Nothing that you have said challenges Faraday's Law of Induction. You have pointed out the distinction between Faraday's Law that is expressed in terms of physical motion, with the more general form that is expressed in terms of changing flux density. Faraday's Law is a subset of the general form.
Where is that "general form" ? All I see is two different equations, one working when flux is changing and one when flux is stable.Both equations boil down to induced EMF being the result of and proportional to the cross product of the conductor length and the time rate of change of flux density perpendicular to the conductor.
Some new findings about disident theries of EM:Do you mean that these ideas are new to you? Your first reference is about 14 years old. I skimmed the article and was not favorably impressed.
The Supressed Electrodynamics of Ampere-Gauss-Weber
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/Electrodynamics.html (http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/Electrodynamics.html)
Joseph Henry - On the discovery of two distinct kinds of Dynamic Induction
http://www.overunity.com/14906/joseph-henry-on-the-discovery-of-two-distinct-kinds-of-dynamic-induction/ (http://www.overunity.com/14906/joseph-henry-on-the-discovery-of-two-distinct-kinds-of-dynamic-induction/)
Gennady Nikolaev - About two kinds of magnetic interaction: transverse and longitudinal magnetic interaction (New Energy Technologies, Issue #6 )
http://magneticuniverse.com/uploads/FileUpload/e4/24d9314e3aa202313fd3cf4259d19e.pdf (http://magneticuniverse.com/uploads/FileUpload/e4/24d9314e3aa202313fd3cf4259d19e.pdf)
Some food for thought...
"In 1831 Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction - says Gennady Markov. - Then his ideas developed by Maxwell. After that, more than 160 years, no one was able to advance electrodynamics in the fundamental terms of a step. And eight years ago, I applied for an international patent, valid in 20 countries of the world, I created a transformer, which has already received four Russian patent. And my discovery was made "in spite of the laws of " the great physicists . Faraday , the magnetic fluxes in the yoke to successively shape - the contour in one direction. And only then works transformer . And I offered to do the opposite : to take the coil with the same number of turns and turn them towards each other . At the same time creates an equal number of turns and equal magnetic fluxes reaching towards each other, which cancel each other , but not destroyed ( as Faraday and Maxwell, they must be destroyed .) I discovered a new law : the principle of superposition of magnetic fields in a ferromagnetic material. The superposition - is the addition of fields. The essence of the law is that the magnetic fields that are mutually compensated , but not destroyed . And here is the word " but not destroyed " and is the key to open my law."
This law of AMPERE, in 1821 1826 to the French Academy of Science, retains always action and reaction. No need for photon emission as no photon emission is experimentally really ever observed and neveris known to occur for DC.
When the law of AMPERE and that of LORENTZ is integrated for closed circuits which only is assumed to exist they are equivalent. This is why the wrong law of Lorentz may survive!
In steady DC currents, forces for closed circuits can be distinguished numerically that are due to Ampere's or to Lorentz's force laws (See section MAGNETS, (3c)). Also by forces due to sparks, lightning, any transient currents. can be distinguished whether they belong to one of the two laws, actually they belong only to one, that of the correct law of Ampere or to the fictitious law of Lorentz ! This is for due to the fact that these currents are transient in very short time. Let me become clear. Suppose we have a stead state current in a closed circuit. All its forces are indistinguishable in origin. Suppose the circuit is suddenly interrupted by a spark unavoidably in a gap, then in the copper parts of the circuit charges are moving very slowly, as in every metallic conductor some cm/second, on the contrary in the unavoidable spark charges may move at any high speed. THEREFORE, DUE TO THE INERTIA, THE FAST MOVING CHARGES KEEP MOVING LONGER AND CONSTITUTE AN ISOLATED CURRENT.! ISOLATED CURRENTS EXHIBIT LONGITUDINAL AMPERE FORCES, WHICH DO NOT CANCEL OUT. As a result an Ampere explosion occurs with a loud audible sound. This explosion can be explained in terms only of Ampere forces.