Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: KARPEN PILE  (Read 219678 times)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #195 on: July 17, 2014, 01:10:24 PM »
The secret electrode was graphite
I would have incorrectly guessed some metal that is quick to develop an oxide layer like Cu or Al shutting down the reaction.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #196 on: July 17, 2014, 01:24:16 PM »
Uhhmm,nah try it markE.its just reversible spillover.it'l last past that expiry date.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #197 on: July 17, 2014, 01:39:56 PM »
Yes only you wouldve guessed Al mark E.we was taught in high school that Al dissolves in NaOH sol.the power wouldve been monstrous and steady if it were Al.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #198 on: July 17, 2014, 01:43:09 PM »
You shoulve kept the graphite experiment going pomodoro,that current was ready to switch polarity lol.but it wouldve been weak anyway.

Offline pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #199 on: July 17, 2014, 01:48:37 PM »
Yesterday, the graphite was giving many 10's or peak mA and a constant current of 2mA when shorted through the meter. Quite impressive. However, I recall that I was bubbling the hydrogen constantly, not diverting it to the top of the flask after having saturated the solution.

Today, I cathodized it in a separate KOH beaker, with a Pt counter electrode and a power supply, just to clean it with fresh H2 bubbles.

When I dipped it in the cell and waited a while, a whopping 1.2V developed. WOW I thought , but as you saw each time it was used it never recovered.  I'm not sure but I guess it cant sponge up the hydrogen from the solution very well.

I also tried palladized silver. Again excellent fresh from the beaker, but quickly died down as well.
Same thing for shiny platinum, got zero volts real fast.

I still need to try lead,nickel,copper and a few others.

So Mr Profitus, I must admit that you did come up with a system that seems to work well at this stage of the research! well done!!!

Back to the basics,  everyone, lets start from step 1.

1.  Why alkaline and not acid as used by Kapern?  I realize  it lowers  the E of the H/H2O couple - well it did as Nernst would have predicted at the Pt, from 0 to -800mV.  I dont know about the shift at the Silver.


2. The Pd/Pt voltage is very rock steady when discharging, no wonder a similar electrode is used as the zero volt standard. The 1cm square has in reality a much larger surface area.


3. The silver is another story.  What formula exactly can be used to predict the voltage that I would expect there?  Is it the same as the platinum plus the hydrogen overpotential on silver?  I need to read the paper on the studies of this overpotential, but I did not think it was as huge as 0.9V.  Even the CV scans I did did not show such a massive difference in the cathodic scans.


4. Why does the silver electrode look more like a capacitor , being charged up by the Pt/Pd when they are connected, which then slowly discharges upon disconnection?



Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #200 on: July 17, 2014, 02:28:21 PM »
Graphite is useless as a H2 sponge,it has monster overpotential.you can replace Ag with graphite as cathode in the gadget. Palladized silver will self-discharge it can't be used,that's why I'm against plating of anything. 1) the electrolyte has nothing to do with overpotential difference in the same cell its just to carry charge.eg phosphoric acid works fine instead of sulfuric in karpens original.as long as there's no corrosion current its ok. 2) yes but its all crammed onto 1cm2. 3) the cv scans only tell some of the picture not all of it which is why I wasn't too interested in them.overpotentialdifference is all that matters.there's no real way of predicting overpotential so they make lists for us. pt was just chosen as our standard. 4)H atoms are very unstable on Ag,recombining quite fast during rest.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #201 on: July 17, 2014, 02:43:47 PM »
I've already given a description of a nickel cell here pomodoro,what do you think,should we collect the prize and split it? Harti wants 1 watt I believe

Offline pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #202 on: July 17, 2014, 02:54:28 PM »
Now need to put ag sponge on the silver.  Oh it was the silver I replaced, I kept the PD/pt for all tests.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #203 on: July 17, 2014, 03:07:19 PM »
Yesterday, the graphite was giving many 10's or peak mA and a constant current of 2mA when shorted through the meter. Quite impressive. However, I recall that I was bubbling the hydrogen constantly, not diverting it to the top of the flask after having saturated the solution.

Today, I cathodized it in a separate KOH beaker, with a Pt counter electrode and a power supply, just to clean it with fresh H2 bubbles.

When I dipped it in the cell and waited a while, a whopping 1.2V developed. WOW I thought , but as you saw each time it was used it never recovered.  I'm not sure but I guess it cant sponge up the hydrogen from the solution very well.

I also tried palladized silver. Again excellent fresh from the beaker, but quickly died down as well.
Same thing for shiny platinum, got zero volts real fast.

I still need to try lead,nickel,copper and a few others.

So Mr Profitus, I must admit that you did come up with a system that seems to work well at this stage of the research! well done!!!

Back to the basics,  everyone, lets start from step 1.

1.  Why alkaline and not acid as used by Kapern?  I realize  it lowers  the E of the H/H2O couple - well it did as Nernst would have predicted at the Pt, from 0 to -800mV.  I dont know about the shift at the Silver.


2. The Pd/Pt voltage is very rock steady when discharging, no wonder a similar electrode is used as the zero volt standard. The 1cm square has in reality a much larger surface area.


3. The silver is another story.  What formula exactly can be used to predict the voltage that I would expect there?  Is it the same as the platinum plus the hydrogen overpotential on silver?  I need to read the paper on the studies of this overpotential, but I did not think it was as huge as 0.9V.  Even the CV scans I did did not show such a massive difference in the cathodic scans.


4. Why does the silver electrode look more like a capacitor , being charged up by the Pt/Pd when they are connected, which then slowly discharges upon disconnection?
A capacitor effect suggests to me that a dielectric layer is forming at the surface of one or both electrodes.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #204 on: July 17, 2014, 03:36:34 PM »
Anodize-cathodize the Ag in Na2CO3 sol for spongey pomodoro.you are going to double or triple power out.I wonder what rhodium anode would do???

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #205 on: July 17, 2014, 04:04:42 PM »
Did you try the gadgets anode with a graphite cathode pomodoro.what happened.

Offline mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #206 on: July 17, 2014, 04:25:01 PM »
Congratulations profitus and pomodoro. I am very impressed with the accuracy
of both your exploits. One thing you should do is go for one completely sealed
cell with maximum "staying power".  It's hard for the general public to accept
that flowthrough method is not supplying hydrogen "fuel" to the reaction, plus
it is a waste of hydrogen gas.

On the you-tube videos of the real Karpens pile in Eastern Europe from pomodoro's
you-tube home page. I was negatively impressed by the poor quality of the seals on
the real Karpens cells. I was somewhat shocked that they don't appear to have used
frit glass seals on the original Karpens cell. I wondering if we could eventually
expect to see oxygen leakage and cell malfunction on the Karpens Piles because
of this? Also they had a picture of a depolarization mechanism that looked inactive.
I hope this is a filmarker's flaw of taking a picture of a disconnected device or
a secondary backup device. I could just see the cell voltage of Karpens Pile
be 1.00V but where the current has dropped to zero and is unable to activate it's
depolarization device any longer, And yet the curator is pulling it out and saying;
"Here it is gentlemen; Karpens Pile." There is another picture of those cells in
a box covered with Sulfuric acid corrosion. If they couldn't handle this correctly
then maybe they *should have* given it to the French.  I suspect that they may
not have valued these much at first, but then history set in.

What I'm saying is eventually your cells may be the only working Karpens cells in
existence, so proceed with care. 

:S:MarkSCoffman

Offline pomodoro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #207 on: July 17, 2014, 04:35:39 PM »
Yep that's the one that did not recover. I will need to look into it further.  Now I can't figure out how I'm getting 900mv. All the journals I've read have a much lower value . for example Google 13(2)_P77-101.PDF.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #208 on: July 17, 2014, 04:45:12 PM »
Aha my mistake.I thought silver vs secret meant silver with secret.ok no graphite lets go of H atoms very slowly.its not so easy to find exact numbers in lists pomodoro.you must remember we are working with galvanic overpotentials for batteries not electrolysis overpotentials.activation overpotential is the key,very dependant on material makeup,surface area,gas exchange rate etc.a number of factors.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: KARPEN PILE
« Reply #209 on: July 17, 2014, 04:53:36 PM »
Thanks marcscoffman.scientist viewers will accept it quickly but yes for the layman viewer a sealed system is best for conviction.karpens romanian device has air trapped in it so if there's a tiny hole in there it won't matter too much.sulfuric acid doesn't crystallize or dry out in open air either it stays in solution which is why I think he could say with confidance that that robust thing will last a lifetime and beyond.