Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: My Theoretical Understanding of a Magnifying Transmitter  (Read 5360 times)

GregorArturo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • Gregor.Ninja
My Theoretical Understanding of a Magnifying Transmitter
« on: January 29, 2014, 05:29:26 AM »
I recently wrote this up on Facebook and realized known one really knew what I was talking about. I feel it will be more appreciated here. This text is obviously heavily influenced by Tesla and Eric Dollard, of course, but Don Smith and Lawrence Rayburn as well. Would love to hear people's thoughts, feedback, and own perspective pertaining to the system. I am going to be building a balanced three circuit tower system here in Boulder, just north of Tesla's old stomping grounds.

The Magnifying Transmitter involves reaching either zero or negative impedance in an electrical generation system. Zero impedance implies perpetual motion and results in free (or undamped) oscillation. This can be obtained by the entire system of all three coils, the ground, and the top terminal balancing the positive aspects of resistance, inductance, and capacitance with their negative aspects. Ideally, the primary at half a wavelength, should be limited to only one or two turns to minimize impulse inductive reactance, and thus the necessary self-capacity to zero out the reactances (inductive and capacitive). However, coupling the primary with a spark gap (aka negative resistance device) can negate the resistance in the wires. The more efficient this device, cannot only the resistance in the entire system be overcome, but also can result in the self-organization of greater voltage. A discharge from a capacitor via the spark gap delivers a high impulse through the primary, or through an external primary capable of 100% magnetically coupling with the primary in the series circuit. This capacitor can be charged in a myriad of ways, but most specifically through atmospheric static electricity (150V/m on average, 60V/m summer low, 400V/m winter max). Most effective above 1,750 ft (so I hear). The secondary involves as much inductance and self-capacity as possible for a given coil. The large amount of inductance and turns of the coil is akin to a traditional Tesla coil, to step up the voltage and pressurize the waveform even greater, which is still associate with the waveform in the primary as they are not electrically isolated as such in a common magnetically coupled circuit. However, to counter the inductive reactance which hinders the acceleration of the waveform, self-capacity is desired as per the coil itself, and not neighboring capacitors. This involves increasing surface area and voltage differential between inductive windings. Negligible impedance is much more important in the secondary than the primary, however, zero impedance in both coils is most desirable. Magnetic coupling should be loose between the primary and secondary otherwise the magnetic induction would dominate over electric induction in this series transformer (Dollard recommends 20%, obviously a specific variable would be very important when certain coil geometries are used to create fractal phenomena). The tertiary coil, also know as the "extra coil" in Tesla's patent, and sometimes referred to as the true "Tesla Coil," is essentially a braking medium for the traveling waveform electrically generated in the tertiary coil, as it does not magnetically couple with either the primary or secondary. Only through (di)electric induction, is the waveform generated in the extra coil. As with a plane breaking the sound barrier, and alpha particles generating Cherkenov radiation when striking water, when the waveform is suddenly slowed down tremendously from its rather large impedance (high inductive reactance, low or zero capacitive reactance) an electrostatic shockwave is generated. The impedance of the coil should match that of the earth (.05 ohms/km, or even negligible, obviously varies due to composition), and not of free space (377 ohms, can be considered as atmospheric attenuation). Thus the shock wave is reflected off of the surrounding atmosphere, and into the earth. A balanced system (such as the one I am designing), creates a scalar resonant circuit between the top terminals, where they are 180 degrees out of phase with each other, and matching impedance. The top terminal is a single capacitive electrode and contains the necessary capacitance to balance out the inductive reactances in all three coils as well containing minimum self-inductance itself. Ideally, the primary and secondary, are already in balance, and only the tertiary needs to be balanced with its neighboring terminal and it's own self-capacity. Thus the crucial aspect relies on the negative resistance device which is capable of establishing a zero impedance system. Low electromagnetic losses (waves that aren't reflected from free space) can be harvested through an external secondary coupling system, rectified, and stored as a DC charge in a capacitor bank, and finally inverted to your chosen load. Parasitic coupling can also be used directly with the primary of the circuit (as described previously with 100% coupling), but in turn can further affect the impedance and resonance of the expanded circuit. If the energy is transferred into the ground (typical of an unbalanced monopole design, a single tower), greater scalar potential exists at the tower, while another tower in opposing phase, less scalar potential exists, in which then so the potential is transferred to that point anywhere on the planet as long as the earth ground is sound. However, if the towers are all oscillating due to atmospheric statics, as well as self-organizing other forms of electrical pressure, then they will develop symbiotic resonant circuits. Specific phasing patterns are brought about by different geometries that adhere to fractal self-organizational phenomena. Thus arranging circuits among themselves (such as mine with three circuits/hexagrammatic) creates micro fractals when compared to then arrangement of various towers which creates macro fractals, especially when the placement is calibrated correctly upon the surface of the earth (leylines).

The two pictures show my conceptual tower I am working on based on hexagrammatic geometry and phasing (the inherent nature of Tesla's polyphase). There are three balanced circuits around one unbalanced monopole circuit. I have recently designed a way to create a three phase pulse signal (atmospheric static build up discharges) into the balanced circuits from the monopole circuit through the coupling of the primaries. I'm getting supplies this week. Currently on the hunt for a decent LCR meter :) Water table is under a meter here!! Score.