Tarsier_79

As a general rule most of what we see on the internet is nonsense, generally 99% nonsense if it's coming out of Russia or China.

I like rexresearch, http://www.rexresearch.com/evgray/1gray.htm
Rexresearch has been around a long time and has been proven to be a credible source for information. It's credible because they show the information which is out there without drama or opinion.

The picture below is from the Gray patent which is the only circuit worth replicating.

AC

As nix85 pointed out in his posts on the Holcomb thread yesterday. It's not the complex or mysterious stuff that eludes most people it's the basics hiding in plain sight. You see, there is no such thing as being "objective" when our subconscious mind discards 99% of what our eye's see which is obviously "subjective". It only let's us see what it thinks is directly related to the task at hand based on our own world view but seldom the actual facts of any matter. A real man does not let fickle beliefs rule him but submits to reality no matter how harsh it may seem.

For example, look at the EV gray circuit I posted prior and below, what do you see?. Probably nothing which makes any sense but let's look at the conversion tube labelled as circuit element #14 in the diagram. So we know from the patent the capacitor 16 is charged to high voltage preferably 1kV as a minimum but I found 5kV to 10kV is optimal. The top positively (+) charged HV capacitor plate on cap 16 is connected to the rod 12 in the center of the conversion tube. The (+) HV potential on the center rod 12 is assumed to jump to the next conductor 32, through a carbon resistor 30, then on to conductor 22 then to a series of switches. We see the same thing happening in the expanded diagram of the conversion tube below.

It's supposedly obvious, in plain sight and only a fool would dispute it however it's not even remotely true, it's a deception...

If anyone had actually bothered to see what is actually present they would realize the conversion tube plates 34 are near 50% closer to the (+) charged rod 12 than the opposing element 32 and the resistor. Thus when I built and tested this circuit to scale the arc jumped from rod 12 to the concentric plates 34, through the motor coils 36, charging capacitor 38. The discharge path was then from capacitor 38, through the motor coils 36, to the upper conversion rod 32/resistor 30 and onto the supply batteries.

It's the damnedest thing because I have talked with countless people in the forums who worked decades on this patent who never got any positive results and had literally no idea the gap between 12-32 and 12-34 was different. Look at it, "LOOK AT IT"  in both diagrams we can clearly see an obvious difference in the gaps so how in the hell could so many people completely screw up something so simple?.

In this respect Nikola Tesla's friend Mark Twain nailed it...

It Ain’t What You Don’t Know That Gets You Into Trouble. It’s What You Know for Sure That Just Ain’t So

AC

The circuit in the patent must be presented in dynamics, as it would work in a motor. The motor switches all at the right time in the right phase.

About the purpose of diodes 44 and 46  this link:

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/9/8/1292

Diodes are necessary so that the discharge in the switching tube goes out.

1. The electron is too slow a bullet, it cannot fly faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
2. In reality, all circuits are closed, if traced.

 

I studied the Edwin Gray tube and didn't understand where the free energy came from.

For Gray Patent #4,661,747 Figure 2, it is said that when 12 and 32 high-voltage discharge produce a spark,
radiation is generated on 12, and radiant energy or cold electricity is received by 34.
It may be that the OU effect appears in this link.

I also don't know what radiant energy is, I don't know what cold electricity is.
I only know that in a vacuum tube, when the cathode is heated and attracted by the positive high voltage of the anode,
electrons run from the cathode to the anode in a vacuum. Electrons can be seen emitting a faint blue glow.

Because electrons cannot move in the air, the radiation of the radio antenna should not radiate electrons or charges from the antenna,
but only drive the charge around the antenna to vibrate.

If the Gray tube does radiate some charge, it is received by 34. Then I think it may be OU in this link.
When radiant energy or charge is radiated from 12, it has nothing to do with 12. And when 34 receives radiant energy,
it has nothing to do with the potential of 34 itself. Just as placing a radio on the ground can receive radio broadcasts,
and putting a radio on a high-voltage wire can also receive radio broadcasts.

Radiation is completely different from induction,
and the amount of induced charge has a decisive relationship with the potential difference between 12,34.

Suppose that 12 of the Gray tube actually radiates out the charge and is received by 34 in a radiative manner rather than inductively.
Then no matter how high the potential of 34 itself, it does not affect the charge that 34 receives from 12.

Suppose 34 receives the charge q.
According to the capacitor formula: U=q/C
That is, the same amount of charge, the smaller the capacitance C, the higher the voltage U.

There is also a capacitor energy formula: W=0.5qU
That is, the same amount of charge, the higher the voltage U, the greater the energy W.

So the charge obtained by the Gray tube 34 is directly sent to 36, and there is no physical capacitor on the line,
only the stray capacitance of the line structure and the parasitic capacitance of the 36 inductor.
That is, the Gray tube is designed for the smallest capacitance to receive 12 radiation.
It is possible to get the highest possible voltage U.

If U is higher than a certain threshold, the OU effect will occur?


Gray Patent #4,661,747 does not seem to be used in Patent #3,890,548.


I look at Gray patent # 3,890,548 mainly to say that the capacitor discharges at high voltage, causing the motor to rotate.
But the conventional understanding is that the discharge time is very short, that is,
the current time flowing through the motor is very short, the rotor only rotates a little angle, the current is gone,
how to continue to rotate?

If you really give the motor current in a short time,
the motor is required to continue to rotate to the next magnetic pole without current.

There may be an option:

The stator core of the motor is made using the steel wire of the past steel wire recorder,
or the magnetic powder material of the recording tape.
The short pulse current reverse-magnetizes such a core material, just like the commutation of a DC motor brush and a commutator.
The electric motor can really rotate continuously under short pulses.
Of course, the coercive force of the material is greater than the magnetic field of the permanent magnet of the rotor.
Sound tapes seem to be easily magnetized?

It is hoped that a small pulse magnetization current can be used to achieve the OU effect.

The above is all conjecture, maybe all wrong. Thank you guys!

onepower
Thank you so much!

panyuming
No problem, you got this your just having some issues with the level on which your trying to solve the problem and it's application.

onepower
Learned!
Thank you so much!