Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 894374
  • *Total Topics: 15729
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 5
  • *Total: 7

Author Topic: Can a PMM rotor generate enough usable electricity to escape the "sticky point"?  (Read 8754 times)

Offline carlprad

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Hello everyone

Is it possible to generate enough electricity/power from the spin of a PMM rotor, to escape the dreaded "sticky spot"?

For example, a TOROID generator does not introduce friction and can be an amazing amplifier. (If I am not mistaken.)

So, can a single turn of a PMM rotor generate enough energy to then power a device that pushes the "stator" past the "sticky spot"?

Or, maybe if you get the rotor spinning to the necessary RPM's, by hand, will it then be self-sustaining with the proper form of energy generator concept?

The TOROID is simply one idea. I'm really hoping someone will have a better idea for harvesting the most out of rotor spin and the most efficient way to spend that energy on getting past the "sticky spot".

I am currently working with the V-GATE rotor paradigm.

Thank you everyone in advance.

Carlos



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline LibreEnergia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Hello everyone

Is it possible to generate enough electricity/power from the spin of a PMM rotor, to escape the dreaded "sticky spot"?

For example, a TOROID generator does not introduce friction and can be an amazing amplifier. (If I am not mistaken.)

So, can a single turn of a PMM rotor generate enough energy to then power a device that pushes the "stator" past the "sticky spot"?

Or, maybe if you get the rotor spinning to the necessary RPM's, by hand, will it then be self-sustaining with the proper form of energy generator concept?

The TOROID is simply one idea. I'm really hoping someone will have a better idea for harvesting the most out of rotor spin and the most efficient way to spend that energy on getting past the "sticky spot".

I am currently working with the V-GATE rotor paradigm.

Thank you everyone in advance.

Carlos


It is not possible. Field theory is on absolutely correct on this point. Magnetic fields are conservative making it impossible to build a working PMM where the prime motive power is derived from the magnets alone.

Don't waste your time.

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
LE is right about one thing,  "don't waste your time".  As for a magnetic field being conservative, it is until it isn't. "they" also said that a vehicle cannot move down wind, faster than the wind, using only the power of the wind.....yet today they now do so at 3 times the wind speed (and more). 

"they" also said steam power was conservative.  Yet Griggs's hydrosonic pump puts out appreciably more energy as heat than it takes in as electricity.

No.  Magnetic fields are not only conservative.  They are relatively conservative.  Big difference.  The V-gate doesn't work because it's researchers are not adequately apprised of the methodology necessary to properly exploit the scales and modalities of efficiency required to see positive gains.  The V-gate makes very poor use of magnetic flux energy. 

Instead of thinking, "how can I make magnets move themselves eternally?"  Think, "How can I move magnets the least to make their fields change the most?"

Then comes the "aha".....

And then, one is encouraged to dwell on the perpetual aspects.




TS

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline LibreEnergia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
LE is right about one thing,  "don't waste your time".  As for a magnetic field being conservative, it is until it isn't. "they" also said that a vehicle cannot move down wind, faster than the wind, using only the power of the wind.....yet today they now do so at 3 times the wind speed (and more). 

"they" also said steam power was conservative.  Yet Griggs's hydrosonic pump puts out appreciably more energy as heat than it takes in as electricity.

No.  Magnetic fields are not only conservative.  They are relatively conservative.  Big difference.  The V-gate doesn't work because it's researchers are not adequately apprised of the methodology necessary to properly exploit the scales and modalities of efficiency required to see positive gains.  The V-gate makes very poor use of magnetic flux energy. 

Instead of thinking, "how can I make magnets move themselves eternally?"  Think, "How can I move magnets the least to make their fields change the most?"

Then comes the "aha".....

And then, one is encouraged to dwell on the perpetual aspects.




TS

All very well, but you've never built one that works or even have any idea how to go about it do you?
The math cannot be disputed. If we accept that the field theory models magnetism accurately then there is no possibility of a working PMM.

You need to show how the math is wrong, and then I'd accept there is some possibility of devising a working device.

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Quote
The math cannot be disputed.
lol.  Only with those who've already judged it indisputable.
 
Quote
but you've never built one that works or even have any idea how to go about it
do you?
And here I thought we were going to be "homies"....
 
TS
 
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
    • DynamaticMotors
LE is right about one thing,  "don't waste your time".  As for a magnetic field being conservative, it is until it isn't. "they" also said that a vehicle cannot move down wind, faster than the wind, using only the power of the wind.....yet today they now do so at 3 times the wind speed (and more). 

"they" also said steam power was conservative.  Yet Griggs's hydrosonic pump puts out appreciably more energy as heat than it takes in as electricity.

No.  Magnetic fields are not only conservative.  They are relatively conservative.  Big difference.  The V-gate doesn't work because it's researchers are not adequately apprised of the methodology necessary to properly exploit the scales and modalities of efficiency required to see positive gains.  The V-gate makes very poor use of magnetic flux energy. 

Instead of thinking, "how can I make magnets move themselves eternally?"  Think, "How can I move magnets the least to make their fields change the most?"

Then comes the "aha".....

And then, one is encouraged to dwell on the perpetual aspects.




TS

"Instead of thinking, "how can I make magnets move themselves eternally?"  Think, "How can I move magnets the least to make their fields change the most?""

How about some more specifics on this?  Do you have some example pictures/drawings so we can see what you are talking about?

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
First, consider the magnetic field as an open/closed system.  A permanent magnet by itself, is a closed system as currently taught.  (Ironically, according to the misdirections taught at the "universities",  their own field models preclude conservation.)  This is done by leading students to believe that the common dipole is comprised of flux quanta emanating SOLELY from one pole and entering the other.

Are they really that unaware?  OR, are they simply counting on their students remaining unaware that there is more?  A simple test proves their field models are wrong.  One has only to bring two PMs into close proximity with like poles repelling...finally forced to make physical contact against their will, to disprove their enforced notion.

How does this disprove the model?  If one cannot see how for themselves, then anything I might be motivated to share further is moot.

If, however, one is able to get close enough to peek through even this single, one way example (among many) of their maliciously overpriced fun house mirrors....

 
TS
 
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline LibreEnergia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
lol.  Only with those who've already judged it indisputable.

TS

As I've said before.. show me where it is wrong then.

You haven't got the slightest clue do you.

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Quote
You haven't got the slightest clue do you.

lol.....On that we can certainly agree.
 

TS

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
LibreEnergia, respectfully I believe you did not read the OPs post correctly. It appears that the OP is asking whether it is possible to derive enough power from a single turn of a PMM to be able to use that power to escape the sticky spot.

Perhaps a generator driven by the PMM could be geared many times to 1 where it could store energy in say a cap and that energy released via a coil at the gate. There are some examples of PMMs giving very good torque on a single rotation.

I would say it may be possible regardless of magnets having conservative fields.

Offline Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
    • DynamaticMotors
LibreEnergia, respectfully I believe you did not read the OPs post correctly. It appears that the OP is asking whether it is possible to derive enough power from a single turn of a PMM to be able to use that power to escape the sticky spot.

Perhaps a generator driven by the PMM could be geared many times to 1 where it could store energy in say a cap and that energy released via a coil at the gate. There are some examples of PMMs giving very good torque on a single rotation.

I would say it may be possible regardless of magnets having conservative fields.

It depends on how much energy is required to overcome the locking or blocking point (sticky spot).  If you have to equal the magnet's strength, it will not be a useful device to have more output than input.  It's all about efficiency.  Here is a permanent magnet motor design that is capable of achieving this level of efficiency.  www.dynamaticmotors.com
The electric car industry needs a developed version of this technology, but so far they only try to use batteries.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline elecar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Hi Liberty, my point was that the OPs questions were not being answered. Instead there are a load of replies that are of no use. To me the OPs questions were pretty clear.

I believe Carl is asking is it possible to generate enough power from a single turn of a PMM to use to escape/pass the sticky spot.
Personally I do not have the answers, specifically because electronics/electrics are beyond me.
But that does not mean it is not possible, and replies simply stating that PMM can not work because they are conservative fields has nothing to do with the questions being asked.

Can a PMM rotate 1 time before it hits the sticky point ? Yes
Can energy be used to pass the sticky point ? Yes
Can energy be stored during that rotation ? Yes

So the OP wants to know, how can energy be captured during that rotation, to be used to get past the sticky point.

Offline Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
    • DynamaticMotors
Hi Liberty, my point was that the OPs questions were not being answered. Instead there are a load of replies that are of no use. To me the OPs questions were pretty clear.

I believe Carl is asking is it possible to generate enough power from a single turn of a PMM to use to escape/pass the sticky spot.
Personally I do not have the answers, specifically because electronics/electrics are beyond me.
But that does not mean it is not possible, and replies simply stating that PMM can not work because they are conservative fields has nothing to do with the questions being asked.

Can a PMM rotate 1 time before it hits the sticky point ? Yes
Can energy be used to pass the sticky point ? Yes
Can energy be stored during that rotation ? Yes

So the OP wants to know, how can energy be captured during that rotation, to be used to get past the sticky point.

Hi elecar,

1.  Whether a PMM can rotate 1 time before it hits the sticky point is not the most important issue.  What is important is how much energy does it take to pass the sticky point, (how efficient is the transaction)?

2.  The energy might be able to be used depending on your design.  How much torque output does your motor have and can it constantly produce this torque or only at certain points in the rotation?  Then (if you have a running motor), calculate the output of the motor using a prony brake and a weight scale at 1 foot distance (Foot ounces).  Then calculate the measurement into watts to find the average output from the motor.  Or if the motor doesn't run,  use a string attached to the rotor and test to see how much weight the motor can lift, and how far it pulls it, in how much time.

3.  To store the energy or delay the energy usage till the proper time to use it.  You can use mechanical methods to feed back the energy into the motor input.  But there are issues and loss you will encounter with this method including friction.

You can capture the energy by generating power with a generator and storing electrical power in a capacitor, or using mechanical means such as a spring.  There is loss using both methods.  The real question is how little energy can I use and how efficiently can the sticky point be overcome vs. how much output can the motor produce.  What is the best method of passing the sticky point?  Is the method to pass the sticky point efficient enough to make the motor useful and practical? 

Happy experimenting!

Offline TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Quote
The real question is how little energy can I use and how efficiently can the
sticky point be overcome vs. how much output can the motor produce.  What
is the best method of passing the sticky point?  Is the method to pass the
sticky point efficient enough to make the motor useful and practical? 

Compare the simplest and most inefficient electric motor you can find.....one with ceramic magnets even....and it will outperform these "gate/track" setups.  Why?  For the simple reason that magnets are MUCH more efficient in close proximity direct push/pull operation than in some slow, drawn out, slide to no where.

The v-gate and similar "experiments" are rather like watching a geriatric try and negotiate a wheel chair ramp.  Eventually one sympathizes with the situation and offers a boost because the person didn't have the energy to clear the bump at the top of the ramp.  And who put that bump there in the first place? 

Monkey see, Monkey do....doesn't just apply at the zoo.

One should make solid efforts to remain methodical in one's approach to negotiating the concepts and practices of any science to which they wish to offer contribution. Starting in the middle somewhere, after watching a video, without first seeking solid foundation, nearly always ends in frustration. 

These exotic, time consuming setups which may look impressive....of which there are many.....one may only truly critique them by the yardstick of "EXPERIENCE".
In your experience, is it worth replicating?  Not sure?  Get more experience.
So many are still copying long ago disproved concepts, in hopes of re-inventing the wheel by....apparently attempting to wear a circular groove in space/time itself?
 
Before following another's path......first get hands on.  Serious hands on time with magnets and their interactions.  Feel nature's rules before trusting the 'sanitized for your protection' versions of others.  Sit in a room by yourself, quiet, no distraction.  Pen and paper handy.  You and two magnets.  Begin observing their interactions in your hand, keeping distance and orientation always in mind.  You may be shocked at the "rules" you observe that no one else has revealed to you.

It can and will save the serious researcher much wasted time following the circular tracks laid down by many.
 
H. Johnson
S. Kundel
Q. Gang
 
Three examples of those on the "Right" track.  Perhaps if they'd have shared the same "train", So many wouldn't still be stuck at the station.
 
TS
 

Offline lumen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
I think, just build it without the "sticky spot"!
 
It may be easier than you think!
Without giving the entire concept at this time, ask "at what point do two magnets contain the most kinetic energy.
1: Far from each other?
2: Close to each other?
I have a computer model that shows an PM oscillator with no "sticky spot".
So before I embarrass myself with claims, I will first build it and see for myself why it fails to operate the way the model indicates it should.
 
« Last Edit: September 19, 2013, 06:50:44 AM by lumen »

 

OneLink