Did you know that in South Africa, in addition to following a different astronomical calendar than the rest of the world, it is not necessary to provide any proof of an assertion? Yes, all one has to do is to make a statement. Any statement at all, and it is taken to be True. A person can simply assert that the sky is green and the rain is made of fine cognac, and until someone actually publishes a scientific paper that disproves it, the sky is therefore green and the rain, cognac! No detailed and published disproof? Then the original statement STANDS, and your petty observations to the contrary mean nothing, they are just trolling.

Funny, too, how the Great Scientist can rant on for weeks and months screaming that something is impossible.... then after dozens of demonstrations ignored, suddenly she is taken aside and given advice by someone out of the picture, and then she "explains" that she knew it all along.  And the handwaving post hockery continues, with more and more insults and the stupid Little essays she emits that get the entire Scientific Method backwards and upside down. Yet  nary an apology, nary any sign of shame or remorse comes from the Great Scientist who has been utterly and rantingly wrong about these specific Little points lo these past few months.

I'm not even going to bother to point out all the lies and false accusations in that absurd psychotic paranoid rant.

But somebody had better look in on Rosemary Ainslie because she is decompensating and may become really dangerous, to herself or others around her.

Donovan Martin is probably quacking in his boots right about now.

I can't recall anyone calling himself "Mr Sean'.

"mrsean2k" maybe, the unimaginative handle in a few places of "Sean Inglis", a link I've never attempted to hide.

Unlike TK and others who labour under different constraints, I don't need anonymity.

As a result of this, when she accuses people of breaking into her computer, Rosemary may want to think a bit more carefully before she opens her fucking yap; there are no details I need to keep private if I was to decide I wanted to do something concrete in response to that accusation. That said, who bothers to kick an old dog just for rolling in shit? I probably wouldn't.


Anyway, these are the files in question:


http://seani.justemail.net/rosemary_ainslie/



I'm happy with the provenance of the shots, and they'll stay up there publicly accessible as long as it suits me.


Rosemary's claims that they weren't posted freely in a public forum to begin with are just her usual mental incontinence.

At one point when they were first posted, I offered to remove any that she (a) said *weren't* publicly available, and (b) where I couldn't subsequently provide a link to her specific chosen screenshot. And similarly if she wanted to claim that a specific screenshot just had nothing to do with her, I'd make a note of that in the album in question. Of course no response.


The problem for Rosemary is that she has to choose specific shots that she maintains have never been made public. If she does that and fails with only one, it renders her claim meaningless. She hasn't got anywhere near the mental discipline to make either claim; lies make things complicated.

Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep....

This is really pretty sad. It looks like somebody needs a Little medication adjustment.

Now, she's expecting to fly.  I think that these claims of persecution by various dark forces strongly suggest mental disorder.

That's a nice summary. She is still even today accusing me of faking the screenshots, or faking something, in several of those videos.

But seriously... I really don't think she has any followers left. After the cringeworthy demostrations last summer, I can't imagine that even her erstwhile co-authors would want to be seen with her in public.

The role of Donovan Martin cannot be discounted. He is all tangled up in this as well. But associating with Rosemary Ainslie is not going to look all that good on his CV -- especially when that March 2011 demonstration is considered.

Bad data and false claims are bad, and wrong. But when Ainslie refused to accept the data from her OWN demonstration.... the only one she has ever done even half-way properly, guided by the expert powersupply analyst and designer SWeir..... and cynically "retracted her retraction" and refused to stop pushing her silly agenda.... and when she chose to continue the insults and disrespect, and most especially when she chose to continue abjectly lying about her own "work" and the work of others.... that is pseudoscientific misconduct of the worst kind. She has once again announced her intention to claim at least three monetary prizes that have been offered for real OU performance. She is a menace to the credibility of the entire "ou" or "free energy" research effort, because she is so visible. People "in the know" and those who control purse strings will encounter Ainslie and her daft manuscripts and begin backing away, carefully watching so that she doesn't come after them with her vitriol, insults and overweeningly arrogant ignorance.  Just look: she is STILL trying to tell people who know better, how a mosfet works... yet she herself has no clue. She has finally "snapped" and, due to my demonstrations and the explanations of someone who apparently gave her a small bit of counselling over the weekend, has admitted something she has always claimed was impossible, that the Common Gate Amplifier circuit with grounded Gate does in fact operate. But she still can't seem to assimilate the fact that the mosfet is NOT just a switch, that it has its own internal resistance and significant power dissipation and more importantly operates in the linear conductance region of its performance curve when oscillating. Her ignorance, deliberately protected, combined with her amazing arrogance, keeps her posting about things she does not understand, it keeps her insulting her critics instead of responding rationally and it keeps her making the absurd paranoid allegations that you see at present.  Were she to honor her retractions, realize and admit the falsity of the "data" in the daft manuscripts, and take a Little vacation from the false claims and absurd "thesis".... all would be well. However she will not do this, and continues her personal attacks upon me especially and upon others as well. She cannot refute me or the other critics, so as you see, she resorts to actual lies about what our work consists of and what it shows.... and even tells her readers NOT to try to repeat my demonstrations! She is afraid, very afraid, but still doesn't have the sense or the integrity to stop. And as long as she refers to "Little TK", the initials GRE, or a pickle..... then I will be there to set her straight. That arrogant scheming ignoramus will never get away with what she is trying to do, which is to perpetrate a fraud, as long as I have an internet connection and fingers to type with.

There, does that explain things a little bit?  I am watching Ainslie twist in the wind, and I am reporting on the course of her demise. If you find it boring you do not have to read, but I do appreciate your contribution, anyway.