in Frederick MD, USA. This is an hour from Baltimore MD and from Washington DC.
If anyone is interested in working on this project, I can spend 1 day a week and drive no more than 1.5 hours in one direction.
Lets split assignments. I can work on studying the programming part, for example if there is somebody who is willing to do electronics.

Having a central, high speed CPU and many buffers and ripple counters may be a wise idea for multidimensional analysis of OU transformers.
We can make the project modular. The final product can be sold as an engineering tool for RCL analysis.

@tarakan

Keep your idea for when you have to choose your thesis in school, and keep your eye out for the sale of this device.
It is a combination of an FPGA and microprocessor. Very high speed digital circuits tend to design themselves. Even
you could design your idea using this device;

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13588168/papilio-duo-drag-and-drop-fpga-circuit-lab-for-mak

:S:MarkSCoffman

No.
Your idea is to make the universal bell-ringing utility.
The size of the bells we have to ring is from 1mm up to 10m diameter (you can replace that with inch if you prefer).
The speed and weight of the hammer should be fixed - even the elasticity of the handle should be fixed - but is not.
We don´t even know the density of the material the bell is made of.

Well - if the bell would be already ringing - there would be some chance of timing that some kind of standard hammer - applied at the right moment == impedance ==  will transfer some energy.
We could build a somewhat thing capable of producing somewhat dirac impulse - or use an inductor - tuneable in the range of 1:1000 (however such inductor would look like).

Dirac impulse is an ideal. A very thin impulse will be smoothed by the inductance of the system. There will be noise, of course. I think we are splitting hairs here...

OK. even if we take a complete "unmatched" hammer - we have no chance to ring that bell until the transfered energy at least exceeds the losses of the system. If our hammer transfers energy slightly above that level - ringing that bell to some nominal level would still take an almost infinite amount of time.
Of course.

Is it that simple ?
As already stated - OU or whatever effect(prefered) might be released in somewhat unusual scenario, which might be coupled to s resonant issue.
You need an OU bell - and the proper hammer. A "one fits all" hammer alone will show no OU.

I hope so.
If you would accept some suggestions concerning the diameters of bells to ring or other reduced constraints - I would think about contributing to this thread further.

Because a negative resistor (even if difficult to build) would be an auto-triggered, auto-scaled hammer - much closer to the goal than you think.
(Far out - of course - but within the same magnitude of far-outness than what you propose)
I already tried to tell you that pushing the button for that hammer is a simple task - and can be done even with 70ies style circuitry - without any uP; somewhat digital - if you think thats better.
The problem is the hammer - not the trigger.

The engineering approach for this problem is:
We know the size of the bell, the density, the resonance frequency, and we calculate the perfect hammer matched to a standard impedance.
And we are quite happy if the bell rings in the end with somewhat acceptable economy.

I think this brings it to certain point ?

You need two things to be successful:
1. PRINCIPLE, a working one and the simplest one is probably the real and working one
2. ENERGY SOURCE of special kind, and I'm sure you  know what property of it is the most needed one
F*ck all else, there is no violation of physics  in free energy !