Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514303
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 248912 times)

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #435 on: February 23, 2014, 06:38:25 PM »
she hasnt claimed a 2nd law breach as her angle of attack @mark E but she seems to be fully aware of it.ive discussed it with her live somewhere on this thread or other thread a few months back and she definitely knows about it judging from her many references to the weakspots of it on her website.i wouldve much prefered for her to take the 2nd law angle of attack as her predominant theme.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #436 on: February 23, 2014, 07:08:25 PM »
perhaps @tk but she,s got the necessary hardened attitude plus determination to succeed.and she has access to the necessary tools of the trade so if she takes a thousand stabs with those tools and misses who knows where the next stab is going to land?maybe straight onto the bullseye.a woman,s styles may be better than a guys styles for this purpose in this instance (-:

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #437 on: February 23, 2014, 09:03:00 PM »
Ahhh.... no. Ainslie hasn't got a chance in Hell of discovering anything, and the reason is that she is blinded by her "thesis". Ainslie already KNOWS everything there is to know.

In addition to the psychological blinders, her utter incompetence at experimentation, operation of apparatus, record-keeping, reporting, and interpreting results make her the least likely person to contribute _anything_ of value to a technical discussion. She is far more likely to damage test equipment than to gather valid data with it... and this is proven by the record. Batteries, clipleads, the oscilloscope itself, a function generator -- I wouldn't let that woman anywhere near _real_ test equipment like the 30,000 dollar oscilloscope that I used for some of my testing. Her ignorance is such that she doesn't even bother to learn the standard terminology in use by millions of EEs and other electronics researchers and tinkerers around the world, and her flubbing of math and engineering units is literally comical -- half a day's study and practice and self-checking would have prevented many of those errors YET THEY PERSIST to this day.

Please don't forget that I have read every word Ainslie has posted publicly since early 2009. In addition I have a thick sheaf of "private" communications between her and some other people I know. There is literally nothing there, except the fascinating (to me) psychology of a sociopathic, narcissistic woman with delusions of grandeur and an internet connection.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #437 on: February 23, 2014, 09:03:00 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #438 on: February 23, 2014, 09:09:12 PM »
In case the point isn't driven home firmly enough.....

OK, if you want to present some New Science that modifies or corrects or expands upon Old Science.... you are going to have to demonstrate your competency and understanding of the _Old Science_ first. If you are going to be basing your claims and conclusions on a mathematical computation like Ainslie does... by GOD you had better be able to add, subtract, multiply and divide without errors. And if your analysis depends on advanced concepts like integration and differentiation, but you've never been exposed to the Calculus and can't communicate using that common language .... then you can go piss up a rope, as far as I am concerned.

Go on, work through the calculations she presents below. Her conclusions are based primarily upon these two calculations and similar ones she has posted over the years.

Just ignore for the moment that she still cannot tell the difference between a Quantity (the Joule) and a RATE (the Watt)..... and DO THE MATH (tm Ainslie).

For example, say you have a stack of 6 ea. 12 volt, 60 A-H batteries. How much energy is IN FACT expected to be contained in those batteries?
Let us calculate together. We have 72 volts at 60 amp-hours. This is 72 volts at 60 amp-hours x 60 minutes/hour x 60 seconds/minute, or 72 volts at 216000 amp-seconds, or 15,552,000 Watt-seconds (Joules).  Or to  string it all together Ainslie-style without including the units that might have saved her from error, we have 6 x 12 x 60 x 60 x 60 = 15552000. Right? This is the energy in the battery stack. Yet look at Ainslie's figure, and the conclusion she draws from it. Far from being overunity, the actual battery capacity could have run her experiment for several hundreds of hours, as she dissipated less than 2 megaJoules in 54 hours. 10 joules/second x 60 minutes/hour x 60 seconds/minute x 54 hours = 1944000 Joules. See how the units work out correctly, as well as the numbers?

Joules/second x seconds/minute = Joules/minute.  Joules/minute x minutes/hour = Joules/hour.  Joules/hour x hours = Joules. This is simple algebra... another subject that Ainslie omitted from her schooling. But Ainslie doesn't even realize that "PER" indicates a division operation! So how could she possibly understand cancelling units algebraically. "Joules/second"... how do YOU read that out in English?

Do you see? Taking Ainslie's OWN DATA and analyzing it without making silly math errors yields the completely opposite conclusion from that which Ainslie has drawn, bragged about and tried to slip down your throat for five years or more.

Yet Ainslie has NEVER ONCE corrected any of the bogus math she has spouted. The closest to a correction is the "vanishment" of the original claim in the early versions of the daft manuscripts that she somehow dissipated 5.9 megaJoules in ninety minutes.... gone without a trace, that one is.

Read this page from the old thread:
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/1125/

Note that there, she says that she will never correct the calculations, they are a "tad out" (sic) (reply 1136) and further on she states clearly that once water is boiling... it doesn't take any more Joules to keep it boiling. (reply 1138).



Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #439 on: February 23, 2014, 10:02:55 PM »
depends how one looks at it @tk. i can at least declare with totalitarian certainty that she,you,or anyone playing with electromagnetic circuitry is 1)going to have to violate kelvin rule to be successful and 2)going to have to violate kelvin rule via the cyclic flipping of magnetic domains somewhere in the circuit to be successful.thus i think i am expanding on the science,at least for overunity-hunters,by zooming in on what must happen for success.no fancy math required for this statement.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #439 on: February 23, 2014, 10:02:55 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #440 on: February 23, 2014, 10:10:41 PM »
depends how one looks at it @tk. i can at least declare with totalitarian certainty that she,you,or anyone playing with electromagnetic circuitry is 1)going to have to violate kelvin rule to be successful and 2)going to have to violate kelvin rule via the cyclic flipping of magnetic domains somewhere in the circuit to be successful.thus i think i am expanding on the science,at least for overunity-hunters,by zooming in on what must happen for success.no fancy math required for this statement.

So you have a "theory" that you believe with "totalitarian certainty." Fine, let's see you provide some EVIDENCE that supports your theory. The rest of your statement is irrelevant to the issue of Ainslie's incompetency and lack of relevant knowledge.

As has been suggested to you SEVERAL TIMES, why don't YOU OPEN YOUR OWN THREAD and discuss your various theories there?
I know why....

And mathematics is not a matter of viewpoint. It is either correct, or it is not. Ainslie's math is incorrect far more often than it is correct, and her conclusions are based on the incorrect maths, as I have shown many times before. This is not a matter of attitude or opinion, it is FACT.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #441 on: February 23, 2014, 10:17:14 PM »
precision math is definitely going to be required for power measurements i agree yes @tk

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #441 on: February 23, 2014, 10:17:14 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #442 on: February 23, 2014, 10:18:54 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #443 on: February 23, 2014, 10:23:33 PM »
precision math is definitely going to be required for power measurements i agree yes @tk

When Ainslie's "calculations" are more than an order of magnitude "out" as they usually are .... precision math is not needed. Just accurate math is enough. Ainslie's calculation errors have led her to the exact opposite conclusion from that which should be drawn from the data. This is not a matter of "precision", it is a matter of accuracy, error checking, and her utter ignorance of basic algebra.

When one's calculations are proven to be wrong, by many people, and one refuses thereafter to correct them, or the conclusions drawn from the incorrect results, and one continues to make the same kinds of errors over and over.... this is not an issue of "precision".

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #443 on: February 23, 2014, 10:23:33 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #444 on: February 23, 2014, 10:23:42 PM »
What Rosemary needs is a Disney-like cartoon animation that shows how the circuit works, step by step with a top view of little "current sheep" moving along pathways being stopped and permitted to go forward by farm gates and stuff like that.  When the little current sheep enter the "load resistor trough" their wool is sheared off by "load resistor Munchkins."  Then, like magic, when the sheepies enter the "battery corral" they are permitted to graze and grow their wool back.  Then the little sheepies start their movement along the pathways being stopped and permitted to go forward by the farm gates, and so on.

A nice 15-minute Disney animation with nice pleasant narration and little sheepies going around in circles growing wool, and having it sheared off, growing wool and having it sheared off.  Step by step and then a few minutes of watching the sheepies do the circuit might do the trick.

Rosie might then understand the circuit.  Her "window of understanding" will only last a few hours and after that you will be back to square one.

So, without Disney or Pixar you are SOL.

MileHigh

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #445 on: February 23, 2014, 10:26:20 PM »
@MH: I have almost descended to that level with the Negative Bias playlist videos. If someone cannot understand those, they don't speak English or realize that a black line on a schematic indicates a wire connection.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #445 on: February 23, 2014, 10:26:20 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #446 on: February 23, 2014, 10:38:50 PM »
The function generator is a source of white fluffy bunnies with it's own bunny hutch where the bunnies also magically grow their fur back.  The poor white fluffy bunnies also get sheared when they hop hop hop along their path.  There are also bunny gates that stop or allow the bunny current to hop along.

Do the fluffy bunnies sometimes take the same path as the sheepies?  I can't remember because I haven't taken a serious look at the schematic in a very long time.

It would make for a cute animation.  Sheepies and fluffy bunnies going in circles and the shearing Munchkin meanies looking to collect wool and bunny fluff.  It's all so clear now.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #447 on: February 23, 2014, 10:56:16 PM »
thats why i wouldve prefered her to take a thermodynamic angle @mark E however its not going to matter much IF she gets a 2nd law violation going and IF all calculations are done adequately.i always advise electromagnetic hunters that i encounter to understand the thermodynamics of their engines for 2 reasons: 1)to get a better understanding of what they,re infact trying to do and 2)to get a better attention from acedemics if need be and to be taken a little bit more seriously by them.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #448 on: February 23, 2014, 11:03:00 PM »
thats why i wouldve prefered her to take a thermodynamic angle @mark E however its not going to matter much IF she gets a 2nd law violation going and IF all calculations are done adequately.i always advise electromagnetic hunters that i encounter to understand the thermodynamics of their engines for 2 reasons: 1)to get a better understanding of what they,re infact trying to do and 2)to get a better attention from acedemics if need be and to be taken a little bit more seriously by them.
Sure you would.  By all means take any of Ms. Ainslie's verified experiments and have at them with a thermodynamic analysis.  Begin with how they do or do not fit a Kelvin interpretation of the Second Law of Energy.  Show your work.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #449 on: February 23, 2014, 11:19:39 PM »
Ms. Ainslie would like a more thorough description of the operation of Q2 in her circuit.  Here is a reference she should read:

http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee320/notes/320Lecture34.pdf

 

OneLink