Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514318
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 248978 times)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #420 on: February 23, 2014, 01:09:40 AM »
TinselKoala that's a possibility.  These latest missives could be explained by such a hypothesis.  You may not be feeling particularly merciful for reasons that are easy to understand.  But, if we are dealing with someone who is struggling with memory and cognitive issues, mercy may be the best course.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #421 on: February 23, 2014, 02:56:14 AM »
When Ainslie stops lying about me and misrepresenting my work, perhaps I'll agree that she deserves mercy. But as long as she continues to emit the amazing series of falsehoods as exemplified by her latest postings, she deserves only mockery and ridicule. Just look at her latest! Not only does she completely ignore what she is being shown and told, she has to lie about it as well !!

Of course I've replicated "her" circuits.... EVERY ONE OF THEM, even the ones she herself lied about using when she never did actually use them. I've demonstrated my replications and I've even offered, time and time again, for my Tar Baby replication to be tested ALONGSIDE HER APPARATUS by any competent third party, whose judgement I will gladly accept as to whether or not Tar Baby is an exact replication. This kind of direct challenge makes Ainslie turn pale and grow faint.

And of course the scopeshot in Test 4, Figure 8 is a lot of garbage, from someone who does not know how to use an oscilloscope to display data. And OF COURSE it is easy for anyone to replicate. What does she think, two circuits built with the same components according to the same schematic will perform differently in Texas than in South Africa? I laugh out loud at Ainslie's flailing about and her abject lies, and I absolutely GUFFAW at her claims about that scopeshot. The currents that pass through the Function Generator have been measured MANY TIMES by me, by Poynt99 and even by Ainslie herself, but Ainslie has apparently forgotten that most of the amplitude in her CSR oscillations is spurious.

Note that Ainslie cannot even describe accurately what the signals are and what they mean for that Figure 8 scopeshot. Note that she states that the FG is set to produce a 20  ms period, and that she claims to be showing the switching transitions. But the scope is set to 500 microseconds per division! The ENTIRE SCREEN only contains 5 ms of data.... it does NOT show the switching transitions at all, only aliased combs of a block of oscillations lasting much longer than the screen display. Further... these oscillations are happening because the FG is supplying a NEGATIVE voltage to the Q2 SOURCE/Q1 GATE, not what she claims in her post. The Q2 Gate signal voltage is never "positive" in her circuit, it is always connected to the battery negative through the CSR and so cannot vary more than a few milliVolts from the zero reference. The Q2s are turned on by LOWERING THE SOURCE voltage to a more negative value than the zero reference voltage at the Gate.

And furthermore... the Current Probe does not even need to be hooked up to ANYTHING for large oscillations to be indicated on that channel !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C72jwywsz3w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-wy8w9MWJY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tReHHljgdjQ

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #422 on: February 23, 2014, 03:12:46 AM »
Quote
.   NO REFERENCE TO THE ADDENDUM THAT EXPLAINS THE REQUIRED PATH FOR THE FLOW OF CURRENT
No reference to Ainslie's silly counterfactual "addendum" to the rejected and completely falsified manuscript is necessary, as everyone knows where to find it.. .and where it rightfully belongs. Why should anyone reference an "explanation" that Ainslie continues to repeat every chance she gets, without it ever making any sense?
Quote
.   NO REFERENCE TO THE POST THAT YOU'RE CHALLENGED TO COPY IN FULL
FALSE. The entire post is imaged IN FULL, so that Ainslie cannot edit and change its meaning.
Quote
.   CONTINUED INSISTENCE THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE 3 WATTS DISSIPATED IN DEFIANCE OF THE EVIDENCE
The EVIDENCE is clear: no more than 3 Watts were dissipated, and it is Ainslie who is in continual DEFIANCE of the evidence... her OWN evidence, to boot.
Quote
.   NO COGENT EXPLANATION FOR THE PATH OF CURRENT FLOW DURING THE 'OFF' PERIOD OF THE DUTY CYCLE
Utterly and ridiculously FALSE !! The full explanation has been given MANY TIMES, dissected into its simplest components and demonstrated, step-by-step, in terms even a bright eighth-grader could understand. Of course.... the explanation has to be READ and WATCHED and FOLLOWED in order for it to be understood. Ainslie is in the position of denying that the Eiffel Tower exists, because she cannot see it from her back porch.
Quote
.   YOU STILL HIDE BEHIND A MONIKER BECAUSE YOU DARE NOT DISCLOSE YOUR IDENTITY IN THE FACE OF THAT UNSCIENTIFIC NONSENSE
The only nonsense here comes from Ainslie, and it's pseudoscientific misconduct and nonsense of the very worst kind, because she is impervious to facts and logical reasoning. If she wants to have her name and personal details spread all across the world for anyone to see... that is certainly her prerogative... and perhaps she has already reaped some of the fruits of her actions. Others may not be so willing to expose themselves to madwomen who lie and threaten instead of reason, who carry on email and telephone campaigns seeking to denigrate those who criticize her. Nevertheless, there are plenty of people who know exactly who I am and where I live... I'm supposed to be Bryan Little, aren't I, living in Tennessee somewhere, or being a senior student at UT somewhere. Right? GUFFAW.... Ainslie is such a comedian.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #422 on: February 23, 2014, 03:12:46 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #423 on: February 23, 2014, 04:31:22 AM »
TinselKoala that's a possibility.  These latest missives could be explained by such a hypothesis.  You may not be feeling particularly merciful for reasons that are easy to understand.  But, if we are dealing with someone who is struggling with memory and cognitive issues, mercy may be the best course.
++


(Even if she's only a very sadistic troll persona - this seems to be the most rational approach)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #424 on: February 23, 2014, 05:01:04 AM »
TinselKoala, the missives from Ms. Ainslie are very far out of touch with reality for all the reasons that you state.  Anyone can watch the videos, see the evidence and decide what it means.  Ms. Ainslie is proclaiming things that are at complete odds with what the videos obviously show including her own declarations recorded by those videos.  I think the reason that she rails against her own evidence is that she does not have the capacity to comprehend it.  I think she is quite oblivious to what she is doing to herself right now.  I think that the enemy you are battling is an empty shell.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #424 on: February 23, 2014, 05:01:04 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #425 on: February 23, 2014, 08:33:29 AM »
Look at the latest from Ainslie. I am flabbergasted! How can ANYONE possibly be so utterly and amazingly IGNORANT as to make the statements she makes in this post? There has been no progress at all, after all these years. She has not learned ONE SINGLE THING.

She makes stupid statements, she lies, she refuses to accept what her OWN DEMONSTRATIONS have shown, she refuses utterly to avail herself of the analyses that have been carefully prepared for her, claiming that they don't even EXIST when we have all posted them many times. She makes absurd claims and even more absurd demands, when she herself cannot even understand the most basic fundamental FACTS about the circuit.

Every post she makes: she lies, misrepresents, insults, and makes false claims. She pretends that the operation of the circuit has not been clearly explained to her many times. Her delusions have taken over completely.

The part about the Q2 mosfets being "DISCONNECTED" is especially comical, and shows just what I've been telling you all along: She has absolutely no clue. She pretends to criticize my simple demonstrations without apparently having even bothered to WATCH THEM. But she can't even read a schematic diagram. This last insane post of hers really takes the cake, and I'm glad she's put all her delusions into a single post, because that makes my task so much easier. Any time ANYONE expresses interest in Ainslie, all I have to do is show them that single post, along with the videos of the demos, Poynt99's full explanation document, and the first four videos in my Negative Bias playlist .... and they will laugh Ainslie out of the room.

How many false statements and ridiculous claims can you find in her post? Count them!




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #426 on: February 23, 2014, 08:50:46 AM »
I will once again post the playlist that DEMONSTRATES, STEP BY STEP, how the Q2 mosfets are NOT DISCONNECTED but rather are connected THROUGH the FG, how they are turned on by LOWERING source voltage, how they operate in the LINEAR mode not as a switch, and upon what the oscillations depend.

AINSLIE, you really should watch these videos, SEVERAL TIMES, so that you might have some chance at saving face.  You have made so many false and ridiculous statements that you have betrayed the fact that you know nothing, you have learned nothing, and you IGNORE everything! Now is your chance, ONCE MORE, to catch up with reality, GROW UP, study, think, and LEARN something for a change. Your statements about mosfets are so off the mark, so utterly ridiculous, that you really are making a laughing-stock of yourself, and I actually feel sorry for you. YOU HAVE BEEN REFUTED, and you are so utterly dense you cannot even admit it. But everyone else sees it.

WATCH THE VIDEOS. Dissect them sentence-by-sentence if you like, I am happy to discuss FACTS with anyone.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8hSDVrRWjmJ2WxgzRvMt7V

ASK STEVE WEIR ABOUT THESE VIDEOS. ASK DONOVAN MARTIN. ASK ANYONE.  Or continue stuffing your foot down your throat by your ignorant statements-- I find it entirely amusing to see you claim things that have been long and soundly refuted. You are indeed the child who does not do her homework, yet expects to be able to discuss it... while everyone is laughing at your ignorance.

Poynt99's playlist of explanatory videos:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa_5QWbelpO5Wp8MctLt5EdQ

And I've attached AGAIN Poynt99's full analysis, from June of 2011 ..... not because I think you'll actually READ it, because I know you won't.... I'm just proving that you LIE when you claim nobody has given you an explanation.

Also I've attached MarkE's diagram.... the diagram of current flow through the FG that has been presented to you by .99, by me, and by other people in various forms for FOUR YEARS or more now. You seem to trust Steve Weir, so ASK HIM ABOUT THIS. I'd pay money to see you and Weir discuss this issue on YouTube. Of course I don't believe you will ever change your mind, Ainslie.... just as before, you would pretend to understand, then in a week or two you will be back at it, spewing your ignorant nonsense over and over again.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #426 on: February 23, 2014, 08:50:46 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #427 on: February 23, 2014, 09:28:50 AM »
TinselKoala, it is looking more and more to me that we are witness to a decline.  I see a person suffering a lot of agitation and confusion struggling to recall and struggling to reason.  I have no desire to torment someone going through such difficulties.  She doesn't understand the electronics.  She is not going to understand the electronics.  Reminding her that she is mistaken just further upsets her.  Explaining the circuit's real operation just works her up.  Reminding her of what happened at her own demonstrations just drives her into a fury.  I don't see an educational path that will result in progress.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #428 on: February 23, 2014, 09:44:53 AM »
Ainslie can stop the "torment" instantly, at any time when it becomes too much for her. All she has to do is to stop posting her lies, insults, misrepresentations and idiocy.

But I think she thrives on it. She's a phenomenal troll queen, making post after post with the explicit intention of riling me up. I, on the other hand, am simply trying to hold my own, in the face of the reeking gale of insult and mendacity spewing from her keyboard.

I am perfectly willing to discuss facts rationally. Unfortunately, Ainslie has demonstrated many times, and not just to me, that she is incapable of doing so. She has been banned from forum after forum, for years now, for doing the same things that she is doing now. I don't think she is decompensating especially much now, as compared to two or four years ago. All discussions with Ainslie eventually come up against her arrogant ignorance and her insulting behaviour, her refusal to study and learn, her false claims and outright lies. This is nothing new, and it's nothing restricted to me. Ask Glen, ask Aaron, ask Ashtweth, Harvey, Picowatt, the posters at Naked Scientists... we have all encountered the same nonsense and the same attitude from Ainslie. That's why she's "confined to quarters" and isn't allowed on other forums. She has been banned from here at least twice, banned from Energetic Forum, banned from Naked Scientists.... on and on.

And I agree with you: there is no path toward educational progress for Ainslie. She will go to her grave not knowing how a mosfet works, but yelling at everyone that she does. Meanwhile... she provides endless amusement. There is no clearer example of the Dunning-Kruger effect that I have ever encountered, and someday she will be famous. Not for her mosfet mistakes, but for her clinical syndrome !

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #428 on: February 23, 2014, 09:44:53 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #429 on: February 23, 2014, 10:43:49 AM »
TinselKoala I don't know of any really good way to tell if you are correct or not that it is trolling versus dementia.  I have seen up close how scary life becomes for some people with dementia.  I knew a particularly wonderful lady who suffered through it for about four years before passing away.  Prior to the dementia onset she had been a very loving woman and very active in the community.  Near the end she thought her family were out to get her.  If something like that is going on here, then I would not want to create further agitation.  If it is really just trolling, then why feed it?  Anyone who made it through first year EE better know what a common gate amplifier looks like and how it behaves.  They ought to be able to interpret voltage drop across a resistor.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #430 on: February 23, 2014, 11:23:17 AM »
i dont think thats a correct analysis doctor E.looking from the outside in i think ainslie intuitively knows that a kelvin breach is very very possible and that its just within her sights.i think both she and gmeast may nail it down sooner or later,if not already.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #430 on: February 23, 2014, 11:23:17 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #431 on: February 23, 2014, 04:23:09 PM »
Profitis, I really don't think you have the background in the Ainslie phenomenon to be able to judge what she "has" and what she hasn't. I am not talking about "maybes" or probabilities, I am talking about the errors, lies, insults, disrespect, ignorance and mendacity that Ainslie has emitted over the years and continues to emit, undamped and undeterred by proven fact. The way she has been acting and her precious, seriously-defended ignorance shouted from the rooftops can only HURT whatever chances (identically zero as far as I am concerned) there may be for anything of real interest to come out of her rantings and blind tinkering.

MarkE, everybody dies, everybody is sick and everybody has personal tragedies. These things have no role in the advancement of Science, except by Max Planck's "one funeral at a time." If Ainslie is tragically ill, in a mental decline, where are her keepers? Why is she allowed to persist in this utter waste of her precious time, instead of participating in therapeutic activities? Never mind, these are rhetorical questions. If I told you about my own personal illnesses and mental problems, would this make any difference as to how a mosfet behaves? Of course not. Would it make your heart bleed for me in sympathy? Maybe, but that would be irrelevant to the evaluation of claims I might make along the way.

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #432 on: February 23, 2014, 06:00:31 PM »
Sure @tk. I may not be electrogenius enough to determine wether she does have something or not but im genius enough to know that she CAN have something.switching magnetic domains in an pulsed element can theoreticly give a window to intake extra heat from the environment than was shoved into the environment from the batteries(im willing to battle you on this issue if your up for it) so she may or may not cut into that window but i dont see how her 'shouting' or 'ranting' can hurt any final demo result any more than doctor E,s diagnosis can.as you say a mosfet stays a mosfet.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #433 on: February 23, 2014, 06:22:48 PM »
Profitis, Ms. Ainslie has refuted her own claims in public demonstrations she has conducted.  She has never claimed against the Second Law of Energy.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #434 on: February 23, 2014, 06:32:24 PM »
Sure @tk. I may not be electrogenius enough to determine wether she does have something or not but im genius enough to know that she CAN have something.switching magnetic domains in an pulsed element can theoreticly give a window to intake extra heat from the environment than was shoved into the environment from the batteries(im willing to battle you on this issue if your up for it) so she may or may not cut into that window but i dont see how her 'shouting' or 'ranting' can hurt any final demo result any more than doctor E,s diagnosis can.as you say a mosfet stays a mosfet.

Ainslie's problem personality has been _actively detrimental_ to the exploration of any postulated effects of the kind she, and you, are talking about. Her insistence on spouting her incorrect interpretations and her absolute abject ignorance of her topic both keep the conversation and the experimental work focussed on attempts to correct her errors, to gather valid data about her experimental paradigm, and to educate her out of her abysmal ignorance, rather than forging ahead in directions properly emerging from good research. To his credit, GMeast has mostly avoided falling into this trap. His initial contact with this work consisted of "replicating" her claims, but he wisely rejected the 5-mosfet design out of hand and when he started work on the single mosfet COP>17 work he quickly found out that there were enough problems with Ainslie's reporting that he quickly dropped any attempt to perform a "replication" of Ainslie's claims, and went on to explore the basic idea of pulsed mosfet switching to see if there really might be something there. To the extent that he has made progress, it is because he ignores the ridiculous rants and impossible claims and bogus circuit analyses coming from Ainslie. His finding that the Quantum article's schematic "does not work" is legendary.

Once again I will say it. What is known about the circuit Ainslie is working with is known because of the excellent experimentation and analysis by her detractors and FORMER collaborators. Ainslie herself has contributed nothing of substance, other than easy targets for debunking.

 

OneLink