Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

@Magluvin,


One large diametric tube sitting side ways inside the core of a Tesla series bifilar coil produced the spontaneous charge. Two fairly large coupled diametric tube magnets coupled end to end sitting up and down tightly inside the bore hole of a series bifilar solenoid coil produced the spontaneous charge. One diametric magnet up and down had no effect. The original "Cook battery" consisted of two criss croosed primary and secondary coils in parallel to create two intermeshed LL tanks. My modified oscillator of a Tesla series bifilar with a resonant capacitor is actually an LCC tank, including the bifilar coils inherent capacitance. It dosen't help to overwrap the coil, and it should be of fairly thin wire. The series bifilar style connection is important.


I discovered that the diametric magnets placed as described, help assist the tank oscillation. You need to jump start the circuit by charging the capacitor a little or shaking the magnets up and down inside the core. Once it's started it should continue to charge on it's own. I'll add something about the diode. I used a fast switching glass germanium of the crystal radio type.

Here's an active hyperlink on high frequency diodes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcCLIwlbhLc&;feature=related

@Milehigh,

Tell me what rectifying terahertz frequency AC current directly into DC current through an MIM diode has to do with Faraday?

The rectenna is a novel combination of a micro-antenna and a tunneling metal-insulator-metal (MIM) diode. This combination will allow for conversion of electromagnetic radiation in the terahertz frequency range (AC) directly into direct current (DC).


http://coolcadelectronics.com/portfolio-item/infrared-rectennas/

 You got Conradelektro to cut the capacitor off my LC tank for testing you meat head!

Is this true Conrad?

Mags

I am including this Hendershot analysis of Fred B. Epps because there are two very important points here. One: The "Synchro Coil Capacitor" must be electrolytic; and Two: There has to be a "One way" interaction between the coil and capacitor!

THE COIL/CAPACITOR

In examining the CC assembly we find a very interesting component that is quite likely to create overunity performance if used properly.

(The basket-weave coil consists of braided windings over a modified electrolytic capacitor).
It is common sense that the capacitor and coil are intended to interact. The question is, what is the nature of that interaction?

Logically, there are three possibilities:

1) The coil affects the capacitor, but not the reverse.
2) The capacitor affects the coil, but not the reverse.
3) The coil affects the capacitor, and the reverse.


I reject option 2 because there is no element in the coil that can be affected by a changing electric field in the capacitor.


I reject option 3 because no true overunity device can be reciprocal-- it must be nonreciprocal. A reciprocal or 'two-way" device must always load the input and cause power loss at the input equivalent to the power gain. Let me explain what I mean by "reciprocal". Most systems that are encountered in everyday life and engineering practice are reciprocal in nature. What this means is that the energy relations are reversible. A good example is EM induction, where if the output of a motor becomes the input, the motor becomes a generator, and the energy relationship is reversed without being changed. This is an extension of Newton's law of action and reaction.


It has been proven (1) that certain systems are nonreciprocal, that is, the outputs cannot be made inputs. It has also been proven (2) that any nonreciprocal device with electrical inputs and outputs must contain a magnetic field. The magnetic field has the property of changing the direction of applied forces without doing work-- this is essential to these types of systems. In nonreciprocal systems the output does not load the input. Imperfect, lossy nonreciprocal devices can be constructed in many forms, among them gyroscopes, gyrators, ferromagnetic amplifiers, microwave phase shifters, and Hall effect devices.


Only the first option is capable of creating overunity performance: there must be a one-way interaction between the magnetic field of the coil and the capacitor. Otherwise the magnetic field must be loaded in some way, either inductively or parametrically, and the coil will lose energy. For there to be no losses in the core, it must 'see' the capacitor as basically an air core with an unvarying u of 1.

I  think it might help to wire a "Radio Tuner", or variable capacitor, in where the capacitor goes and fish around for the ideal resonant tank capacitance experimentally by scope at first. It should be a terahertz fractal, maybe a fibonacci number.

Synchro1:

It's time for a peace treaty.  I am not going to comment any more on your fantastical speculations, there is no point any more.  Do as much fantasy electronics talk as you want.  On your side stop all of the creative names you give me.

The only thing I will comment on are real world circuits or real clips made by people like Conrad and others.  Or I will comment on any serious electronics talk on threads of mutual interest.

The only "action" going on right now is Conrad, and let's hope that he continues his investigations.  I am sure that you have noticed that so far has has found no differences between monifilar and bifilar coils of similar construction.

MileHigh

@Milehigh,


Try and remove the diode and capacitor from a crystal radio and see how much that improves performance.
You ran a snout rut that wide through my experiment, now you dare to call the coil "Fantastical"! Send me back to grammer school again why don't you. You're just a stinking fraud!