As long as I have blinking lights, spinny things, and multiple oscilloscopes going on in the lab, my housemate thinks I'm doing something productive, and she leaves me alone. Otherwise, I might have to wash the dishes or clean the bathroom or something.

Right, I can't prove Akula's device isn't OU. I can prove that mine isn't, though, and I'm trying my best to make it functionally identical to his.
It all boils down to what Pirate said: it is the claimant's responsibility to provide enough evidence to support his claim. So far, we are working with the spotty incomplete and error-ridden data that Akula has provided, with Wesley's much appreciated help. But it really isn't enough. So I'm exploring the problem space.

You might better be asking "why does Akula waste everyone's time with partial information and inconclusive demonstrations.... when he should really be working in a secret military lab making fuelless power supplies for Russian submarines and spy satellites?"

I know why.... and I think you do too.
 

Ya nye govoryu po-Rooski. Ochyen ploho.

I listened to that TeamSpeak conference. While it made me more sympathetic towards Roman himself, it highlighted the fact that he himself has no idea whatsoever as far as the true nature of the processes is concerned.

Another interesting fact is that he went to Germany to demonstrate his skills. One month (and many thousands of Euros) later he admitted defeat. Some suggested that at home he uses a RF transmitter to induce voltage and that his circuits are simply cleaver receiver fakes. (This, kind of, makes you remember one of his videos where he's adjusting frequencies and the circuit's producing a typical receiver noise, doesn't it? )

You are right in saying that understanding the principle is the key to success. However, at this stage,  it seems we all have no clue.
Some of the greatest discoveries have been made by chance. Whatever it is Roman has stumbled upon, he's not sharing.

~A

Google to help

To help what, rolling laughter? Google translates Russian even worse than I do, nearly. Don't you wind up laughing when you read a Google translation of a long English technical passage?

Spasibo anyhow. Nichego nye ponyemayu. Excuse my Texan accent.

А что поступали предложения? 

То что я сделал -результат моих изысканий за 5 месяцев, и я не уверен что так правильно.
Ребята придумайте что нибудь новое, я например ищу альтернативные варианты, например резонанс в сегнетоэлектриках.
Я думаю не стоит повторять то в чем не разобрались, не получиться просто копировать.



P.S.  Я отправил ферритовые чашки из моих видео человеку с этого форума, на изучение, думаю скоро все повторят, а может и сделают лучше.



What I did is the result of my research for 5 months, and I'm not sure so right.
Guys come up with something new, I like looking for alternatives, such as resonance in ferroelectrics.
I think you should not repeat what is not understood, not be able to simply copy.



P.S. I sent ferrite cup of my video person on this forum, to study, I think soon all repeat, and maybe do better.