Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Are rotoverters really viable?  (Read 4745 times)

Photonfanatic

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Are rotoverters really viable?
« on: November 03, 2013, 11:24:51 PM »
I searched google and read a few of the articles. I watched some of the youtube videos. I could never satisfy myself, that what I was seeing was really an overunity device. So I'll just ask here. Are rotoverters the real deal? I know that by and large, they're still in development. But if anyone can speak to their validity, it would be the people of this forum.

Photonfanatic

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Are rotoverters really viable?
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2013, 10:33:20 PM »
Hellooooooooo is anyone there??

Neo-X

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Are rotoverters really viable?
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2013, 06:37:26 AM »
I dont know either if it was an ou but i do believe that ou exist.

baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Are rotoverters really viable?
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2013, 09:09:20 AM »
despite their great para-philology by Perez and his likes, not a single rotoverter has been reported as plain OU ready fro work.

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Are rotoverters really viable?
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2013, 09:27:40 AM »
I searched google and read a few of the articles. I watched some of the youtube videos. I could never satisfy myself, that what I was seeing was really an overunity device. So I'll just ask here. Are rotoverters the real deal? I know that by and large, they're still in development. But if anyone can speak to their validity, it would be the people of this forum.

To state it very briefly: nobody has ever shown a true OU device.

There are claims of having an OU-device every now and then, but OU has never been proven conclusively. So, do not buy one.

But think, if you had an OU device, would you give it away for free? Therefore it is more likely that good OU-candidates are kept a secret. (Personally I do not believe in hidden OU devices, but some people think there are OU devices which are kept secret. But if they are well kept secrets we will never know.)

In this forum people discuss interesting circuits, devices and set ups, which COULD be OU. But of course, it is very difficult and may be impossible to make these ideas work.

Nevertheless, many of the discussed circuits, devices and set ups are interesting. May be not interesting for everybody, but interesting for people who like strange and unknown things.

But there is no proven and finished OU device!

Greetings, Conrad

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Are rotoverters really viable?
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2013, 06:57:59 PM »
despite their great para-philology by Perez and his likes, not a single rotoverter has been reported as plain OU ready fro work.
That depends on who you are listening to.   I've got documents that say tests have been made to show several times OU.  EVGRAY group on Yahoo groups is where you'll find the most info on them.   Doug Konzen  aka konehead and silvertheau are genius in this field.   
As far as statements made here about no proof of OU there are lots of people who have made things which are 'free energy'.   Claiming OU gets into semantics on energy and all most people want is something to generate power without consuming fuel or energy that you pay for.   Solar cells are free energy when the sun shines.   But most things built that are free energy get quickly supressed, bought out or driven into obscurity by many different means.   And some people are smart enough to build their own free energy device and then shut up.   What is really being said here is no one has built a free energy device that has been shown with detailed easy to build plans and list of materials that anyone can put together or go down to Walmart and buy such a device.   
        Considering mainstream news is now saying 'green scientists' have done a 180 on nuclear power and are advocating building more Nuclear plants I believe it is time we 'get it done' and push the known working or good ideas forward.  And anyone having solutions come out of hiding and put your knowledge out there.   Do so anonymously to protect yourself.