Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514282
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy  (Read 35246 times)

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« on: May 26, 2014, 06:47:38 PM »
just found this and its way above my education level so hopefully you guys can help. second half of this page under tesla cosmic energy extraction and attached is his refrenced books
http://www.whale.to/b/lyne_tesla.html

reconstruct much of the unknown Tesla discoveries from available sources, in order to see what has been carefully hidden from us by our own government and the corporate fascists who control it.

Tesla's Extraction of Cosmic Energy

According to Tesla, the ether is not an "energy source", since it is composed of tiny independent "carriers immersed in an insulating fluid"3. The ether, therefore, is a "medium" through which energetic transferences and transmutations can be effected, and electric and magnetic "tubes of force" can be created and carried into a body from space, giving it momentum to propel it."Cosmic radiation" is not the ether, but "starlight"—what Tesla called the "Primary Solar Rays".4 This extremely highfrequency light—of much tinier wavelength than visible light, U.V.,X-rays, and gamma rays (also emitted by our sun and other stars)—is the ZPR. Tesla stated that the Zero Point Radiation gives rise to secondary radiations through impact with the cosmic dust of space, which are commonly called "cosmic rays" today.

In 19355 Tesla objected to the observations of the German radiologist, Dr. Werner Kolhoester, saying his observations were another confirmation of his own theory of cosmic rays originally advanced in l896, but asserted that Kolhoester's 1935 theory was erroneous, because light is a wave motion of definite velocity (C),determined by the elastic force and density of the "medium", while cosmic rays are "...particles with velocities determined by the propelling force...", which therefore could be much slower or faster than that of light. Since the velocities of the two radiations would not (and could not) coincide, Kolhoester's observations whichcoincided with the light observed, would not be accurate. Here, Tesla distinguished between the "cosmic radiation" he proposed in 1896, which was particles, which were propelled by ultra-highfrequency "primary solar radiation", which I equate to the ZPR, which are light rays traveling at C. Because of their extremely high voltages levels and frequencies, they can propel "cosmic dust" articles faster than C, when of sufficiently high voltage levels and frequency.

3T.C. Martin, The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla, The Electrical Engineer, New York (1894)
4 Nikola Tesla (as told to Alfred Albelli) Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World, Modern Mechanics and Invention (July, 1934)
5Nikola Tesla, German Cosmic Ray Theory Questioned, New York Herald Tribune (March 3, 1935)

In his "objection" letter of 1935, at a time when he was involved with the German "p2" project which I wrote about in Pentagon Aliens, Tesla gave a clue to his electrodynamic spacepropulsion system, which if one is to take Tesla's statements seriously, means that a "particle"—or a ship—in space can be propelled very fast by electromagnetic wave radiation—light waves—which in this case are the "Primary Solar Rays", the ZPR.

The Primary Solar Rays (the ZPR) are ubiquitous in the universe and in direction of approach at a given point, with frequencies so high that there is normally no reaction with atomic matter, being able to pass through "...thousands of miles of solid matter..."6, and therefore can approach an object on earth even from the direction of the ground. This makes this invisible "solar energysource" available around the clock, though it is said to slightly vary cyclically. This radiation should not be confused with so-called "photon energy", which is a Relativist fantasy involving "corpuscles" or "particles" of light. What a laugh.

In the on-going Relativist theory, Wolfgang Pauli, in 1933, invented the neutrino theory, in response to Niels Bohr's radical finding that, if experiments say so, the Law of Conservation ofEnergy does not hold for ("beta" or electron) emission and absorption processes.7 Pauli's theory sought to explain a loss of heat energy in beta decay, which the Relativist theory was unable to account for or measure in such processes as K-capture, in which a neutrino is emitted when a proton is converted into a neutron. The reverse process is the conversion of a neutron into a proton, thus emitting a beta particle (electron) and sucking a neutrino back into the atom from surrounding space. Other particles are involved, but these are the ones of interest. It should be of interest to you that Bohr was not a Relativist, and held a sort of "free-energy" view. It is also interesting to note that Bohr attended the opening of the Tesla Museum in Belgrade. Without Bohr's work, the A-bombwould have been impossible at that time.

6 Nikola Tesla, Radio Power, etc. (Supra) 
7 Gamow, George, Thirty Years that Shook Physics, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, New York (1956)

The acquisition of energy from the ZPR was regarded by Tesla as a "step-down" process, in which the super-high-frequency light waves were stepped down to a more familiar and usable form, such as 'normal' radioactivity, heat or electrical energy. In the K-capture process, an element is transmuted into another element, forexample, iron to manganese—and in the reverseprocess—manganese to iron. Monoenergetic neutrinos are ejected in the first process, and sucked back into the iron in the reverse process, but what happens to the damned X-radiation emitted in the first half of the reversible process, Einstein? And how is it mysteriously "replaced" in the reversed half?

The neutrino explanation has always appeared as a loophole in the Relativist theory, since the missing momentum and heat, and misconceived "photon energy" (actually electromagnetic light wave radiation), were impossible to explain without the invented neutrino theory. Furthermore, since the neutrino is a neutral particle, it is composed of tiny positive and negative charges which do not exist according to Relativism, since Relativism holds that the electron is "indivisible", as the main foundation of quantum mechanics. With this argument, I now have some of my Relativist friends denying the existence of neutrinos.

In contradicting their own theory, admitting that the tinier positive and negative charges composing the neutrinos exist, the Relativists inadvertently acknowledged the "building blocks" of electrons and protons. As such, neutrinos appear to be the aether.

Since neutrinos are so tiny, they must have the capacity to react with the ZPR, in bringing about so-called "nuclear radioactivity". In so doing, what are the nuclear characteristics of an element which produces radioactivity naturally? How can a non-radioactive element be made to mimic these qualities, in artificially-inducedradioactivity"? If neutrinos are prevalent in K-capture (transmutation), and its reversal, it seems that an element which is made to oscillate between two elements (to transmute and detransmute), would have to react with the ZPR. Since there is excess energy involved, as the neutrinos (ether carriers) move in and out,energy is being transferred to and from the element, the ZPR, and the ether.

We know that synthetic radioactivity can be induced by exposing an element to appropriate radiation, which is only a reversal of the process which initially created the radiation, as averification of Tesla's theory.

In K-capture in iron, when the K-shell electron passes into the nucleus, converting a proton into a neutron, not only is a monoenergetic neutrino emitted, but also an X-ray, when the vacant K-shell takes on another electron. Though the iron atom is now a manganese atom, and has emitted energy, it has the same mass number. Shouldn't the mass number reflect the loss of energy?

Where is your damned "E = MC2?" There is also the question, "Where did the incident particle beam energy which induced the Kcapture go? If the neutrinos taketh away, they also giveth back, as "carriers". Of course, one can say that the electrons involved do not weigh enough to be reflected in the mass number. The Relativistsadmit (or assert) that the neutrinos carry energy, just as the aether carriers do. Recent Japanese experiments showed that neutrinos are plentiful in space. The greatest source of free-energy appears to be the ZPR.

If the number of neutrons in a disintegration product (the atom transmuted to) is too small compared to its number of protons, the nucleus will tend to reduce its charge by one unit by positron emission, and will always have 1 Mev less kinetic energy than if beta decay had occurred.8 Since a light element (below atomic number 19) will transmute in U.V. light, radioactivity in light elements can be induced very easily. When Joliot and Curie bombarded aluminum with alpha particles, they observed that neutrons and positrons were emitted. When they removed their alpha source, the positronemission did not cease, but decreased exponentially with time, as if the aluminum were a naturally radioactive element, for a period of three minutes.9

8 R. E. Lapp and H. L. Andrews, Nuclear Radiation Physics, Prentiss-Hall, Inc., New York (1950).
9 Lapp and Andrews (Supra)

The positron will always carry 1 Mev kinetic energy, and may be used for energy production. Since this process can be effected by use of an U.V. incident particle beam on the light elements, and will produce positrons at 1 Mev of kinetic energy, it may be used in what I call "leapfrog technology", which can be used for transmutation processes which will manufacture elements in much greater quantities than could be effected by the huge accelerators at such places as U.C. Berkeley.

Based on the Tesla Primary Solar Ray theory, using the Kcapture process, this is my explanation for a device I call Free EnergySurprise (© 1997, Wm. R. Lyne, ISBN 0-9637467-6-6, $10.00, Creatopia Productions, General Delivery, Lamy, New Mexico 87540, Tel/Fax 505-466-3022), a technical report which includes a set of plans and documentary photos.

I got the idea for this device from a statement by Nikola Tesla, concerning "special" uses for iron, to capture the ZPR/Primary Solar Rays. Whether or not this is exactly what Tesla meant, I believe it verifies his statement concerning special properties of iron. The device, composed of steel pipe and bar stock (about 10 lbs.), is stimulated with a 15 kv, center-tapped transformer. Itoperates in several modes, but in what I call the "hum" mode shows an input of 35 watts and a secondary activity of 42.6 kw, operating at or beyond the approximate K-capture voltage on each leg, ca. 7,110 volts (the K-capture voltage for iron), at the standard 60 cps. The low frequency current goes into the mass of the iron (not a 'skin effect'). The iron seems to be going to manganese and back to iron, 60 times per second. This idea is based on what appeared to be the appearance of a purple area near the top of the pipe which Irecognized to be the color of manganese dioxide. The extra electrical

energy might be the product of interaction with the ZPR, the ether (neutrinos?), and the iron. Since manganese is the next element down on the periodic chart, with the same mass number as iron, it sounded like a reasonable hypothesis. The voltage is not really critical, as the effect could occur so long as the voltage passedthrough the K-capture voltage on its way up and down, and is only supposed to cause a somewhat more definite effect when it is right on the "absorption edge".

It appears that the electrical energy in the secondary output circuit can be converted into usable electrical energy, especially by using a resonant transformer, tuned to the same, 60 cps frequency.

Corporate-government disinformationists have already tried to debunk this device. One "debunker" inadvertently revealed the fact that he didn't actually do the experiment, when he described the device when assembled as weighing "two pounds". No reputable "scientist" could confuse "ten pounds" with "two pounds", so I knew he was lying. Naturally, his assessment was negative. He was either a lightweight, who didn't do the experiment as described, or a liar with a concealed agenda. This discovery may prove to be a new way to produce K-capture, and to transmute elements in a reversible process, by stimulation with simple, standard 60cps electric current, at or near the K-capture voltage, or at some other appropriate voltage, without the necessity to use an incident particle beamaccelerator, vacuum chamber, etc.

A good free-energy process, therefore, can use anelement—conveniently a light element—as a "medium" to induce another "medium"—the ether, or another element—to interact with and acquire energy from the ZPR, which is then stepped down to either a synthetic radioactive output—which can be further stepped down to manageable electrical energy or heat—or perhaps converted more directly to electrical energy by some ingenious means.

The attempted destruction and concealment of Tesla's work has now been exposed, and will soon be reversed. The factions which were responsible for this still exist through perpetuity, but will not be able to control the technology when it finally emerges.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2014, 08:38:23 PM »
oh,crap... why everybody expect more and more complicated theories involving zpr, cosmic rays , radioactivity and maybe alien forces are better to explein natural phenomena ?

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2014, 10:37:26 PM »
im talking about the devise 45kw output 35w input and it looks simple to build check out the free energy surprise attachment

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2014, 10:37:26 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1867
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2014, 05:26:56 PM »
Lyne is fairly well known and interesting to read.   He has a Yahoo group also.   That device is one of those things I seem to keep putting on the back burner to try out.   It does look interesting but as far as I know there are no replications jumping out screaming free energy on this.  Might just be an issue with construction or like me it just keeps getting put on the back burner ;)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2014, 05:35:08 PM »
That pdf -- which by the way includes a clear copyright statement at the beginning.... is another story of misinterpretation and misrepresentation of Tesla's work, and another full set of Bad Measurements, improperly and unsafely performed.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2014, 05:35:08 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2014, 05:43:04 PM »
oh,crap... why everybody expect more and more complicated theories involving zpr, cosmic rays , radioactivity and maybe alien forces are better to explein natural phenomena ?
It's because they don't understand the _real explanations_ which are consistent with a huge body of real knowledge and mathematics. They prefer to wave hands about and conjure entities from their imaginations... usually because they have some pet theory (not consistent with any huge body of real knowledge, not consistent mathematically) that they are seeking to "prove" rather than to test experimentally.
The pet theory may be dreamed, or revealed from a higher power, or constructed out of some fictional re-interpretation of Nikola Tesla's writings and experimental work.... and that's why these kinds of theories are so persistent. They are literally Holy Writ. They blind their proponents to real data: data which does not "confirm" or "prove" their theories is rejected as being "conventional" and therefore wrong (without proof being presented for this new claim) or it is simply ignored.

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2014, 06:23:05 PM »
sorry about copywrite i didnt know... can i get in trouble do i need to edit.. has anyone replicated the porsilin device with the spark gap and the magnets or electromagnets. the one thats the first devise in ch.11 of pjk fei

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2014, 06:23:05 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2014, 06:57:17 PM »
Tinsel

You are right in your comment !  :) but  do you afraid of the theory which is stritly based on science and consistent ?  ::) ;)
Lyne theories are admirable , yet explained in sophisticated way, while the nature shows us the real power easily, without going into zpe mumble...





Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2014, 09:16:01 PM »
ok mabey the introduction isnt right but tesla devise in the begining of free energy surprise and ch. 11 that some call mhd devise anyone know of any replications

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2014, 09:16:01 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2014, 01:59:38 AM »
so I'm reading Tesla's book called the problem with increasing human energy and it says a couple paragraphs into the book that his inexhaustible energy for the world the unlimited energy was the burning of nitrogen check it if you don't believe me but I didn't really expect that definitely have to keep investigating this research

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2014, 08:51:38 AM »
so I'm reading Tesla's book called the problem with increasing human energy and it says a couple paragraphs into the book that his inexhaustible energy for the world the unlimited energy was the burning of nitrogen check it if you don't believe me but I didn't really expect that definitely have to keep investigating this research

joe cell

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2014, 08:51:38 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2014, 05:51:07 PM »
joe cell are very cool. but do they have any type of throttle responce. im talking to a friend who got his vehicle to run on joseph cater free energy box like in free energy info ch. passive systems. the thing he noticed was there was absolutley no throttle responce and he had to use shifting. then after a week of driving he was stopped at a parking spot the engine started revving out of control he said it.must have been from the engine finally getting acclimated to the orgone.

i dont want this to be about orgone but if its free energy that can power our cars and houses then im all for it. and we need to do this now asap

i cant find any circuits that can harness orgone. reich supposively had one but got suppressed
 
i found this devise from ch.11 in kelly's fei and it looks like it could capture some free energy but my questions are what would the emission be? the air that is burnt releases radiation. the devise seems to capture but whats left goes right out the top into the open enviroment. i was never good at chemistry or anything nuclear waste so what are the dangers of this devise. burning nitrogen with a high voltage spark gap and having nitrogen emit radiation onto the electrodes to pick up energy. what happens to the burnt nitrogen. how can we safely let air into the devise and out without being exposed to gamma radiation?


Offline thx1138

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2014, 07:52:35 PM »
oh,crap... why everybody expect more and more complicated theories involving zpr, cosmic rays , radioactivity and maybe alien forces are better to explein natural phenomena ?
I don't know about the alien forces but, as far as I know, cosmic rays and radioactivity are natural phenomena.
 
And zpr, if you meant zpe, is just a different name for the Casimir effect which is also a natural phenomena although it lives in that weird world of quantum doohickeys. So that one might be purely theoreical.
 
If you want to evidence of radiation, take a look at a dental x-ray. If you want to see evidence of cosmic rays, build one of these: http://quarknet.fnal.gov/resources/QN_CloudChamberV1_4.pdf
 
Then again, cosmic rays can be looked at as "alien forces" since they don't originate on the earth and the more powerful ones originate in different galaxies.

Offline tturner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2014, 09:21:21 PM »
guys made a big mistake i misread tesla problem of increasing human energy . he talks about burning nitrogen but i thought i read he saw it as a unlimitedfuel source.lol. sorry for the mistake i am a newbie but thats for the posts and hopefully we can keep working on this

Offline pix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
Re: tesla zpr generator cosmic energy
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2014, 10:32:48 PM »
guys made a big mistake i misread tesla problem of increasing human energy . he talks about burning nitrogen but i thought i read he saw it as a unlimitedfuel source.lol. sorry for the mistake i am a newbie but thats for the posts and hopefully we can keep working on this
Burning nitrogen in ambient air means- spark gap.
Spark gap is electrons multiplier plus source of UV radiation. One electron "in"- many more electrons "out". Loeb and Meck, read it.


Regards,
pix

 

OneLink