Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83913
  • *Latest: wdstk7

  • *Total Posts: 524228
  • *Total Topics: 15608
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 7
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 276219 times)

Offline chessnyt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #585 on: March 02, 2014, 06:27:47 AM »
Rose has asked me to relay this message as she has been banned from this site.  It is simply concerning the PMs that she keeps receiving:
Guys,

This is for those members at OU.com who send me personal  messages.  Thanks Guys, I DO get them.  But I can't answer you.  I've  been banned from that forum. 

Hopefully Chess or someone could  take the trouble to post this over to OU.com.  I'd be sorry to have them think I'm ignoring them - or that I'm indifferent to that support.

Kindest regards
Rosie
 
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #586 on: March 02, 2014, 06:31:47 AM »
There are a couple of solutions to that problem:

Those who want to PM Ms. Ainslie can register with her forum and PM her there.
Ms. Ainslie can use a go between who has permissions here to PM her responses.  But that is a lot to ask of the go between.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #587 on: March 02, 2014, 06:36:59 AM »
Greg here is the analysis that I performed on the control circuit (555 portion) of the 2002 magazine article.  I think that the duty-cycle claims were a matter of confusion.  I went to great effort to analyze and test 555 circuit variations to show what could and could not be done with either the published schematic or the published schematic with variations.  The bottom line is that without substituting at least four components, it is simply not possible to get the timing that the magazine article claimed.  However, it is trivial to get the exact complementary timing with the schematic as shown in the article.  Since the article did not include any oscilloscope shots, we are left to deduce what was really built and tested.  I conclude that what was built is the schematic and that the timing was the listed frequency and complementary duty cycle.

Gmeast: Given a 24 volt main battery  in the Quantum circuit.... Ask Ainslie what the expected voltage at the mosfet DRAIN should be when the mosfet is 1) completely OFF, and 2) completely ON.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #587 on: March 02, 2014, 06:36:59 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #588 on: March 02, 2014, 06:39:42 AM »
There are a couple of solutions to that problem:

Those who want to PM Ms. Ainslie can register with her forum and PM her there.
Ms. Ainslie can use a go between who has permissions here to PM her responses.  But that is a lot to ask of the go between.

It certainly is  because then we will ask the go-betweens hard questions. Like.... what about YOU, chessnyt? Do YOU agree with Ainslie that my latest demonstrations are faked in any way? Simple question, yes or no. I have no idea of your experimental capabilities but if you have the kit, I urge you also to perform these very very simple demos yourself and to interpret them to your friend Rosemary Ainslie.

I wonder how Ainslie gets PMs if she has been banned here. Perhaps her ban is of a "read only" nature where she can log in and read PMs but cannot post to the threads. Well, Ainslie, child, that's what happens when you disrespect and threaten our kind host the way you have done so many times.

Quote
Kindest regards
(sic)  Can you spell "hypocrite"?

Offline chessnyt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #589 on: March 02, 2014, 07:17:17 AM »
It certainly is  because then we will ask the go-betweens hard questions. Like.... what about YOU, chessnyt? Do YOU agree with Ainslie that my latest demonstrations are faked in any way? Simple question, yes or no. I have no idea of your experimental capabilities but if you have the kit, I urge you also to perform these very very simple demos yourself and to interpret them to your friend Rosemary Ainslie.

I wonder how Ainslie gets PMs if she has been banned here. Perhaps her ban is of a "read only" nature where she can log in and read PMs but cannot post to the threads. Well, Ainslie, child, that's what happens when you disrespect and threaten our kind host the way you have done so many times.
@TK:
The questions you are asking are not so hard to answer.  The truth is, I have not seen your demonstration and therefore I cannot comment on it. 
I experiment quite a bit in my little lab (fancy shed with A/C).  Unfortunately, my area of expertise has always been in electrolysis and the last time I drifted away and was sidetracked from my research was when I replicated a John Bedini window motor :)  It actually worked until the capacitor was depleted but I could never get the thing to self-run.  That was back when "Mike's Motor" was the device to replicate (an off-shoot from the Bedini/Cole window motor), which could be compared to the recent romeroUK motor (or something like that).
 
Regards,
 
Chess

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #589 on: March 02, 2014, 07:17:17 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #590 on: March 02, 2014, 07:27:12 AM »
@chessnyt: The relevant demonstrations are linked about four or five posts back in the thread( ETA: reply # 583). I think the two of them total about 17 minutes  to watch, and require only a few parts to perform, and just about any mosfet will do, you don't really need the PG50, but you should try to select one with large input capacitance and high Rdss if you can. I had essentially the same results with IRF830.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #591 on: March 02, 2014, 08:57:32 AM »
And here you can see again that the ignorant ranting Ainslie cannot accept the evidence that is put before her. She would rather dig herself in deeper and deeper than actually to investigate the matter for herself. It's sad, really. Who in the world could possibly support her after this? Who would really LIKE to have their names associated with that madwoman? It boggles the mind. Oh, where are you Donovan Martin? Can you  not take your co-author aside and try to get her to reason? Where is ANYONE who can explain things to Ainslie in terms she might understand? I have presented simpler and simpler demonstrations, descending down to the very individual elements of the performance of the circuit, and when she finally sees what I am showing she has to claim that it is fake, in order to defend her own ego from crumbling under the exposed weight of her mendacity and error. Really sad. Funny.... but tragic.

The demonstrations are so simple that it is beyond belief that they can be misunderstood. They are so simple that it is impossible to fake the results. They are so simple that I would bet that my neighbor's ten year old son would understand them. But the Great Scientist Ainslie.... well, it is as you see. I shake my head, I almost feel pity for the poor old deluded Ainslie. To finish out her life believing in such nonsense is indeed a tragedy.

Come on, fellows, can you not talk or show some sense into that old grey head? Is it _moral_ for you to leave her making such an abject fool of herself? How would you feel if that was your _mother_ ranting and raving such nonsense, such easily refuted assertions, such lies and misrepresentations?




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #591 on: March 02, 2014, 08:57:32 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #592 on: March 02, 2014, 09:03:48 AM »
I would be very proud of my mother if she could troll like that Ainslie persona at that age.   ;D

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #593 on: March 02, 2014, 09:56:40 AM »
Quote
IF you mean this video - http://youtu.be/ufEZW5iTv6Y ... I do not think you fake it.  IF you mean this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTTA80T0BU4... I KNOW you fake it.  I've used words of 1 syllable there.  You SHOULD therefore understand what I've just written.

Here's why.  When you cut the MOSFET out of the circuit on that Q2 Array - you've got the probe of the function generator attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q2.  It CANNOT SWITCH THE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE LEG.  IT NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE GATE.  ANY GATE.  And you've taken the only gate AWAY - out of the picture.  Therefore it CANNOT switch.  DON'T look at the circuit.  LOOK AT YOUR EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS.  The PROBE of the function generator is NOW ONLY CONNECTED TO THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2. SO. On THIS video - you've either performed a MIRACLE.  Or you you are FABRICATING THE EVIDENCE.  Which is a euphemism for CHEATING.  Not good Little TK.  Not at all.

There is of course one other possibility that YOU HAVE NOT MENTIONED, dear troll queen. And that of course is that YOU ARE UTTERLY WRONG about how mosfets actually work.

And of course, since you have not done your homework before shooting off your mouth, you have not seen the EVEN SIMPLER videos that hold the clue that is so obvious even you could not miss it: a battery is used to LOWER the voltage at the SOURCE of the mosfet. What does that do to the Gate Voltage, then? Why... if the Source is Lower than the Gate.... then the Gate must be HIGHER THAN THE SOURCE!!!  And it is this _relative_ elevation of the gate voltage by lowering the source voltage that turns on the mosfet.

And the two batteries are in series through the mosfet when the mosfet turns on. And of course when the bias battery is removed and the Function Generator is put in its place... THE SAME THING HAPPENS. And the FG is in SERIES WITH THE MAIN BATTERY and all of the current flows through it just like it was ANOTHER BATTERY.

Quote
The point here - Little TK - is this.  IF the function generator was providing a path for the flow of discharge from the batteries - then - at these levels of current flow - it would be NUKED.  THEREFORE?  IF the batteries ARE the source of all that 'heat' - WHEREVER it is that the battery is DISCHARGING - IF it is RESPONSIBLE for and the SOURCE OF all that WORK - it CANNOT be using the function generator NOR IT'S PROBES for its path.

The point here, mendacious ignorant old woman, is THIS: The FG DOES provide a path for the discharge flow from the batteries, as PROVEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN JUST AS ABOVE. And it is true that  the FG would be damaged IF IT REALLY CARRIED THAT MUCH CURRENT. Since its internal impedance is 50 ohms, to put 20 amps through it would require how much voltage? Eh? Can you do the math? V=IR=20 x 50 = 1000 Volts!!!! And a power supply that could supply 20 amps at 1000 volts! A 20 KW power supply! And yet the FG , even your OWN weak Little chinese cheapo, survives without difficulty. THEREFORE: the currents cannot be that high at all.
And accurate measurements of the ACTUAL CURRENTS in the circuit flowing through the FG during the oscillations are much less than 2 amperes. You and your mob have proven this yourselves under the guidance of Steve Weir.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #593 on: March 02, 2014, 09:56:40 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #594 on: March 02, 2014, 10:10:41 AM »
And here you can see again that the ignorant ranting Ainslie cannot accept the evidence that is put before her. She would rather dig herself in deeper and deeper than actually to investigate the matter for herself. It's sad, really. Who in the world could possibly support her after this? Who would really LIKE to have their names associated with that madwoman? It boggles the mind. Oh, where are you Donovan Martin? Can you  not take your co-author aside and try to get her to reason? Where is ANYONE who can explain things to Ainslie in terms she might understand? I have presented simpler and simpler demonstrations, descending down to the very individual elements of the performance of the circuit, and when she finally sees what I am showing she has to claim that it is fake, in order to defend her own ego from crumbling under the exposed weight of her mendacity and error. Really sad. Funny.... but tragic.

The demonstrations are so simple that it is beyond belief that they can be misunderstood. They are so simple that it is impossible to fake the results. They are so simple that I would bet that my neighbor's ten year old son would understand them. But the Great Scientist Ainslie.... well, it is as you see. I shake my head, I almost feel pity for the poor old deluded Ainslie. To finish out her life believing in such nonsense is indeed a tragedy.

Come on, fellows, can you not talk or show some sense into that old grey head? Is it _moral_ for you to leave her making such an abject fool of herself? How would you feel if that was your _mother_ ranting and raving such nonsense, such easily refuted assertions, such lies and misrepresentations?
At this point she is just foaming at the mouth.  Her ignorant assertions are so naive and silly the real question is:  Who takes anything that she is saying seriously?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #595 on: March 02, 2014, 10:34:19 AM »
Her co-authors. Where are they? How can they allow their good names to be sullied by association with _that_ mass of deluded ranting? How can they allow their names to be included on documents that contain fabricated data, outright lies about the actual experimental conditions and false conclusions based on math errors performed on fake data?  I am flabbergasted. Surely Donovan Martin must know better, or at least be amenable to reasoned arguments. Is this a Monty Python sketch we've wandered into somehow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCN_E5nveQ

I could have done it with three AAs, it works fine with only 4.5 Vgs too. But of course the bulb is a bit dimmer.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #595 on: March 02, 2014, 10:34:19 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #596 on: March 02, 2014, 11:40:19 AM »
From "her" over "there":

Quote
Here's why.  When you cut the MOSFET out of the circuit on that Q2 Array - you've got the probe of the function generator attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q2.  It CANNOT SWITCH THE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE LEG.  IT NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE GATE.  ANY GATE.  And you've taken the only gate AWAY - out of the picture.  Therefore it CANNOT switch.  DON'T look at the circuit.  LOOK AT YOUR EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS.  The PROBE of the function generator is NOW ONLY CONNECTED TO THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2. SO. On THIS video - you've either performed a MIRACLE.  Or you you are FABRICATING THE EVIDENCE.  Which is a euphemism for CHEATING.  Not good Little TK.  Not at all. 

No MIRACLE, no FABRICATING THE EVIDENCE, just the very basic operation of a MOSFET configured as a "common gate amplifier"...

For going on three years, many different people have attempted to explain to her how the FG turns on Q2 by applying a negative voltage to the source of Q2, and that when Q2 turns on, the DC current flowing thru Q2 flows thru the FG.

All manner of words and methods attempting to teach her these simple facts have been utilized.  Even discussions at fairy tale levels involving Ms. Gate and Mr. Source were attempted and she still could not comprehend it (check out the locked threads).

All this time, she demonstrated an inability to comprehend what everyone was trying to teach her.  But now, after having watched TK's simple and concise video on the subject, and as evidenced in the quote from her above, she finally demonstrates that she does indeed understand exactly what everyone has been telling her for years, but that she just plain refuses to believe it.  Apparently this is just willful ignorance...     

I recall that way back when, in a locked thread far far away, it took something like three months of discussions involving many people and more videos from TK just to convince her that a FG could pass current.     

Possibly her belief systems would have been more willing to accept TK's recent video had TK flicked a piezo ignitor next to the circuit before he turned on Q2 in his video...

PW

Offline Farmhand

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #597 on: March 02, 2014, 11:58:07 AM »
Even I can understand how a mosfet could be turned on that way, with a simple explanation. I think she just likes the attention and it gives her something to do.

What I don't get is how on Earth did she originally come up with this circuit all that time ago, all on her own without knowing any electronics ? Was she handed the circuit and told what to do as in make claims and such. How did it originate and who first designed the circuit that she first made claims with ?

In my opinion if a function generator is used the power it draws from the wall should be considered as input, not just what the FG give to the circuit, without the FG drawing power there is no complete circuit. IF she doesn't like that then she should design an efficient circuit to do the driving, like Tinsel did. I say put a Watt meter on the wall socket that the FG is plugged into then add that to the input.  ;D

Cheers

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #598 on: March 02, 2014, 12:23:37 PM »
Even I can understand how a mosfet could be turned on that way, with a simple explanation. I think she just likes the attention and it gives her something to do.

What I don't get is how on Earth did she originally come up with this circuit all that time ago, all on her own without knowing any electronics ? Was she handed the circuit and told what to do as in make claims and such. How did it originate and who first designed the circuit that she first made claims with ?

In my opinion if a function generator is used the power it draws from the wall should be considered as input, not just what the FG give to the circuit, without the FG drawing power there is no complete circuit. IF she doesn't like that then she should design an efficient circuit to do the driving, like Tinsel did. I say put a Watt meter on the wall socket that the FG is plugged into then add that to the input.  ;D

Cheers
The various circuits were not her designs.  She came up with the Zipon idea and was told that she needed to conduct experiments to validate it.  It's been downhill from there.

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #599 on: March 02, 2014, 02:44:55 PM »


I wonder how Ainslie gets PMs if she has been banned here. Perhaps her ban is of a "read only" nature where she can log in and read PMs but cannot post to the threads.


Ainslie had Stefan ban me from this forum 1 day after I joined, and made one single post.
Not only is she able to log in to read PMs, but she is able to reply to them and send new ones while banned from posting.



 

OneLink