Eliminate lenz's forces using parallel core

@d3x0r
 
 
Thanks for the link.  That (JLN) website is last updated in 1999.  Since then has anybody tried to build it?  Is it self sustaining as claimed in the website?  I think this is a very interesting principle but why he has used copper tube as core material and not magnetic material? (laminated iron core)
 
Regards
 
Vineet.K

Eliminate lenz's forces using parallel core

Hi Vineet,

You are banging on open doors...

See these videos done by Bedini and especially the first one shows the same setup you propose with scope shot across the coil and he also says it is Lenz-less... He calles this kind of setup as zero force motor.

first video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kpDMMcNQxc

second video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TICXxP1jI4

Unfortunately he has not returned to his motor setup since then (not yet on his new forum either) so the best you can do is to replicate. I do think that Lenz law manifests in the coil's ON time moments because a closed electrical circuit exists between the supply source and the coil but due to the orientation of the coil this effect is minimal (it could be checked easily by monitoring the input supply current to the motor when running and load the motor shaft mechanically). 

So yes, such design exists and I also think it is worth tinkering with.

One more thing,  I quote from your PDF file:
"If multi cores are used, the individual cores should not be joined to form a loop as in the case of a conventional generator since fluxes produced by individual cores cancel off with each other and you will not get any output power."
If you watch carefully the second video, then (unless I am mistaken) you can see several short coils wound on a toroidal former (not known yet if the toroidal former is only an air cored bobbin or it has short individual cores inside just under the short coils). Nevertheless, I agree with your statement, those cores should not be made to be a closed toroidal core shape.

Greetings, Gyula

Try to work with a much longer solenoid than the length of your magnet. You will see interesting things happen.

My guess is that the pulse will only show at the start and end of the coil, and inbetween will be a net 0 as the electrons move in one way and then the other none.


So extending into a toroid is a net 0.  But you could spin any magnet inside a toroidal coil and see...

 
 
@Gyulasun
 
 
Thanks for the nice videos.  Anyway let us not bang the open doors. Let somebody else enter the house straight away.
 
I had made one more design to avoid lenz's forces and posting it in a new thread (Single coil Generator).   Kindly have a look and share your thoughts on it.
 
 
Regards,
 
Vineet.K.
 
 
 
 
 
 

With regard to the naudin ref, isn't that center peak due to the field collapsing? If so, what if you had coils on each side of the magnet connected with diodes so they short circuit the induced current (low peaks) and only collected the field collapse.  Probably wouldn't slow down the motor that much??

There may be a more effective way to
hopefully overcome the Lenz Effect in
electromagnetic dynamos.

Since conventional dynamos make use
of either rotating coils in a stationary
magnetic field or rotating magnets acting
upon stationary coils the Lenz Effect is
very pronounced.

If a dynamo was constructed with stationary
permanent magnets and stationary output
coils and a rotor assembly which simply diverts
the magnetic polarity to the coils in an
alternating fashion the Lenz Effect should be
greatly reduced or minimized.

How can such a device be constructed in order
to accomplish this?  And with what sort of
materials in order to avoid induced eddy current
losses?

It would be similar to the MEG in principle with
the exception that it would be mechanical and
would have "Motion" in the rotating magnetic
diverter assembly.

It should be possible with careful design and
fabrication to put together a device which
will output more electrical energy than that
which would be necessary to rotate the diverter.

Any ideas?

Yes SeaMonkey. It will work just fine.

It takes nearly 7 years to reply to SeaMonkey!

In regards to SeaMonkey's idea, it sounds like a Lundell (claw rotor) alternator would fit the bill. I believe you can alter it to keep the field coil stationary thereby having only the iron (claw) rotor rotating. It'd require mechanical redesign obviously. Then I doubt it will yield desired results, but you never know what might develop out of the experiment.

Regards,
bi