Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful  (Read 72813 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #75 on: November 21, 2012, 11:13:47 AM »
Thanks!! Actually the camera is fine, a Panasonic HD, but its files are huge.... a ten minute video is a Gigabyte of data and would take hours to upload, so I convert it to a compressed .avi for upload, reducing it by a factor of about 9 in size, so it uploads in a reasonable time. This hurts the quality some. Then of course YT does its thing, which sometimes helps and sometimes hurts the resolution further. And for some reason, when I do upload an uncompressed file from the camera, YT screws up the aspect ratio and presents it as 4x3 instead of 16x9.

And the light... sorry about the light.  I can't handle really bright lighting myself, and when I'm trying to show scopeshots from the CRT scope it's got to be kind of dark for them to show up well. I appreciate the feedback, and I'll try to do better.

The times I've used a tripod.... sometimes if I'm just showing something on a bench and don't have to look around a lot a tripod works OK. But it makes it much harder to look around at my various instruments and work areas, and takes longer to set up.

I use these videos as my lab notebook, they are bound to be quite raw just as all raw data is, and I hope that their entertainment value compensates for their flaws.

Thanks again for watching!

Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #76 on: November 22, 2012, 02:48:00 AM »
Hi Tinsel, I find you're video's very informative and entertaining at the same time. Eventually I will finish my version of your wireless power transfer
device, Speaking of Tesla stuff I like to tinker too, here is my Tesla coil I made mostly from "found" stuff, it is a twin MOT setup with a rotary gap
as can be seen teh gap is made from a wooden frame, a floor polisher motor a fan shaft and a cutting board mainly, other bits and pieces as well.
The secondary extra coil have only 190 turns all up 40 on the secondary and 150 on the extra, single turn primary, even though it's spark
gapped, the break rate can go to over 1 kHz. Lots of fun and interesting but difficult to determine the input power, I've ruined two cheap kilo watt meters
in the supply line.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzqbSPi8VKU

Cheers

P.S. If you got 0.5 of a cent per view you could have earned $1500.00 from 300 000 views.

..

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #77 on: November 22, 2012, 04:24:23 AM »
Very nice indeed Farmhand! I love an SGTC. Makes me want to put my big one back together, for the first time in twelve years... I wonder if I can find all the parts. I know where the rotary gap is, but I don't recall where I put the primary winding.....  ??? It's still in one of the boxes that surround me in my little labroom, I hope.

I've found that with a lot of contacts on a rotary gap rotor, especially at fast speeds, sometimes the spark-arc won't quench at the breaks and is "dragged along" by the rotor piece, so I don't get good clean performance. One of the best gaps I've used for a SGTC was a multiple element fixed gap, not even adjustable, just eight big disks of nickel-iron on a nonconductive rod with spacers, and one of my smaller SGTCs works very well on a 3-element adjustable fixed gap.A rotary gap powered by blown compressed air can work amazingly well by using the air blast to help quench the spark as the rotor is spinning, and even a simple two element fixed (but adjustable of course)  gap can produce amazing performance if it is "blown out" with a constant stream of high-pressure air.

Ah.... I love the smell of ozone in the morning....

Teunis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #78 on: November 24, 2012, 07:22:27 PM »
Someone came up with the comment you can see the light bulb light up before it actually touches the contacts.
Any idea on that?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #79 on: November 25, 2012, 11:34:28 AM »
Someone came up with the comment you can see the light bulb light up before it actually touches the contacts.
Any idea on that?
I didn't notice that, do you know the time in minutes/seconds where this was seen?

A really effective demo would have him clip the bulb to the clips and toss the  whole thing from hand to hand or up in the air, showing it still lit to full brilliance.

But even that could be "fekked", probably. I once saw a stage closeup magician do the most amazing levitations with a "magic wand", in a small venue; I was about 10 feet away from him up on his little stage-like platform in the spotlight. I _knew_ he had to be doing it with threads and wires, fishing line or something like that but I could not see any fakery or "tells" other than the impossibility of what he was doing. The wand danced around, flew all over, under his legs and around his head, while he "gestured hypnotically" at it with his hands. It was really amazing.... and really a trick.
And of course now that CGI video effects are within reach of anyone with a computer, practically...it sort of takes the fun out of second-guessing videos. They could show anything at all on a video, done with computer graphics, and from a YT video... I'd never be able to tell.

Teunis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #80 on: August 14, 2014, 01:02:33 AM »
There's a lot of activity going on in his YouTube channel again and he made some new videos that make me wonder.

After using google I found out that the LifeHack2012 guy has a blog too but it doesn't offer much information or schematic diagrams: http://lifehack2012.wordpress.com

There are 2 videos that keep amazing me:

Powering a motor, a led and a festoon bulb.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhtqcgO0y5w

Powering a remote controlled car:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQRPlzf1cLA

Does this actually work?

John.K1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: "solid state free energy device" - rebuilt it but unsuccessful
« Reply #81 on: August 14, 2014, 01:31:48 AM »
Hi guys.
I am not sure about that one. I was asking him to show us the tuning proces. Instead, he just made a new video showing the build of the coil. Not any tuning shown - just bang, and energy was there. Very suspicious. Also he says the wire he use is the " white copper". Does that wire on the picture looks like white, or lighter than ordinary copper?  Just I am not sure in this case.

There is now on the youTube also interesting thing- so called "One way transformer" I tried to build one a little bit modified version and it has interesting properties. Ex. I have five output coils. I set the input V,A & f to get light lit. Next I connect more light to the rest of output coils. They light and no change on input. I can show some pictures next time.  Cheers.