Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.  (Read 9377 times)

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« on: October 29, 2013, 12:45:12 PM »
Here is another group of mates trying to peddle the Nunez wonder coil.
Has anyone actualy done some serous measurements on one of these coil's?.
Daniel Nunez says they are OU,and these guy's(video below)video title is FREE ENERGY-vortex coil.
Seems there even worried about the government moving in,and takeing it all lol.

Nunez seems to be makeing a good amount of cash flow with these OU coil's-as he promoted them.Guess these guys are going to give it a try aswell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7detcajIUo

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2013, 01:53:14 PM »
I posted this comment:

Quote
I dare you to show a side-by-side comparison.
Compare your "vortex" coil with another "normal" coil of about the same dimensions and amount of wire, both driven by the same drive source. What is the difference in performance?
Unless you can SHOW some differences, BIG differences according to you and Nunez, you are just wasting time and (cynically) preying on the hopes and emotions of people with little knowledge but much faith.
If you are selling these as "free energy" coils, that's fraud.
We'll see if it survives or is removed. I finally had to block Nunez from commenting on my channel because he protests and whines and insults but will never show any kind of real comparisons or measurements.

 

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2013, 02:19:32 PM »
@TK
Have you done some testing,or made a video in reguards to Daniel's coil?,as i would love to see it.
On this we can agree,i see nothing out of the ordinary with this coil.  Daniel is as yet to show any sort of accurate P/in P/out from his coil-but hey,it runs lots of LED's,so must be OU?.
Daniel also makes claim to this design,he refers to it as his art work. I always new this design to be that of Randy Powell's design,which was a take off of marko rodins design.

Like you say,they prey of those that know no better.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2013, 02:57:09 PM »
He showed his coil working as an inductive heater, running off an audio amplifier, and claimed it was superefficient or something, so I just took one of my Royer oscillator wireless transmitters, swapped the transmitting loop for a small helical coil, about 7 turns of heavy copper antenna wire, and heated up a bolt with it, using 12 volts input to the oscillator. Not even any kind of optimal match or deliberately designed inductive heater circuit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SKsMRGEAdA
Nunez wants to ignore the power it takes him to run his amplifier, but he wants to count the power I use to run the Royer oscillator.... lol.
You can see the comments from Nunez and his sock puppet Tranquil Kaos, both of whom I finally blocked. I always look at the channel of the commenters and if they, like that "TK" have no videos, no experimentation of their own, but criticize me without providing evidence or counterexamples ... I usually block them.

I don't have the urge to wind a "rodin coil" at the moment, although I have plenty of wire. I think the people that have them already should show comparisons, I'm just not that interested. If a comparison can show some special performance from the Rodin coil I might make one, but I see no reason to do so at this point.
Cheers--
TK

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2013, 04:45:46 PM »
Isn't this a Rodin coil?

It makes me think of the Caduceus coil.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2013, 07:20:47 PM »
what name did you post it under,, I do not see it,, but I do see a lot of removed poster withheld or whatever from the comments.

My YT account username is the same as here, TinselKoala. Last time I checked my comment was still there.

artiechoke

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2013, 12:03:59 AM »
I thought this was a radio thread, guess not. I better look around and see since I am new here. :-[

Thanks!

xee2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
Re: Another group jumping in on the Nunez wonder coil.
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2013, 04:40:13 AM »
Here is another group of mates trying to peddle the Nunez wonder coil.
Has anyone actualy done some serous measurements on one of these coil's?.
Daniel Nunez says they are OU,and these guy's(video below)video title is FREE ENERGY-vortex coil.
Seems there even worried about the government moving in,and takeing it all lol.

Nunez seems to be makeing a good amount of cash flow with these OU coil's-as he promoted them.Guess these guys are going to give it a try aswell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7detcajIUo


I have looked at Daniel Nunez videos. He seems like a nice guy but he does not measure AC power correctly. His coils are not OU. If he was really getting OU he would be able to light a 20 watt incandescent bulb using less than 20 watts input. I have been able to light a 120 volt 20 watt fluorescent tube wirelessly using a 1.5 volt AA battery, but that does not prove OU: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embNCvPUvO0