Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514819
  • *Total Topics: 15318
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 250981 times)

Offline Turbo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
    • Youtube
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #240 on: January 14, 2014, 11:22:08 AM »

Why don't you


I already did but you never got back to me.
You were too busy.
The demonstrations are there for those to find.
Clearly, You are not one of them, and i am not going to spoonfeed you.

I just point out to you that you do not notice overunity, nor do you notice working overunity devices, you do not notice overunity concepts, ways of doing things, or what else.
It is a signal from me to you that you are missing something and that you might want to decide to stop wasting your time and start to look around a bit better.

I have not adressed to many people.
Only to you, Tinselkoala, who never got back to me when we met the first time.
And to Poynt, Who never got back to me.
Also to MarkDansie in fact more then once, who also does not get back to me.

See only 3 people and i get the same responce a big fuck off, luckily i know that there are people who do find it.

You imediatly get defensive, start telling me what to do, and so on, i´m just saying put it aside.
As for newbie, you do not have a clue about what i .
Why do people attach status to number of posts? is it related to how smart one is?
No it's not.....it can't be.

So,
Why don't you


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #241 on: January 14, 2014, 11:27:09 AM »
Do you see? I told you that she would not be responsive to a reasoned discussion of actual points. She persists in maintaining those fictions which her own data disprove. I will wager that she has not even watched the recordings of her farcical demonstrations.... and I will point out that the screenshots which Steve Weir guided them to make have never been posted publicly as they agreed to do... in fact Ainslie has never even mentioned them again.



There are "innocent" mistakes, and then there are deliberate falsifications. You may think that innocence deserves gentler treatment, and perhaps it does, but I reserve my right to berate people for the deliberate falsifications and cover-ups. And when "mistakes" persist for years after they have been pointed out and paths to correction defined.... then those who commit them become highly beratable, in my book.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLqM7FRMeZ4
TinselKoala, all that you say about Ms. Ainslie may well be true.  Even if it is, what would it really matter?  To all rational people familiar with her claims and the evidence, the matter is settled.  To any rational people who might later come along, thanks to people like you and Poynt99, the evidence is irrefutable and they will not be fooled.  All that leaves is the personal stuff. I encourage you to just let the personal stuff go.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #242 on: January 14, 2014, 01:49:25 PM »
TinselKoala, all that you say about Ms. Ainslie may well be true.  Even if it is, what would it really matter?  To all rational people familiar with her claims and the evidence, the matter is settled.  To any rational people who might later come along, thanks to people like you and Poynt99, the evidence is irrefutable and they will not be fooled.  All that leaves is the personal stuff. I encourage you to just let the personal stuff go.

If my responses to Ainslie's personal attacks on me are bothering you, you can always put me on your "ignore" list and then you won't have to see my comments at all.

I would remind you that it was Ainslie who chose to resurrect this topic, and she did it with continuing personal attacks, insults, false accusations of criminality, and even threats against my person and reputation. She has been engaging in email and telephone campaigns seeking to identify me and she has been making false allegations against me to others. Where is anyone seeking to restrain her? This forum thread is my only avenue of response and defence against her calumnies.  She chose to make this argument personal, in the nastiest possible manner, long ago. I have responded with facts, checkable outside references and completely documented demonstrations which anyone can repeat... and you see how she replies: with more insults, false accusations and misrepresentations of my work and my words. There is one sure way to get me to stop doing what I'm doing, and that is for Ainslie to put an end to her perpetual lies and insults and start behaving like an honest researcher who wants to learn the truth. Since this will never happen.... here I am, and I will continue to reply to her insults and disrespect with all the contempt they deserve.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUzsCVNXaGs

I find this video incredibly offensive. Can you imagine the outrage that would be directed toward me, had I published anything like this with Ainslie as subject? Where is the outrage directed toward Ainslie?

Why does Ainslie need all these YouTube accounts, anyway?

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAbOZ4AUgzJBbit6Yu_ee-g/videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont/videos
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl_CaI0BzcLgmW7aFWM29WQ/videos
http://www.youtube.com/user/aetherevarising/videos

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #242 on: January 14, 2014, 01:49:25 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #243 on: January 14, 2014, 02:13:37 PM »
If my responses to Ainslie's personal attacks on me are bothering you, you can always put me on your "ignore" list and then you won't have to see my comments at all.

I would remind you that it was Ainslie who chose to resurrect this topic, and she did it with continuing personal attacks, insults, false accusations of criminality, and even threats against my person and reputation. She has been engaging in email and telephone campaigns seeking to identify me and she has been making false allegations against me to others. Where is anyone seeking to restrain her? This forum thread is my only avenue of response and defence against her calumnies.  She chose to make this argument personal, in the nastiest possible manner, long ago. I have responded with facts, checkable outside references and completely documented demonstrations which anyone can repeat... and you see how she replies: with more insults, false accusations and misrepresentations of my work and my words. There is one sure way to get me to stop doing what I'm doing, and that is for Ainslie to put an end to her perpetual lies and insults and start behaving like an honest researcher who wants to learn the truth. Since this will never happen.... here I am, and I will continue to reply to her insults and disrespect with all the contempt they deserve.
TinselKoala, I can see what she's done and what she is doing.  My suggestion, and it is only a suggestion, was intended for your benefit as you are someone I value.  If my suggestion doesn't suit you, that's fine.  I will not belabor it.

ETA:  Yes, that first video is very off color.  I think that reflects badly on her for making it and posting it.  I have no idea why she has more than one You Tube channel.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #244 on: January 14, 2014, 03:34:32 PM »
I appreciate your kind words and your concern. Thank you. I'm sorry that I can't seem to achieve your detachment. I've been bearing the brunt of Ainslie's rank insults and disrespect ever since I first elucidated the duty cycle problem with the Quantum magazine circuit back in 2009.


Meanwhile, I watched again the video of the August 11 demonstration. In about an hour and eleven minutes, I see about ten minutes of actual data presentation. Once again it seems to me like the presenters don't really grasp what is expected of them or what is being presented, or why. Without Steve Weir's patient guidance, it's clear that this would have been another complete farce, an utter waste of time. At least Steve managed to herd them down the right path for a few minutes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY3mHLJ2DzU


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #244 on: January 14, 2014, 03:34:32 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #245 on: January 14, 2014, 05:08:28 PM »
TinselKoala, you are welcome.

The August 11 demonstration offers a lot of information to anyone who is willing to take the time to watch closely.  I find it unfortunate that Ms. Ainslie is making declarations that are directly contradicted by what the demonstration unequivocally shows. 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #246 on: January 16, 2014, 06:43:30 AM »
Indeed so. I wonder what SWeir might have to say about the recent developments, and how he would interpret your comments and my efforts to Ainslie.

Ainslie continues to demonstrate that she is impervious to reason and that she is incapable of learning from my simple demonstrations. Clearly I have pitched them at too high a level -- I was trying to make them understandable by a bright eighth-grader.... but then, around here they do teach algebra to bright students of that age. In the future I will have to "dumb down" even further if I expect persons of Ainslie's educational level and reasoning ability to grasp my demonstrations.

I also think it is hilarious when Ainslie chooses to denigrate my equipment or my technique.... when nobody in her crew even knows how to operate their equipment and can't tell normal functioning from a malfunction, causing them to waste hours of useless effort. Ainslie herself has no idea just what the FG offset control does. Just about every statement she makes is contradicted by her own data and the evidence from her own demonstrations! She doesn't even have the skill--or courage-- to operate the equipment herself for her demonstrations, she has to get someone else to do it for her.... and can't even find anyone competent to do so.... yet she makes her silly comments about my demonstrations.


Posted on April 6, 2012:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoYFxq4bm2w

Also posted on April 6, 2012:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXAqEinb8YU
(Note the monitoring of the mosfet DRAIN voltage to show what is really going on)


But I think that this one might be pitched at a level more appropriate for Ainslie's understanding:
(July 14, 2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSFS99SaZTA

(I'm pretty irate for this one all right, and I'm talking so fast I made a few errors in the patter but I've corrected those by text annotations on the video. Believe it or not... this demonstration was a response to people -- including Ainslie's main sycophants at the time -- who believed that the Drain voltage being HIGH meant that the mosfet Drain-Source channel is ON. This is part of the "duty cycle" issue. The little test circuit was suggested out by Aaron, who believed it would behave exactly opposite than it actually does, as a challenge to me during the initial "debate" over the duty cycle produced by the "precise circuit" given in the Quantum article. This is also why you do not see Drain voltage traces on Ainslie's scopeshots: she does not understand what the Drain signal is showing.)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #246 on: January 16, 2014, 06:43:30 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #247 on: January 16, 2014, 10:13:02 AM »
TinselKoala, the videos are very good:  They state the principles that they intend to demonstrate and then proceed to do that clearly and concisely.

The observable facts are that mention of Ms. Ainslie got quiet, and Ms. Ainslie published her comments.  That should tell most people what they need to know.  For the record:  Yes, Ms. Ainslie is correct, I misused 'dispersion' five days ago.  I am at a loss to find anything else in that posting or her other subsequent postings that deserves comment. 

I do not speak for Steve.  If anyone wants to coax comments from him then I think they will need to contact him directly.









« Last Edit: January 16, 2014, 03:17:15 PM by MarkE »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #248 on: January 17, 2014, 05:10:17 PM »
Yawn.

Ainslie, in her ignorance, still confuses "libel" with "slander", even while committing it .... just as she doesn't know the difference between "equinox" and "solstice". Or "Joule" and "Watt". Or many other fine distinctions she ignores .... such as "Truth" and "Falsehood".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPOap8nwQ2A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIB-_dL-unA




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #248 on: January 17, 2014, 05:10:17 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #249 on: January 17, 2014, 07:10:26 PM »
TinselKoala, the videos do tell a story.  The story has been repeated many times.  The circuit that Ms. Ainslie once thought and continues to profess "breaks the unity barriers" in reality, and as proven by her own August 11 demonstration, is massively inefficient compared to simple wires.


Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3586
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #250 on: January 17, 2014, 08:40:38 PM »
I'd like to see a lot less chatter from the Ainslie camp, and a lot more testing. The proof is in the pudding, and all I've seen is promises of pudding for several months now.

When is the Ainslie camp going to get off their keisters and whip up some of that pudding they keep teasing us about? Talk is cheap, and it simply doesn't cut it when outrageous claims are involved.

Maybe they just need a little cheering-on; all together now:

"Go go Ainslie camp
Get to testing
Save the rant"

 :P

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #250 on: January 17, 2014, 08:40:38 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #251 on: January 17, 2014, 09:32:22 PM »
There is no testing to talk about!

Remember the June and August demonstrations? They went into those, cold. But for the "private" session before the more public August demo, there weren't even any rehearsals! Remember how, in the June 29 demo, they didn't seem to understand what the problem was, and how they were surprised by the Q1 oscillations, to the point of suspecting their FG of malfing? None of them had operated that apparatus for a long, -long- time, and they certainly didn't understand the problem space.

And of course, for over a year prior to that, Ainslie claimed testing was happening, that the Figure 3 scopeshot was trivial to make, and all the rest of it. For how long has she been promising battery draw-down data? Since 2009, at least. Yet they were caught completely by surprise on June 29, and again on August 10.

Now she is making her claims without producing any supporting data at all. She has apparently learned one lesson from her farcical performances: if you don't give out any data or details, you cannot be solidly refuted.

Where are the scopeshots that Steve Weir had them save to the USB stick, and that _AINSLIE AGREED TO PUBLISH_ ? Nobody has seen them, and Ainslie has given several lame excuses, like "Donny has them and Ainslie doesn't want to bother him"..... right.  The TRUTH is that those scopeshots, along with the conditions under which they were made, are powerful coffin nails, that demonstrate to those with the wits to understand them, that Ainslie's claims are utterly false. And Ainslie knows this! This is why she will not publish them, not some lame excuse involving Donovan Martin's busy schedule.

The entire history of the Ainslie affair demonstrates that getting data from Ainslie is like pulling teeth.... from an old woman, who has lost all her _real_ teeth long ago.  Where are the alleged reports from all those engineers and companies? She cannot provide them because they don't exist.





Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #252 on: January 17, 2014, 10:52:58 PM »
TinselKoala, awhile back I asked Steve if he knew anything about the flash drive captures from the June 29 demo.  He said that they were not available.  He did not elaborate.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #253 on: January 18, 2014, 06:20:18 PM »
Mark E., that's right, they are "not available" ... from the Ainslie camp.

Several possible reasons we can imagine. On the one hand we have several different kinds of incompetence: They lost the flash drive, the dog ate it, the scope wasn't set properly to make the recording, etc. etc. On the other hand we have several different kinds of duplicity: They don't want to publish them because they realize what they show, they are in Donny's hands and Ainslie doesn't want to bother him, etc. etc. Can anyone think of other kinds of reasons why we don't have those shots? The fact remains that they were to be published, by the agreement made and discussed ... and they have not been published.

By the Ainslie mob, that is. I went through the video and made screenshots of the scope screens at the times of the USB saves. The descriptions of the conditions of each shot can be easily heard in the video -- as can be Steve Weir's words telling them to publish the shots, and their words agreeing to do so.

(Of course as we all know this is not the first time (nor will it be the last) that we have been promised raw data by Ainslie ... and she has failed to provide it. Where, for example, are the spreadsheets that she promised to Stefan and the rest of us, years ago? Of course those are moot since it has been amply shown that the data from all those early experiments cannot be trusted at all.)



Now.... we really should be asking a bit more pointedly, I think.... WHY have the Ainslie mob not released their clear versions of these scopeshots, since we have the screen grabs of them already and we can tell, with sufficient detail, just what they do show because of MY work?

(The compendium of most of Ainslie's posted and "published" scopeshots, no thanks to Ainslie:
http://seani.justemail.net/rosemary_ainslie/
And below I've posted an image of what she had to say about that compendium. Every one of the shots was indeed posted to the internet, publicly, by Ainslie herself, as anyone (except, apparently Ainslie) can verify for themselves. )

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #254 on: January 18, 2014, 06:41:09 PM »
By the way.... I have told Ainslie, long ago, that I can indeed provide the source (her posting) of each and every one of those shots, and I've asked for her to specify any one that she challenges. She has never responded to that, instead choosing to continue to emit statements like that above: paranoid, delusional accusations that are simply impossible in fact, and which are easily refuted by simply entering into "google" the filename or SCRN sequence number of the shots.


 

OneLink