Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514297
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 16

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 248876 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #450 on: February 23, 2014, 11:31:46 PM »
Ms. Ainslie would like a more thorough description of the operation of Q2 in her circuit.  Here is a reference she should read:

http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee320/notes/320Lecture34.pdf

That's a great reference... for the "restofus". I've downloaded it and added it to the Ainslie database, in the .pdf section.
Unfortunately Ainslie does not have the prerequisites to understand more than the title of the document. By the middle of the first page her eyes have already started to water and glaze over. The rest of the document will wind up on the floor of her birdcage.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #451 on: February 23, 2014, 11:54:42 PM »
i,l see what i can suss out @mark E.not going to be easy though.i wish electromagneto-hunters would use a small finite power source like a watch-battery attatched to a mini-pulse-heater and just drop the whole gamut into an oil bath and read the temperature vs a controll.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #452 on: February 24, 2014, 12:02:21 AM »
That's a great reference... for the "restofus". I've downloaded it and added it to the Ainslie database, in the .pdf section.
Unfortunately Ainslie does not have the prerequisites to understand more than the title of the document. By the middle of the first page her eyes have already started to water and glaze over. The rest of the document will wind up on the floor of her birdcage.
It does not matter whether or not Ms. Ainslie can understand that document at this moment.  It only matters that the circuit configuration that she has set-up with Q2 is well understood and documented.  The general analysis included in that document has all the elements needed, including the negative bias voltage applied to the source terminal through an impedance, just as from the function generator's offset that Ms. Ainslie and crew dialed up through the internal 50 Ohm impedance of the instrument.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #452 on: February 24, 2014, 12:02:21 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #453 on: February 24, 2014, 03:12:16 AM »
A simple illustration:

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #454 on: February 24, 2014, 03:51:51 AM »
LOL.... that's a good one!

It's particularly encouraging to see that she has reverted to uncritical naive acceptance of the large _artifactual_ amplitudes shown in the Figure 8 scopeshot. This makes shooting her down almost ridiculously easy. These large amplitudes have been shown unequivocally to be due to the large stray inductances caused by her battery wiring and her highly inductive current sense resistors that were used at that time. She used 4, 1 ohm, "concrete" wirewound power resistors in parallel for the CSR at that time.

I've just kluged together a test apparatus with a single Q2 and single Q1 mosfets, with 2, 0.51 ohm concrete wirewound power resistors in parallel for my CSR and overall a lot less stray inductances. I had to add some inductance to the battery interconnect wiring to make the Vbatt oscillations grow to a "reasonable" artifactual value. The results of my testing are in a video that will be ready in a couple of hours, but here are a few stills. I wasn't able to reach quite the extreme values that Ainslie gets in Figure 8, because I just didn't have enough inductances scattered about, but I think I have soundly refuted Ainslie's latest claims and I've met her bogus, cynical "challenge" adequately nevertheless.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #454 on: February 24, 2014, 03:51:51 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #455 on: February 24, 2014, 04:19:53 AM »
The video will be here when it's finished uploading.

http://youtu.be/ufEZW5iTv6Y

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #456 on: February 24, 2014, 05:27:51 AM »
The video is clear enough.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #456 on: February 24, 2014, 05:27:51 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #457 on: February 24, 2014, 06:45:58 AM »
The video is clear enough.

Clear enough for a bright child, certainly ... but perhaps not quite clear enough for Rosemary Ainslie. She is such a comedian! Time and time again I've shown her what she claims I cannot do, what she claims is impossible. Time and time again she has been proven soundly and completely WRONG by my video demonstrations. She must enjoy making herself look stupid, and her posts, as usual, are full of frantic flailings and even more frantic insults. What they do not contain, and never will contain, is any hint of understanding or any capability for performing her OWN demonstrations that actually test her vapid claims.

The video of course proves that my apparatus acts just like hers (surprise surprise) but of course it does not prove that the high-amplitude oscillations go through the FG. I don't know why she chose to post that silly cynical "challenge" anyway, since it proves nothing except that she lies when she says I haven't replicated "her" circuit and its artifactual performances. My "negative bias" playlist, the first four videos therein, however, do prove that the Q2 oscillations DO depend upon a current path through the FG or whatever is there to take its place, and they show that a bias current supply that is more negative than the negative pole of the run batteries is necessary to cause the oscillations. Together, this video and those provide the full explanation for the oscillations and the spurious amplitudes caused by the stray (or in my case deliberate) inductances in the circuit.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #458 on: February 24, 2014, 06:56:36 AM »
Hey AINSLIE, why don't you SHUT UP and PAY ATTENTION for a change. You have been trumped, over and over again, and the more you whine and flail about stuff that you SHOULD know about, the sillier you look. It amuses me greatly.

Why aren't you calling me Bryan Little any more? Did you finally find out that you were WRONG, every time you did, for YEARS?

You are a laughingstock!


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #458 on: February 24, 2014, 06:56:36 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #459 on: February 24, 2014, 09:17:21 AM »
She is not doing herself any favors.  Her first paragraph is more or less correct:  The statement which is an observation of readily verified reality is that Q2 conducts current through the function generator during the "Q1 Off" intervals.  The fact that it does is beyond dispute as she herself demonstrated that current flow as Phase 2 of her August 11, demonstration.  What she seems to have absolutely zero capacity to comprehend are a couple of other points:

1) When the circuit oscillates, current also flows through the parasitic capacitances of the MOSFETs.
2) The Ainslie team connected their current sense voltage probe across wiring on their breadboard instead of across the special non-inductive current sense resistors they bought.

Both effects are at work in her circuits.  Poynt99 explained this, simulated it, and closely reproduced her reported results.  Both her June 29, and August 11 demonstrations showed the extent of distortion parasitic inductance has caused her.  It is the combination of 1) and 2) that generated large voltages read by her oscilloscope during the "Q1 Off" period oscillations even though the scope probe tip was connected to the same DC node as the probe ground clip on June 29.  The voltage read was di/dt read across the wiring inductance between the probe tip location and the ground clip location.  The source of the di/dt passing through her current sense resistors was parasitic capacitance in the MOSFETs.  Based on the facts both that this has been explained over and over again, and that Ms. Ainslie remains absolutely clueless about it, it is predictable that she will forever rail on about how there must be something extraordinary happening.  For whatever reason she doesn't process the plain facts in front of her. 

Paper 1 incorporates measurements that Ms. Ainslie and her collaborators proved was completely invalid on June 29, 2013.  During further demonstration on August 11, Ms. Ainslie and her collaborators completely refuted their own claims that the "Q Array" circuit produces an efficiency improvement over a direct DC connection.  They established that the circuit wastes ~80% of the input power supplied to it.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #460 on: February 24, 2014, 11:56:08 AM »
Just for the record, here's her latest nocturnal emission.

Note how she insults and lies. Note how she has forgotten that her setup that was used for her Figure 8 did NOT include any non-inductive resistors. Note how long her interbattery and main supply wiring is for those old experiments. Note that she lies when she says that I have specifically criticized the Figure 8 shot before this. Note how she mocks the GRE without even knowing what it is, or having ever taken a standardized achievement test in her life. Note how she still falsely believes that the amplitudes of the oscillations represent actual currents, and note how she still ignores the proofs, published months and years ago, that she has been whining about lately. Note her flailing about, like a landed fish, gasping and choking in an atmosphere she cannot hope to breathe. Note her abject and total ignorance of facts and her total inability to comprehend simple explanations. Note her willfull ignorance of the fact that I have repeated her bad data all down the line, demonstrating how it is obtained, since 2009, complete with replications of every different scope trace, including amplitudes, that she has ever produced. Note her inability to process the fact that her own demonstrations have already demolished her silly "thesis", and no amount of her delusional ranting can affect the Steve Weir demonstrations and analyses-- even though she now seeks to obscure and hide the GOOD data that Steve had them produce.

Finally... note the fact that I hold her in utter contempt, since she is so dishonest that she cannot even admit to herself that she is utterly and totally wrong, her lies have been exposed for what they are,  and she has wasted all this time, all these years of her life chasing imaginary zipons, playing at her pseudoscientific misconduct.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #460 on: February 24, 2014, 11:56:08 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #461 on: February 24, 2014, 04:47:26 PM »
Ms. Ainslie routinely says things that are absolutely false.  How much of it she realizes and how much is delusion built on faulty memory and/or other possible cognitive limitations is not something that I cannot readily estimate.  The fantasies that she has concocted surrounding last year's demonstrations and her withdrawal of her retraction is a bit mind boggling.  This latest bit seems to imply that she doesn't realize the inductance that her long lead wires have or the resulting impacts on her fixture and measurements.  It doesn't matter because her demonstrations put those effects on display for all to see.  That she rails against what she herself showed isn't doing her any good.

I'll talk to Steve and see if I can get more details about what happened with the USB stick.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #462 on: February 24, 2014, 07:05:20 PM »
The USB stick isn't important except as proof that they are trying to suppress data. I have made screenshots from the demo videos at the moments that Steve had them do their saves, and they are of sufficient resolution to see what is happening, even though the "numbers in boxes" cannot be read off the images. The trace amplitudes and waveforms are clear enough, and coupled with the narration in the demo recordings the facts of the matter are perfectly clear.

A much better use of the "Steve Weir" connection and Steve's valuable time, in my opinion, would be for Steve to give Ainslie a true and correct critique of the videos in my Negative Bias playlist. To have him go through those videos with Ainslie, totalling just over one hour (less than a fourth of the time of Ainslie's miserable demonstrations that we all watched carefully several times -- in fact less time than the DEAD AIR in Ainslie's demonstrations), just might... just barely might... cause Ainslie to step back and consider her position carefully.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8hSDVrRWjmJ2WxgzRvMt7V

But more likely it would turn her against Steve, just as sound criticism has always turned her against her critics. Her vitriol and her venomous petty disrespect and insults would be unleashed against him, too. I really wouldn't want that to happen.... but if it does it will be more than just a "final coffin nail"... it will be tossing another spadeful of earth over the stinking pile of decaying garbage that is her "thesis" and her "experiment".


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #463 on: February 24, 2014, 09:08:47 PM »
I think that Steve has watched several of your videos and left comments, though maybe not on these particular ones.  Ms. Ainslie denies what is in plain sight, and that she previously acknowledged she saw in her own demonstrations.  Since she doesn't believe herself, I think it would be imposing on Steve to ask him to try and persuade her of the reality that she denies. 

On another note she doesn't like the new book series.  She calls it facile and infantile while complaining that she complains that it contains too many acronyms.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #464 on: February 24, 2014, 09:23:14 PM »
Notice that the idiot Ainslie wants ME to do something that SHE has NEVER DONE, and in fact is irrelevant to the issues at hand. What part of "replication" does this woman fail to understand? Never mind, that's a rhetorical question, since it's clear that she understands nothing of the process, at all, and the more idiotic rants she emits, the clearer it is to the onlookers.

She dare not repeat for herself the demonstrations I have presented in the Negative Bias playlist. She doesn't have the skill or knowledge even to put together those simple demonstrations, so maybe she could get her minion Donny to do it for her. And maybe pigs with wings can fly, too.

Too many acronyms? Are we speaking in a language that Ainslie doesn't comprehend, again? The common language of electronics and mathematics? Yes, that is clearly over her head. One would think that the deluded old woman doesn't have a computer with the ability to query Google about something she doesn't understand. Well, we have noted this deficiency of hers before, like when she says Wiki says one thing, but the actual Wiki says the exact opposite.

Ainslie disgusts me. She's not deserving of sympathy or tolerance for her mounting dementia, since she cannot restrain herself from emitting the childish insults and lies that fill up her forum posts. Someone who has had their errors pointed out many times, by many different people, for many years, but who still refuses to pick up a book and learn her topic, is deserving of contempt and nothing more.

 

OneLink