@gotoluc

I understand completely. You know I am on your side man. I just hate wasting time. Our dearest friend @otto that just passed away in a blink of an eye left many things undone. His departure just kicked me into hyperdrive knowing that at my age (56) even in good enough shape, I can kick the bucket anytime. So who wants to waste any more time. Not me.

About your 1 watt OU testing, watch out for your scope probe ground. It will introduce so much crap into the circuits. Always have a habit of disconnecting the probe ground once in a while to verify if it is the cause of the effect. Because of that problem I always use my scope without the ground. I have learned how to interpret the waveform as being a pointal indication and not a referenced indication because the ground just screws things up especially when you are working on a floating ground system that had no ground of its own going to the mains. Tried explaining that at OUR but I guess I failed. hehehe Can't win them all.

Because you are such a great guy, I have been muddling an idea so I will put it here. It is not QEG related but much better and I personally think it has 1000 times more potential and should be very easy to do, and if it is promising, it can be replicated by anyone in the world.

So here goes nothing...hahaha.

A while back someone on the Energy Amplification thread asked me for new ideas. I did not forget so I'll put this one here. hahaha

OK, the best spinning sphere magnet I have ever seen was on youtube, a guy showing a sphere magnet rotating inside a Rodin coil. That magnet was turning so damn fast. So this proves to us that a Rodin coil produces a great rotating impulse matrix inside the donut hole.

You get that, right. Such great news indeed.

OK, now, the best low cost generator I know is a simple new or used car alternator. Funny that when you take it apart, you end up with this great donut shaped stator coil with three stout wire pairs leaving it.

The funniest thing is the stator looks just like a Rodin coil former (donut) and funny again that all that alternator stator wants is to see is a nice rotating field inside of its hole. hint hint

Due to lack of time, I will not be tackling this idea that has been bundling in the back of my mind for months now, so if anyone wants to tackle it and has some good Rodin winding techniques, because it does demand some discipline in the winding method (see youtube tutorials) and in the pulsing method sweeping for the sweet spot please do so because I think this type of "Spin Conveyance" may be a prime potential method when fine tuned as a low tech OU solution. Imagine an alternator with zero drag.

Why Rodin and a car Alternator?. Both techniques are proven performers so why not meld them into a Rodin Rotorless Alternator or maybe call it a "Rodinator". Maybe if JL Naudin reads this thread and needs a new challenge. hint hint

Why use the alternator stator? Because that part of the build technique is extremely difficult to get right the first time (say impossible) and these ready made stators enjoy millions in R&D and an already solid track record of performance. The winding angles, the armature, the known output all favor the rotating source field and not your regular axial core coupling. Maybe tape up the stator first so the Rodin coil wire does not get shorted on the armature. Or, find a good donut former that will fit the stator and hug the inside wall of the stator and wind the Rodin over that former.

Advanced Rodinators:

1) Maybe eventually add a center axial rotor magnet not too close to the armature so it can just float along pushing the effect with the Rodin providing the lead.  Could be an internal rotor magnet that does the switching that energizes the Rodin coils. Many ways indeed.

2) We may eventually discover that a virtual impress on the alternator armature has to ramp up slowly otherwise the armature may tend to seize or freeze the effect before it can overcome internal cancellations. Like requiring a minimum rpm to push output.

This means maybe a two layer Rodin. You start with one pulsing as a ramp up and when it gets to its maximum the second layer starts pulsing with the first then even a third layer after that one or as many as the design can handle. That stator is known to output 12 volts at 100 amps. Not a bad goal.

Even guys doing Jule Thief works, find a small motor stator, wind a small Rodin coil over it and pulse it. Play the hell out of it to find out what secrets can be discovered. Or take a naked toroid and wind a 2 or more wires Rodin coil style. Pulse one and tank the other(s). That's a new way to think of winding the toroid coils. It's like the Rodin and the Toroid were made for each other, both having the ability to engage in a virtual rotational loop.

Don't know if you heard it here first or not. Don't care. What matters is.... can it be done. All I know is I have not seen this anywhere so maybe this can be a more utilized out of the box approach and another part of the OU puzzle. This is however the type of approach I call realistic. You know where you stand from the start and not based on anything else but your own minds ability to reason out the build in your mind, work out all the bugs that you can in your head before starting a build. It is all pure creative logic in action but always keeping a realistic and open mind.

Everything around us is just yelling out "Please please love me for what I am and see in me the potential of what I can become."

wattsup

SeaMonkey,

Those are interesting quotes by MarkDansie that you have there, but I was unable to locate them with a search engine.

Where did you find them?

Could I have a link?

Regards,

VIDBID

The fact that Hope Girl and team don't have one going should send up a lot of caution flags.

From the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atLN-mkmqBE , they have something going, but we need to look at the data, but unless I'm mistaken, there was talk of a 10 kW output.

I always find it curious when people talk of suppressed free energy schemes that they know about.

Why is that? I mean somebody has to know about them, right?

If someone knows about them and talks about them in public then they haven't been suppressed very well

Well, human beings are traffickers of information, and what is supposed to be secret is bound to get out sometime, isn't it?

and there shouldn't be any technical reason keeping one from replicating the supposed working technologies.

I doubt there are many people who could actually build a QEG in their basement, and the building of a QEG does require some advanced technical skills, doesn't it?

As to the plausibility of the military possessing these wonderful free energy systems, that would be the same military that spends $100. / gallon to move fuel in war zones.

I don't know if that analogy is applicable in this particular case.

If the military was using a type of free energy technology, wouldn't that be classified?

How would you know that it even existed?

If they had these wonderful technologies why don't they use them?

How do you know that they're not? I mean they could be using them in secret, right?

I mean their use in the military would be classified, wouldn't it?

Regards,

VIDBID

Let me recap from what I gotten from the PESN interview video and this thread.

1)  We are being presented a device that is driven by parametric excitation of inductance. 

2)  Driving a device with parametric excitation is an obscure method, although it is still a well understood process.  The parametric excitation modulates and builds up the noise currents in the winding of the device, noise currents that are created in the windings by exposure to ambient natural and man-made magnetic fields.

3)  Although there are zero windings on the rotor of the device to create Lenz effects, the build up of magnetic flux within the stator would likely create some magnetic drag on the rotation of the rotor, which in turn would cause at least some loading on the motor driving the rotor.  This load would likely be much less than the Lenz effect in a typical generators.

4) As a result of #3, as more load is place on the output of the device a reduction in the output voltage and or output current would be expected rather than an increase of the loading of the drive motor though the magnetic drag upon the rotor.

5)  As far as over unity capability of the device, the only suggested source for this has been some sort of mechanical-piezo effect involving the atoms of the magnetic core.  As far as I know, piezoelectric effects have yet to be verified as a source of over-unity operation in any device.  Everything else about the device seems common and ordinary in the field of motors and generators with the addition of a voltage limiting spark gap and resonant circuit tuned to a much higher frequency than the rest of the system.

6) In conclusion the device presented employs an unusual method of input, parametric excitation, which has been previously documented to be a viable method for the conversion of mechanical energy to electrical energy and to work with a COP of <  1.  Thus, it is my expectation for this device that it will generate a useful output at a COP of < 1. 

Now we have a least one person, who appears to be reasonably educated and skilled in the art, claiming the device operates at a COP of > 1, and his method of disseminating the information about the device appears to be appropriate for one, who honestly wants to get the information out to the world as fast and directly as possible.  Unfortunately the device described in that information costs upwards of $10,000 to build, making replication attempts cost prohibitive for a lot of would be replicators.  Also the videos presented so far have been less than comprehensive and convincing of any over-unity effects.

To facilitate replication and verification of over or under unity operation in this device, perhaps the core can be scaled down, so that a device would be made that would cost hundreds instead of thousands of dollars to build.  Aside from trying to figure out how to build a similar parametrically excited induction generator on a smaller scale, my take on this will be to just wait and watch.  Results from Taiwan should be rolling in soon enough over the coming days and weeks.

***

For those of you with the interest for it, here is a link to my step by step analysis of the Tesla Hairpin Circuit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gPeIVVy0A

Those are interesting quotes by MarkDansie that you have there, but I was unable to locate them with a search engine.

Where did you find them?

Could I have a link?

Aye, here they are:

First

Second

From the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atLN-mkmqBE , they have something going, but we need to look at the data, but unless I'm mistaken, there was talk of a 10 kW output.

The hour long internal conference from Korea? indicated that they did not actually make that work.  Hope Girl has declared that they don't need to and suggests that they do not want to show a working unit.

Why is that? I mean somebody has to know about them, right?

If something has been successfully suppressed then the public would never know about it.  Yet, over and over again we hear stories of supposedly wonderful inventions suppressed by the gov't or PTB or whoever, but none of the people who report these suppressed devices can actually back up the  stories with any actual proof of a device that works.  These suppression tales are like the "big one that got away".

Well, human beings are traffickers of information, and what is supposed to be secret is bound to get out sometime, isn't it?

Many humans are story tellers.  The difference between a story and reality is evidence.  These suppression stories routinely lack evidence.

I doubt there are many people who could actually build a QEG in their basement, and the building of a QEG does require some advanced technical skills, doesn't it?

It requires a lot of material.  Building a working one requires skills no one has:  Altering electromagnetics.

I don't know if that analogy is applicable in this particular case.

Why on earth would a military spend $100/ gallon to move fuel if it had "century ahead" free energy technology?  If one has enough energy, one can suck CO2 and H2O out of the air and make liquid fuels on the spot for those archaic current technology machines that still use liquid fuels instead of free energy directly.

If the military was using a type of free energy technology, wouldn't that be classified?

Lots of advanced technology is classified.  It does not prevent us from noticing when older technology does and does not get replaced.  When older technology stays in place, it is a safe bet that there is not a new and better technology to replace it.

How would you know that it even existed?

Again, look at what gets replaced.

How do you know that they're not? I mean they could be using them in secret, right?

Sure and just to pull the wool over everyone's eyes they keep using the old stuff and subject convoys to great risk.  May I interest you in some ocean front land in Florida?

I mean their use in the military would be classified, wouldn't it?

Regards,

VIDBID

You said that before.  There are huge contracts and RFQs out there for energy efficiency and mobility.  Those contracts and RFQs would not exist if the military and elites had these claimed miracle energy technologies.

 Well from what I understand it wont need the poles but we will see. The pole block would be easy enough to add if need be. I attached a picture of the core in my last post... I am slao thinking that I will need a coil on the rotor in this design to add a very strong magnetic field to the rotor. There would be almost no cogging in this design. My premise is to create a heavy magnetic field on the rotor via a closed looped coil on said rotor. This way it would guide the magnetic field around the toroid and cut the copper and generate a huge voltage depending on the thickness of the coils. But again I'm speculating.

 Well this is what I am basing this off of:


 http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-390,721-dynamo-electric-machine


 Tesla said that a toroid in this design would have infinite poles. So seeing that the poles define the machine then it should be way better. But like I said I will have to tinker with the design. By the way the magnets on the toroid I have shown are for the exciter section, If I need that part. Also as Tesla stated the increased capacitance of the bifilar coil should make additional caps not required. But again I'll have to tinker with that too.. First thing will be to try the setup like Hopegirl presents.