Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,  (Read 303037 times)

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #390 on: July 14, 2015, 05:22:43 AM »

Sorry to sound like mr know it all but in fact I do hahah

ATOM1

 


All of your fancy words just lost meaning to me due to this enlightening statement you made.  You may know everything, but I think it is engineerable using simple electrical engineering formulae.  Paul basically stated this clearly.  I spent many hours in contact with Eric Dollard speaking about electricity.  Dielectric is only outdated if you choose to keep your mind shut.  This circuit still needs to be tested and I will eventually do so.


Can anybody come up with an alternative, good reason that Paul stated that a center tapped transformer was key to putting the power back and why Jim's SERPS has two loads?

The only reason I can see for Jim needing two loads and a center tapped transformer is the circuit I described in my last post. 

Dave

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #391 on: March 06, 2016, 03:05:30 PM »
10 F at 10v is 100 watts over one second !
Hello ATOM1, surely you're a Very Trained Engineer but as myself electrician, I do see not how you can write: "..F at ..V is ..W"; for me, before to come to any wattage calculation it would need at least to know the resistance through the capacitor will charge or discharge while controlling the corresponding current.

Maybe you have made a short-cut in your expression but if so, I think that is VERY NOT the place to do so! unless your purpose was just to align abstruse words to put you under the light but not to help :/

So, if you really wanted to help, make PLEASE the effort to be understandable by those who may read your post and rewrite your post :)

Regards,
Didier

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #392 on: March 06, 2016, 03:13:40 PM »
To everyone and especially Barry,

Would it be possible that been genuine at the beginning, Jim and Paul realised that they've mistaken about the interpretation of their results but not have the courage now to recognise it now?

Indeed, it would explain why they asked to not go further in our experiments and why they refuse individual financial helps but only ask big funds of big compagnies (for "moral" reasons). It would explain why they couldn't realise a loop between a alternator and their device (which by their own theory should be possible, if their device really works)...

I remember you also that in the demo of 2014 they don't show IN REAL TIME measurements of in and out power! :/

What do you think?

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #393 on: March 07, 2016, 03:13:59 AM »
Khwartz,

Can you link me to where they told people to stop pursuing their experiments into the SERPS concept?

Thanks,

Dave

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #394 on: March 20, 2016, 03:21:14 AM »
@ web000x

That was on a common video call I had participated too in real time.

Regards,

Didier

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #396 on: March 20, 2016, 04:51:27 AM »
but as myself electrician, I do see not how you can write: "..F at ..V is ..W"; for me, before to come to any wattage calculation it would need at least to know the resistance through the capacitor will charge or discharge while controlling the corresponding current.

Maybe you have made a short-cut in your expression but if so, I think that is VERY NOT the place to do so! unless your purpose was just to align abstruse words to put you under the light but not to help :/

So, if you really wanted to help, make PLEASE the effort to be understandable by those who may read your post and rewrite your post :)

Regards,
Didier

Quote
Hello ATOM1, surely you're a Very Trained Engineer

No he's not
Quote-10 F at 10v is 100 watts over one second
10F with a potential of 10v is 500 joules of energy.
1 watt is the flow of 1 joule of energy per second.-->W=J/s--> 100 watts is 100 joules over 1 second. 10F @10v is 500 joules--not 100 joules.


Brad

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #397 on: March 20, 2016, 04:38:40 PM »
@ web000x

That was on a common video call I had participated too in real time.

Regards,

Didier

I don't think they ever said to stop pursuing the technology.  I never heard that...

I have been actively piecing together a replication for the SERPS concept.  I'm working on a microprocessor program for the switching at the moment.  I'll keep everyone posted if I stumble upon anything interesting.

Dave

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #398 on: March 20, 2016, 09:39:16 PM »
Did anybody at the conference happen to catch the approximate value of the capacitor banks?  Or if the caps were electrolytic or nonpolarized?  Or the electrical rating of the light bulbs?

This info would help me greatly...

Thanks

Dave

Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #399 on: March 26, 2016, 09:07:14 PM »
No he's not
Quote-10 F at 10v is 100 watts over one second
10F with a potential of 10v is 500 joules of energy.
1 watt is the flow of 1 joule of energy per second.-->W=J/s--> 100 watts is 100 joules over 1 second. 10F @10v is 500 joules--not 100 joules.


Brad

Hello Brad,

Yes, indeed! Sorry, I had missed the "over one second" (as you see in my sequence of signs: ""..F at ..V is ..W""), don't know why! ^_^ But very thanks for having taken time to quietly specify :)

Regards,
Didier


Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #400 on: March 26, 2016, 09:15:23 PM »
I don't think they ever said to stop pursuing the technology.  I never heard that...

I have been actively piecing together a replication for the SERPS concept.  I'm working on a microprocessor program for the switching at the moment.  I'll keep everyone posted if I stumble upon anything interesting.

Dave
Just check the video: they said they didn't want to have problems to get their pattent while we would disclose the technology and asked us to not publish our results. The reason they have given at least, but since, NOTHING has moved on their side either; I mean nobody granted them enough credit to finance them like they wanted: in the range of a million dollars.

Up to know, just applying their exact advices and explanations have never brought us to a successful result.

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #401 on: March 27, 2016, 11:12:12 PM »
I haven't read this thread in it's entirety but did read the thread on this at Energetic Forum.  It seems only a select few people even pursued this much past some initial tests.  Barry, listener192, seems to be the only one that has really posted much experimental data  and it seems he's fallen off the map...  His user name is 'listener' and he joined the EF back in 2009 with a total of 22 posts.  Could it be that he gathered enough info to successfully replicate the effect and is why he's disappeared?   He seemed very determined to follow this one through.  I am surprised that more people didn't try to replicate this.  Paul and Jim seem to be some of the more technically competent and honest researchers out there...

Dave

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #402 on: March 28, 2016, 06:07:15 AM »
Reactive power excites you? Maybe you'll find this video interesting... and instructive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xuXBHJcNsk

web000x

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #403 on: March 28, 2016, 11:35:29 PM »
Reactive power excites you? Maybe you'll find this video interesting... and instructive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xuXBHJcNsk

Have you built and tested the SERPS concept?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,
« Reply #404 on: March 29, 2016, 05:01:30 AM »
Have you built and tested the SERPS concept?

What is the difference between the "SERPS concept" and what I showed in the video linked above?

By the way, the Video URL has changed: It is now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCdrAE_IZ74

Same video, just a different URL.