Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 524080
  • *Total Topics: 15602
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 8
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 275613 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #660 on: March 08, 2014, 04:09:04 AM »
Miaow....

 ;)


(You still haven't left your "thumbs down" indicators on two vital videos in the series, Ainslie. You really need to watch them.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilT3LRF0hUA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCN_E5nveQ

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #661 on: March 08, 2014, 06:01:25 PM »
Those pix are of my test load, getting ready for DC power dissipation temperature calibration. This shows the "low thermal leak rate" LTR arrangement; I also have a way to mount the naked cell in a fan-forced air chamber to create the "high thermal leak rate" HTR arrangement.

I'll be using a webcam system for data logging. I'll have the webcam looking at the constant DC power level (voltage and current on sensitive DMMs) from a heavily capacitor-filtered power supply, and the load temperature thermometer reading, and I'll be taking one frame per suitable time interval, like one minute per frame. I'll repeat the runs with different DC power levels.  The data will then be transcribed into the spreadsheet for graphing. If I can get sixty or ninety data points per power level setting I should be able to state with some precision the power dissipation, given the stable temperature reached by the load cell oil during the experimental trials.

Knowing the thermal mass and the specific heat of the mineral oil, I will also be able to put an accurate number to the actual thermal leak rate of the container, and then I will also be able to determine the _actual_ value, in Joules, of the energy output of the device under test, during the test period.

I may decide to reduce the volume down to 150 mL to make things go a Little faster.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #662 on: March 09, 2014, 12:36:40 AM »
Those pix are of my test load, getting ready for DC power dissipation temperature calibration. This shows the "low thermal leak rate" LTR arrangement; I also have a way to mount the naked cell in a fan-forced air chamber to create the "high thermal leak rate" HTR arrangement.

I'll be using a webcam system for data logging. I'll have the webcam looking at the constant DC power level (voltage and current on sensitive DMMs) from a heavily capacitor-filtered power supply, and the load temperature thermometer reading, and I'll be taking one frame per suitable time interval, like one minute per frame. I'll repeat the runs with different DC power levels.  The data will then be transcribed into the spreadsheet for graphing. If I can get sixty or ninety data points per power level setting I should be able to state with some precision the power dissipation, given the stable temperature reached by the load cell oil during the experimental trials.

Knowing the thermal mass and the specific heat of the mineral oil, I will also be able to put an accurate number to the actual thermal leak rate of the container, and then I will also be able to determine the _actual_ value, in Joules, of the energy output of the device under test, during the test period.

I may decide to reduce the volume down to 150 mL to make things go a Little faster.
That sounds like something of a plan.  The double containers with radiant barrier in between should have a pretty low leak rate.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #662 on: March 09, 2014, 12:36:40 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #663 on: March 09, 2014, 05:26:30 PM »
I came on here to read science not to hear twiddly twadly nattering and all that bickering ! Also why so many stupid circuits where is the formula for the energy production ? You are all just flapping your wings with no current of anything under you !!! don't tel me about negative feed back rubbish or high voltage high frequencies . Where is the formula ??? ??? ??? And if you don't have one than just ask me !!!!! 
 
The input should read zero amps zero volts with 10kwh at the out put !! Try that !!

Regards nanobot

Hello, little bitty newbie nanobot. Are you quite sure you are in the right thread? Why don't you trot on over to where the Great Scientists are posting and discussing their "zero amps and zero volts" input readings with lots of "kwh" at the output:

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/

I can tell you really don't belong here. Here... we are concerned with truth and accuracy, the Scientific Method and actual experimental evidence for claims. You will find that other website much more you your liking, I think. Certainly the intellectual landscape there will be a better fit to your obvious skills and talents, and they certainly could use the "formula" you have offered so kindly to share.

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #664 on: March 09, 2014, 11:44:38 PM »
I came on here to read science not to hear twiddly twadly nattering and all that bickering ! Also why so many stupid circuits where is the formula for the energy production ? You are all just flapping your wings with no current of anything under you !!! don't tel me about negative feed back rubbish or high voltage high frequencies . Where is the formula ????????? And if you don't have one than just ask me !!!!! 
 
The input should read zero amps zero volts with 10kwh at the out put !! Try that !!

Regards nanobot
Nanobot if you think favorably of Ms. Ainslie's claims and would like to discuss them, then by all means do.  Why don't you start by watching the August 11, 2013 demonstration that is on her web site?  That demonstration was intended to show her basic claim of over unity energy production.  See if you find that the experiments she demonstrated August 11, 2013:

1) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's claims made in Paper 1 and Paper 2
2) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's decision based on that demonstration to withdraw her Paper 1 and Paper 2
3) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's subsequent decision to "reinstate" Paper 1 and Paper 2

Use any equations that you feel are appropriate.  Efficiency = EnergyOUT/EnergyIN  might be a good one.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #664 on: March 09, 2014, 11:44:38 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #665 on: March 10, 2014, 12:11:48 AM »
Efficiency = EnergyOUT/EnergyIN


That equation is not recognized at the Ainslie Institute.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #666 on: March 10, 2014, 12:15:18 AM »
Hey, it's not the Great Scientist's fault that you never learned how to divide by zero.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #666 on: March 10, 2014, 12:15:18 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #667 on: March 10, 2014, 02:22:42 AM »
There is a strangeness to you ? And it comes with a cold energy maybe you need some warming up I my little friend am a real quantum mechanic ! let me count your over-unity and place it in its correct box . In science there is fact or fiction so far all I have read here is outside the two ! FREEDOM is an expression
beyond the chains of doubt , try it and let go of control or you may find that what you are doing will become a journey with no end .

In my left hand is time and my right is space in-between is energy that is only an expression of actions between the two its the formula that finds the path to fully explore the circuit ! Without formula you will all ways be lost in time and space . I am the master of all that is ! I offer you no insult just pity as you have not one clue to any reality that you seek .

STOP ! LISTEN ! THAN ASK AGAIN ! ..... OR SHUT UP !!!!

Regards

Nanobot

 

           
It seems that you have yet to offer any commentary directly relevant to Ms. Ainslie's claims.  You're rather demanding for someone with three whole posts under their belt.  Don't catch the nearly incurable disease of troll-itis. 

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #668 on: March 10, 2014, 02:49:22 AM »
I have now spent some time not much but enough to study the problem with the claim ! mmmmmmmmm ! You guys need some basics in particle physics and most old school understanding of electrons are wrong ! So are you going to keep round round in circles ? There is no gain in energy and its a reactive circuit so ohms law wont help and is why the test meeter is wrong to .

Just because the light is brighter only means there are more photons and that is also a condition of the reactive circuit that is presented ! The working design of the semi conductor is not with it was designed for so don't depend on the plotted presentations for it as to electron flow . Now put aside what you see and what you think you are reading with the test meter ! Lest take a closer look at an electron what is it made of and how many X Y parts does it have, what is its speed its mass and its relationship with bosons gravestones photons and resistance . Volts is pressure mass is amps heat is applied resistance and how many photons are there ! And what is a reactive cir-cute . As you can now begin to see the real picture is very different and the test should be carried out with stable capacitors not just a battery. There will be a difference and than you will see it as a chemical change in the battery and the semiconductor will begin to change the speed of the electrons in the gate .

Also the test meter is not designed to measure reactive circuits that change ohms law ! And finally the light is the wrong load to undertake the experiment to conclude the full results in energy in energy out ... Throw it all in the bin apart from the semi conductor ..... !!!!

Now you will be at a total loss wont you because you have no i dear of anything that you need to know to final a conformation of the facts you are completely lost ! So I will wait for your insults to just confirm my measurements of you ! Good luck ! hahaha

Regards

Nanobot
 
Oh dear, it seems it is too late.  You have already caught a bad case of troll-itis and you are only four posts old.  Perhaps someday researchers will develop a vaccine so that others will not have suffer such as you have.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #668 on: March 10, 2014, 02:49:22 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #669 on: March 10, 2014, 03:25:09 AM »
Oh dear, it seems it is too late.  You have already caught a bad case of troll-itis and you are only four posts old.  Perhaps someday researchers will develop a vaccine so that others will not have suffer such as you have.

This is really too bad.  Sterling was going to run his house off of this unit.  Maybe this is a good thing.  He is starting to run out of space to put all of these OU devices near his house.

Bill

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #670 on: March 10, 2014, 04:27:27 AM »
This is really too bad.  Sterling was going to run his house off of this unit.  Maybe this is a good thing.  He is starting to run out of space to put all of these OU devices near his house.

Bill
There was a time not so long ago when Ms. Ainslie complained that Sterling was demanding money for coverage.  Was that Sterling Allan demanding payola?  Was it Ms. Ainslie ranting madly?  Is there a way for it to be both?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #670 on: March 10, 2014, 04:27:27 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #671 on: March 10, 2014, 05:30:38 AM »
Quote
Just because the light is brighter only means there are more photons and that is also a condition of the reactive circuit that is presented !

I see. You must be talking about the "Pop quiz" where I asked the reader to explain why the light was so much brighter when it was lit by the Common Gate Amplifier circuit in my video.

Did you miss the fact that the current in the circuit at the time that the light was lit was strictly DC? What is the DC reactance of that circuit, can you tell me?

Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #672 on: March 10, 2014, 12:11:23 PM »
My my! What an unpleasant little bot. As a self proclaimed "quantum mechanic" I hope your maths is better than your grammar or spelling -- I'm not holding my breath. There are many before you who have tried to convince the world that they are knowledgeable  by spewing illiterate, incomprehensible rubbish, supported by bilious invective. You don't sound clever. You sound like an idiot and an unpleasant one at that. At least Rosemary has a good command of language.

Offline Tseak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #673 on: March 10, 2014, 12:15:25 PM »
I see. You must be talking about the "Pop quiz" where I asked the reader to explain why the light was so much brighter when it was lit by the Common Gate Amplifier circuit in my video.

Did you miss the fact that the current in the circuit at the time that the light was lit was strictly DC? What is the DC reactance of that circuit, can you tell me?

The DC reactance is the energy between the right and the left hand which will only be unlocked when you have the formula. Isn't that perfectly obvious?

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #674 on: March 10, 2014, 12:17:25 PM »
The DC reactance is the energy between the right and the left hand which will only be unlocked when you have the formula. Isn't that perfectly obvious?
What happened to North and South?

 

OneLink