Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Building a self looping "SMOT"  (Read 298037 times)

norman6538

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #135 on: October 15, 2013, 01:46:55 AM »
Elecar, that is great. I really like the attraction, escape and track switching movement.

I did not see the magnets so I assume they are underneath. I held mine on the side where I could shift them easily.

Norman


elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #136 on: October 15, 2013, 01:52:23 AM »
Hi Norman, the magnets are at the side of the ramp. You can see the white nylon spacer standing upright that I am using to adjust the distance of the ramp from the track. I have a simple camera and no tripod so I will try and rig something that can get the full track and magnets in the shots.
If you recall my earlier test video, the magnets are the same arrangement.

elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #137 on: October 15, 2013, 01:07:32 PM »
Hi Norman,


elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #138 on: October 15, 2013, 01:13:58 PM »
Quote Libre 
Quote
'elecar' make have discovered a way to loop a SMOT a few times by giving the ball some gravitational potential energy to start with , but it will stop once friction bleeds that excess away. Interestingly this would probably work better without the magnet in place.

Quote TK
Quote
Exactly



Please watch the following video, and the tests as described below. Then either retract your statement or supply the evidence that you are correct.




When you watch the video you will see clips of 3 tests. please excuse the jerry rigged set up, that is all the C8 magnets I have left after building my prototype. I would have preferred to show test 3 on a longer length of ramp, but I do not have enough spare magnets and I do not have a longer piece of aluminum track as I butchered it all for the track. Test 3 does however show how the ball can reverse under gravity in the magnetic field.

My text from page 2 of this thread.

Test 1:  The ball being released from different positions on the track  2mm - 6mm higher than the lowest point. Note how the ball always makes it to the first 2 marks when rolling under gravity regardless of where it is released from even when traveling around "friction" bend.

Test 2: Magnets in place, this test is the same as test one but with the magnets positioned to draw the ball up the ramp. Note how it makes it all the way to the "hole" no matter where the ball is released from on the same section of track as shown in test 1 Also note the ball ends higher than it starts every time.

Test 3: Magnets in place but positioned to prevent the ball making it to the hole, Note the ball loses its forward momentum and reverses under gravity whilst in the magnetic field. It does this from any position as in test 1 and test 2.


My video from page 2 of this thread.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--3rugO_RMg&feature=youtu.be



elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #139 on: October 15, 2013, 01:23:53 PM »
The tests carried out in that video clearly show that the 2 experts are wrong in their assumption,

The tests clearly show the ball being released at different points on the track without the magnets in place.

It shows (the 2 red marks) where the ball covers less distance rolling when released from the lowest point without the magnets in place.

With the magnets in place it clearly shows the same test carried out and the ball making the "hole" each time regardless of where it was released.

The video also shows the ball rising and falling in the magnetic field the same distance every time regardless of where the ball is released from.

The video clearly shows that the unit operated much better, in fact there was an obvious gain when the magnets were in place.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #140 on: October 15, 2013, 02:23:15 PM »
Hi Powercat, respectfully you state the obvious, I mean if your give me this coming Saturdays 6 winning lotto numbers I will win the lotto !!

I stated right off the bat I would not be disclosing my working prototype, I am in the middle of doing a deal with someone who may be prepared to pay me for my design. Is it really that hard for people to understand ? Should my word that was given to that person be made worthless, just so I can prove to some random strangers that I am telling the truth ?

I state again clearly on record here, I will NOT be showing my unit to ANYONE until I am done with the business I am conducting.
If anyone only want to see my unit working, is it so hard to understand what I wrote in the opening post of this thread "please come back later"
But no, post after post of "show it"


Hi elecar,
note, I did used the word "obvious" In my original post.

There is a classic forum pattern emerging with the sceptics and the believers and as much as the believers try to get the skeptics to shut up, they so far have failed to produce a self looping model and that says it all,  I have lost count how many times on this forum claims are made for self running / self looping, and yet no actual evidence of a continuous running model is shown. 
@ all
I would love to see this device working so please don't start quoting theories at me just show the device working as claimed = self looping continuously.

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #141 on: October 15, 2013, 02:25:49 PM »
The tests carried out in that video clearly show that the 2 experts are wrong in their assumption,

The tests clearly show the ball being released at different points on the track without the magnets in place.

It shows (the 2 red marks) where the ball covers less distance rolling when released from the lowest point without the magnets in place.

With the magnets in place it clearly shows the same test carried out and the ball making the "hole" each time regardless of where it was released.

The video also shows the ball rising and falling in the magnetic field the same distance every time regardless of where the ball is released from.

The video clearly shows that the unit operated much better, in fact there was an obvious gain when the magnets were in place.

Ruling out some unknown deception, which I see no evidence of, I would say there is no way to refute what you've stated here. The video shows the ball completing the loop.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #142 on: October 15, 2013, 02:41:17 PM »
Ruling out some unknown deception, which I see no evidence of, I would say there is no way to refute what you've stated here. The video shows the ball completing the loop.


Suggest watching the video again there is about a 1 inch gap between the start of the ball rolling and where it stops, most people would not consider that  "completing the loop"

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #143 on: October 15, 2013, 02:46:23 PM »

Suggest watching the video again there is at least a 1 inch gap between the start of the ball rolling and where it stops, most people would not consider that  "completing the loop"

It drops in the gap at the top of the incline. The ball is poised over a drop. How do you figure it wouldn't drop if the gap were wider.

The semantics game is silly.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #144 on: October 15, 2013, 02:52:54 PM »
If your (assumption) is right and I hope it is, there will be no problem for somebody to show a working model, self looping continuously, but so far that has not happened.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #145 on: October 15, 2013, 03:15:15 PM »
"SHOW ME"
 
?
 
We're talking about a few magnets [scrap from old speakers]some garden hose and a ball bearing.
there isn't even a paper clip or chewing gum involved here!!
 
@Elecar
Thank you for the demonstration ,I don't think it will break anyones bank account to play with your idea.

We have to repect your  business Ethics, they are commendable .
 
Chet
 

elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #146 on: October 15, 2013, 04:14:54 PM »

Suggest watching the video again there is about a 1 inch gap between the start of the ball rolling and where it stops, most people would not consider that  "completing the loop"


Hi Powercat, please be aware that I made it clear the test rig was not looping.

My response was to two of the forums "experts"

One said
Quote
" Interestingly this would probably work better without the magnet in place."

The other said
Quote
"exactly"


Tell me Powercat did the ball perform better with or without the magnets ? Go on go out on a limb, dare to say what they dont want you to.


happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #147 on: October 15, 2013, 04:26:49 PM »
Elecar, can you elaborate a little on why you don't want to show the ball drop to the starting point?

As per my posts you know I don't feel you're being deceptive.

What is it you feel you'd be giving away by widening the gap and showing the ball drop.

Thanks

elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #148 on: October 15, 2013, 04:39:56 PM »
Hi Happyfunball, I hope you do not mind me mentioning the video link that I sent you. As you saw in that video the ball did drop away from the middle of the magnet array and out of the gap that I widened and onto a track where it rolled away. In order to make that video I butchered the test track as you could see. I showed it to you purely to show that TK was absolutely wrong when he said it could not happen.
I had to use my finger to push the ball into the magnet array as I had butchered the track to show you that test. If I had posted that video I would have got nothing but abuse and an accusation that my "finger" did the work.

Please feel free to correct anything I have stated above.

I can not pretend to understand on a nano level why it works, sometimes things occur that turns traditional thinking on its head. Apparently there are two mammals that lay eggs.

I am working on using the effect on someone elses design, I am openly showing the results. I have 50mm of ground to make up and a height of 1.7mm, I am reasonably confident I will show that design also works with the effect and that it will loop, regardless, the skeptics will still find a reason as to why it is not as shown.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Building a self looping "SMOT"
« Reply #149 on: October 15, 2013, 05:24:30 PM »

Hi Powercat, please be aware that I made it clear the test rig was not looping.

My response was to two of the forums "experts"

One said
The other said

Tell me Powercat did the ball perform better with or without the magnets ? Go on go out on a limb, dare to say what they dont want you to.

Hi,
Yes from what I can see in the video the ball performs much better with the magnates,  hope you enjoyed reading those words, unfortunately that doesn't change the fact that we have seen no self looping model from any body at all.

If your believers want to prove your case they should show a continuous self looping model, until then the skeptics can keep saying it hasn't been shown to work and therefore it doesn't work.