Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: anyone heard about QEG ?  (Read 27557 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2014, 12:31:44 PM »
You shore, that they have not working prototipe? They say, that they not have working prototipe?
No, they say they DO have a working prototype. Sure, it turns. Does it power itself? No, it does not. Does it produce excess power over and above that which it takes to run it? No, it does not. Look at WITTS for a bunch of similar claims, and then look around for anyone who can confirm them.


Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2014, 07:48:34 PM »
Dear all,

Means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations.

http://www.google.com/patents/US685012

In the above patent tesla describes :

It is evident from the above that the greater the number of the freely-vibrating circuits which alternately receive and transmit energy from one to another the greater, relatively, will be the gain secured by applying my invention.

Was he indicating towards energy amplification through resonance ? What do you think ?


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2014, 09:17:54 PM »
Dear all,

Means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations.

http://www.google.com/patents/US685012

In the above patent tesla describes :

It is evident from the above that the greater the number of the freely-vibrating circuits which alternately receive and transmit energy from one to another the greater, relatively, will be the gain secured by applying my invention.

Was he indicating towards energy amplification through resonance ? What do you think ?
Resonant networks store a large portion of the externally applied energy each cycle.  All resonant networks dissipate a portion of the externally applied energy cycle by cycle.  High Q networks are capable of accumulating large amounts of externally applied energy over many cycles.

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2014, 01:30:59 AM »
Resonant networks store a large portion of the externally applied energy each cycle.  All resonant networks dissipate a portion of the externally applied energy cycle by cycle.  High Q networks are capable of accumulating large amounts of externally applied energy over many cycles.

So, there is no overunity described covertly / overtly by Tesla in this patent. Right ?

But resonant amplification as in soundwaves, we do observe that amplitude of the wave rises many times the amplitude of the source wave. Why does that happen Sir ? And that happens alongside of constant energy loss by both source and target resonant object by means of converting it into louder sound energy. Why will any amplification take place AT ALL, rather attaching a target to a source should dampen the source and kill the soundwaves amplitude of the source.

Instead of doing that the target resonant object amplifies the sound waves ????

Where is the extra energy coming from for amplification ??????

Best,

Best,

Offline gauschor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2014, 10:50:30 AM »
Rule #1: if it's from WITTS it's a scam.

2) Her stage name: 'Hope Moore'.

The non existing fake girl probably hopes for moore (money).

On a sidenote: the whole website looks like an advertisement to donate money. Seriously there is nothing else on it. Did anyone check the old news? It's all about "we will change the world", "we will do salvation", "it shall be done"... well that was 2 years ago. A real inventor does not proclaim for ongoing years, but delivers. I can see nothing delivered but scraps of paper put together like a mosaic of pictures from various sources of the internet.

Offline vasik041

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
    • FE R&D
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2014, 04:56:51 PM »
Now somebody created a forum about QEG (http://theqeg.freeforums.org/)

How sad if all these just another fake  :(




Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2014, 12:45:06 PM »
you can get the history here
http://revolution-green.com/qeg-part-2/
Kind Regards
Mark

Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2014, 12:47:47 PM »
No, they say they DO have a working prototype. Sure, it turns. Does it power itself? No, it does not. Does it produce excess power over and above that which it takes to run it? No, it does not. Look at WITTS for a bunch of similar claims, and then look around for anyone who can confirm them.


You are as usual 100% correct
I updated the article and included your comments  PS send me your email address again I lost my address book in a crash
http://revolution-green.com/qeg-part-2/


Many
Thanks Mark

Offline ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #23 on: April 04, 2014, 02:42:04 AM »
It might work, assuming the inventor's credentials are true, this is very humiliating behavior otherwise for a master engineer like robitaille.

The goal of the motor is just to rotate the magnet to the right speed. The argument that ''cannot be true since dc motor is fed by ac'' is very pathetic.







Offline mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #24 on: April 04, 2014, 08:47:29 PM »
It might work, assuming the inventor's credentials are true, this is very humiliating behavior otherwise for a master engineer like robitaille.

The goal of the motor is just to rotate the magnet to the right speed. The argument that ''cannot be true since dc motor is fed by ac'' is very pathetic.


I can't believe that any engineer would accede to having their names linked to such an unfinished schematic/parts list.
Showing two motor control schemes when only one is needed/works. Spec'd incorrectly both ways. Using
a motor without a part number linked to a motor rebuilding service. This suggests something that doesn't
work, because they can keep a real motor manufacture out of the fingerpointing fray, if the device doesn't work.

:S:MarkSCoffman

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2014, 11:13:22 PM »
These folks are religiously motivated and they claim, buried in the rhetoric, that the design was Revealed to the engineer, or channeled in a dream or something like that. Therefore they believe and know that it _will_ work, because God and his prophet Thrapp told them so. The fact that it _doesn't_ work as designed/planned/revealed is just a matter of getting the magnets properly up to speed, or using the right capacitors, or winding the coil widdershins instead of hickorydock. Or something. There will always be something keeping it from "self-running"... even the thought forms of the builder can prevent it from running, according to WhateverGirl.

Offline ourbobby

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #26 on: May 01, 2014, 02:37:00 PM »
I reckon that if you are trying to show a 10:1 ratio of improvement of the input power, wouldn't it be better to use a few more light globes? I mean, really, such enthusiasm for five globes. One born every minute!!

Offline vasik041

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
    • FE R&D
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #27 on: May 01, 2014, 04:30:33 PM »
They promised publish power measurements...let's wait and see what they actually got there :-)


Offline Mr Summitville

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2017, 05:15:53 AM »
OK, it has been three years. What is the verdict?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: anyone heard about QEG ?
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2017, 06:30:26 AM »
The verdict is that nobody following the directions of the QEG team has ever produced a single Joule of extra energy, nor have they achieved self-running, even after spending thousands of dollars and countless hours of tuning, rewinding, changing aerial length, etc. Most of the QEG machines are functioning well-- as doorstops, boat anchors, and bones of contention with SWMBOs.
 
They have dropped below the radar of the "Open Source" world and have opened some subscription-only "services" in order to keep the cash flowing in. The last time I saw photos or videos of Her and Him, they both looked sick, especially Him. And I guess the Mediterranean diet must not agree with Her; probably misses her daily supersized Big Mac meal.