Anyone who knows:
I need some help!!!   Refering to the attachment below showing Akula83's system diagram.

Two questions:
1. What does the symbol (that I circled in red) of 2 arrows pointing toward each other mean?
2. Is one of the Magnetic coils wound CW and the other one CCW?
As always; Thank You and Have a Great Evening.
br549

@ Br549,


Honestly, even if i wondered over the circuit (since i am somewhat fond of circuits) and confused about that biffilar's low self-resonance frequency (still i am till i pulse run my biffilar's too) have not given much thought about the practicalities of this device.

It mixes a few concepts as the need of a ground (for grounding the device rather than sucking energy from it as many theories go), NMR, that we have not even a clue that this process can output energy and a God knows what.

If, really AKula wanted to help, will identify that very fact that "makes the energy", analyse and present it thoroughly along with how to(s), and then let us later worry about assembling a self-looped device. If you make a search, Akula has presented half a dozen schematics over the time that calims OU from them..

I hate web browsers... I lose so many thoughts so many times.




Re akula's coil schematic;


what is Elk. magnet?   does it just go to the chart?  Ya, but the chart is 'bi-synchronization unit' which has two jumpers on it... I think that peice is missing schematically.


so the other end of 2..   is that just a capacitor? it doesn't have resonance?  Is it just a stepup from (4)


3: output coil; located at intersection of 1 and (unlabeled, tesla coil)
1: interacts with (unlabeled, tesla coil), and I would assume (2) but maybe it's just the exciter (4).
  - the aluminum forms a topload... which will be coupled with the capacitance of the (unlabeled)


2: again, is it just an LC tank? is it high resistance and low capacitance?


considering Dally's scheme; he has an LC tank; loop antenna, but this is only effective in the near frequencies... it'll fail as the system drifts, so probably this is a thing that should be added after; otherwise it's the intersection of a resonant tank of a stepup toroid and an inner coil, and the outside is a high potential pulse;  when the load has a poor inductance matching on my mazilli I can get such a pulse.  The pulse shows up as a postiive potential on all conductors in the area.... that is the other coils don't induce it, because both ends are both positive... and yes the scope probes themselves in the area also sense it, but it is more significant when attached to another conductor.... But both intersect on the output coil.


A) neither have a ferrous core.
b) a copper strip pickup and grounds that run through coils aren't required... Though a inductor passing through a ferrite tube does increase its inductance...


the copper is also (maybe) a single turn winding?  It's not closed, and there's no connection except to the air, which is to the other tesla coil.... so it really looks more like a topload.




--------------------
highest potential, higher frequency (3x)
higher potential, frequency (x)


tuning the exciting side to the side it drives is also a +




------------
Having read eric dollard's books, lone pine writings, and the 4 quadrant theory thing, I have a better appreciation of the dynamics of this.  He's a good translator between maxwell-steinmetz and me


I had this one mobius coil that was 4 layers.... it worked OK, but I really kinda didn't like it, like there was just something wrong with it.  I think layers matter a lot in this case...


5 layers...


exciter, pickup, output, pickup, exciter
low inductance, high-medium inductance, low-medium inductance, high inductance, low inductance
1, 5, 3, 9, 2

dally would additionally include another stepup before 1...
1,10-1,5,3,9,2   (10-1 is in parallel, with a capacitor)...
 
I know I'm not making sense, just sketching an idea..... but really

1:x (out) 3x:1

Okay here's where coil dynamics confuse me.

X inductance is going to be less than the tesla's inductance.  But yet, has a lower frequency.

The tesla's inductance is going to have a huge penalty because of length... but having a higher voltage, it's frequency is higher?  but then specifically it's resonant frequency, which includes capacitive reactance, so I guess there's just a lot more capacitance on (1)

but then there's the consideration of just length of wire, which itself has a wavelength.... but again the longer wire in the tesla is going to be a lower frequency... so if I project multiple waves on the coil... so only a small portion at the bottom is induced with the secondary... then the ... stupid rotational phase thing can align on a higher frequency, giving multiple node points in the tesla tower... maybe a quarter wave of the quarter wave?  It's driven not free oscillating...

---------
no words from akula in a while; did he run into technical difficulties?  I hope all is well.  I see others replicating too; this time I don't have a strong desire to be the first replication... but I think I can build a functional model... akula's system looks fairly robust; in that the logic follows the tuning, so having the coils, he should just be able to plug in the logic parts and demonstrate power?  Maybe he waiting for a sufficient load?

Some of his last interactions, make me think that he's not actually the guy in the videos?  he's questioning things on dally's and criticising other inventors instead of just going ahead with his own installation?  I dunno I think too much probably; he complained that the content was pirated on stive's channel... or was he saying that he had pirated it?


-------------
I was playing with a particle simulation, simple gravity, electrostatic, magnetic behavior on particles... so I was modelling the magnetism, and playing with magnets, trying to establish the forces.... If two magnets are aligned with their poles to the north, and then offset so they can be passed by each other's sides, so the north is forced to remain up, the torque force increases, up to the point that the plane of the south pole passes the plane of the north pole... almost asymptotically but then starts to repel that pole instead of attracting the south to face the north, and a lateral translation force starts to apply more also.

Somewhat reminds me that when having a scope on AC, there is a spikey effect at the very top of the wave... but that's probably a comosite of all the reactance from the system... since most things are bridge rectified first, the 0.7V difference in switching time's... But maybe as the north and south pass each other there's a significantly higher force than would be expected.

Was wondering about the center of all these overlayed coils?  There should be a very focused magnetic beam being projected from it during excitation of the coils.


Clearly, we have three separated coils making a focused mixed waveform. John Hutchinson did exactly the same thing using 3 separate units and look at his results. 


I believe that if he knew it or not he had found a way to effecting the central mass polarities of the atomic nucleus.  This in turn caused the outer sub atomic particles to polarize.  Their orbits became looser or tighter due to this and even molecular bond boundaries changed.  Evidenced by molecular bond destabilization and even gravity being overcome. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9Nl6c7ZtS8&feature=youtu.be


Wesley translation and comments About Akula video #11






Wesley

And

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9Nl6c7ZtS8&feature=youtu.be


Wesley translation and comments About Akula video #11



Wesley

Wesley,

Thanks for translating this video from Akula.

You raise some very important points about Akula's crude method of measurement. My thought is that either Akula thinks we are all stupid, or else he does not realise that his measurements are not at all reliable! Another point is why do we not hear any sound coming from the device in his garden video?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUjJjBUdwE  Surely, the two towers need to be 'talking' to each other in order to produce an output.

Hoppy

application of mixed frequencies?

http://www.rexresearch.com/maccanti/maccanti.htm


"Electromagnetic device (100), particularly to be used as a generator, for example of mechanical energy, comprising means (105) for generating a magnetic field, at least one electric conductor (110, 115) arranged inside said magnetic field, means (120) for generating at least one sequence of electric pulses having amplitutes variable in time, said means for generating pulses (120) being connected to the electric conductors (110, 115) for applying a corresponding pulse sequence to each electric conductor (110, 115)"[/size]

[/size]
"[/size]An example of the pulse sequences generated by the signal processing unit is:[/size] [/size]1/ 380V 448V 381V 447V 383V 450V 382V ... 2/ 449V 380V 450V 381V 448V 382V 447V ... 3/ 384V 449V 383V 448V 380V 446V 383V ... 4/ 450V 382V 448V 385V 449V 381V 446V ... "

[/size]
I didn't identify a specific time ... only that it's variable...[/size]

[/size]
composite frequencies ... modulated through a single output?[/size]

[/size]
I attempted to use my mazzilli's to drive my new coils that fit the resonant character desired; but they started to interfere... so I got very jagged pulses from both... needs a more steady state pulse generator... but even then the transistors are going to be "leaky"... maybe I just need better drive mechanism... [/size]

[/size]

[/size]

Not sure what kind of speed your looking for, but if you want to issolate the output drive circuitry from your control circuit you might try driving a single output with a optically isolated A/D circuit. I attached a JPeg of on that I have used (only as an example) which could be modified to so suiet your taste (single A/D output, or multipal perset output). (Note: many high speed Opto-Couplers will operate well above 1 mhz).
As Always: Thank you and have a great day. br549