Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Jerry Bayles Chiral Effect Homopolar "A" Vector Alternator, and Syncho Coil.  (Read 41117 times)

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
@Verpies,


Here's a quote from the Acoustic Magnetic Generator thread:



Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 02:41:26 AMThe small motor drives two big radially-magnetized disk magnets.


Wrong! You're looking at two axially magnetized spinning disk magnets


Please keep the discussion coherent and at a decent debating level.
He wrote "radial" - not "axial".


Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 02:41:26 AMIf it is, then you are looking at a synchronous motor. 


...in a Faraday Homopolar configuration.


There you go again.
He wrote "synchronous", not "Homopolar"


Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 02:41:26 AM...flutter due to the changing magnetic fields


The magnetic fields are stationary.


Why are they stationary if their sources are non-uniform and moving?
Anyway, Milehigh specifically wrote about changing magnetinc fields, not about moving or non-stationary fields.
Conflation of "changing" with "moving" confuses direction with magnitude and brings the discussion to a new lower level.


@Verpies,


So what if Milehigh wrote that Bayles's magnets are radially magnetized? Who is he when he's just a chronic crank? Who am I who wrote the magnets are polarized axially, some kind of contentious disrupter? What right do you have to start to denigrate me assuming you got the word from God, when he's just dead wrong about it. The magnets are either polarized from end to end or side to side. What's the matter with you? You believe Milehigh is the almighty authority when at least three quaters of what he says is simply bilious?


Jerry's magnets are not diametrically polarized from side to side, but AXIALLY POLARIZED from end to end as I stated, not as Milehigh pontifically wrote. That's just for starters. I need to update the thread immediately for the viewers, but I'll be right back to you on your Moby ration of rubbish!

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Here's a comment to Milehigh from the Acoustic Magnetic Generator thread with the hyperlink to the Jerry Bayles video at the bottom:

@Milehigh,

Here's what I think to be Jerry Bayles's best video including a sound tract: He conducts five tests and discusses an electrogravitational frequency of 10.03 hrz along with the Schumman constant of 7.83 hrz. View tests 3 and 4. Bayles understands the nature of the Shumman resonance cavity between space and ground. Explain why you don't believe there is extra energy generated in Bayles balance magnets at the resonant frequencies he remarks about. There's an inverse conversion factor, and he's measuring in micro seconds.


Bayles's analysis of the Chiral effect, excluding equality of field strength in magnets of equal strength and the possibility of propulsion back and forth from rotation is of special interest as well:


The fundamental electrogravitational frequency of 10.03 Hz is measured as a strong resonance along with others that prove the wave field exists around the disk magnets which leads to chiral energy differences that arise from a spiral geometry moving outwards from the disks. This is free energy and proof that energy is not balanced around the disks.

This sounds extremely complex, but Jerry's experiments would be very simple to replicate.


http://www.electrogravity.com/BMRT/BalMagResTests_6.mov



synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720

Here's a hyperlink to all Jerry Bayles's videos:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Jerry+Bayles

Take a look at the Chral effect video:

http://www.electrogravity.com/ChiralMagFld/ChiralMagFld_6.mov

Here's a link to Jerry's website:

http://www.electrogravity.com/

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Quote from Bayles:

"There's a quantum effect much like Pauli's exclusion principle, where two particles in an atom cannot have the same quantum state. A double magnet system cannot have the same energy in opposite sides if one side is the mirror image of the other. That is, there is a quantum state of the field that will not allow for equal energies in the opposite and mirror image field".

The upshot of Jerry's discovery is that two axial polarized disk magnets of equal mirror strength in adjacency will result in one or the other magnets gaining strength over it's twin.

Secondly; Spinning the twin magnets will result in a predictable strength shift in the direction of spin. Reversing the direction of spin will result in the opposite twin gaining the extra strength.

Thirdly; The magnets fight to restore their equilibrium. As the spin frequency is reduced to resonance, the equal strength magnet has a "Tug Of WAR" with it's sister. resulting in a powerful oscillation!


Placing a set of LC tank radial magnet core "Synchro Output Coils" around the oscillating disks in resonance would result in copious free energy from the "A" vector quantum potential! 

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
I subscribed to Jerry Bayles's Youtube site, and wrote and invited him to join us on this discussion thread.


Here's a copy of the attachment image text from below:

"The right side is a lighter shade of yellow then the left side. This is to represent the difference in energy in the field. There's a quantum effect much like Pauli's exclusion principle, where two particles in an atom cannot have the same quantum state. A double magnet system cannot have the same energy in opposite sides if one side is the mirror image of the other. That is, there is a quantum state of the field that will not allow for equal energies in the opposite and mirror image field".

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Conradelectro got a stack of radial polarized neo tube magnets to flutter on the Self accelerating Reed switch thread this past December.


I wonder if while positioning the stack carefully towards the diametric rotor, if a balance point was reached where both magnets appeared to have equal strength to one another, and a Chiral effect caused an oscillation from the quantum plane along the lines theorized about by Jerry Bayles. 


A bit harder to hold the coil core magnets in equilibrium to a spinning rotor, then to attach two disks to a fixed axle!

Turbo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
    • Youtube
I am not sure if this is usefull but i did found some other things that might be of use to someone.
I found that this setup with permanent magnets and moving magnetic fields does not work with coils only there needs to be moving permanently magnetized matter for some unknown reason.
The energy is being transferred or released and stored back and forth between moving matter and moving massless magnetic fieldlines.
The change rate is about one hertz per second this means that for one second the energy gets stored in or as moving matter or moving magnets and then the energy is released out of this moving matter into the magnetic field which is the transfer mechanism, and then the next second the energy is stored in the other magnet as again moving mass or kinetic energy.
This is just one of the things you can find when you set up freely moving magnets close and opposite to each other and you set just one into motion.
I never found exactly why it happend but the energy in the setup slowly oscillates between moving matter, to a moving magnetic field, and back to moving matter again.
It is weird because it defies a direct relationship or link between the two magnets, there is amost a point where both magnets are still and all the energy is in the field, so to speak, and then it somehow knows which one was previously moving and so it starts to move the other one something like gear one is slowing down while gear two is speeding up i never understood why that happend but it is very easy to observe just hang two magnets separated and free to move horizontally and set one in to motion.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
I built a version of the Medieval magnet wheel of Peregrinus. Three bearing wheels on end, set in hat boxes, with windows cut where the magnets met. The center one, sixteen inches in diameter and two eight inch diameter wheels, one to each side. The center wheel had sixteen ceramic magnets sandwiched upright between two plastic serving plates. The side wheels had eight ceramic magnets sandwiched the same way, all magnets in opposition, only each side wheel had one ceramic magnet turned the opposite direction in attraction. Thirty magnets in opposition pointing North pole out and the two satellite attraction magnets pointing South pole out.

This set of wheels never stopped rotating. All the magnets were in opposition except the two I spoke of on each side wheel. When the attraction magnets came to stick on the center wheel, they would balance for only a set period of time, then they would begin to show a small wobbling that would again set the wheels spinning.

I think maybe the Chiral effect was responsible for this, as nature works to add imbalance to equilibrium, and one attraction magnet would begin to gain strength over the other through this effect creating a perpetual motion wheel. The wheel would stop when the single attraction magnets held fast to the center wheel, but eventually, they would begin to start and re-spin! Chiral effect??? This was actually the force that powered the wheels.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2014, 11:45:16 PM by synchro1 »

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720

You can see one eight inch plastic serving dish wheel I disassembled from the Peregrinus project in the upper right hand corner of the attachment photo. The magnets are configured differently in the photo. This rode upright on a bearing inside a cylindrical hatbox, with viewer windows in the top, and a side window to expose the magnets to the adjacent 16" wheel. I never understood what powered it until I learned of the quantum Chiral theory of Jerry Bayles. This project reassembled would demonstrate the effect better then anything!


I stared fixated and totally mesmerized at this  set of wheels for hours on end set up next to my sleeping couch. Really incredible to watch the motionless wheel start to come to life a little at a time. To watch as the oscillating force built up untill it repelled off the magnets on either side. When it busted out of the lock position, it flew off with tremendous force! This was a spontaneous and self starting motion!


You can see the 16" plate server in this video between two 8" plates. The 16" rode freely on a base bearing between the two hat boxes with a bridge for the top bearing.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dnlMcZK5Dw

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Here's a schematic of the Perigrinus perpetual magnet wheels I built and tested: I used 32 rather then 16 magnets and had the wheels in close adjacency rather then overlapping. I believe now the Chiral effect Jerry Bayles theorizes about powers this set of magnet wheels.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
This topic is inscrutable. It might be wise to try and understand what Jerry try's to make of it. From the outset:


"A double magnet system cannot have the same energy in opposite sides if one side is the mirrorimage of the other. That is, there is a quantum state of the field that will not allow for equal energies in the opposite and mirror image field".

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720

Take a look at this video on the scalar Faraday:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njWwyynLrdo


Diveflyfish demonstrates the opposite polarity current coming from two axial disks pressed together in opposition. This is how I assume Jerry Bayles has his twin axial polarized disks configured. 


I think this helps explain the formula:

TOPOLOGICAL CHARGE+MAGNETIC FIELD=CHIRALITY+POLARIZATION.


Even though these two magnet disks are spinning together at the same rate, one is generating more current of an opposite value then the other!

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720

Here's a good video on the Faraday paradox from Scotty 7129:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlUY3snoWI8


"You can't spin light by spinning a lens".

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Another good video by HPGO2 showing that the field does not rotate with the axial polarized magnet disk when spun on it's axis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSWwrvT_c8w

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
@Quotes from Gravityblock on the "Faraday Paradox thread" explaining  what we're calling Homopolar Chirality:



"The disc on the left side is looking at the magnet's face from the east.  The disc on the right side is looking at the magnet from the west.  They are looking at the magnet's face from opposite directions, thus they will be moving through the magneticfield in opposite directions since the magnetic fields are stationary and are not rotating with the axis.  This is why you can't use the axle's direction of rotation to determine the direction the discs will be moving relative to the stationary magneticfields".


"If you're attached to the disc on the left side and looking at the magnetic field or the magnet's face, you will notice you are moving CW through the magnetic field.

If you're attached to the disc on the right side and looking at the magnetic field or magnet's face, you will notice you are moving CCW through the magnetic field.

Even though both discs are rotating in the same direction as the axle, each disc will be rotating through the magnetic fields in opposite directions.

The EMF isn't determined by the rotation of the axis.  The EMF is determined by the direction the disc is moving through the magnetic field.  Moving through the field CW will produce an opposite polarity than a disc moving through the field CCW".


With that understanding in view, let's move forward and discuss the "A" vector potential!