That's something I've been urging her to do for a long time. A really long time. Unfortunately the only person she seems to trust, and who actually has the prerequisite knowledge, is Steve Weir, and I'm sure he has better things to do than to conduct remedial highschool physics and maths tutoring. She doesn't even respect Poynt99 enough to stop arguing with him and pay attention.
Donovan Martin... does not inspire confidence, but at least he seems capable of connected thought.

Look at her squirm and lie! The amazing output of the lying troll queen continues apace.

She accuses me of using a stored waveform.... ON AN ANALOG SCOPE. What an idiot she is.

(Actually... I do have that capability in my lab, since I have another "garage sale" bit of kit, the Epic Instruments WaveSaver, but I do not use it except very rarely, and of course I am not using it in the video demonstration, nor have I ever used it for any video demos. Ainslie simply cannot grasp that she is, and has been, and will continue to be, obliviously WRONG about the operation of the circuit.)

And notice the continued lie about where she had the Black lead of the FG. They NEVER NEVER placed the Black lead anywhere but at the COMMON GROUND POINT, the battery side of the "shunt" until the August 11 demonstration where they had to use a groundlift system to do so. What an abject liar and fool she is! As we have repeatedly shown, the schematics given in the daft manuscripts are lies, because until August 11, 2013, Ainslie's Black FG lead was ALWAYS placed at the common ground, the WRONG side of the CVR. Just as I emphasize in the video, this is not the correct location but it IS the location that Ainslie ALWAYS used until the August 11 demonstration.

What an abject liar and fool she is.


Keep it up, AINS-LIE. Continue to lie, and make your insulting trollings, you are just digging yourself a deeper pit in which to rot.

Or you could get up off your scrawny duff and try the simple experiment for yourself, before you start shooting off your lying mouth.

EVERY BIT OF MY WORK IS FULLY DOCUMENTED AND REPEATABLE BY ANYONE who has the equipment. Trying to reproduce your lying claims always fails, though.

She still hasn't watched the NEGATIVE BIAS PLAYLIST where it is FULLY EXPLAINED STEP BY TINY STEP how a mosfet is turned ON by LOWERING THE VOLTAGE SUPPLIED TO THE SOURCE PIN while the GATE IS GROUNDED, the common gate amplifier configuration. This has been explained to her over and over again, by at least four different people, and I've demonstrated it over and over again in many videos... but since it falsifies her "thesis" she cannot even grasp that it could be true.

I have never encountered such an idiotic claimant. It truly boggles the mind. She is totally and completely unreachable.  She simply lies to herself and to everybody else when she is confronted with information that falsifies her claims, and she cannot ever provide any support in favor of her claims. None of which deters her from stuffing her foot deeper and deeper down her own throat.

Mercy!

In the run-up to the first 2013 demonstration which finally happened on June 29, she sent some photos to Sterling at  PESN. Here is the shot that shows the Black FG lead connected.... to the Common Circuit Ground, the BATTERY SIDE of the current-sense "shunt".

Always, until the August 11 demo, they used this incorrect connection. IN EVERY PHOTO, EVERY SCHEMATIC, EVERY DIAGRAM _except_ the mendacious daft manuscripts, the Black FG lead is located as you see. And the "correct" location depicted in the daft manuscripts... did not appear until _after_ it was pointed out to her that the connection they actually used enables the FG current to bypass the current-sense "shunt". The schematics in the manuscripts are conscious fabrications, outright lies.

Here's a screenshot from the miserable June 29, 2013 demonstration, showing the Black FG lead.... at the common circuit ground, on the battery side of the current-sense "shunt".

So how many different proofs are there that the lying Ainslie ALWAYS used this connection? Count them.

She's really going out of her way to make herself into a complete fool.  Obviously she does not realize it, but she's got herself so tangled up that she actually makes a number of your points for you.  She notes that I asked for the Q1 disconnection test.  And that test performed just as you and I both knew it would:  The oscillations persist unabated without Q1.  Ergo Ms. Ainslie's hypothesis that Q1 carries the oscillating load current during the "Q1 Off" times was falsified by that test.

Then she went on to howl about how this showed exactly what everyone has told her for years:  The current that flows through Q2's source terminal flows through the red lead of the function generator and then out the black lead of the generator.  She specifically measured that during the August 11 demonstration.  Is it a coincidence that in the ten hours it took her to formulate a new response, that the August 11 video became unavailable?

Let her pull them, it makes no difference to the record. It just shows how LITTLE regard she has for the truth, yet again.

Here's the March 2011 demonstration in full:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8AIRkWF55k

Here's the June 29, 2013 demonstration, broken down into LITTLE excerpts, with most of the dead air cut out. See what happens, Ainslie, when you relinquish control?
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa_6b8yMpkYJHIR7F9ah3-1q

I'll upload the full August 11 demonstration a LITTLE later on, I've got something else in the pipeline at the moment.

See below, for the schematic of my next LITTLE demonstration:

The August 11 demonstration video will be here when it is done uploading, probably in an hour or so. I have a really slow upload connection.

http://youtu.be/ld-LTPxmoQA