Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%  (Read 443199 times)

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #405 on: July 14, 2014, 02:10:03 AM »
No, I make this machine that I invented.

More powerful than Skinner, only loss is by purposeful pulse, bearing and pulley loss, motor must simply refill storage system in time.

I will get the synergistic effect of pulse system that you wont, and the little cult will cry.

Drive to speed via one way clutch then release shaft drive and only drive from disconnected middle.

Sorry, I only have time for the best, and I make for real with big investment and big planification, using metal.


ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #406 on: July 14, 2014, 10:04:13 PM »
No! You are confused.

I make torque arm like this, but better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODf49HtCNj0

It doesnt cost much to keep flywheels in motion.

You pay only for push/pulse/loss. And here, ''aspden effect'' will be here, + DePalma effect of rotating pendulum bob.

You will not have Aspden effect or depalma effect.

My invention based on Dimitriev >>> William Skinner 1939 device.  The whole Skinner cult will be defeated with their puny 1.5 HP (1100 watts) output.

Bye!

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #407 on: July 15, 2014, 02:24:56 AM »
You pointed out the only non-advantageous force of the mechanism, I was aware of that and have a solution, but this makes it also simple and precise contact point, a good compromise.

There will be a counter force, if the ramp is included into the mobile frame, you are right.

But there will be a net forward force, same principle as him with his feet, In fact, I think he is generating much torque..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB1ygJh8PEE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajIQhdDYSEo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6G5aC9BtSc

My new re-design will allow the heavy wheels to push themselves on immobile external static ramps. Placement must be absolutely perfect for every wheel.

I still think however that pushing from the frame will be just fine, you have to remember that this lower area is lower speed and will have much forward mass and will never be pushed back, its as good as static concrete, just slightly less delta, what matters is the difference relative to.

Deal with it bro.


« Last Edit: July 15, 2014, 04:46:07 AM by ARMCORTEX »

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #408 on: July 15, 2014, 01:19:27 PM »
Armcortex,

go ahead.. it works. Found this here however almost any trace in the internet is gone:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVuIHm6ADQ4&feature=youtu.be

Regards

Kator01

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #409 on: July 15, 2014, 05:44:46 PM »
sorry,

my cache had stored the wrong link, here it is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt_Ny8Wbtz8

Regards

Kator01

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #410 on: July 15, 2014, 09:31:03 PM »

Considering those circus acts are setup with a balanced device to the weight of those working it,, look at the forward angle required to make it spin,, kind of huge that,  and then consider how much it "should" take to just make it spin,, sure looks to me like they are doing a little more than just climbing uphill, so that is no even a 1:1,, it is a big loss system,, not a good example I think.



Deal with the fact that I  re-engineered Dimitriev and made an OU invention, noob.
LOL, not OU, 1:1 noob says...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajIQhdDYSEo

The harvest of the fall is OU, noob, see this guy fly @ 50 seconds, the machine barely felt anything.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #411 on: July 15, 2014, 11:55:54 PM »
The logic is, 2 humans jump on a mechanism, that consumes no power.

After a few sweats, they reach a point where they can launch a human 25 feet into the air.

And they can do it again and again as long as they dont get tired.

I hire those guys to make OU for me, see whats their max speed.

See, they understand the value of pulse.

I belt that together they make more energy then the 3 of them running bycicle generator..

shylo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #412 on: July 17, 2014, 01:24:14 AM »
Hi All, The upper weight of Skinners' device is heavy enough that it keeps the translation plate in a position relative to the lower ,so the lower is always at the highest part of a tilt , "always falling".
Wheels that have weights that are thrown out, To me will never work. Once sped up all the weights will just throw out .
artv

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #413 on: July 17, 2014, 01:37:59 AM »
Poor lowly minds...Its too bad that you are not able to compute and have to follow the cultists, Skinner was DOA since the beginning, idiot.

I dont have to calculate things to know if they are generating energy, I have to calculate if the bearings will hold and load the bearings up to 80 %, in good environment.

The clever design makes it produce more energy, when 1 way bearing is used, naturally is OU, by the invention of 1 way bearing all is done for me.

Fuel is replaced by bearings, bearing is the new consumable, 10% fail after 10,000 and maximum recommended is 50,000 hour,

And finally, the missing piece of the puzzle. I have just equipped you with OU device knowledge that will satisfy all your needs, and this is how you thank me ?

Scumbag, I will remember this, all this shows that you are a lowly mind.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #414 on: July 17, 2014, 02:57:54 AM »
I am working on this atm.

I call them ''modules''.

Tsss...Cant wait to crush your little ego with a nice video, give ya a couple smacks.

It will be fun to just stompede on the doubters afterwards then go hide, like a rich man, boss on the lake.



ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #415 on: July 17, 2014, 06:58:43 AM »
before we move onto Skinner, one last idea. This just hit me, I remembered this video from purelyprimitives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0O0YKsBXUY&list=UUky8Hqzkspvmgw51osyKnaw

I like this device  but the way he pulses the motor is very inefficient. If we could transmit rotational power to the weight itself as per my method.

We could really get a good contact, and then a nasty energy release and subsequent pulse of speed.

Now I hope people ignore this revelation as this will leave alot of people butthurt @ me.

There is also other ''pseudo-theories'' that apply, pendulum resonance by taps etc... Lee Tseung , Aspen effect, De palma effect, coo coo effect, crank effect.

(http://i61.tinypic.com/miky8j.jpg)

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #416 on: July 19, 2014, 03:21:15 AM »
Well well it seems like the method I posted was the best after all.

There is no way to have static pushers outside of the frame besides that  method.

This means I cant make my new cheaper version with less materials

This means  is gonna be quite a tuning and material gathering procedure.

I need 8x 50 to100  pound wheels and 8 x bycicle wheels, something with wider contact surface than bycicle would be better.

This is gonna be pretty big quest, I may have to pursue other ideas on my mind.



FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #417 on: July 19, 2014, 07:50:17 PM »
Well well it seems like the method I posted was the best after all.

There is no way to have static pushers outside of the frame besides that  method.

This means I cant make my new cheaper version with less materials

This means  is gonna be quite a tuning and material gathering procedure.

I need 8x 50 to100  pound wheels and 8 x bycicle wheels, something with wider contact surface than bycicle would be better.

This is gonna be pretty big quest, I may have to pursue other ideas on my mind.

could you please post the simulation file for this so i can run it in Algodoo?

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #418 on: July 19, 2014, 08:01:58 PM »

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: 1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%
« Reply #419 on: July 19, 2014, 09:58:28 PM »
Sorry those are not my sims.

Im not good with sims, and I dont think you can trust them 100%, especially not for something that needs sprag clutches.

Whats really stupid about algodoo is that you cant even add some emulation of thickness, how is this supposed to be comprehensible.

+ the fact of rotating bob and\or pulse systems, for wich special new physics needs to me taken into account.