Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 524080
  • *Total Topics: 15602
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 5
  • *Total: 8

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims  (Read 275616 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #645 on: March 05, 2014, 07:40:44 AM »
Yes, strange isn't it? I have never figured out why or how people can actually be _proud_ of their ignorance. But we have a clear example here. The ignorant troll queen, er, Great Scientist actually _wants_ her insane rants, misconceptions and lies to be preserved, referenced, and repeated!



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #646 on: March 05, 2014, 02:47:06 PM »
Did you know that in South Africa, in addition to following a different astronomical calendar than the rest of the world, it is not necessary to provide any proof of an assertion? Yes, all one has to do is to make a statement. Any statement at all, and it is taken to be True. A person can simply assert that the sky is green and the rain is made of fine cognac, and until someone actually publishes a scientific paper that disproves it, the sky is therefore green and the rain, cognac! No detailed and published disproof? Then the original statement STANDS, and your petty observations to the contrary mean nothing, they are just trolling.

Funny, too, how the Great Scientist can rant on for weeks and months screaming that something is impossible.... then after dozens of demonstrations ignored, suddenly she is taken aside and given advice by someone out of the picture, and then she "explains" that she knew it all along.  And the handwaving post hockery continues, with more and more insults and the stupid Little essays she emits that get the entire Scientific Method backwards and upside down. Yet  nary an apology, nary any sign of shame or remorse comes from the Great Scientist who has been utterly and rantingly wrong about these specific Little points lo these past few months.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #647 on: March 05, 2014, 07:17:57 PM »
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep....

This is really pretty sad. It looks like somebody needs a Little medication adjustment.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #647 on: March 05, 2014, 07:17:57 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #648 on: March 05, 2014, 07:27:12 PM »
I'm not even going to bother to point out all the lies and false accusations in that absurd psychotic paranoid rant.

But somebody had better look in on Rosemary Ainslie because she is decompensating and may become really dangerous, to herself or others around her.

Donovan Martin is probably quacking in his boots right about now.



Offline orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #649 on: March 05, 2014, 07:31:08 PM »
The login for her mouse doesn't work anymore?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #649 on: March 05, 2014, 07:31:08 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #650 on: March 05, 2014, 07:49:45 PM »
I can't recall anyone calling himself "Mr Sean'.

"mrsean2k" maybe, the unimaginative handle in a few places of "Sean Inglis", a link I've never attempted to hide.

Unlike TK and others who labour under different constraints, I don't need anonymity.

As a result of this, when she accuses people of breaking into her computer, Rosemary may want to think a bit more carefully before she opens her fucking yap; there are no details I need to keep private if I was to decide I wanted to do something concrete in response to that accusation. That said, who bothers to kick an old dog just for rolling in shit? I probably wouldn't.


Anyway, these are the files in question:


http://seani.justemail.net/rosemary_ainslie/



I'm happy with the provenance of the shots, and they'll stay up there publicly accessible as long as it suits me.


Rosemary's claims that they weren't posted freely in a public forum to begin with are just her usual mental incontinence.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #651 on: March 05, 2014, 08:01:55 PM »
And I have a few more that aren't in that database. If anyone wants to know where any specific shot came from, just ask and I'll provide the full location.  And of course I have made this same offer, every time Ainslie has accused me or mrsean2k of "rifling" her computer.

Or you could simply use Google, typing in "rosemary ainslie" in quotes then the filename of the item in question. Usually the result you are seeding will be on the first page if not in the top five suggested links. Of course that might require that your mouse login works. LOL.

Bear in mind that many came from Ainslie's various blog postings and she has the ability (if she ever finds her passwords) to remove the original postings in those blogs, something she is known to do, just as she removed all reference to the March 2011 demo from her four different YouTube accounts.

There is no point in kicking an old dog for rolling in shit, that's certain, but when the old dog runs out into the street, or starts behaving aggressively towards the kitchen help.... it is time for some kind of intervention, and I just hope her loved ones -- if there are any left -- don't get hurt in the process.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #651 on: March 05, 2014, 08:01:55 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #652 on: March 05, 2014, 08:10:20 PM »
At one point when they were first posted, I offered to remove any that she (a) said *weren't* publicly available, and (b) where I couldn't subsequently provide a link to her specific chosen screenshot. And similarly if she wanted to claim that a specific screenshot just had nothing to do with her, I'd make a note of that in the album in question. Of course no response.


The problem for Rosemary is that she has to choose specific shots that she maintains have never been made public. If she does that and fails with only one, it renders her claim meaningless. She hasn't got anywhere near the mental discipline to make either claim; lies make things complicated.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #653 on: March 05, 2014, 08:47:06 PM »
Well, here are some specific photos that she claims have never been made public, or at least she did claim that when I first posted them.

http://pesn.com/2013/05/22/9602322_Rosemary-Ainslie_Planning_Public-Demo_of_her_Free-Energy-Circuit_June-1/Rosemary-Ainslie-circuit_2013-05-22-1089_400.jpg

http://pesn.com/2013/05/22/9602322_Rosemary-Ainslie_Planning_Public-Demo_of_her_Free-Energy-Circuit_June-1/Rosemary-Ainslie-circuit_2013-05-22-1090_400.jpg

The links just go to the thumbnails, but since she uploaded those pix at _full resolution_ and Sterling posted them as-is, there is a _lot_ of information that can be extracted from those. But here's what Ainslie said, on or about 25 May 2013:

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #653 on: March 05, 2014, 08:47:06 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #654 on: March 06, 2014, 01:08:19 AM »
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep....

This is really pretty sad. It looks like somebody needs a Little medication adjustment.
Now, she's expecting to fly.  I think that these claims of persecution by various dark forces strongly suggest mental disorder.

Offline Rfacts

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #655 on: March 06, 2014, 04:59:56 AM »
It is blatantly obvious that Rosemary Ainslie is clueless about the operation of her circuit and has limited knowledge about electronics in general.  She couldn't follow TK's MOSFET tutorial videos, even when her basic circuit was built right on top of her schematic.  If she weren't so clueless she would realize the damage she is causing to herself and the OU community she purports to champion.  From big picture perspective, the OU community actually benefits from commenters like TK, ME, P99 and MH who provide a reality check and are willing to provide technical help.  But some OUers are blinded by their quest and they turn science into personal dogma which incorporates double standards, deflection, baseless accusations and conspiracy theories.  This attracts more blind followers but drives away true experimenters thus hurting their cause.

Note: The following quotes from Rosemary Ainslie can be found at http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.660.html
Quote
...he now presented an argument based on the EVIDENCE, if you please, of a function generator applying a signal to the SOURCE LEG of Q2 - WITH NO GATE OF ANY MOSFET CONNECTED ANYWHERE to either the probe or the terminal of that function generator.  He'd CUT THE ONLY OTHER FUNCTIONAL MOSFET OUT OF THE CIRCUIT.  Which calls for a miracle of no mean dimension.  It's understood - within the standard model - and in line with EVERYTHING that is known about a MOSFET - that the signal from the function generator - be it positive or negative - needs MUST be applied to that GATE.  Else it cannot pass it's signal to switch that current."

Quote
When you cut the MOSFET out of the circuit on that Q2 Array - you've got the probe of the function generator attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q2.  It CANNOT SWITCH THE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE LEG.  IT NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE GATE.  ANY GATE.  And you've taken the only gate AWAY - out of the picture.  Therefore it CANNOT switch."

Quote
And yet he insults his viewers with an uncluttered view of Q2 connected ONLY by its SOURCE leg - with it's gate 'floating', unattached - free as a bird.  And he INSISTS that he's switching that circuit.  Not so.  Just not possible.  I'm adding this for clarity as this is still not obvious to those dull witted trolls.  The GATE leg of Q2 was attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q1.  WITHOUT THAT CONNECTION THEN THERE CAN BE NO SIGNAL APPLIED TO THE GATE OF Q2.  THE CIRCUIT IS OPEN."

Quote
Then he argues that the voltage at the source is lower 'relative' to the voltage at the Gate.  Quite possibly - if there WAS a Gate connected somewhere in his apparatus.  But there isn't.  He disconnected it.  Snipped it off.  Away.  Out of the picture.  Leaving only 1 connection to Q2 at it's SOURCE LEG.  He effectively OPENED THAT CIRCUIT - TURNED IT OFF."

Quote
A common gate amplifier requires - AT ITS LEAST - a signal to the Gate of the MOSFET.  If the Gate is FLOATING it CANNOT DETECT A SIGNAL.  It's an OPEN CIRCUIT."

When Rosemary Ainslie makes erroneous statements like those above and doesn't retract them she further exposes her dishonest character and her irrational and ignorant behavior.  She stated at least these 5 times that there was no connection to the referenced Q2 MOSFET gate.  Her circuit is both audibly and visually explained and traced out for her in the recent Electric OU video that TK addressed to her.  In her irrational state she doesn't comprehend that the Q2 MOSFET gate on her circuit also connects to the battery (-) through the CVR (0.26 ohm shunt resistor).  The Q2 MOSFET gate doesn't just connect to the source of the Q1 MOSFET that TK cuts out.  She continued to ignorantly and arrogantly argue as if she had expertise in this subject matter but her above comments confirm that in reality she has none and is oblivious to it.  If she can allow herself to be this oblivious about something as basic as this, and continue to argue against this reality, what other reality wouldn't she accept?  Anyone who observes these types of errors and allows the person making them to move on without acknowledging the error and retracting/correcting it would be accepting bad data and irrational and unprofessional behavior which has no place in science.  Only blind followers/supporters look the other way and allow proven errors or unsubstantiated accusations to be made by someone in their community.  This obvious and verifiable example provides another wake up call to your integrity.

You lose credibility, trust and respect  by your own doing when you jump to conclusions before confirming facts, when you do not objectively consider verifiable analysis about your work, or when you do not stand corrected when proven wrong.  This is all you basically need to know about a person's character to make this reasoned judgment about them.  In the context of forums like this one, it means that a person of this type of character is an irrational experimenter /scientist /theorist that is not interested in discovering real knowledge through well conducted repeatable experiments, empirical data and rational analysis - and they can not be taken seriously.  The person making a claim has the burden of proof and can not and should not be allowed to shift this responsibility away from themselves by arguing from ignorance.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #655 on: March 06, 2014, 04:59:56 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #656 on: March 06, 2014, 08:53:30 AM »
That's a nice summary. She is still even today accusing me of faking the screenshots, or faking something, in several of those videos.

But seriously... I really don't think she has any followers left. After the cringeworthy demostrations last summer, I can't imagine that even her erstwhile co-authors would want to be seen with her in public.

The role of Donovan Martin cannot be discounted. He is all tangled up in this as well. But associating with Rosemary Ainslie is not going to look all that good on his CV -- especially when that March 2011 demonstration is considered.

Offline eatenbyagrue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #657 on: March 06, 2014, 03:25:50 PM »
I have to ask, why are you guys still beating this dead horse?  It seems it has been years.  Generally, when research is erroneous, it gets ignored quickly.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #658 on: March 06, 2014, 04:42:11 PM »
Bad data and false claims are bad, and wrong. But when Ainslie refused to accept the data from her OWN demonstration.... the only one she has ever done even half-way properly, guided by the expert powersupply analyst and designer SWeir..... and cynically "retracted her retraction" and refused to stop pushing her silly agenda.... and when she chose to continue the insults and disrespect, and most especially when she chose to continue abjectly lying about her own "work" and the work of others.... that is pseudoscientific misconduct of the worst kind. She has once again announced her intention to claim at least three monetary prizes that have been offered for real OU performance. She is a menace to the credibility of the entire "ou" or "free energy" research effort, because she is so visible. People "in the know" and those who control purse strings will encounter Ainslie and her daft manuscripts and begin backing away, carefully watching so that she doesn't come after them with her vitriol, insults and overweeningly arrogant ignorance.  Just look: she is STILL trying to tell people who know better, how a mosfet works... yet she herself has no clue. She has finally "snapped" and, due to my demonstrations and the explanations of someone who apparently gave her a small bit of counselling over the weekend, has admitted something she has always claimed was impossible, that the Common Gate Amplifier circuit with grounded Gate does in fact operate. But she still can't seem to assimilate the fact that the mosfet is NOT just a switch, that it has its own internal resistance and significant power dissipation and more importantly operates in the linear conductance region of its performance curve when oscillating. Her ignorance, deliberately protected, combined with her amazing arrogance, keeps her posting about things she does not understand, it keeps her insulting her critics instead of responding rationally and it keeps her making the absurd paranoid allegations that you see at present.  Were she to honor her retractions, realize and admit the falsity of the "data" in the daft manuscripts, and take a Little vacation from the false claims and absurd "thesis".... all would be well. However she will not do this, and continues her personal attacks upon me especially and upon others as well. She cannot refute me or the other critics, so as you see, she resorts to actual lies about what our work consists of and what it shows.... and even tells her readers NOT to try to repeat my demonstrations! She is afraid, very afraid, but still doesn't have the sense or the integrity to stop. And as long as she refers to "Little TK", the initials GRE, or a pickle..... then I will be there to set her straight. That arrogant scheming ignoramus will never get away with what she is trying to do, which is to perpetrate a fraud, as long as I have an internet connection and fingers to type with.

There, does that explain things a little bit?  I am watching Ainslie twist in the wind, and I am reporting on the course of her demise. If you find it boring you do not have to read, but I do appreciate your contribution, anyway.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims
« Reply #659 on: March 06, 2014, 07:24:02 PM »
It's hilarious! I can tell when Ainslie watches one of my videos using her friend's account or one of her own that I don't know about yet. She just can't restrain herself from leaving a drive-by thumbs-down vote!  She has almost gotten caught up, but still needs to watch this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCN_E5nveQ
and also to go back and pick up on some of the chapters she missed while out basketweaving. She just may accumulate enough credits to avoid flunking out yet again! But don't forget: she cheats on exams.

 

OneLink