Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles  (Read 12860 times)

BushWacker

  • Guest
Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« on: April 15, 2005, 11:17:49 PM »
Dear Beautiful People,


? ? The very fact that you are here gives me hope. You are doing a noble thing by sharing your knowledge for the purpose of trying to make the world a better place for all. Do not give up hope of finding new, and even what for all purposes could be called free energy. It is there, but it is secured by the most powerful people on the planet. I am no genius, I am nobody special, I am no better than anyone here, I just simply want to help in any way I can. There is a great deal of suppressed information, which I have signed nondisclosure documents not to disclose/divulge. Please believe me when I say, that most is better left unknown. Some of things are scheduled to gradually be released a little at a time, because the majority of humans could not handle everything at once. I have taken much risk in mentioning one tiny thing that got plastered all over the world, and it is now to late to take it back. My life is a small thing in comparison with the billions of souls on this planet, and if I have helped even a little, that is enough for me. Below are a few links to clues that are already out there. This is far from the only answer and I encourage you all to keep up the good work, and the good fight. There are many technologies which are hundreds of years beyond any openly voiced estimates given by the so-called experts in any given field, so don't just look to the alleged experts, but use your own minds that God gave you, and don't put your faith in man, but instead, in the One who created all things. Whatever you can imagine, has already been done. I say this not to discourage you, but to encourage you that you are likely much brighter than you think. Believe in yourselves as being the children of God that you are, and being such, that you have much greater abilities than society gives you credit for. If you could see what I have, you would not be seperating science from spirituality and mainstream science is beginning to recognize some of these things also. Don't let the old propaganda machine wash away your own common sense or you will never go any further than the theorists who call themselves physicists.


Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
http://www.karinya.com/nexusmag.htm


High Energy Magnetic Monopole Sequestered by U.S. Government:
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/2004/06/05/HighEnergyMagneticMonopole/index.html


Role of magnetic monopoles:
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/187monopoles.html


Suppressed Science:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Suppressed+science+Magnetic+Monopoles&btnG=Google+Search


High Energy Magnetic Monopoles:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=High+Energy+Magnetic+Monopoles


Rex Research:
http://www.rexresearch.com/home.htm

Subject:? Re Magnetic Monopoles
Sent:? Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:06:52 +1000


Names withheld to protect the innocent down under - v

Hi ______
 
I wish to keep a certain amount of covertness for the time being . My name is _______ , I currently live near _____ in Australia. I have just finished reading your article on magnetic monopoles in the latest Nexus magazine. I have been making monopole magnets either north or south in Alnico magnets for a while, the method you describe in ZPenergy is basically the method I used with a bank of Caps dissipating through a set of high power diodes and induction coil. That is no surprise but the magnetic field containment around the magnets is rather novel, also the type of wire used for coil is some what different to copper.? Thanks!
 

Regards,
 
_______? ________


« Last Edit: April 16, 2005, 03:52:54 AM by BushWacker »

terry5732

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2005, 01:38:30 AM »
Why do all these conspiracy mongers have such poor grammar and spelling?

I just have a hard time believing the claims of knowledge of these people when they can't come up with correct words for simple intercourse.

Effect is not similar to affect!
Then is NOT than!
Appears to be about third grade level .

BushWacker

  • Guest
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2005, 03:23:45 AM »
Sorry, didn't realize we were in here for your english lessons. If you are so perfect and never make a mistake, then perhaps you can provide us with your great knowledge and tell us how to build an affordable alternative to oil, nuclear, coal, and all the rest of the dirty technologies oh great one?
You sound like another plant to me! You will not stop the truth from eventually being known ah___. Also, why does someone trying to point out some hidden facts, and trying to encourage their colleague's not to become disheartened or give up bother you? Seems rather strange for someone in a forum trying to find answers. You want answers? Here ya go ding dong! Go back to school yourself! HIGHSCHOOL!? :D

P.S. Who ever said they wanted to have intercourse with you?  ::)


than

than (than, th?n) conj.
Used to introduce the second element or clause of an unequal comparison: She is a better athlete than I.

preposition
Usage Problem.
In comparison with: disliked no one more than her.

[Middle English, from Old English thanne, than.]

Usage Note: Since the 18th century grammarians have insisted that than should be regarded as a conjunction in all its uses, so that a sentence such as Bill is taller than Tom should be construed as an elliptical version of the sentence Bill is taller than Tom is. According to this view, the case of a pronoun following than is determined by whether the pronoun serves as the subject or object of the verb that is "understood." Thus, the standard rule requires Pat is taller than I (not me) on the assumption that this sentence is elliptical for Pat is taller than I am but allows The news surprised Pat more than me, since this sentence is taken as elliptical for The news surprised Pat more than it surprised me. However, than is quite commonly treated as a preposition when followed by an isolated noun phrase, and as such occurs with a pronoun in the objective case: John is taller than me. Though this usage is still widely regarded as incorrect, it is predominant in speech and has reputable literary precedent. It is also consistent with the fact that than is clearly treated as a preposition in the than whom construction, as in a poet than whom (not than who) no one has a dearer place in the hearts of his countrymen. Still, the writer who risks a sentence such as Mary is taller than him in formal writing must be prepared to defend the usage against objections of critics who are unlikely to be dissuaded from their conviction that the usage is incorrect.? Comparatives using as . . . as can be analyzed in a parallel way to those using than. Traditional grammarians insist that I am not as tall as he is the only correct form, and though both literary precedent and syntactic arguments can be marshaled in support of the analysis of the second as as a preposition (which would license I am not as tall as him), one should treat this use of as as a conjunction in formal writing.

Excerpted from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition Copyright ? 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V., further reproduction and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.


You've just been wacked!
« Last Edit: April 16, 2005, 03:55:49 AM by BushWacker »

raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2005, 12:43:02 AM »
Go get um Bushwacker I don't check over my posts either , that's time I can be standing at my
bench or working. And some who post here don't use english often,and others just don't give
a north bound rats south side!!!

andreas_varesi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2005, 01:22:49 AM »
Magnetic Monopoles could solve the main problem I've had to create overunity from Neodym magnets (see also http://overunity.com/index.php/topic,156.0.html). But I actually doubt whether they really can exist. On the other hand 30 years ago nobody could believe in a superconductor at room temperature...

Please let us know, when there is more detailled information about Magnetic Monopoles.

Regards

Andreas Varesi

kenbo0422

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2005, 03:40:01 PM »
I want to know the exact process for making them.  Step by step, like an ISO production manual, not leaving out the small stuff that the technician takes for granted.  This is where I have a problem with most 'thorough' instructions and drawings.  They usually aren't complete or they are presented in such a way that voice inflection seems to be the way to 'know' what is being implied- like -wink wink-...  Granted I catch myself doing the same thing.  I'm in the process of documenting the 'production manual' to the machines that we build.  Sheez! what a pain in the butt!

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2005, 07:10:02 PM »
Sure 'monopoles' exist.? Lockheed Martin wouldn't say it if it weren't true....(lol)

http://www.delphion.com/cgi-bin/viewpat.cmd/US05929732__?MODE=fstv

You've got your RH spinning strings and your LH spinning strings.......of? 'virtual' photons.? And they 'corkscrew' together or they don't.  Depends on just a few simple rules.......for dating my teenage 'doubter'. (Buddum Bum)

That's what a 'Dipole' really is.? A couple of Aetherically excited, field coupled, quantum 'place holders'.......One from the Right hand and the other to my left.? Why do you think that the strings eminating from each pole separate so energetically into their arcuate flight pattern in a rush to meet up with their 'dance partners' from the other side?? They are spinning in the same direction as they leave the surface of their parent pole and push away from each other due in part, to friction.? Same reason they stack up over one another enroute round the poles after leaving perpendicular to the magnet's surface.


You and I floating in free space are 'monopoles'..... in close proximity....Voila', 'Dipole'.? The Earth and Moon, field coupled, become a kind of 'Dipole'.



In reality....consider not only the Monopole and the Dipole.



How about a "Googlepole"......for variety's sake.




Imagine, if you will, a 'sun'....emitting light in such a manner as a magnet emits it's field.? What would you call such light...by inference?? IF light can be made to travel such a path....certainly 'Might' can be made to do the same.


As regards the truly advantageous exploitation of these 'monopoles', it would seem.....there exists a 'monopole' 'e'.? Make that a Capital?'E', you see....



Much can be extrapolated from the study of 'Celestial Mechanics'.? ?As an example: Although it is possible for our Sun to have satellites in a polar orbit.....the vast majority of her captive entourage orbits much nearer the plane of her 'equator', or 'midpoint field terminator'.....indicating that each satellite's ferromagnetic signature certainly plays a 'pivotal' role in eventual orbital vector assignment.? One of many allusions to the necessarily symbiotic relationship between gravity and 'magnetics'.


In retrospect,? Maybe Tesla wasn't 'blowing smoke' in regards to his forays in communication by exploitation of radiation.


There are, of course, many more considerations that can be made.....as 'Time and Space' permit.



Peace,

TS
« Last Edit: April 20, 2005, 08:43:49 PM by TechStuf »

kenbo0422

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2005, 09:19:49 PM »
Techstuf,

you said....

Imagine, if you will, a 'sun'....emitting light in such a manner as a magnet emits it's field.  What would you call such light...by inference?  IF light can be made to travel such a path....certainly 'Might' can be made to do the same.

Would that be polarized light?   ;D   No pun intended....  Like what you see with an inferometer?


TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2005, 09:38:52 PM »
LOL!  Good one, Ken......even if unintentional!

Polarized, certainly, among other things....a kind of quasi, axial coherence not being the least of these.


TS


P.S.  Now how did I know those were polarized lenses you were wearing?

andreas_varesi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2005, 04:32:17 PM »
Sure 'monopoles' exist.  Lockheed Martin wouldn't say it if it weren't true....(lol)

http://www.delphion.com/cgi-bin/viewpat.cmd/US05929732__?MODE=fstv



If you want to see the whole patent including description see http://l2.espacenet.com/espacenet/viewer?PN=US5929732&CY=de&LG=de&DB=EPD
The navigation is in German, but there is no password needed and the patent description is free accessible. In this system you can also find any other US or European patent for free!

I will try to re-build this amplifier for a magnetic beam. Maybe it can be used for an overunity magnetic system.

Best regards

Andreas

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2005, 08:06:44 PM »
A quick word of advice....try buying your magnets from eBay user 'Drills 12'? from Canada.? His are the only magnets large enough and strong enough at affordable prices to effect noticeable results, unless you are using strong and efficient EMs.

As one is dealing with a small percentage of overall field strength comprising the 'beam'......large fields of appreciable density are needed to effect the necessary level of field compression to allow a few 'loops' to be broken.

EMs are easier to assemble and can be made to suit.


The size and strength of PMs required for this purpose, practically necessitate the need for bolt holes as shown in the patent.


Have fun!


TS

2 words:? Field Geometry
« Last Edit: April 29, 2005, 09:12:21 PM by TechStuf »

Kysmett

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2005, 11:41:39 PM »
A few more words:  Golden mean (phi) and Ancient geometries as megnetic models

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Suppressed Science: Magnetic Monopoles
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2005, 01:49:50 AM »
On the off chance you actually meant:? 'megnetic'? I googled it.....would you believe over 6,000 hits!? Scientific terminology is undergoing such a metamorphosis at this time, who knows, you may actually have coined a term!

That is....unless Col. Bearden has it copyrighted already.....(lol....?)


And you're right, nothing new under the sun, I'm told.....


 8)
« Last Edit: April 29, 2005, 09:13:47 PM by TechStuf »