Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514285
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 6
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 248823 times)

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #120 on: September 21, 2013, 04:52:44 AM »
Lol. I cant believe she is speculating that TK 'faked' debunking Mylow.  Mylow had motors under the couch cushions in the background. Mylow stood up on the table that his motor was running on while filming and very noticeably steps over, where the fishing line was found much later. In fact TK had suggested that Mylow was 'possibly using fishing line and did a demonstration of how invisible it could be on a YT vid. But to the trained eye, it was others that examined the videos using programs that enhance details, not Tk.

And always remember, feed this thread daily, to keep it up on top the page. ;) ;D

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #121 on: September 21, 2013, 05:05:36 AM »
And why would Mylow, the master of the hand, ever punk out so badly and admit to faking it, if he didnt, just because TK 'pressured' him to plead guilty when innocent?? Na, Mylow was a trickster. He can shuffle a shell game on a magazine at a street corner and rake it up any night of the week. He was very good with pointing the camera here n there while pushing the rotor with the other hand out of view. For the average Joe, yeah, he had them fooled. Even after the bunk and admission, he came back and still had followers. I remember a lot about all that. What a mess he was. But I tell ya, He put up a good fight to protect his fakeness. lol What a character he was. Almost likable, except for all the deception. Couldnt trust a word. Nada. That went on for months. Second longest to Rose I believe. At least top 5.

Mags

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8369
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #122 on: September 21, 2013, 06:05:56 AM »
And why would Mylow, the master of the hand, ever punk out so badly and admit to faking it, if he didnt, just because TK 'pressured' him to plead guilty when innocent?? Na, Mylow was a trickster. He can shuffle a shell game on a magazine at a street corner and rake it up any night of the week. He was very good with pointing the camera here n there while pushing the rotor with the other hand out of view. For the average Joe, yeah, he had them fooled. Even after the bunk and admission, he came back and still had followers. I remember a lot about all that. What a mess he was. But I tell ya, He put up a good fight to protect his fakeness. lol What a character he was. Almost likable, except for all the deception. Couldnt trust a word. Nada. That went on for months. Second longest to Rose I believe. At least top 5.

Mags

Yes, and even after the debunking, Sterling stood behind Mylow and called all of us that did not believe idiots.  Then came the MIB that made Mylow stop posting.  Sure, whatever.

I think Rose is worse than Mylow.  I have no idea how she can sleep at night.  It is surprising that Sterling is no longer backing her.  Now she trashes him as well as the rest of us.  Oh well.

There is reality, and then there is Rose.  You decide.

Bill

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #122 on: September 21, 2013, 06:05:56 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #123 on: September 21, 2013, 06:35:50 AM »
Yes, and even after the debunking, Sterling stood behind Mylow and called all of us that did not believe idiots.  Then came the MIB that made Mylow stop posting.  Sure, whatever.

I think Rose is worse than Mylow.  I have no idea how she can sleep at night.  It is surprising that Sterling is no longer backing her.  Now she trashes him as well as the rest of us.  Oh well.

There is reality, and then there is Rose.  You decide.

Bill

Yeah, but he is in the top 5. ;]

Ya know, If I went into a bank looking for a job, and claimed to be an expert enough to write new rules in the game of banking, got hired, said I was going to do this that and the other, but the bank soon finds out that I could not do what I said I could do, and they told me I wasnt as good as I said I was, well then I could just tell them that Im not very good at math or counting, cant see just about anything, and my memory isnt squat, and harass people at work almost every day of the week, I think they would keep me around for the big job and endure my incompetence. Because it the right thing to do.  lol

Mags

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #124 on: September 21, 2013, 06:51:18 AM »
There is a big difference between Ainslie and Mylow. He was a conscious and cynical fraudster. He may have believed in Howard Johnson but he knew full well that his own motors didn't work and couldn't work. Ainslie is different: she truly believes in her "thesis" and has constructed an entire delusional system around it. This causes her to distort reality and do whatever she feels necessary to promote the "thesis" including the lying and insulting and all the rest. Mylow was bad but sane. Ainslie is bad, and in the grips of a profound delusion. In addition she is too arrogant to educate herself properly, believing that she knows enough already, even though her "knowledge" is faulty. Mylow deliberately constructed a fraudulent apparatus with hidden parts (the motor and line); Ainslie fraudulently tests and represents results from a real apparatus that is replicable, in spite of her attempts at deliberate obfuscation and her blundering. Mylow was a fake, a conman, with a great career ahead of him in marketing or law enforcement. Ainslie is just a naive old fool with an overbearing manner, with nothing ahead of her but more failures and refutations of her silly claims.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #124 on: September 21, 2013, 06:51:18 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #125 on: September 21, 2013, 09:48:53 AM »
Hi,
    Ainslie is ignorant, I just looked up the word in my dictionary and she's an exact match.
 Mylow was fraudulent which is quite a different thing. Some fraudulent people are achievers
because they go on to the next scam.
  Ignorant people don't get anywhere because they don't listen to others, study the facts
and just go on thinking they know it all.
                                                      John,

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8369
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #126 on: September 21, 2013, 05:59:07 PM »
TK:

I get it now.  Rose has discovered a path to OU by utilizing the Reality Distortion Field.  I wonder if she can patent this?

Bill

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #126 on: September 21, 2013, 05:59:07 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #127 on: September 21, 2013, 06:55:25 PM »
Rosemary has forgotten a very important part of her circuit, one of these needs to be fitted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T9w6htMEpY

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #128 on: September 24, 2013, 09:48:28 AM »
Lost? Forgotten? Patented? 

 :P

 ;)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #128 on: September 24, 2013, 09:48:28 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #129 on: September 27, 2013, 04:22:54 PM »
Well, here it is almost the end of September and Ainslie still has produced absolutely no evidence for any of her claims. Perhaps she thinks the trail of confusion she has laid down will distract from the FACT that her claims are bogus and have no evidence whatsoever to support them.

Nor will she commit herself to endorsing any waveforms as being the "correct" ones to produce the effects she claims. How very convenient! She can't show any evidence of her own claims, no waveforms that "work", but she is sure that anyone NOT producing her claimed effect is therefore using the wrong waveform.

But wait.... in the IEEE and IET submissions, which according to Ainslie were checked and reproduced by Donovan Martin Himself, the waveforms are specified. They are GLEN's waveforms, shown in the links to Glen's work above, and reproduced by Poynt99 in simulation and by ME in hardware, using the circuit that GLEN used at the operating parameters that GLEN discovered and that Ainslie endorsed. But of course, now that people are once again ready to examine those claims, and have the Demo Kit 1 box _actual schematic_, thanks again to a third party Steve Weir, no thanks to Ainslie, she rejects Glen's work and the waveforms she formerly endorsed. And of course she does this without providing any evidence, any waveforms of her "own".

Whatever, dude. Those of us who _can_, are still _doing_, and are ready to test Ainslie's claims again, whenever she can actually get it together to state what they are: A specified circuit, operating at specified parameters, producing a specified effect. Not some lying conglomeration of delusional fantasy, false schematics, references to fifteen year old "vetting" with no documentation, and broken promises to share data.

In the image below, you can see my current test setup. This uses a NE555N timer in the _exact_ timer circuit that SWeir determined from Ainslie's recent photos of the "lost" apparatus containing the chip made in 2007. I am using the same make and model of "off" time control potentiometer, a 10-turn Spectrol 50k wirewound pot, and I am using the IRFP450 mosfet that ACTUALLY appears in the "Demo Kit 1" box rather than the IRFPG50 that Ainslie has ALWAYS claimed they used. I even found a turn-counting dial for the potentiometer, so that precise settings can be reproduced, just like on Ainslie's Demo Kit 1 box from the garden path... er, shed.

The load is an 11-ohm load made from the nichrome wire ripped out of a blow-dryer. The test board has positions for added inductance in the load side of the mosfet and it has the Gate potentiometer which was apparently not used in Ainslie's box, again in spite of the claims made. I have found that this pot is generally turned all the way to minimum resistance for the effects that I like: good fast cap charging from MY external diode syphon system. You can see the diode, the ultrafast MUR1560, attached to the bottom leg of the load, with the line leading off leftwards to the cap-neon-system to dump the spike power back to the battery (out of view to the left.) The IRFP450 works better: it charges the cap faster, than the IRFPG50 at the same timer settings. I've put a little inductance (the brown thing with the white dot) in series with the Gate leg to simulate the rat's nest inductance in the box. Is this really  necessary? I dunno.

The NE555N timer circuit makes a fixed "on" time that is a short HI pulse, and the potentiometer varies the "off" time, thus varying frequency and duty cycle simultaneously. They cannot be independently controlled by the Demo Kit 1 circuit. I've left in the "Secret of DPDT" on the board, but for this set of demonstrations the switch is in the "Q17" mode, that is, not inverting, since the actual pulse output of the timer circuit does make a short HI duty cycle. Again, in stark contrast to the originally published and still uncorrected Quantum magazine article circuit.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #130 on: December 07, 2013, 07:20:31 AM »
Well, just as I predicted, Ainslie is attempting to "retract" her earlier fake retraction of the two daft manuscripts which contain DOCUMENTED and PROVEN falsified data, along with all the other major nonsense they contain.

She forgets, as is typical, that she cannot reproduce the data in the manuscripts, such as the famous Figure 3 scopeshot upon which the outrageously hilarious OU conclusions are based. She also forgets that the manuscripts contain conflicting schematics and that they both lie about the actual circuit used. She also ignores the fact that even her colleague Donovan Martin has been caught in misrepresentations and outright lies on Ainslie's behalf. None of this prevents her from making her continuing claims without presenting a shred of credible evidence. She continues to lie about me, as well. In short, the Ainslie comedy continues. The goalposts keep moving, the claims mutate, the excuses and rationalizations, the insane theorizing, all continue apace, but what you will never see from Ainslie and her collaborators is an honest, repeatable set of experiments using proper measurement and analysis methodology.

She knows better now, than to publish actual schematics or real data!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #130 on: December 07, 2013, 07:20:31 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3586
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #131 on: December 07, 2013, 04:30:19 PM »
Just when Rose thought you were down for the count. ;)

Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #132 on: December 07, 2013, 09:23:07 PM »
TK Check you PM
Mark

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #133 on: December 22, 2013, 08:52:30 AM »
Well.... I see the lying Ainslie is back at it in full form.

Quote
It seems that our Little TK is sinking down to the very bottom of his own pickle barrel.  You will recall that he based his ENTIRE refutation of our Quantum paper on the CERTAINTY that we had inverted our duty cycle - that we were running at a 10 percent OFF / 90 percent ON.

That's a clear, outrageous and outright lie. The circuit published in the Quantum article has been analyzed fully and CANNOT make the claimed duty cycle. Further, the "found" apparatus does not even contain anything like the same circuit published in the article and doesn't operate anywhere near the same frequency range. This has been proven over and over again. Ainslie is true to her lying form here once again.

Quote
  He certainly convinced the most of those members on OU.com - which speaks to the efficacy of pure REPETITION of an allegation.  Clearly all that's needed is to say something often enough for it to be believed. 

No, all that was needed was for anyone to build and test the circuit... which they did, and found that I am correct and that Ainslie lies. Everything I say is supported by demonstrations that are repeatable by anyone, and by outside references and images provided by Ainslie herself.

Quote
BUT.  That allegation was finally contradicted by the evidence. By a miracle of good fortune we found our original apparatus.


The apparatus that Ainslie and her dupe Donovan Martin both repeatedly lied about when they said it was "lost." The apparatus that contains a chip that was manufactured well after the date of the Quantum article. The apparatus that does NOT contain the circuit published in the Quantum article but an entirely different circuit. The apparatus, in short, that Ainslie continues to lie about to this day.

Quote
And Steve Weir did the required analysis to PROVE that we could and did have the capability of tuning to less than 10% on AS WE CLAIMED - IN THAT PAPER. 

On the contrary, lying troll Ainslie. Steve Weir analyzed the circuit from the photos and showed that it WAS NOTHING LIKE the circuit in the Quantum article, and cannot produce the FREQUENCY that is claimed in the Quantum article, but operates at a much higher frequency. It also contains a chip with a manufacturer's date code that PROVES that it could not have been used at the time of the Quantum article. The entire statement of Ainslie concerning Weir's findings and the "found" apparatus is a total lie.

Quote
This ENTIRELY negates his BEST argument.

On the contrary, Ainslie: the photos and Weir's reverse-engineering PROVE my argument: the found apparatus IS NOT the circuit claimed in the article and WAS NOT used in the experiment described. This is INCONTROVERTIBLE; the photos clearly prove my point here and show that Ainslie continues to lie baldly and without compunction.

Quote
His other arguments are too varied and confusing to follow. 
For an uneducated overweeningly arrogant fool as Ainslie, no doubt. But others follow and agree with my arguments.

Quote
The bulk of them claim is that I ...LIE.  Which is CLEARLY just a case of gross projection.

No, Ainslie. Your lies have been documented over and over and over again, from the "I did not post that video" lie to the "taking water to boil" lie, to the lies about the true schematic used for the "papers"... and on and on. Your lies are manifold... and documented.

Quote
His own facility in the art of deception - his MENDACITY, which is his preferred term - is EXTRAORDINARY.  It shows a flair for innovation which, one hopes, would at least have secured him SOME kind of financial compensation.
Ainslie cannot point to a single instance of my "mendacity". She accuses without a shred of evidence. Whereas, I have documented references and images of many many lies that have been uttered by her and have shown them many times in this and other threads.

Quote
  The more clumsy of those efforts are those that make miniscule variations to the posts that he CLAIMS are COPIES of my own posts and that they're needed FOR POSTERITY?  Lest I alter them?  He even invented a couple of posts and CLAIMED that I authored them.

Another outright and egregious libellous LIE. The images I have made of Ainslie's posts are done with the specific intent of preserving her utterances, since she is WELL KNOWN to go back and change or remove her posts, editing meanings, long after the originals are made. The accusations that I have made up or edited any of these images of Ainslie's posts are simply more of her ridiculous and unsupported lies.

Quote
God forbid that I ever use such clumsy language.  In any event,  I think he meant to say that those copious posts were needed for his own PROSPERITY.  But it's all backfired.  I was told that his disappearance from the forums is because he's terminally ill.  Frankly I doubt this.  I think he's been retrenched because he's blown his cover and can no longer enjoy that duplicitous technique.  And since life itself begs a kind of 'terminal' condition - then I'm not inclined to waste sympathy on him.  I too feel that I'm aging at speed - at a terminal velocity.  Which is why I am working this hard to expose those 'techniques' of troll spin.

And it goes on. The Troll Queen cannot provide any evidence or support for her lying allegations.

Quote
Poynty - to his credit - tried an intellectual approach.  He firstly recommended that it would be good enough to use the measurements of a standard digital multimeter.  He STRONGLY urged all and sundry to RELY on the average - and OVERLOOK the fact that these instruments CANNOT POSSIBLY GIVE AN ACCURATE VALUE OF ANYTHING SWITCHING AT THE SPEEDS OF OUR SWITCHES NOR THEIR RESULTING OSCILLATIONS.  It was one way of both FUDGING the results AND invalidating them as dependable value by any EXPERT in the field. With this kind of heavily flawed evidence, there was no one who mattered who would EVER take any over unity claims seriously.  Which makes it a SCOOP of no mean dimension.

THEN.  He DUPED me into retracting our own over unity claim in PAPERS 1 & 2 - by showing that the advantages that we were measuring were most CERTAINLY NOT recharging the batteries.  He was absolutely CORRECT.  BUT.  AGAIN.  I was too precipitous with my retraction.  The questions related to that self-perpetuating number teased my mind.  Eventually I did my own detailed analysis and found that INDEED - the advantage did NOT go through the battery.  But it most CERTAINLY was evident in the heat over the element resistor.  It was just that the resonance simply moved backwards and forwards through the resistor without EVER going through the battery.  Suddenly we had both the explanation for that anomalous heat signature as well as an explanation for the discharge of the battery - albeit at a rate that generated an efficiency in EXCESS of the battery's watt hour rating. 

How ridiculous can you get? Ainslie and her "team" of sycophants showed over and over their incompetence, their ignorance, and their inability to reproduce their own FALSIFIED data when being observed. Now she claims falsely that she was "duped" when what really happened is that she finally encountered someone who knows what they are doing and agreed to work with him in public.

Poynt99's clear explanation of Ainslie's circuit and the measurement issues is documented in a series of videos, that I have gathered into a playlist on my YT channel.

Ainslie's own demonstrations proved that there is NO "anomalous heat signature" and that the power supplied by the battery exceeded the power dissipated by the load resistor. This is clearly documented in the video of the most recent demonstration, also available in a playlist on my YT channel.


Quote
AND BY THE WAY.  WE'VE NOW OFFICIALLY REMOVED OUR RETRACTION AND AGAIN STAND BY THE RESULTS AND CLAIMS IN THE PAPERS 1 & 2 DETAILED UNDER OUR FLAG

Ainslie refers to the papers that contain false schematics that were never used in the experiment. The papers that contain clearly fabricated data, scopeshots that are impossible under the claimed conditions, and wild claims about experimental conditions that never actually happened. The data that cannot be reproduced under the conditions stated in the paper. The paper that contains a wild and ridiculous "thesis" that has no correspondence with reality and is nothing more than an ignorant mismash fantasy cartoon delusion... and doesn't even correspond to the actual circuit used when it tries to explain it!

The mind boggles at the very thought of it.



Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8369
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #134 on: December 22, 2013, 03:42:51 PM »
So, she has retracted the retraction?

I don't think we even have a word that covers this do we?  Re-retraction? Unretraction?  Retractionous interuptus?

Bill

 

OneLink