Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 44 Times More Power Output than Input  (Read 37183 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #45 on: September 08, 2013, 08:52:10 PM »
HMMM
somethin fishy Huh ?
 
Perhaps a few more candles and a couple Crawfish then?
 
Grandma had a good recipe......,Lacking that, there was a vid of this Candle effect somewhere?
 
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/jcook/
 
 
thx
Chet
PS
I see the "movie" is in the above link!

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #46 on: September 08, 2013, 09:27:13 PM »
OK,  as most of you know, my background is in precision machining.  Well, check out the non-alignment of these pulleys.  They are not even close to being lined up with each other.  Even if you could get a magnet to spin as this fellow states, it would have next to 0 torque and you for sure would want the "drive system" designed to have as little friction as possible.  You do NOT do that by having the pulleys at weird angles to each other.  It takes the same amount of time to mount those devices in alignment as it does to mount them as we see here.  Also note that the drive "belts" are not continuous.  They appear to have a staple or metal binder of some kind joining them together.  I could not even begin to calculate the additional force it would take to overcome this crude design.  A simple "O" ring would have no such power robbing joints.  What gives here?

Bill

***EDIT***

I know that some have posited that the motors will spin on their own from the field of the coil. this may be the case.  If so, why burden them with all of that friction of the pulleys and the magnets?  Why is there no video of this device running that we know of?  Maybe this guy is a great theoretician and writes great papers but possibly his practical skills are not up to the task?  I really do not know and am just asking questions here.  Has anyone seen this running?
« Last Edit: September 09, 2013, 12:48:46 AM by Pirate88179 »

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #47 on: September 09, 2013, 12:02:11 AM »
Is this the same Jeff Cook? Selling a 'reactionless drive toy'...?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLJDQwHnItA
He got some kind of patent awarded for that toy? I think I remember reading or hearing about that last year. The system is not reactionless, and the basic behaviour of bar magnets and ring magnets has been known (by some people) for a long time. But it keeps being rediscovered.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C69a28Jpmec

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #48 on: September 09, 2013, 03:06:36 AM »
Great demo vid TK.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction-well almost.
There is a way to eliminate the reaction force,by simply deviding it into to half forces in opposite directions 90* to that of the action force.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #49 on: September 09, 2013, 04:59:54 AM »
Great demo vid TK.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction-well almost.
There is a way to eliminate the reaction force,by simply deviding it into to half forces in opposite directions 90* to that of the action force.


That's great sir, I LIKE IT.  ;)

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #50 on: September 09, 2013, 06:35:48 AM »
He got some kind of patent awarded for that toy? I think I remember reading or hearing about that last year. The system is not reactionless, and the basic behaviour of bar magnets and ring magnets has been known (by some people) for a long time. But it keeps being rediscovered.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C69a28Jpmec

So, Newton was correct after all?  That does not jive with what the guy with the patent on his toy was saying in his video.  My guess is that he was not correct.  Your video clearly shows this.

Bill

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #51 on: September 09, 2013, 09:28:06 AM »
Insted of getting off topic in this thread,i will get the below thread up and going again-for those that find this subject interesting.
http://www.overunity.com/6387/inertia-drive/

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: 44 Times More Power Output than Input
« Reply #52 on: September 09, 2013, 02:35:35 PM »
American antigravity did a test On Mr.Cooks Flame experiment here.
 
http://www.americanantigravity.com/files/articles/JCE-Generator-Experimental-Notes.pdf
 
a successful [sort of ] replication.
 
thx
Chet