Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83535
  • *Latest: Fritzman

  • *Total Posts: 514401
  • *Total Topics: 15308
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 249502 times)

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #360 on: February 06, 2014, 01:42:46 PM »
I'm sorry, but some of the above discussion from sims doesn't seem to jive completely with my results in the hardware. I know watching my demonstration videos gets old, but could you please watch again, and comment specifically upon, this video here, particularly "part 4b", the latter part of the video. Schematics are shown at the front of the video but also see the 4b schematic below.
The series resistance of 100 ohms with the bias battery is a carbon resistor. The CSR is a one-ohm wirewound power resistor.
So what I'm getting from the discussion above and from my testing is that the output impedance of the bias source is rather critical. If it's too low, as when I hooked the circuit up without the 100R briefly near the end of the video, it doesn't oscillate, but with a bit higher impedance (through the 100R and the bulb) it does. At 7:09 in the video I touch the bulb to the positive battery terminal bypassing the 100R, the bulb lights up brightly and the tpA trace shows -4 volts but with no oscillation. By fiddling with the connection I briefly get a pulse of oscillation, then I place the 100R in series and obtain the continuous oscillation and a dim bulb.
I presume the bulb lights up in the no-oscillation case because the mosfet's body Zener is reverse-biased enough to conduct, and that the two batteries are now in series and the scope trace from tpA is indicating the voltage drop across the body diode and the load resistance. Is that right?
In any case, due to the action of the body diode, the voltage at tpA never seems able to go below -4 volts or so, oscillating or not, regardless of the bias source impedance. Of course when the oscillations are happening this -4 V is the mean of the oscillations. Also, during oscillations there should be some current flowing across the source-gate capacitance as well, right?
I'm still trying to understand fully the behaviour of the circuit myself, so I'm happy for any and all guidance, and if I'm completely missing something please let me know!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV2ePEbJ76I
The videos do not contradict the discussion above.  What the simulations show is that if you connect a battery without a ballast resistor that you will not get the oscillations.  That should make intuitive sense:  That configuration looks like the drawing I posted.  One can look at the circuit as either common gate, or common source.  A common source circuit with 0V / 12V drive acts like a switch that is off with 0V and on with 12V drive.  Now if you insert 100uH between the battery and the MOSFET source then according to the simulation you'll get big time oscillations.  100uH is the equivalent of about 400 feet of lead wire.  If you insert only 10uH which would be about 40 feet of wire then the simulations do not show any oscillations.  The critical inductance to start and sustain oscillations for 20mOhms with four IRFPG50's appears to be right about 80uH.

In order to get oscillations we need two things:  180 degrees phase shift and gain greater than 1.  The discussion that PW and I were having had to do with getting a gain > 1.  For that, the MOSFET has to operate in its linear region.  When set-up as a switch it doesn't have a lot of opportunity to do that as it slews through its linear region pretty quickly.  However, when we insert enough inductance in the source leg, that impedes rapid on/off off/on switching, multiplying the time that the MOSFET takes to slew through its linear region, and in the process also introducing more phase shift.  It's just a matter of inserting enough unbypassed inductance and the circuit will take off if subjected to a strong transient such as power on.  The impact of a 50 Ohm or 100 Ohm degeneration resistor in series with the source is that linear operation extends to DC.  You should be able to do a quick test where you get the oscillations with the 100 Ohm resistor, but kill them by bypassing the resistor with a 1uF or larger capacitor.

During the oscillations there is current through all three parasitic capacitances:  D-G, D-S, and G-S.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #361 on: February 07, 2014, 01:34:25 AM »
A formally attired Rosemary guides her team's build while typing up the thesis:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBBvXth-O_g

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #362 on: February 07, 2014, 02:38:29 PM »
MrSean2k.... I am afraid Ainslie doesn't need you to make a laughingstock of her... she is perfectly capable of doing that all by herself.

Quote
Sorry.  I omitted mention of preliminary tests done on efforts at replicating Deirone's test.  What has been managed is to 'briefly' turn the switch on.  The ground pin used is copper.  I've got an idea that it may be preferred to use aluminium.  But there's still some way to go.  Frankly - I'm AMAZED that even this was achieved.  It certainly defies standard assumption - or what I've learned about the standard model.  Frankly, it's looking promising - more so than I dared to hope.

Yes, that's right... the Deirones who plugs an extension cord into itself, then uses the piezo sparker from a cigarette lighter to "start" the thing up. Ainslie thinks she has managed "briefly" to turn the switch on... while splitting infinitives left and right. Now we know ... Ainslie actively hallucinates.


(Perhaps someone should inform Ainslie that the lower specific heat of Mineral Oil, 1.67 Joules per gram per degree C, and its lower density of about 0.83 or 0.84 grams per ml, means that a given amount of _energy_, measured in Joules, applied to the oil, will result in a _greater_ temperature change (measured in degrees C)  than the same amount of _energy_ applied to the same volume of water. This actually makes the oil bath system _more sensitive_ to applied energy than the water bath.)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #362 on: February 07, 2014, 02:38:29 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #363 on: February 07, 2014, 03:03:46 PM »
The idea that anyone takes Deirones farce seriously, much less claims to replicate pegs the absurdity meter.  Such a claim is either a big joke or the person making the claim is very, very confused.

Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #364 on: February 08, 2014, 09:00:31 AM »
I'm delighted that Rose has proven this technology. My commissioning teams roll up extension cables and plug them into themselves to prevent them becoming knotted. All I have to do now is give the guys some lighters then they don't need to bother with carrying generators. How easy is that? However they'll have to unplug them during transport or the leads may cause a fire. In the meantime I'll get some aluminium  earth pins made up.   ;D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #364 on: February 08, 2014, 09:00:31 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #365 on: February 08, 2014, 09:35:17 AM »
I'm delighted that Rose has proven this technology. My commissioning teams roll up extension cables and plug them into themselves to prevent them becoming knotted. All I have to do now is give the guys some lighters then they don't need to bother with carrying generators. How easy is that? However they'll have to unplug them during transport or the leads may cause a fire. In the meantime I'll get some aluminium  earth pins made up.   ;D
When you heartlessly drive the generator manufacturers out of business I hope that you will send some of your savings to the Generator Manufacturer's Widows and Orphans Fund.

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8369
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #366 on: February 08, 2014, 10:00:20 AM »
Yes, but,,, the extension cord folks are going to see more business than they can handle.  I would stock up on them now while they are still affordable.

Bill

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #366 on: February 08, 2014, 10:00:20 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #367 on: February 08, 2014, 10:17:26 AM »
Yes, but,,, the extension cord folks are going to see more business than they can handle.  I would stock up on them now while they are still affordable.

Bill
I believe that the Koch brothers have already cornered the market.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #368 on: February 09, 2014, 05:39:36 AM »
It just keeps getting funnier and funnier. Ainslie is now enamored with a video, uploaded on December 8, 2013, that shows some interesting things.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rpFZqrzBok

But is there trouble in Paradise?
Quote
Not even the guys who are doing our replications - are convinced by these videos.  To a man they claim that its fraud.  So.  It's left to me to see what I can do to replicate.

It's too bad that she missed my videos on the same topic, that I made and uploaded back in September, November and December of 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koNnPYjeKDE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr3Olkd_5EI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saa39OCuBy0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9BifULAgfA

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #368 on: February 09, 2014, 05:39:36 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #369 on: February 09, 2014, 07:15:53 AM »
Who would fake free energy on YouTube?  The only reason that the real free energy motors are not at Walmart is because they still have to be safety certified.

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #370 on: February 09, 2014, 10:21:37 PM »
still no answers about this circuit?
guess it's another hoax

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #370 on: February 09, 2014, 10:21:37 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #371 on: February 10, 2014, 02:37:33 AM »
still no answers about this circuit?
guess it's another hoax
Ms. Ainslie has recently spoken out defending several hoaxes.  Is there one in particular that interests you?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #372 on: February 10, 2014, 06:41:29 PM »
I've just received a PM from a new poster called AlaskaStar. I don't quite know what he's talking about, but perhaps he's the person referred to on this page of Ainslie's honeypot forum.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?topic=2313.235;wap2

Quote
Rosemary Ainslie says:
 Guys - Here's a new one for the books.  A new reach into 'spin'.    You'll recall that 'the boss' was the poster who promised me 'unusual methods' to discredit me.  What actually happened, within a week of threatening this - was my computer was STOLEN during an attack on my premises - a robbery that took place - WHILE I WAS RIGHT HERE.  From under my nose... so to speak.  I believe the attack would have extended to me as well but for the brave intervention of my beautiful dog - LOKI.  Plenty of blood was left as evidence AFTER that attack - and the most of it on my duvet.  It has taught me to pay heed when 'the boss' makes a post.  So.  With this in mind - here's the thing...  In this link...
http://www.overunity.com/13593/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-june-29-2013-video-segments/msg364941/#m

he now says this...
For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.


Bear in mind that Chris Hunter wrote in Mark Dansie's forum Revolution Green.com wrote to Mark in defense of both my work and Rossi's.  On record - BEFORE that article I have NEVER even heard of Chris Hunter.  I put it to you all - under oath - that ten years ago and to date - I have NEVER spoken nor written to Chris.  And far from saying that he's a 'remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff'... ON THE CONTRARY - clearly he does. 

What is alarming is that 'the boss' claims that 'He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability.'  This is COMPLETE HOGWASH.  IF it's true then 'the boss' needs to show proof - FROM CHRIS HIMSELF.  WHERE HAVE WE ENGAGED?  WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT HE HOLDS THIS OPINION?

It is STAGGERING that this level of 'spin' - calumny - lies - can be perpetrated - WITHOUT QUESTION.  And it is BEWILDERING to try and understand how it is that our technology is SO DANGEROUS - that it needs to be NEGATED - and my own skills along with it?  I put it to you that we most CERTAINLY have something that these HORRORS are desperately trying to DENY.  I am the FIRST to claim that our 'proof' is small - our contributions 'negligible' compared to those of Rossi's et al.  But NOW?  NOT SO MUCH.  I am beginning to realise that our technology REALLY REALLY matters.  Why else would they need to lie?  And to lie in every single post that they make?  And to work SO HARD at those lies? It beggars belief.

Kindest regards
Rosie

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:ArcticTek:Chris_Hunter_%28Alaska_Star%29%27s_Axial_Flux_Motor

Please feel free, AlaskaStar, to join in this public discussion. I'd really like to know the history of you and Ainslie, since "The Boss" has said that you were the first one to "call her to account" many years ago -- yet Ainslie absolutely denies this. It would not be the first time that Ainslie has categorically denied doing something that she clearly has actually done.

As Ainslie quoted above, The Boss said:
Quote
For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #373 on: February 11, 2014, 04:03:00 PM »
TinselKoala:  Ms. Ainslie is trying to stir the pot again this morning.  Apparently she does not understand your video:  'Electric OU: Tar Baby Cooks Some Turnip Stew: High Heat with "NO CURRENT FLOW"'  Ms. Ainslie speaks as though she is confident that new tests will vindicate her ideas.  Whether Ms. Ainslie believes it or not, I personally encourage her to experiment to her heart's content.  I encourage her to improve her test methods and documentation so that her results are both crisp and certain.  It is through such a process that she may yet learn something about physics and electronics.

Ms. Ainslie is unhappy that you used a DMM to obtain average readings.  She has latched onto information that is only partially correct in order to try and score points on you.  What Ms. Ainslie and a lot of people don't know is how a DMM works, and where it can and cannot reliably extract the DC average of a signal.  What she does know is that a DMM samples.  She assumes that beyond the sample frequency that the DMM cannot obtain reliably extract the average DC voltage.  She is wrong. 

What happens to any sampled system where input energy with content above half the device's sample frequency is that energy aliases.  Aliasing causes problems under certain circumstances.  The circumstances where it causes problems for a modern DMM are narrow.  Signals that are between about half the meter's conversion rate and about 10X the conversion rate result in unstable DC readings.  When the signal changes slowly enough for the meter to track it, the readings will appear chaotic to the human reading the meter.  A typical handheld DMM samples between 2 and 10 times per second.  Signals that are 100X or more the DMM sample rate average well due to the quad slope conversion architecture of DMM A/D converters.  Fluke handheld DMMs that I have tested are perfectly stable reading 50Hz signals.  I believe Poynt99's work inspired Steve to do some tests where Steve went as high as 500MHz.  Steve has some really nice equipment that is good for that.  I have only gone up to a few MHz with my gear.

There are two caveats:  One is that is that the common mode rejection of a DMM front end has an inverse saddle shape.  Somewhere in the mid 100kHz region, the common mode rejection ratio may fall down into the 40dB range, which means the DC signal will bounce around by up to 1%.  At lower frequencies and higher frequencies the rejection is better.  This effect can be more pronounced with cheapy meters.  The other is that meters present pretty substantial capacitive loads.  At frequencies above a few MHz the loading can be significant and a series resistor should be used between the signal source and the DMM.  1K Ohm is usually a good choice.

A fun experiment that anyone with a DMM, a function generator, and an oscilloscope can do is:

Put a BNC T on the function generator.
Connect one BNC patch cable from the T to an oscilloscope channel 1 to monitor the signal output.  Set vertical gain to 500mV/division.  Set 0V to center.  Trigger on channel 1.  Set horizontal sweep to 2ms / div.
Connect another BNC patch cable with a dual banana plug adapter into the DMM.
Set the DMM to read DC volts, 20V scale.
Set the function generator amplitude to zero.
Dial up an offset voltage until the DMM reads 1.000V.
Set the function generator to sine wave output.
Set the function generator amplitude to about 2Vpp
Adjust the function generator frequency to 100Hz.
If the oscilloscope has measurement capability, read average voltage.
Make step adjustments to the function generator operating frequency in 1-2-5 steps, IE 100Hz, 200Hz, 500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz... 
Adjust the oscilloscope horizontal sweep to keep from 2 to 5 cycles on the screen at each step.
At each step frequency read and record the DMM voltage.  Typically, a decent DMM will remain stable to within a couple of mV until the mid 100kHz range, such as 500kHz.
If the oscilloscope has measurement capability read and record the average voltage reading at each step.
Repeat the process with the offset voltage set to -1.000V.
Repeat the process using a triangle waveform.
Repeat the process using a square waveform.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #374 on: February 11, 2014, 09:01:05 PM »
Ainslie and her "team" will never perform that simple series of DMM tests for themselves, or if they do they will never report the results. Ainslie has a long history of avoiding any tests that have the potential to falsify her claims, and simply failing to report results that don't support her claims, like the results from the laboratory in the USA to which she sent her entire apparatus, a year or so ago.

Not only that, but Ainslie and her "team" have been aware of Poynt99's excellent testing and documentation of DMM accuracy ever since he produced it.

Furthermore, note that in that old video from May of 2012, I clearly am using a MINERAL OIL BATH and I clearly am taking, recording and reporting THERMOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS, properly obtained, of the oil bath system.... and yet the lying, willfully ignorant, mendacious and deluded Ainslie has stated just a few days ago that I have never shown either of those things.

Also note that on the blowup photos that she herself posted to PESN back before the most recent demonstrations.... her FG is set to produce a TRIANGLE or ramp waveform, just as I showed in this video.

 

OneLink